GOP kills civil unions in Colorado special session

Why don't the dumb LIBERALS and LIBERTARIANS get it?

America is not and never will be for equal rights!

"Prey for Rmoney 2012!"

poor homohas dick r for chix

The GOP is right on this one.

For once, the Republicans actually did something right, for a change.

"Medical Marijuana"
Is legal in CO
who'd a thunk the
GOP
would be smoking it?

Great to know while economy is tanking our government is wasting our tax dollars on special gay agenda meeting. So important and helps the economy so much, thats why I like paying taxes

This will cost the GOP the House in Colorado. Was it worth it just to prevent the civil unions bill from passing; a bill which 75% of Colorado voters supported??

So now the Dems will take the state House back in November and immediatly pass a civil unions bill.

Talking about cutting of your nose to spite your face!!

Your Ex wrote:

"Medical Marijuana"
Is legal in CO
who'd a thunk the
GOP
would be smoking it?

Ask Ted Haggard. I hear crytal meth and gay hookers are better because they aren't legal. It's that whole sexy taboo thing.

Makes sense wrote:

<quoted text>
Ask Ted Haggard. I hear crytal meth and gay hookers are better because they aren't legal. It's that whole sexy taboo thing.

Look up"Sherriff of the Year"
Patrick Sullivan
if you need more hypocrisy-by-authority.
He's doing time in the jail named after him.

Your Ex wrote:

<quoted text>
Look up"Sherriff of the Year"
Patrick Sullivan
if you need more hypocrisy-by-authority.
He's doing time in the jail named after him.

Is he related to Paul Babeu?

WeTheSheeple wrote:

This will cost the GOP the House in Colorado. Was it worth it just to prevent the civil unions bill from passing; a bill which 75% of Colorado voters supported??
So now the Dems will take the state House back in November and immediatly pass a civil unions bill.
Talking about cutting of your nose to spite your face!!

...why didn't Democrats do it when they had full control of the Senate and House for several years prior to 2010?

Why not put it to a vote again?

Why not do SOMETHING before election year?

Yes, McNulty MIGHT have made an error in judgment, but at least you know where the GOP sits before they they tell you where they stand.

We know where the Dems sit. Wherever it benefits them the most. Not HONEST.

Then wrote:

<quoted text>
...why didn't Democrats do it when they had full control of the Senate and House for several years prior to 2010?
Why not put it to a vote again?
Why not do SOMETHING before election year?
Yes, McNulty MIGHT have made an error in judgment, but at least you know where the GOP sits before they they tell you where they stand.
We know where the Dems sit. Wherever it benefits them the most. Not HONEST.

What about Ted Haggard? Not HONEST.

Makes sense wrote:

<quoted text>
What about Ted Haggard? Not HONEST.

Interrupting, but what does Ted Haggard have to do with Democrats not getting this thing done when they had the chance? Oh, are you saying they are BOTH hypocritical? I get it. ;)

On topic, Hick knew this would happen. He has an axe to grind on this issue after his failure as Mayor in 2006 on civil unions. He pushed it and spent escrow money we have for real emergencies playing politics and McNulty called his bluff. To what end, I am not certain.

Anyone who has read my posts knows that I am not against gay civil unions. But I feel like gays are really being played here, and not just by Republicans.

I wonder what larry 'tap three times' craig thinks about this?

Romney is placing 10 dual citizen ship Zionists on his foreign policy staff, including the suspected mastermind of 911