Evolution vs. Creation

Judged:

1

1

1

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
What made you think that?

Judged:

2

2

2

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no fossil record of evolution
None, zero. Zipo nada.
There is no record of one species turning onto another.
Every think genus that if we evolved from Ape or chimpanzee then why are there still apes and chimpanzee.
Please explain the flower and the bee in evolution or how about the Giraffe or the little big that shoots to chemical that when they combine they explode.
Giraffe long neck bends down to eat blood rushes to the head bang he's dead or while eating he sees a lion shoots his head up fast and blacks out bang he's dead.
The bug first attempt at mixing the two chemical bang he's dead.
Flowers evolved at the same time as bees and of course two Flowers needed to evolve at the exact same time. And what did they evolve from? Plants that was already reproducing with out a symbiant so why evolve to a more risky way to reproduce?
There are thousands of these that evolutions just can't explain in a sane manner.

Judged:

2

2

2

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
Not so BH's have solar mass equivalence and we classify them by that.
The size of a black hole, as determined by the radius of the event horizon all the way to super massive classed are determined by it's density. But the universe singularity is assumed to have began infinitesimal point. What they do have is infinite density and infinite gravity compacting infinite space/time.
But it's event horizon has a definite size.

Judged:

2

2

1

MAAT wrote:

Woodtick so right...all we have is approximations.
And what we would see is the shadow of the eventhorizon.
All we do now think we know is that the mass involved is in relation to the size of galaxies.
Except those babygalaxies...kind of the weird ones out, like slow evolving very cold ancient gaseous clouds.
Fascinating stuff.

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>the event horizon is not the black hole, it is the extent of its gravitational field at the speed of light escape velocity.
if there is no space time at the actual black hole, hw ow are you coing to measure it? if even the Planck scale of space is gone, there is no size of anything.

Judged:

1

1

1

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
That's like saying "the top of the hole is not the hole , the bottom of the hole is the hole". Meaningless and despite your objections
all black holes have a definite calculable size.

Judged:

1

thewordofme wrote:

<quoted text>Take a chance...enter the real world. Evolution is already proven, it is a fact and a theory.

You lose

Igor Trip wrote:

<quoted text>It is possible to turn lead into gold and it has been done.

"Transmutation of lead into gold isn't just theoretically possible - it has been achieved! There are reports that Glenn Seaborg, 1951 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, succeeded in transmuting a minute quantity of lead (possibly en route from bismuth, in 1980) into gold. There is an earlier report (1972) in which Soviet physicists at a nuclear research facility near Lake Baikal in Siberia accidentally discovered a reaction for turning lead into gold when they found the lead shielding of an experimental reactor had changed to gold."
http://chemistry.about.com/cs/generalchemistr...

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Seriously? After how many times have you been told this? hominids split off the evolutionary tree from the great apes.(well, we are a great ape) we did not replace any other apes.

in fact we have this great fossil record showing lees apelike and more human like animals. each one its own species. see how that works?

the rest of your post is too silly to comment on...again...

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>they have a calculable strength and effects. how can you measure size when there is no space?
the area a foot above the top of a hole is NOT the hole, that is what you are saying is part of the hole.
PLease whow me where a black hole's size has been measured. not it's effects, or it's strength, but the size of the singularity.

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
Easy way out. Put the blinders on. Don't let the facts get in the way of a good theory.

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
This was done long ago by Kurt Schwarzschild , it's now called the Schwarzschild radius. Anything smaller that it's Schwarzschild radius is a black hole.
The actual size of a BH , is determined by it's Schwarzschild radius x mass.
This explains it for you.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C007571/english...

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Easy way out is providing facts that anyone can look at?

those records of past species show a clear movement from more apelike beings to more man-like beings. how is that not evolution? how does that not support the theory?

Aura Mytha wrote:

<quoted text>
This was done long ago by Kurt Schwarzschild , it's now called the Schwarzschild radius. Anything smaller that it's Schwarzschild radius is a black hole.
The actual size of a BH , is determined by it's Schwarzschild radius x mass.
This explains it for you.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C007571/english...

Langoliers wrote:

Here's one for you gravity comment
THE MOON FALLS UP! The Apollo 11 astronauts left a laser reflector on the Moon which has allowed scientists on the ground to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon very accurately. They discovered that the Moon gets 4 cm farther away from the Earth every year.

Langoliers wrote:

A PIG'S TOOTH by any other name is Nebraska man. Evolutionists found a single tooth in Nebraska that seemed to be half way between a human tooth and an ape tooth. They claimed they had found conclusive proof of the missing link between ape and man. The tooth was later positively identified as a pig's tooth, but by this time textbooks were filled with artists' conceptions of Nebraska man, showing him to be a hairy ape-man with poor posture. All that was missing was the football. To find out more about Nebraska man, Java man, Cro-Magnon man, Neanderthal man, Lucy, and other missing links, write for one free copy of our newsletter. Science Against Evolution, P.O. BOX 923, Ridgecrest, CA 93556.

ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you believe this movement in evolution took place without the addition of new information in DNA?