The President has failed us

Rico the 168 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
Positronium desire to run away is what's known as "white flight". People with positronium's mentality do not know how to assimilate with a change in demographics so they "white flight" out of the region. White flight is based on man made fears, xenophobia, racism and ignorance.
This is why you see so many racist in Arizona, it has much to do with the fact that these people white flighted out of California and they all wallow in a State that has demonstrated sheer intolerance for non-whites.
White flight, it's not joke.

I just don't understand the mind-set that allows a grown person to say..."this is my country, get out or I'm leaving".

I'm tired of arguing the point.

As far as I'm concerned they can get the hell out (if they can find a country that will take them) and the rest of us will "build it" without them.

;)

Rico the 168 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
Michael Myers is a fictional character sorta like you. Oink Oink!!!

then you better wake the he$$ up..........there is nothing fictional about my character nor MM's as I read!

No I liken my character to one with core values you know those virtues, like honesty, integrity, etc.! Rico...you should try being like that.........I bet you are and are just acting like you are stupid not in not in real character on here. you know fictional!

whatthey wrote:

<quoted text>then you better wake the he$$ up..........there is nothing fictional about my character nor MM's as I read!
No I liken my character to one with core values you know those virtues, like honesty, integrity, etc.! Rico...you should try being like that.........I bet you are and are just acting like you are stupid not in not in real character on here. you know fictional!

14.7 is a real character alright. A pathetic Lib moron shill.

In search of the bundlers.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-sunlight-fo...

Romney Has Not Disclosed His Campaign Bundlers -- There Oughta Be a Law Requiring It

As the pundits debate what the addition of Paul Ryan to the GOP presidential ticket means for the race, one sure thing the presumptive candidate for vice president brings to the campaign is a prodigious fundraising ability. According to Wednesday's Washington Post, as a mere congressional candidate, Ryan has raised more than $8 million for this year's election. That figure will soon be dwarfed when he starts dialing for dollars as a national candidate. But, it is safe to assume that, like the man at the top of the ticket, he will keep secret the identities of some of the most influential donors to the campaign -- the bundlers who raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in one fell swoop and get unprecedented access to the candidates in return.

President Obama, like presidential candidates on the right and left before him, voluntarily discloses his bundlers. Sunlight and others have called for the Romney campaign to do the same, but as with his tax returns, Romney seems unwilling to voluntarily disclose more than he is legally required to.

It would be nice to be able to trust our potential leaders to do the right thing, but since we can't, there oughta be a law. Conveniently enough, language to require disclosure bundler has already been written. Part of the Presidential Funding Act (S. 3312 and H.R. 414) would require presidential candidate committees to report the name, address, and employer of each person who provided 2 or more bundled contributions totaling $50,000 or more to the campaign, as well as the amount of the contributions.

Under current law, campaigns must publicly identify individuals who contribute $200 or more. Disclosure of bundlers who happen to be registered lobbyists is also required. The missing piece is disclosure of the elite individuals who have the ability to hit up their friends, family, neighbors and business associates to amass six figure contributions that make a big impact on candidates. Big enough to warrant weekly phone calls with the campaign, invitations to retreats with the candidates, the possibility of plum assignments like ambassadorships if the candidate is elected, and access to the leaders of the free world to attempt to influence them on policy.

Now that there is precedent, future presidential candidates may, like Romney, decide to keep secret the identity of their major funders. Rather than rely on candidates' moral compasses to steer them toward transparency, Congress should remove the option of secrecy and enact a law to require that presidential candidates disclose their bundlers.

NuRidersoftheePurpleSage wrote:

<quoted text>
Same here podnah, I liked Eastwood since his first bit part in "Tarantula!" 56' as the jet pilot who bombs the critter.
Taint taking political sides, just the same as telling a friend his zippers down so he don't get funned at. Anyways here's something from one of Clint's movies where again, advice was not well heeded.
"When you have to shoot, shoot don't talk."
http://youtu.be/sTcBgs2huRo
{The G B & the U}

Eastwood deserves credit for his life's work and I do believe there should be some deference to age, but his performance at the convention was uncomfortable to watch.

I just don't want to remember Clint Eastwood that way.

This morning even Ann Romney questioned the wisdom of scheduling that appearance just when the prime time audience was tuning in.

JackMcIntosh wrote:

<quoted text>
I just don't understand the mind-set that allows a grown person to say..."this is my country, get out or I'm leaving".
I'm tired of arguing the point.
As far as I'm concerned they can get the hell out (if they can find a country that will take them) and the rest of us will "build it" without them.
;)

Well, being as white as I am, even I have to hear the "go back to Mexico" crap all the time and I'm not even from there. Heck, I probably dislike that shithole country more than most of these radical anti-illegals but not for the fact that Mexicans are there but rather for what the Federales did to my convoy once upon a time in Baja California.

Anyways, you'll always hear some kind of ignorance from these people. I simply learned to take what they say, find their weakness and just pour salt on it.

What else can I do considering the fact that all they're here to do is to hate? I might as well turn them into a tool for my own enjoyment.

Rico the 168 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, that was a crime of opportunity gone horribly bad. The term Domestic Terrorism only applies when the gunman is white and especially right wing radical, racist, republican, conservative or christian.
Everyone knows this.

Is that according to big sis and her gal pal?

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>14.7 is a real character alright. A pathetic Lib moron shill.

Look at my IQ. It went up one point just becuase I was thinking of ways to end global warming. I am so smart.

Did you notice the way I spelled the word becuase?

LOL!!!!

JackMcIntosh wrote:

<quoted text>
Eastwood deserves credit for his life's work and I do believe there should be some deference to age, but his performance at the convention was uncomfortable to watch.
I just don't want to remember Clint Eastwood that way.
This morning even Ann Romney questioned the wisdom of scheduling that appearance just when the prime time audience was tuning in.

That's why the Republican party is in shambles. They're incompetent and the irony here is that they know it.

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>I get it just fine. You seem not to get it. Under the Obama program, it isn't the beneficiaries themselves who would receive less. In fact, a portion of that money would be plowed back into Medicare to cover the doughnut hole in prescription drug coverage.

We've been over and over this before. I showed you where you are wrong over and over and you still just keep repeating the same crap. Just to humor myself, I'll ask you the question again. How are beneficiaries not going to be affected when payments to hospitals, providers and medicare advantage (which is 11% more effective than regular medicare) are going to be reduced? What usually happens when you get less payment for services? I'll answer for you since you won't admit it. SERVICES WILL BE REDUCED!!!!! It has been proven, I have linked to the articles that showed it and here you are still posting the same old tired FALSE statements. That rock of yours sitting on your shoulders sure is a dense one.

whatthey wrote:

<quoted text>then you better wake the he$$ up..........there is nothing fictional about my character nor MM's as I read!
No I liken my character to one with core values you know those virtues, like honesty, integrity, etc.! Rico...you should try being like that.........I bet you are and are just acting like you are stupid not in not in real character on here. you know fictional!

Right, you have core values, like honesty, integrity, etc. I'm sure you sit on the left hand side of God also.

Out of curiously, have you ever gone on "virtual reality" vacations?

Rico the 169 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
Look at my IQ. It went up one point just becuase I was thinking of ways to end global warming. I am so smart.
Did you notice the way I spelled the word becuase?
LOL!!!!

Noe.

Clint Eastwood meets Chairry!!! LMFAO

http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd442/ric...

fishaholic wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that according to big sis and her gal pal?

Um.... Nope!!!!

NuRidersoftheePurpleSage wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, I like ol' Clint but seems he shoulda listened to one of his own quotes that night before he went on stage.
"A Man's Got To Know His Limitations"
http://youtu.be/_VrFV5r8cs0
[Magnum Force]

He came off as a wannabe drunken comedian. I can't wait to see the SNL sketch.

Rico the 169 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
Right, you have core values, like honesty, integrity, etc. I'm sure you sit on the left hand side of God also.
Out of curiously, have you ever gone on "virtual reality" vacations?

that would be a no Rico..........as all this ...well it is that fictioal stuff only you know about! only you Rico...Do not speak of God in this nonsencial way! THANKS...."curiously... as you are curious ...that is what you definately do!
Where are you off to next time? Please feel free to stay a little longer! WE will miss you!

fictional rico............fictional

Rico the 147 IQ Hispanic wrote:

<quoted text>
When we pay taxes to the government, those taxes by law become the property of the US government. It no longer belongs to the tax payer and any services the government renders such as the construction of roads & bridges is paid out by the US government so yea, he's going beyond stupid now.

WE build that. LOL!

The state, local, and fuel taxes (if any) that corporations pay are written off as a business expense.

President Starky wrote:

<quoted text>
Government has money?
Where did they get it?
And you call me stupid?
"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

Yup thangs is gettin Mo Bedda all the time. lolol

USMail XXXII wrote:

<quoted text>
He came off as a wannabe drunken comedian. I can't wait to see the SNL sketch.

I really look forward to that one!!