Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage

Judged:

5

4

4

John wrote:

Just because the gene pool produces defects does not mean it is a healthy or prominent American lifestyle. I try not to think about what they actually do with each others body parts. A revolting thought at best.
The g's should stay in their closets and stop the push to make the lifestyle seem normal.

Judged:

4

4

4

John wrote:

Just because the gene pool produces defects does not mean it is a healthy or prominent American lifestyle. I try not to think about what they actually do with each others body parts. A revolting thought at best.
The g's should stay in their closets and stop the push to make the lifestyle seem normal.

Judged:

4

4

4

Rogue Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
perhaps you're right... Hey can we do the same with fat smelly people? Maybe even skinny dorks and midgets? Such revolting imagery of those people having sex. Oh! Oh! And hairy Mexicans to!!!

Judged:

4

4

4

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>i don't know. Because we have no laws set up for it?

Judged:

4

4

4

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
In a way we do. One man, one ex-wife w/two kids, one current wife also with two kids, he's the biological father of all four. Each has a legal status in relationship to him. I thought read somewhere that there are polygamists who marry, divorce, and remarry, so that each wife/exwife will have some form of legal recognition.

Judged:

4

4

4

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
Did they have to? or did they not do so because bumper stickers didn't exist in the day? And just because they didn't have some symbol to identify with.......didn't make them any less who they were, right?

Judged:

4

4

4

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>yet the ex wives do not have the same legal ties to the current wife. Nice try, but you'll still have to keep your many wives in the dark for now. probably safer for you anyway...

Judged:

4

4

4

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose, mi amica
I knew you'd miss me. I do not believe modern concepts, values, norms, cultural beliefs, etc. can be, or should be projected into the past, regardless of the situation, or issue. The same hold true with the ssm. I've said in numerous posts same sex sexual behavior is not new. Various societies scattered throughout time and place have accepted and/or tolerated it. Some of those have even recognized same sex relationships, although that doesn't automatically mean they wete accepted as "marriage", and/or were on par with opposite sex marriage. SSM is a relatively recent, Western, creation. So is the idea of a "gay/lesbian/homosexual " identity. We need to keep that in mind when viewing the past.

Judged:

4

4

4

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Cute. Thanks for the laugh. I didn't say they had the same legal status, just that had a legal status in relation to the husband.

Judged:

4

4

4

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Adios Mio! Smeone get them some Nair and some workd visas...

Judged:

5

5

5

John wrote:

Just because the gene pool produces defects does not mean it is a healthy or prominent American lifestyle.

Judged:

5

5

5

John wrote:

Just because the gene pool produces defects does not mean it is a healthy or prominent American lifestyle. I try not to think about what they actually do with each others body parts. A revolting thought at best.
The g's should stay in their closets and stop the push to make the lifestyle seem normal.

Judged:

5

5

5

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
It is? Sure. When the church refuses, the gays are gonna cry "discrimination!!!"

Judged:

5

5

5

RiversideRedneck wrote:

According to geneticist Simon Levay in 1996, "Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities.
Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity. It is much more prolific in humans.

Judged:

5

5

5

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
You're confusing our demand for equal rights as a desire to be seen as normal. These are two distinct things. Frankly, you'd honor me if you would never consider me anything close to "normal". Why would I want to be like you?

Judged:

5

5

5

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
I bet you got your ass kicked a lot! HAHAHA you deserve it.

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice dodge. Don't be scared, give it shot.
Why should we alter the marriage requirements/laws for one group, but not for another? Bigamy laws can be changed, or eliminated. What makes the same sex argument superior, more compelling, better, than the plural marriage argument?

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Woody
Perhaps I didn't communicate my point clearly. Two men, and/or two women are not going to interact as would a man, and a woman. The institution of marriage is built on the m/f relationship. SSM is a virtual recent invention. There's no deep, historical, cultural, traditional, religious, etc. same sex marriage institution. Thus one has to be developed as time passes.

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Rose, mi amica
I knew you'd miss me. I do not believe modern concepts, values, norms, cultural beliefs, etc. can be, or should be projected into the past, regardless of the situation, or issue. The same hold true with the ssm. I've said in numerous posts same sex sexual behavior is not new. Various societies scattered throughout time and place have accepted and/or tolerated it. Some of those have even recognized same sex relationships, although that doesn't automatically mean they wete accepted as "marriage", and/or were on par with opposite sex marriage. SSM is a relatively recent, Western, creation. So is the idea of a "gay/lesbian/homosexual " identity. We need to keep that in mind when viewing the past.

Judged:

5

5

5

RiversideRedneck wrote:

Homosexual activists attempt to portray their lifestyle as normal and healthy, and insist that homosexual relationships are the equivalent in every way to their heterosexual counterparts. Hollywood and the media relentlessly propagate the image of the fit, healthy, and well-adjusted homosexual. The reality is quite opposite to this caricature which was recently conceded by the homosexual newspaper New York Blade News:
www.frc.org/get.cfm...