McCain picks Palin as Veep nominee

Capt Crunch wrote:

<quoted text>So Pumpkin would be a saint if she adopted the baby of crack crazed prostitute, but would be insane to keep and care for a disabled child of her own. If you Californians with an ounce of brains would read your posts before putting them here they may be worded differently. But then I was talking about Californians with an ounce of brains, and not about you.

Wow, you Retardlicans always miss every point with common sense attached to it...yeah, pumkin would be a saint if she were willing to care for a child that is already THERE in existence and is need of critical care...not have one that she knows is going to be severely challenged ahead of time, that is why almost 90% of down syndrome babies in utero are aborted, the best and most moral choice that should be made...the biggest problem with immoral selfish fools like yourself who willingly have disabled children, is that you want to impose your will on the rest of us by wanting to abolish Abortion rights, and calling yourselves pro life, regardless of the quality and geniune care of that life...the only way to accomodate both sides of the issue is to ALWAYS have abortion as a LEGAL and unrevokable right to ALL women, if you dont' want an abortion, then don't get one...but don't force the rest of us to live in your unrealistic land of rainbows and bunnies and money growing on trees...not everyone should be born, period...and please tell me, when these down syndrome babies are born, do you want to let them get free government money to get cared for? I mean you Retardlicans are the ones who don't think people should get welfare or government help right, well, these disabled children get government assistance in the form of SSI and SSA, and disability checks, not to mention low income health insurance, that my dear is called WELFARE!!~!!!!, you hypocritical Rubes, want every life born, and moan and gripe about the government paying the tab.....HOW MORONIC????

Calvin wrote:

<quoted text>
And you think us liberals are quickly sucked in..
24 months ago she was the equivalent of the Mayor of International Falls. She was elected Governor by fewer voters than people who live in the greater Duluth area.
And now she is the messiah of the paradigm shift for the most influential country in the world?
Whew....

LOLOLOL...I have been political since I was 10...maybe 8 years old.(Huntley/Brinkly).
I didnt think Mr Mcaian would make sucha Great! Move...but after watching a week of Obermeister and Matshoes, I can see why he did.

No sir Cal, us 2nd Ammendment types knew about Mrs Palin......

But that He Picked her...Brilliant!

Capt Crunch wrote:

<quoted text>It's not about the size of the pond ,it's about the size of the frog, and she is HUGE!

Senator Biden...Population Delaware....853476

Gov. Palin...Population Alaska......670000

Monday, July 28, 2008
Palin's approval ratings still sky-high

A poll conducted last week by the Hays Research Group shows that Gov. Palin's approval rating is still an astronomical 80%!

Jacki_Ho wrote:

<quoted text> Wow, you Retardlicans always miss every point with common sense attached to it...yeah, pumkin would be a saint if she were willing to care for a child that is already THERE in existence and is need of critical care...not have one that she knows is going to be severely challenged ahead of time, that is why almost 90% of down syndrome babies in utero are aborted, the best and most moral choice that should be made...the biggest problem with immoral selfish fools like yourself who willingly have disabled children, is that you want to impose your will on the rest of us by wanting to abolish Abortion rights, and calling yourselves pro life, regardless of the quality and geniune care of that life...the only way to accomodate both sides of the issue is to ALWAYS have abortion as a LEGAL and unrevokable right to ALL women, if you dont' want an abortion, then don't get one...but don't force the rest of us to live in your unrealistic land of rainbows and bunnies and money growing on trees...not everyone should be born, period...and please tell me, when these down syndrome babies are born, do you want to let them get free government money to get cared for? I mean you Retardlicans are the ones who don't think people should get welfare or government help right, well, these disabled children get government assistance in the form of SSI and SSA, and disability checks, not to mention low income health insurance, that my dear is called WELFARE!!~!!!!, you hypocritical Rubes, want every life born, and moan and gripe about the government paying the tab.....HOW MORONIC????

You liberals always think in one way. Who is going to come along and clean up the mess that I have made. You are a perfect example. Not a bit interested in the gruesome choices made by the person who opted for drugs and pregnancy, but harshley critical of anyone who doesn;t volunteer to follow the elephants with a broom and dustpan. why should the goverment(me) have to pay for the stupidity of those without remorse or conscience. I realize that you are from California, and are subject to all sorts of weird realities, but this is going to far.

I had my first child at 34 and my second child at 36. I am a very strong educated woman, but there was NO WAY that I could have been running for VP and taking care of my two babies. I really feel very sorry for her. In her heart she is probably sick. Shame on McCain for asking her.

Palin has all the assets Clinton lacks and is a lot easier to look at.

DJE wrote:

I had my first child at 34 and my second child at 36. I am a very strong educated woman, but there was NO WAY that I could have been running for VP and taking care of my two babies. I really feel very sorry for her. In her heart she is probably sick. Shame on McCain for asking her.

Narad and NOW must just hate you

DJE wrote:

I had my first child at 34 and my second child at 36. I am a very strong educated woman, but there was NO WAY that I could have been running for VP and taking care of my two babies.

That's why McCain didn't ask you to run. Good luck with your life.

Senator Eagleton 1972. All over again.

Jacki_Ho wrote:

Don't worry Capt.Crunch, cuz' us "Scum of the Earth Dems" understand the frailties of the undereducated, weakminded, gun toting shoot-em-first-n-ask-questions -later, uber **** Retardlicans like you....you will still get your SSI check from us Librals when Obama takes office, so you can pay for your shack, your shotgun, and the rocking chair you fire it from at every squirrel and darkie this side of Kentucky....Obama/Biden 2008,2012,so on and so forth...besides your hard headed little lady Sarah Baracuda from Alaska is so stubborn and foolish that she chose to have a child that is going to be severly challenged in this world that is already difficult enought, all to walk the line on her pro-life position. Talk about politics being more important than common sense. If I was a down syndrome baby and my mom was told at around 3 or 4 months about my diagnosis, I would say, vacuum and chuck me. That's a hard and crappy life that I wouldn't want and I've been around a few special needs kids myself, it's not happy joy land. I have taken care of a bed patient for 9 years as well..and it's just too darn hard, and she wasn't born that way, a disease was what affected her after many years of suffering with early stages...but to have the choice to not let an innocent child suffer for your ridiculous and moral beliefs but still have that child anyway...well that's pathetic and selfish.

Wow, you are very convincing. I have spent my life adamantly pro-life, as has my wife.
Reading your post, we just saw the exception. Oops, is it to late for a late term abortion? How tall are you,,lol....

DJE wrote:

I had my first child at 34 and my second child at 36. I am a very strong educated woman, but there was NO WAY that I could have been running for VP and taking care of my two babies. I really feel very sorry for her. In her heart she is probably sick. Shame on McCain for asking her.

Well, to be consistent, don't you think it is terrible that Obama is running for President, also. After all, he has two young children, also.

AS IS EVIDENT BY SOME OF THE COMMENTS ON THESE BLOGS, ALL OF THE BLACK RACISTS SUPPORT OBAMA. NOW A NEW STUDY SHOWS THAT THE WHITE RACISTS SUPPORT HIM, ALSO. NOW, ISN'T THAT SPECIAL ...

White Supremacists for Obama
Posted By: Gary Detman 1 hr ago

NBCNC -- Senator Barack Obama became the first African-American to accept the Democratic party's nomination for president Thursday.

The historic event prompted a Montgomery, Alabama civil rights organization to gauge how white supremacists might react to an Obama presidency.

A Southern Poverty Law Center investigation shows most white supremacist groups support Obama's candidacy.

It's not the result they expected.

"What was really unexpected was that a very large number of white supremacists, including some of their intellectual leaders, like David Duke, were saying actually, this could be a good thing for us," explained the SPLC's Mark Potok.

Potok heads the Intelligence Project, which monitors hate groups nationwide.

SO I GUESS IT REALLY IS TRUE. OBAMA IS TRULY A “UNITER”... OF ALL OF THE HATE GROUPS.

ANOTHER LIE TOLD BY OBAMA AND HIS SUPPORTERS, IS THAT HE VOTED AGAINST THE INFANT BORN ALIVE LEGISLATION BECAUSE ILLINOIS LAW ALREADY PROTECTED THESE LIVE BABIES. That is patently false. When Jill Stanek, an advocate for the rights of these babies, approached the state Attorney General of Illinois, he reviewed the legality of the “live birth abortions” which were taking place in a number of hospitals in Illinois. After several months, he issued a finding that Christ Hospital (which was one of these hospitals) was doing nothing illegal under the laws of Illinois. Under Illinois law, he said, doctors had no ethical or legal obligation to treat these premature babies. Under the law in Illinois at the time, although these babies were living outside their mother’s womb, they were non-persons. This decision by Attorney General Ryan was partly based upon a 1993 case, Herbst v. Jack O’Malley, wherein the court permanently enjoined (i.e. prevented the enforcement of) large segments of the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975, including provisions of the law which dealt with live births.(And yes, this law is the very one that Obama cites on his website, and which he contends already protected these innocent babies from the cruel death that awaited them – 720 ILCS 510.) So, the Born-Alive Infant Protection legislation was introduced into the Illinois legislature to protect these live babies from being killed or left to die.

I’m sure Obama is not finished changing his story yet, however, one thing is clear: HE MAY THINK THAT HE CAN RUN FROM HIS RECORD, BUT IN TRUTH, HE CANNOT HIDE.

Here is a link to the Herbst v. Jack O’Malley case enjoining enforcement of certain provisions of the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975:
http://www.aclu-il.org/legal/courtdocuments/h...

Hey,

Mcain doesn't need viagra or a mistress,
He has Palin!

Capt Crunch wrote:

<quoted text> but harshley critical of anyone who doesn;t volunteer to follow the elephants with a broom and dustpan. why should the goverment(me) have to pay for the stupidity of those without remorse or conscience.

In the case of our Republican Administration, we are going to need massive front-end loaders and 175-ton dump trucks to clean up after the Elephant ends it run on January 20.

We taxpayers will be in debt to China for decades, paying for "the stupidity of those without remorse or conscience."

McCain's lame choice should be the final nail in his electoral coffin. Did he really expect that Democratic women would flock to him in droves because he picked an unknown Republican woman?

Jacki_Ho wrote:

Dearest Dumbkin, I mean Pumkin,
You are a sad and nieve person to think that every one wants to be born with disabilities and that it's a wonderful and joyful existence...It's one thing to not know, such as in maybe, 1918 when women had jack diddly rights, much less the ability to see what the fetus they are carrying will have in the form of crippling genetic defects: but to know with 100% proof, early enough to have the abortion to spare a cruel and difficult life for this poor child...is INSANE and disgusting...the person who forces such a life upon an innocent being, now that is the act of a VILE person...and maybe your mom would have vacuumed and chucked you if she had any sense...why don't you go home school some down syndrome childen stuck in the foster care system, or hell better yet, go adopt a crack baby from some innner city born to an African American prostitute...that would be terrific and you would be a saint with the ability to handle the unbelievably difficult task of caring for a child and future disabled adult like that..then come and tell me how wrong and vile I am , and how every life should be forced to be birthed out despite it's extreme difficulties....YOU are truly a conservative Retardlican...Good day!

Oh I get it, it's all about the womans right to choose except if the baby might not be perfect then they are vile. My sister had tests done and was told the same thing as Gov Palin. Sam is 4 years old now and is doing great with no problems. Speaking of vile, why don't you crack a vile of cyanide open and take a gulp. As you are obviously mentally impared.

Calvin wrote:

<quoted text>
And you think us liberals are quickly sucked in..
24 months ago she was the equivalent of the Mayor of International Falls. She was elected Governor by fewer voters than people who live in the greater Duluth area.
And now she is the messiah of the paradigm shift for the most influential country in the world?
Whew....

And as little as 31/2 years ago your messiah won by 52% of the vote and nobody had heard of him.

Madman wrote:

<quoted text>
In the case of our Republican Administration, we are going to need massive front-end loaders and 175-ton dump trucks to clean up after the Elephant ends it run on January 20.
We taxpayers will be in debt to China for decades, paying for "the stupidity of those without remorse or conscience."
McCain's lame choice should be the final nail in his electoral coffin. Did he really expect that Democratic women would flock to him in droves because he picked an unknown Republican woman?

No, he doesn't expect them to flock to him in droves, because he considers them to be human beings and not cattle, as you seem to regard them. However, a certain number of women will resent the treatment of Hillary by Obama, and vote for a more humane person, John McCain.

I don't see her as a saint for keeping her child , BUT she is NOT QUALIFIED to be vice president.And she is just a glorified barbie TOO SICKLY SWEET

JLH01 wrote:

I don't see her as a saint for keeping her child , BUT she is NOT QUALIFIED to be vice president.And she is just a glorified barbie TOO SICKLY SWEET

SO are you voting for Franken who has ZERO, Zip, Nada experince?