Video: McConnell: This is about freedom of religion

Earth Child 1 wrote:

<quoted text>Once an institution is an equal opportunity employer and is deducting taxes from paychecks and providing public services, then religion doesn't get to decide an employee's health, especially when the employee is contributing money towards insurance from their paycheck. A house of worship is protected, not its business.

Judged:

1

Mitt s Airtight Dog Crate wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't forget Muslim polygamy. That will scare the xstain talibangelicals and Tea Baggers more than your example.

Grumpy Guy wrote:

<quoted text>Its not so cut and dry.Many Religions run Hospitals as Charities and provide low cost services for the poor who cannot pay.There is and should be a difference between a Non Profit and a for profit business. Even if the non profit has people who show up for a paycheck only.

Judged:

2

2

1

PlacitasRoy wrote:

<quoted text>A corporation is a corporation. Religious freedom is a right of PEOPLE not their corporate bosses....even if those corporate bosses head non-profit corporations and wear magnificent gold embroidered power robes and gold crowns!!

The OLD supposedly celibate bachelors and the Evangelical fundamentalist dictators, must believe that, without the force of law to restrain them, the Catholics employees at a hospital will run down and get prescriptions for birth control pills.

It should NEVER be management's right, even if the managers wear vestments and gold crowns and dump their scared sperm on their bedsheets, to impose their religions dogma on their employees.

Makes sense wrote:

No, this is about FREEDOM FROM RELIGION.

Judged:

1

1

1

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
the church isn't a corp and no one is telling their employees not to use BC. They are saying they are not going to pay for it.

Judged:

1

1

1

CTYankee wrote:

<quoted text>And your stupidity continues.

Judged:

1

1

1

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
since you can argue your point this is your reply. I understand. You are a liberal and unable to defend your positions.

Judged:

1

1

1

CTYankee wrote:

<quoted text>You've shown in previous posts you're not capable of a coherent discussion. You're a moron.

Judged:

2

1

1

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
you mean that I expose your lies and ignorance so you don't want to try that on me

Judged:

2

1

1

Bandmaster wrote:

<quoted text>Obama is the New Anti-Christ. That's the same as being a communist, by the way.

Grumpy Guy wrote:

<quoted text>Its not so cut and dry.Many Religions run Hospitals as Charities and provide low cost services for the poor who cannot pay.There is and should be a difference between a Non Profit and a for profit business. Even if the non profit has people who show up for a paycheck only.

Judged:

2

1

1

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
the church isn't a corp and no one is telling their employees not to use BC. They are saying they are not going to pay for it.

Judged:

1

tha Professor wrote:

<quoted text>No, he means what he says - you're a moron. Many others have noticed it as well.

Should tell you something, but as you're stupid, it probably won't.:)

Judged:

2

1

1

Mitt s Airtight Dog Crate wrote:

<quoted text>Hey ignorant filth, the churches are exempt.

We are not talking about the churches.

We are talking about church run, non profits like hospitals and universities, which are places of public accommodation and are not to use government monies to promote a particular "religious" dogma...namely that someone other than the woman in question should control her body, either directly, or indirectly by making it any more difficult to obtain covered birth control than it is to obtain covered flu shots.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mitt s Airtight Dog Crate wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey ignorant filth, the churches are exempt.
We are not talking about the churches.
We are talking about church run, non profits like hospitals and universities, which are places of public accommodation and are not to use government monies to promote a particular "religious" dogma...namely that someone other than the woman in question should control her body, either directly, or indirectly by making it any more difficult to obtain covered birth control than it is to obtain covered flu shots.

McGruff wrote:

<quoted text>
that are owned by the church. And the church isn't promoting religious dogma by refusing to pay for BC. That is just a foolish lie from a little small minded, brainwashed liberal.

Judged:

1

Mitt s Airtight Dog Crate wrote:

<quoted text>The RCC still is not happy with the offer of having someone other than the RCC pay for the birth control which will be covered by these non religious institutions'- universities and hospitals - health insurance policies.

So the RCC does wish to impose its dogma about birth control on all these secular, non Catholic and Catholic-birth-control using employees.