Chuck Norris speaks out on truths of Ten Commandments

If that is coolminds picture she looks like mother earth fell on her

puffdoggy wrote:

Hey cori..newsflash...now he's wrinkle-up,tiny little oh so little of a man since he quit taking steroids...probably couldn't satisfy a chicken...find yourself a new hottie and quit watching re-runs of this jerk. All that does is keep his worthless ass on TV....smokem if ya gottem...puffy

I think it is great that he stopped using steroids, if that was ever the case...now he knows exactly whom to beat on if it is ever needed...wetmop, have to stopped using drugs as of yet? Your government still hasn't found you, huh?

jimbow wrote:

<quoted text> I am glad you set this gal straight ,all they have to do is compare the dead sea strolls to the Bible , the strolls are authentic .

Glad that you clarified. As I was not sure of your approach in the previous comment.

Of myself I am nothing. Greater is He that is in me, than he that is in the world.

The Lord still loves her, despite her blindness. He is more than willing and able to save her. However, the beginning of all wisdon, is humility. It is still upto her to repent, and seek the Truth. There's not much time left in which to do it. She has been deceived by the ruler of this world....

Read Revelations 17 & 18 if you want to know the truth about the U.S. And Jeremiah 50:18-46 to get an idea of the time that we are in....

I think this is the funniest part of Chuck's article:

As late as 1917, the Supreme Court of North Carolina declared: Our laws are founded upon the Decalogue...blah blah blah.

Declared by the Supreme Court of North Carolina in 1917?! Well then, it must be indubitably true! Yeah, right, like any thinking person cares what primitive rednecks thought.

That aside, this "Christian State" business will be forever moot...if you want to find archaic passages that support the notion that the US is a Christian country, you easily can; if you want to prove the opposite, that's just as easy. Personally I find that the founding fathers believed in many notions and activities that are irrelevant or immoral to me; I don't find a need to imitate them. People should be encouraged to think for themselves rather than taking recourse to the actions of long-dead religious figures or political hacks; both instances have as their main goal the preservation of the power structure and their personal self-interests therein. When people start quoting founding fathers or religious figures like Christ or Muhammed, it usually means that they're up to some type of mischief.

In closing, I'll add that no one really cares what Chuck Norris thinks except bitter, overweight middle-aged losers who haven't gotten laid since Gerald Ford was in office and who are still driving '79 T-birds held together with duct tape.

praise god wrote:

Home,Thank God there are people who are not ashamed to stand up for God .I to love my lord and savior JESUS CHRIST.The girl will think about this when she is casted into hell.Pray for her that Jesus will touch her heart .Thank you for your stand

No one gets cast into hell unless someone else is there to rake them over the coals. Where was Jesus when mum & dad were skrewing like animals? Jesus had a chance to save me then but he was too busy collaborating with Allah to hoodwink the world. I pray that you will take more time and put more thoughtful effort into crafting your next dogamtic, hocus-pocus spew on religion.

Obviously there are some whom refuse to acknowledge the TRUTH of the matter. Our nation was FOUNDED on "the TRANSCENDENT Laws of Nature and of Natures God". To Wit -

...When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them....-Declaration of Independence, 1776

As well as our new Constitution -

....The first question is answered at once by recurring to the absolute necessity of the case; to the great principle of self-preservation; to the transcendent law of nature and of nature's God....- James Madison, The Federalist No. 43, Jan. 23, 1788....

And, "the Laws of Nature and of Natures God" CANNOT be arbitrarily dismissed -

...The law of nature is immutable; not by the effect of an arbitrary disposition, but because it has its foundation in the nature, constitution, and mutual relations of men and things. While these continue to be the same, it must continue to be the same also. This immutability of nature's laws has nothing in it repugnant to the supreme power of an all-perfect Being. Since he himself is the author of our constitution; he cannot but command or forbid such things as are necessarily agreeable or disagreeable to this very constitution. He is under the glorious necessity of not contradicting himself. This necessity, far from limiting or diminishing his perfections, adds to their external character, and points out their excellency....- James Wilson,[The Works of the Honourable James Wilson, L.L.D.;
Chap. III Of the Law of Nature]. Mr. Wilson signed the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. In addition he was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention and a U.S. Supreme Court Justice.(Impressive credentials, yes?).

I'm sure that everyone her knows what the meaning of the word IMMUTABLE is, right?

Pete Gulliver wrote:

I think this is the funniest part of Chuck's article:
As late as 1917, the Supreme Court of North Carolina declared: Our laws are founded upon the Decalogue...blah blah blah.
Declared by the Supreme Court of North Carolina in 1917?! Well then, it must be indubitably true! Yeah, right, like any thinking person cares what primitive rednecks thought.
That aside, this "Christian State" business will be forever moot...if you want to find archaic passages that support the notion that the US is a Christian country, you easily can; if you want to prove the opposite, that's just as easy. Personally I find that the founding fathers believed in many notions and activities that are irrelevant or immoral to me; I don't find a need to imitate them. People should be encouraged to think for themselves rather than taking recourse to the actions of long-dead religious figures or political hacks; both instances have as their main goal the preservation of the power structure and their personal self-interests therein. When people start quoting founding fathers or religious figures like Christ or Muhammed, it usually means that they're up to some type of mischief.
In closing, I'll add that no one really cares what Chuck Norris thinks except bitter, overweight middle-aged losers who haven't gotten laid since Gerald Ford was in office and who are still driving '79 T-birds held together with duct tape.

You have no idea of what a Constitutional Republic is, do you? Nor, do you understand the basis on which this country was founded. The Constitution does NOT alter, nor can it be lawfully altered except by amendment. What it meant, as well as the intentions of those writing it, when it was originally written. Has the same exact meaning today as it did then.

Would suggest that you learn the REALITY concerning the Country you live in.

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
You have no idea of what a Constitutional Republic is, do you? Nor, do you understand the basis on which this country was founded. The Constitution does NOT alter, nor can it be lawfully altered except by amendment. What it meant, as well as the intentions of those writing it, when it was originally written. Has the same exact meaning today as it did then.
Would suggest that you learn the REALITY concerning the Country you live in.

I'm willing to consider your points, however, I request that you explain your comments above in relation to specific instances in my post. Otherwise, you're simply making lazy accusations which results in neither of us learning anything.
Thanks.

Pete Gulliver - Fair enough. You had stated

"That aside, this "Christian State" business will be forever moot".

How can it be moot when it is the whole basis provided for instituting our government to begin with? It was the very reason given for declaring our Independence.(Keep in mind that I'm NOT talking religion here). It becomes even more sigbificant when taking the Constitution into consideration. As that is the BASIS upon which ALL American government stands.

Can understand, and readily agree with those whom don't agree with 'religion'. For it is just the man-made form of worship. Jesus himself was most harsh with the 'religious' people of his day. For, the 'religions' were often employed to control and enslave mankind. That is NOT the God of our fathers here in America. They wanted NOTHING to do with having 'religion' controlling the state, or visa-versa. For 'religion' has been employed to destroy millions of people. But, they resoundingly relied on God and His laws.

By utilizing these tenets and reliance on God, they made this country the most powerful nation EVER on the face of the earth.

They also warned us that if We The People forgot these vital and indespensible morals and values. We would cease to be great, and fall. As all the rest of the nations that have ever turned their back on God throughout history. They had examined history in order to come up with our Constitutional form of government. They picked what had worked, and disregarded what did not.

Most Republics only last 200 years, and then collapse. That we have lasted for 220 years so far, is a testimony all in itself. But, there are readily identifiable signs that we are at a pivotal point. If we continue to disregard the wisdom passed on to us, history shows that it will only be a matter of time before we fall.

We The People still have time to turn the current perversion of our intended system around. We should strongly think about exerting our best efforts, if we want to pass down anything good to our "posterity". Don't think I need to describe what failure to do so will bring...

These are some of the better reeasons that I've seen -

...This will be the best security for maintaining our liberties. A nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins....- Ben Franklin

....But, if you exert the means of defence which God and nature have given you, the time will soon arrive when every man shall sit under his own vine and under his own fig-tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid....- AN ADDRESS OF THE CONGRESS TO THE INHABITANTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, May 8th, 1778

....To take from the people the right of bearing arms, and put their weapons of defence in the hands of a standing army, would be scarcely more dangerous to their liberties, than to permit the Government to accumulate immense amounts of treasure beyond the supplies necessary to its legitimate wants. Such a treasure would doubtless be employed at some time, as it has been in other countries, when opportunity tempted ambition....- President Andrew Jackson, Message to U.S. House and Senate of 5th December, 1836.[Journal of the Senate of the United States of America, 1789-1873. TUESDAY, December 6, 1836.]

Oooops! That last quote wasn't the one I had intended (sorry, I'm used to the gun forums)-

...Self-preservation is the first law of nature, and has been implanted in the heart of man by his Creator, for the wisest purpose; and no political union, however fraught with blessings and benefits in all other respects, can long continue, if the necessary consequence be to render the homes and the firesides of nearly half the parties to it habitually and hopelessly insecure....- President James Buchanan, Washington City, December 3, 1860. Message to the U.S. House & Senate

Coolmind;

You say people shouldn't don't impose your myths and superstitions on others. Well what is it you think you are doing? Don't believe in God or at least the christian version than fine, but heed your own advice and stop telling others what to think----Or stop advising others to sum up.

You called some a Hypocrit above, look in the mirrior!

There Seems to be a revival of atheists, but
I don't believe in atheists. This isn't because I haven't met people who claim the title, but because such a person cannot be. Let's imagine that you are a professing atheist. I will ask you two questions: First, do you know the combined weight of all the sand on all the beaches of Hawaii? I think I can safely assume that you don't. This brings us to the second question: Do you know how many hairs are on the back of a fully grown male Tibetan yak? Probably not. I think, therefore, that it is reasonable for me to conclude that there are some things you don't know. It is important to ask these questions because there are some people who think they know everything.
Let's say that you know an incredible one percent of all the knowledge in the universe. To know 100 percent, you would have to know everything. There wouldn't be a rock in the universe that you would not be intimately familiar with, or a grain of sand that you would not be aware of. You would know everything that has happened in history, from that which is common knowledge to the minor details of the secret love life of Napoleon's great-grandmother's black cat's fleas. You would know every hair of every head, and every thought of every heart. All history would be laid out before you, because you would be omniscient (all-knowing).
Bear in mind that one of the greatest scientists who ever lived, Thomas Edison, said, "We do not know a millionth of one percent about anything." Let me repeat: Let's say that you have an incredible one percent of all the knowledge in the universe. Would it be possible, in the ninety-nine percent of the knowledge that you haven't yet come across, that there might be ample evidence to prove the existence of God? If you are reasonable, you will be forced to admit that it is possible. Somewhere, in the knowledge you haven't yet discovered, there could be enough evidence to prove that God does exist.
Let's look at the same thought from another angle. If I were to make an absolute statement such as, "There is no gold in China," what is needed for that statement to be proven true? I need absolute or total knowledge. I need to have information that there is no gold in any rock, in any river, in the ground, in any store, in any ring, or in any mouth (gold filling) in China. If there is one speck of gold in China, then my statement is false and I have no basis for it. I need absolute knowledge before I can make an absolute statement. Conversely, for me to say, "There is gold in China," I don't need to have all knowledge. I just need to have seen a speck of gold in the country, and the statement is then true.
To say categorically, "There is no God," is to make an absolute statement. For the statement to be true, I must know for certain that there is no God in the entire universe. No human being has all knowledge. Therefore, none of us is able to truthfully make this assertion.
If you insist upon disbelief in God, what you must say is, "Having the limited knowledge I have at present, I believe that there is no God." Owing to a lack of knowledge on your part, you don't know if God exists. So, in the strict sense of the word, you cannot be an atheist. The only true qualifier for the title is the One who has absolute knowledge, and why on earth would God want to deny His own existence?

The professing atheist is what is commonly known as an "agnostic"--one who claims he "doesn't know" if God exists. It is interesting to note that the Latin equivalent for the Greek word is "ignoramus." The Bible tells us that this ignorance is "willful" (Psalm 10:4). It's not that a person can't find God, but that he won't. It has been rightly said that the "atheist" can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman. He knows that if he admits that there is a God, he is admitting that he is ultimately responsible to Him. This is not a pleasant thought for some.

It is said that Mussolini (the Italian dictator), once stood on a pinnacle and cried, "'God, if you are there, strike me dead!" When God didn't immediately bow to his dictates, Mussolini then concluded that there was no God. However, his prayer was answered some time later.

Preacher wrote:

The professing atheist is what is commonly known as an "agnostic"--one who claims he "doesn't know" if God exists. It is interesting to note that the Latin equivalent for the Greek word is "ignoramus." The Bible tells us that this ignorance is "willful" (Psalm 10:4). It's not that a person can't find God, but that he won't. It has been rightly said that the "atheist" can't find God for the same reason a thief can't find a policeman. He knows that if he admits that there is a God, he is admitting that he is ultimately responsible to Him. This is not a pleasant thought for some.
It is said that Mussolini (the Italian dictator), once stood on a pinnacle and cried, "'God, if you are there, strike me dead!" When God didn't immediately bow to his dictates, Mussolini then concluded that there was no God. However, his prayer was answered some time later.

You don't temp God.Thanks for your post .God bless