California's Gay Marriage Ban Overturned

jusathought wrote:

<quoted text>
did i say anything about them being different? im only concerned because i see it as a snowball effect that you cant get out of. the children of gay parents will be open minded about trying what their parents do....if daddy is into cars the son will probably be into cars, sports ect. ect., how would you like a litte boy in preschool kissing your son because thats what he sees his daddyS doing? think about what to say to your 4,5,6, year old when that happens, is that when you have the "gay" talk?

Judged:

3

3

2

The Troll Stopper wrote:

<quoted text>
Let us know of any such problems actually occurring in places were same-sex marriage has been legalized and then we'll talk.

Judged:

3

3

1

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
Blowhard (noun)
An opinionated person who talks loud and way too long on the same subject, often sensationalizing the subject matter
"She's the biggest blowhard on Topix."
Ignoramus (noun)
Pejorative term frequently used to describe an ideological opponent who acts like he/she knows more than he/she actually does and/or argues according to obviously misinformed logic.
"That Mrs. Hughes sure is an ignoramus!"
Assclown (noun)
One, who, through the fault of his parents procreation, is a skid mark in society's collective underwear.
"You, madame, are an assclown."

Judged:

2

2

2

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>Oh, please, granny, for anything to even cause a tingle in that catcher's mitt you got going between your legs, it would need to be hooked up to a high powered drill with a toilet plunger hooked to the bit to arouse you at this late LATE date in your sorry old life. Possibly they could take you down to the hardware store and strap you backwards onto the paint shaker and shove you up against a chair leg or something of that size and strength. As for lubrication, that stopped when Carter was president, so a tub of Murphy's Oil would do the trick.

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
so gays hated bisexuals when they kicked them out of the gay softball league?(see my posts and links about that story or google NJ gay softball)
Or is it that they had a mission with the club whose purpose was frustrated by having others who don't fit in the group?

Judged:

1

1

1

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought marriage rights were not subject to the will of the voter...
gay marriage will lead to more insurance fraud..friend with benefits..and immigration fraud...green card buddy...

Judged:

1

1

Mrs Hughes wrote:

<quoted text>
well they won't be "real" grandkids - duh

Judged:

1

1

1

Jupiter wrote:

<quoted text>
Where did you get the idea that I implied that marriage rights are subject to the will of the voter??

Judged:

1

1

Mrs Hughes wrote:

<quoted text>
A little biology lesson for you: Children are produced from a male /female union.

Judged:

1

1

1

jusathought wrote:

its a sad time in history. when a mental disorder is considered normal and accepted, there is something wrong.

Judged:

1

1

1

jusathought wrote:

<quoted text>
lets see if i can argue my "ignorant" statement without a personal insult...maybe take the high road....Sigmund Freud, the father of modern psychology said that if a man looks at an animal and is aroused there is a misfire in the brain to make the man think he is attracted to that animal...same theory goes with a man looking at a child...the human body is designed to procreate(not a religious statement)so why then if a man looks at another man and is aroused, this should considered normal? i personally agree with dr freud that it is a mental disorder and should be studied along with pedophilia to try and find a cure or accurate treatment

Judged:

1

1

1

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>Why don't your friends just ask you instead?

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
We create life with our wives. Homosexuality is a perversion that produces only hell and death. Also , anything gay is bad for the kids.
Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death... "

Judged:

3

3

2

Jupiter wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, then look on the Internet to see if you can find a group that is studying this "disorder" and contribute all that you can afford. Good luck.

Judged:

2

2

1

Mrs Hughes wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for your mini-contribution to the forum. When you say, "worthless piles of toxic waste" you show your limited debate abilities and childlike surrender to potty room tactics. Insults are great to feel superior, while providing nothing of value to support you. We want to see children raised in normal environments - that's hard enough - how much more so, raised in stigma homes. The "parents" are "out of the closet"...... so? Good for them - what if the children are straight and have the stigma of "two mommies" (which can never be true - a person can only have one true mommy)- or "two daddies" (same thing)- and have to grow up with that, and explain it to their friends, always carrying around baggage? Sad.

Judged:

1

1

Mrs Hughes wrote:

<quoted text>
Children are produced from one male and one female. I did not click on your link because (1) don't know if it's even safe and (2) there is nothing that will change my opening statement.(No child will be conceived in the bowel.)

Judged:

1

1

1

eyeful wrote:

<quoted text>
Finally the Old Gasbag delivers more than a 1-2 sentence skid mark! Suddenly you're indignant enough to write a WHOLE RUN ON PARAGRAPH of tripe!
Look, Church Lady... here's the TRUTH. You can "want to see children raised in normal environments" until you're blue in the face. But who are YOU to decide what constitutes a "normal environment?" And how are are you going to legislate YOUR definition?
It is unbelievable that so many sanctimonious, self-righteous BLOWHARDS like you exist. See, you don't have the slightest understanding of humankind or history or fact. That "normal environment" you are so obsessed with is a mirage. Throughout history, your "sacred" marriages have produced troubled spouses and troubled children. How do you explain the high rates of divorce, abuse, adultery, abandonment that characterize so many of your "normal environments?" How do explain loveless, unhappy, unhealthy, destructive "normal environments?" How do explain why so many people spend their entire adult lives trying to free themselves from the emotional baggage they incur in these "normal environments?"
I am more interested in "loving environments" for parents and children. Loving families and friends and communities. I am NOT interested in your black/white world of absolutes and "normal by mandate." Your opinions and attitudes reflect someone who has little or no exposure to the real world and its remarkable social variations.
Your hyper conservative agenda is showing! Guess what? The rest of the world could care less about what you think is right and wrong... or "normal."