|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Size of American governm,ent the lowest it's been since 1968; http://politomix.com/thinkprogress/27126/char... Romney stating Obama has gutted "Welfare to Work" also a blatant lie as well - Politifact characterizes it as "Pants on Fire"; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state... So Mr. Reagan lover, how many illegals did that dumb ass president give then? Try 3 million numbnuts! http://www.youtube.com/watch... "As the nation's attention turns back to the fractured debate over immigration, it might be helpful to remember that in 1986, Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill into law. It was sold as a crackdown: There would be tighter security at the Mexican border, and employers would face strict penalties for hiring undocumented workers. they even have a saying: What Would Reagan Do? Well... he'd pass the DREAM ACT you ignorant right wingers!" http://www.opposingviews.com/i/entertainment/... Yet how many illegal aliens did the Obama Administration deport? "Republican presidential candidates blasted the Obama administration during the primaries for not doing enough to combat illegal immigration. But a conservative group is launching a television ad in Nevada on Wednesday criticizing President Obama for deporting a record number of undocumented immigrants. The $38,000 ad, which will run in the Las Vegas area -- including on the top two Spanish-language TV stations -- warns viewers:“Don’t let Obama fool you. He’s not committed to immigrants. He just wants your vote.” It criticizes Obama for “offering our young undocumented a solution that is temporary” and does not resolve their legal status, and asks:“Why didn’t he push immigration reform like he promised us?” The ad continues by showing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents with a handcuffed woman and stating that “Obama has deported more people than any other president in the history of the country.” http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-conse... With those sources and $5, you can get a starbucks super latte.
|
|
Ralph
Wyoming, MI
|
I don't suppose he said anything about the 100 million people that are now receiving federal welfare assistance or that unemployment is stuck above 8% or that the billions of $ spent on green energy was a total waste of tax payer money or that GM is doing so well after their bail out that they still owe us 42 billion or how he managed to jam a healthcare tax down our throats even though most Americans are against it or how the middle class has lost 40% of their wealth or the trillions in debt he racked up with nothing to show for it...obama needs to go in November before the retard can do anymore economic damage.
|
|
“Why Is the Right Deranged?”
Since: May 09
Lake Success, N.Y.
|
Please wait...
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>OBAMA CREATES MORE WELFARE……….STILL NO JOBS…….. FLASH: THIS JUST IN FROM THE ODOODLE NETWORK………After publishing a new ad that is a proven lie trying to link Romney to a 7 year old death is below the normal Obama ad that is lower than whale chit. Desperation is running deep in liberal land. Obama attack ad from super PAC gets facts completely wrong... Second News Release: Today, August 8th, 2012, Obama organization is now going nuts because of the new Romney ad showing Obama once again ignored the constitution and congress has erased the Clinton bipartisan Welfare Reform law by not only removing the requirement for the need to work, which cut welfare in half, but Obama’s action also has made it legal for illegal’s and others not eligible could now ride free on the backs of American taxpayers. Nearly half of long-term U.S. immigrants are on welfare... Obama speech judged a complete lie again………Obama’s internals are giving him thoughts of Overdosing. Dumbo's stupidity rides again! Welfare reform law was never removed - a blatant lie by the Romney douchebag campaign - here are actual facts Dumbo; "The HHS memo Since 1996, welfare has been administered through block grants to states through a program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. TANF, as it’s called, limits how long families can get aid and requires recipients to eventually go to work. It also includes stringent reporting requirements for states to show they are successfully moving people off welfare and and into the workforce. A memo from George Sheldon, the acting assistant secretary at HHS, said the department wanted to give states more flexibility in meeting those requirements. The memo notifies states "of the Secretary’s willingness to exercise her waiver authority ... to allow states to test alternative and innovative strategies, policies, and procedures that are designed to improve employment outcomes for needy families." The memo outlined, using the jargon of a federal bureaucracy, the kinds of waivers that would be considered. It suggested projects that "improve collaboration with the workforce and/or post-secondary education systems" and "demonstrate strategies for more effectively serving individuals with disabilities," to give two examples. What does all that mean? "If you can do a better job connecting people to work, we would consider waiving certain parts of the performance measures and use alternate measures," is how Liz Schott, a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, translated the memo’s point.(The center supports the plan.) Schott, who studies welfare policy, said TANF sets guidelines for what activities may count toward meeting the law’s work requirements: jobs, job training, internships or school, to name a few. Beyond that, it puts restrictions on how many hours a welfare client may spend at school, or how many consecutive months they can attend before that activity no longer counts toward the work requirement. The result: "States are running less-effective programs than they might be, because they are so driven by performance measurement as it’s set forth in the federal law," Schott said. The waivers, then, would allow for flexibility. For example, someone with a special-needs child might require different work arrangements than are currently allowed. Or a person who needs to improve his or her English skills might need more time to take classes. "It’s really about the underlying program," Schott said. "The real starting place is: What’s the most effective program to get this person to work?" http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state... Statement labeled a s "pants on fire" - like most of the crap you spew Dumbo.
|
|
“Why Is the Right Deranged?”
Since: May 09
Lake Success, N.Y.
|
Please wait...
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>With those sources and $5, you can get a starbucks super latte. I at least supply sources DumbShit - what do you provide?
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Dumbo's stupidity rides again! Welfare reform law was never removed - a blatant lie by the Romney douchebag campaign - here are actual facts Dumbo; "The HHS memo Since 1996, welfare has been administered through block grants to states through a program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. TANF, as it’s called, limits how long families can get aid and requires recipients to eventually go to work. It also includes stringent reporting requirements for states to show they are successfully moving people off welfare and and into the workforce. A memo from George Sheldon, the acting assistant secretary at HHS, said the department wanted to give states more flexibility in meeting those requirements. The memo notifies states "of the Secretary’s willingness to exercise her waiver authority ... to allow states to test alternative and innovative strategies, policies, and procedures that are designed to improve employment outcomes for needy families." The memo outlined, using the jargon of a federal bureaucracy, the kinds of waivers that would be considered. It suggested projects that "improve collaboration with the workforce and/or post-secondary education systems" and "demonstrate strategies for more effectively serving individuals with disabilities," to give two examples. What does all that mean? "If you can do a better job connecting people to work, we would consider waiving certain parts of the performance measures and use alternate measures," is how Liz Schott, a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, translated the memo’s point.(The center supports the plan.) Schott, who studies welfare policy, said TANF sets guidelines for what activities may count toward meeting the law’s work requirements: jobs, job training, internships or school, to name a few. Beyond that, it puts restrictions on how many hours a welfare client may spend at school, or how many consecutive months they can attend before that activity no longer counts toward the work requirement. The result: "States are running less-effective programs than they might be, because they are so driven by performance measurement as it’s set forth in the federal law," Schott said. The waivers, then, would allow for flexibility. For example, someone with a special-needs child might require different work arrangements than are currently allowed. Or a person who needs to improve his or her English skills might need more time to take classes. "It’s really about the underlying program," Schott said. "The real starting place is: What’s the most effective program to get this person to work?" http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state... Statement labeled a s "pants on fire" - like most of the crap you spew Dumbo. Obamaloney gone wild!! LOL
|
Since: Jan 10
Las Vegas, NV
|
Please wait...
"In battle for Colorado, Obama pushes economic message" Let's help out obama folks. Here's his message 1. 8.3% unemployment -- for years 2. 1.5% GDP -- for years 3. Trillions in added deficits -- for years 4.$850B "porkulus" -- no help, ever. 5. Zero "shovel ready jobs -- not a one. 6. It's Bush's fault -- zillions of times 7. Republicans block everything -- zillions of times. obama has been a monster failure. We are tired of his excuses, broken promises, cover ups and out right lies. he's a radical leftist, nothing more. Come on libs, tell your boy to come clean. He's got nothing.
|
|
Bob Lewis
AOL
|
Not every American supports Obama just as not every Cuban supported Castro or every Russian supported Stalin.
|
|
“Why Is the Right Deranged?”
Since: May 09
Lake Success, N.Y.
|
Please wait...
Eighthman wrote: <quoted text>Obamaloney gone wild!! LOL Once again, the meaning of your post is "I have nothing to refute you facts with". Understood. Simple minds.
|
|
|
|
1 post removed
|
|
MorrowRosanna
Los Angeles, CA
|
what Michelle said I'm blown away that you able to profit $6099 in 1 month on the internet. did you see this web page http://zapit.nu/23a
|
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Dumbo's stupidity rides again! Welfare reform law was never removed - a blatant lie by the Romney douchebag campaign - here are actual facts Dumbo; "The HHS memo Since 1996, welfare has been administered through block grants to states through a program called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. TANF, as it’s called, limits how long families can get aid and requires recipients to eventually go to work. It also includes stringent reporting requirements for states to show they are successfully moving people off welfare and and into the workforce. A memo from George Sheldon, the acting assistant secretary at HHS, said the department wanted to give states more flexibility in meeting those requirements. The memo notifies states "of the Secretary’s willingness to exercise her waiver authority ... to allow states to test alternative and innovative strategies, policies, and procedures that are designed to improve employment outcomes for needy families." The memo outlined, using the jargon of a federal bureaucracy, the kinds of waivers that would be considered. It suggested projects that "improve collaboration with the workforce and/or post-secondary education systems" and "demonstrate strategies for more effectively serving individuals with disabilities," to give two examples. What does all that mean? "If you can do a better job connecting people to work, we would consider waiving certain parts of the performance measures and use alternate measures," is how Liz Schott, a senior fellow at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, translated the memo’s point.(The center supports the plan.) Schott, who studies welfare policy, said TANF sets guidelines for what activities may count toward meeting the law’s work requirements: jobs, job training, internships or school, to name a few. Beyond that, it puts restrictions on how many hours a welfare client may spend at school, or how many consecutive months they can attend before that activity no longer counts toward the work requirement. The result: "States are running less-effective programs than they might be, because they are so driven by performance measurement as it’s set forth in the federal law," Schott said. The waivers, then, would allow for flexibility. For example, someone with a special-needs child might require different work arrangements than are currently allowed. Or a person who needs to improve his or her English skills might need more time to take classes. "It’s really about the underlying program," Schott said. "The real starting place is: What’s the most effective program to get this person to work?" http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state... Statement labeled a s "pants on fire" - like most of the crap you spew Dumbo. Are you really this stupid to try and pass this prevarication to deflect Obama's going around congress and allowing welfare for illegals even those not working. Obama must be going for 7 trillion by November.
|
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Bob Lewis wrote: Not every American supports Obama just as not every Cuban supported Castro or every Russian supported Stalin. PRESIDENT WARNS: Romney Will Take Us Back to The 1950's..., but neglects to tell the public that he took us back to the depression........
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Obama is talking a lot of baloney lately. It's called Obamaloney.
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> I at least supply sources DumbShit - what do you provide? We provide mustard for that giant Obamaloney sandwich that you are eating. LOL What a fool.
|
|
Cat74
South Elgin, IL
|
I can't believe Romney is winning 50% to 45% in Colorado. They were tied last week at 47%. One by one these states are showing Romney with 50%. I don't feel sorry for Michelle, and Barack having to go back to Chicago, but I feel sorry for the girls. School children are so mean.
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Size of American governm,ent the lowest it's been since 1968; http://politomix.com/thinkprogress/27126/char... Romney stating Obama has gutted "Welfare to Work" also a blatant lie as well - Politifact characterizes it as "Pants on Fire"; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state... So Mr. Reagan lover, how many illegals did that dumb ass president give then? Try 3 million numbnuts! http://www.youtube.com/watch... "As the nation's attention turns back to the fractured debate over immigration, it might be helpful to remember that in 1986, Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill into law. It was sold as a crackdown: There would be tighter security at the Mexican border, and employers would face strict penalties for hiring undocumented workers. they even have a saying: What Would Reagan Do? Well... he'd pass the DREAM ACT you ignorant right wingers!" http://www.opposingviews.com/i/entertainment/... Yet how many illegal aliens did the Obama Administration deport? "Republican presidential candidates blasted the Obama administration during the primaries for not doing enough to combat illegal immigration. But a conservative group is launching a television ad in Nevada on Wednesday criticizing President Obama for deporting a record number of undocumented immigrants. The $38,000 ad, which will run in the Las Vegas area -- including on the top two Spanish-language TV stations -- warns viewers:“Don’t let Obama fool you. He’s not committed to immigrants. He just wants your vote.” It criticizes Obama for “offering our young undocumented a solution that is temporary” and does not resolve their legal status, and asks:“Why didn’t he push immigration reform like he promised us?” The ad continues by showing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents with a handcuffed woman and stating that “Obama has deported more people than any other president in the history of the country.” http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-conse... More spoiled Obamaloney from the long-winded and full of shit Obamaloney maker. LOL
|
|
PBsuccess
Marquette, MI
|
Rodney Stich (1923 —) is an United States citizen, a former Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) investigator (1962 — 1968) and an author. According to Burnett "his work led him to believe that there was major corruption at the heart of the aviation business. His "whistle-blowing" campaign was carried out for over 30 years, in which he filed his own "federal actions" in courts throughout the United States. His book Unfriendly Skies (1968) led to a "tale of Job-like proportions in which Stich deggedly filed private lawsuits against the FAA and eventually lost his business, money, home, and ultimately his liberty." He was imprisoned in 1986 for six months under charges of contempt of court.[1] The International Currency Review considers that Stich was a pioneer in exposing the crimes committed by the United States government and their concealment. Stich suffered harassment, was put in jail and destroyed financially by the United States federal government and its agents. The United States Federal government action was similar to that of the then USSR's persecution of its opponents.[2] Rodney Stich: Defrauding America As I have repeatedly shown in the book, Defrauding America, federal judges aid and abet these false charges by depriving the defendant of required defenses. http://www.serendipity.li/cia/stich1.html - 10k -
|
|
2 posts removed
|
|
Mary Montoya
AOL
|
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Once again, the meaning of your post is "I have nothing to refute you facts with". Understood. Simple minds. Mr. Obama is only appealing to those Boulder kind of women who don't shave their legs and some radical la raza Latinas . Most Colorado Mothers and Grand Mothers will support their kids chance to have a bright future by voting for Gov. Romney.
|
|
“Think,does it help or hurt?”
Since: Jul 09
" Because logic tells us so "
|
Please wait...
Mary Montoya wrote: <quoted text> Mr. Obama is only appealing to those Boulder kind of women who don't shave their legs and some radical la raza Latinas . Most Colorado Mothers and Grand Mothers will support their kids chance to have a bright future by voting for Gov. Romney. Sorry but all the current polls show that nationally Mr. Obama has the complete support of women! To the tune of 67%!!! Not making it up,just a fact! Sorry but you're wrong!
|
|
“Think,does it help or hurt?”
Since: Jul 09
" Because logic tells us so "
|
Please wait...
Mary Montoya wrote: <quoted text> Mr. Obama is only appealing to those Boulder kind of women who don't shave their legs and some radical la raza Latinas . Most Colorado Mothers and Grand Mothers will support their kids chance to have a bright future by voting for Gov. Romney. Bright future? Maybe Romneys magic underpants will help him? LOL
|
|
Razors Edge
Palos Hills, IL
|
pogue mahone wrote: Obama has no economic plan outside of taxing the wealthy and the middle class into oblivion with his vision of a Marxist America. The Communists could not conquer the USA militarily, so they tried subversion and deception: contaminate the education system, rewrite history to separate religion and politics as much as possible, pretend that the Founding Fathers were really atheists or deists so America was not founded as a Christian nation, excoriate religion and religious values as things to be kept in the closet (if anywhere), extol secular extremism and multiculturalism, substitute government-created rights to death, government-provided security and "equality" of circumstance through affirmative action and "reparations" for God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and create ACORN to organize the poor as political pawns and "muscle" in a campaign to win political control, by means both fair and foul. Obama is ACORN's and SEIU's choice because he is willing to implement as much of their agenda as possible (regardless of where he was born). He has carefully cultivated a non-threatening, Ivy League, "cool," young, hopeful, smart, half-black but also half white image that let him con enough voters with the cooperation of the liberal media establishment. The Reagan years set the Communists back and ACORN-backed Clinton did not have the kind of political power needed to be transformative, but the ACORN-created financial crisis, media malevolence, bad Republican campaign strategy and typical discontent with war (the British voted Churchill out of power before World War Ii finally ended) let Obama win much bigger than Clinton ever did and created the real possibility of catastrophic change. The liberal media establishment made Obama president by failing to scrutinize him and/or covering up for him and pretending that he was not the radical he is. Non-partisan National Journal rated Obama the most liberal United States Senator (even more liberal than avowed Socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont) because he earned that designation, by his votes. I do understand the Far Left wanna be Commies,Will absolutely hate all of the above? And will react to it by baseless personal attacks,name calling etc... But seeing that I do not give a flying F..k Who cares...LOL..Let us see if I am right..And lets look at the IQs of the Liberal Scumbags Intellects?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|