On Native GroundTHE Nexus of Climate Change and War

There is no nexus except in the minds of scared little people.

Could you please give me the referance that proves your claim that more than half of scientist agree about global warming. As for no doubt, you really need to state that that is your opinion, I am quite sure that there are millions of people on this planet that do in fact have doubt.

JED wrote:

Could you please give me the referance that proves your claim that more than half of scientist agree about global warming. As for no doubt, you really need to state that that is your opinion, I am quite sure that there are millions of people on this planet that do in fact have doubt.

Are you open-minded? Watch this recent video where Ralph J. Cicerone, the president of the National Academy of Sciences talks about "Climate Change Seen from Space and Earth's Surface"

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

How about "97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?" Here

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/...

Let me know what you think.

btw, one doesn't have to click on this stupid f**ing Holhut BS article which the damn 'roboblogger'* keeps putting up on the right side of the page. Just ignore it and we won't have to see it come up in the Bratt list of 'topix' as was caused again now by 'stardust'.
GlobalClimateScam.com
ClimateDepot.com
*or maybe Randy Holhut himself, or some other f**tard warmist alarmist happens to be the 'moderator' and 'roboblogger' here.
Anyone with a brain knows that there's no true consensus among unbiased scientists on the AGW theory, same with the BS notion that nukes are 'green' and that 'radiation is good for you' etc.

The foundation for belief that AGW is real is actually research form the US military carried out in the upper atmosphere in the 50s, which settled the argument- yes, adding more CO2 would warm the planet.

Since then we have satellite observations which show CO2 absorbing heat and thus warming the planet.

Yes, of course there's a consensus about this- it's based on physics and instrumental observation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

JED wrote:

Could you please give me the referance that proves your claim that more than half of scientist agree about global warming. As for no doubt, you really need to state that that is your opinion, I am quite sure that there are millions of people on this planet that do in fact have doubt.

It saddens me that people who understand the science behind nuclear fission are so quick to dismiss the science behind AGW because of politics.

Spacecadet and the 'green troll'(at least an admitted one unlike troll 'IKMTY') beLIEve the BS artists caught scheming in their emails, the infamous 'ClimateGate' scandal!!
Ewe'all can beLIEve that CO2 is a pollutant and that paying a $tax will somehow make the phony 'problem' go away, but We The People will not put up with the scam, which turns out was cooked up by the likes of Enron's Ken Lay and proven liar/hypocrite and petroleum magnate Al Gore.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&...
Neither will we put up with the overall agenda of you UN-lovers to achieve the 'new world order' one-world govt. that the globalist banksters behind the UN etc. have been pushing for. Your 'Agenda 21' program is being exposed across the country. Don't think that cuz you got some idiot town selectboards like Brattleboro's and Burlington's to accept Agenda 21 garbage means you'll win.
Patriotic Americans will push back and with FORCE.
Scientific Siege Against UN-IPCC Farce Revealed IPCC declares itself above the law
Dec. 2011
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-declares-its...
Global Warming On Trial: Inhofe Calls For Investigation Of UN IPCC
http://info-wars.org/2009/11/23/global-warmin...
Good scientists backlash against being shut out of the debate and the false 'consensus'
'The UN-IPCC Farce Revealed'
http://www.infowars.com/scientific-siege-agai...
"In 1998 a group of concerned scientists began a concerted effort to counter this trend, and to stop the false UN-IPCC push to tax the people of the world and blame climate change on humanity. This HUGE effort has gone totally unreported by the mainstream media. It is the Global Warming Petition Project. This effort is NOT a political effort, it is PURELY SCIENTIFIC in it’s thrust! All signers must be scientists with at least a Bachelor of Science degree from an accredited school…
The Global Warming Petition Project
http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php
^31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,including 9,029 with PhDs

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider
http://www.infowars.com/the-ipcc-consensus-on...
as for the govt./military saying we're supposedly warming, the Earth's mean temp has actually NOT risen in over a decade. Ewe can beLIEve the ones that have flip-flopped on Earth warming-then freezing- then warming, or ewe can get Real!
TIME etc. magazine covers from the 70's
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/20...
'The Cooling of America'
http://symonsez.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/g...
'The Big Freeze'
http://qph.cf.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-5d4bbc12...
'How to survive the coming ice age'
http://qph.cf.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-236c26d2...
Al Gore as the Inquisitor of the church of Gaia
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_K5rWAp8IBWQ/SfOS43I...
Dees' illustrations are great->
http://www.google.com/search...
IKMTY spews:
"It saddens me that people who understand the science behind nuclear fission are so quick to dismiss the science behind AGW because of politics."
once again nuketard it's the OTHER way around!
yet it ain't mere politics that cause nuclear proliferation but $$$, just as the love of $$ is also the root of the evil behind the AGW scam

I Know More Than You wrote:

It saddens me that people who understand the science behind nuclear fission are so quick to dismiss the science behind AGW because of politics.

Actually, many topix AGW deniers do NOT know the science of nuclear fission. A prime example is 'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver', who is a topix AGW denier.... & is a slimy filthy vile pukey proud reprobate racist rooting pig & alleged threatener & proud threatener.

'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' believes carbon is created at Earth's center via nuclear fission. Like 'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver', many topix AGW deniers have a sub-sub-kindergarten comprehension of their poorly earned hi skule deegreees. Also,'piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling' doesn't even have a poorly earned hi skule deegreee.

It does NOT sadden me that so many topix AGW deniers are so limited educationally. I like that topix AGW deniers are as dumb as their egos insist on proving.

Alex wrote:

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider
http://www.infowars.com/the-ipcc-consensus-on...

You need to be a little bit sceptical.

If you were, you'd find the supposed source of your claims goes out of his way to say you have misrepresented his views:

http://tinyurl.com/7um38b3

Alex wrote:

as for the govt./military saying we're supposedly warming, the Earth's mean temp has actually NOT risen in over a decade.

Really?

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from...

Alex wrote:

Ewe can beLIEve the ones that have flip-flopped on Earth warming-then freezing- then warming, or ewe can get Real!

There was a debate in the 70s about whether cooling caused by aerosol pollution (pollution) or warming caused by CO2 would dominate.

It was settled in the late 70s when the consensus emerged that warming would dominate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

litesong wrote:

Actually, many topix AGW deniers do NOT know the science of nuclear fission.

I would like to think that people who post on this Brattleboro forum and whose ISP location is Louisiana and who state they work for VY Entergy understand nuclear fission.

Thanks for stopping by.

Fair Game wrote:

<quoted text>
There was a debate in the 70s about whether cooling caused by aerosol pollution (pollution) or warming caused by CO2 would dominate.
It was settled in the late 70s when the consensus emerged that warming would dominate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

nothing is settled '*green troll', not when the average temps are NOT increasing, islands are Not disappearing, polar bear populations are Increasing not decreasing etc. etc.
I'm going skiing this weekend, something ewe obliviots said over ten years ago that I wouldn't be able to ten years later, but I can and am. Ewe still beLIEve all that extra snow last winter which came with lower temps was cuz of 'warming' as the AlGoreythms ridiculously claimed?--pppfffffttt!

(*more like a watermelon, green on outside, commie Red inside, with an agenda actually called "Agenda 21")