|
x-nutmegger
Phoenix, AZ
|
Nuggin wrote: <quoted text> The act allows loggers to clear trees which are in the way to the trees they are permitted to log. It's sort of like if I wanted to bulldoze a house at the end of the street and took out every house between here and there because they were "in the way". And, forests do not need to be "thinned". Trees have been around A LOT longer than chainsaws. Most of the forests evolved (yes, evolution is a real thing) to deal with periodic forest fires. In fact, there are several species of tree which can not reproduce WITHOUT forest fires. Bullshit. I've seen it first hand in the forest on the Mongollon Rim in Az. Previously a forest service type would paint mark trees to be thinned out plus deadwood could be harvested. Since the LOONIES stopped it from happening many jobs were lost and the built up brush and crowded trees cause major foreet fires. Not only that but the fires consume many wild life species plus raise havoc on private property nearby. As to controlled forest fires ...yes ... but not the uncontrolled havoc the Tree Huggers have created. The Native American tribes were using a system of clearing brush , tree harvesting and controlled burnouts long before the Euros came here.
|
|
Samuel
Front Royal, VA
|
I didnt know Herman Cain is racist. Well Morgan Freeman was god, I guess he does really know.
|
|
Frank Rizzo
Santa Rosa, CA
|
Nuggin wrote: <quoted text> So you're "small government" solution is to continue to try and suppress fires forever? We had a BIG fire here just a year or two ago. Lots of trees died. Lots of trees didn't. The brush is growing back. There won't be another huge fire in that forest for a long time - now. Stop trying to "fix" the forests by cutting them down. <quoted text> I was going to until I read the last line. If you can ask like an adult and stop with the insults then I'll provide you with the information. I'm tried of dealing with children. Just as I thought. You don't have any supporting evidence to support anything you say. You're just talking out of your big, liberal ass. Not only that, you try to change the subject because it's become even more evident that you don't know what you're talking about. A.L. made the point. Liberals create decieving names for every policy and law they propose, and even the groups they put together.
|
|
Last Republican in MA
Marlborough, MA
|
Yet another tiresome example of a Hollywood Liberal Bigot who doesn't get out much beyond the Hollywood fantasy sets . . .
|
|
1 post removed
|
|
obumbalamumbala
Aurora, CO
|
pamiety wrote: <quoted text> If a white person is a Conservative and didn't or won't vote for a black Liberal candidate that's not racist. If a white Liberal won't vote for a black Liberal because of his race then that's racist. Since the majority of blacks are Liberal why would we vote for Cain? If we did vote for him because of his race that would would be racist. I wouldn't vote for Trump because he's a businessman so the same applies for Cain. A well to do businessman and radio personality doesn't cut it for presidency. and a community organizer with a nefarious past did?
|
|
“gay is OK”
Since: Dec 07
Denver
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
kalon wrote: <quoted text> You're not getting it. Because if we'd had a small government that doesn't interfere then Ike wouldn't have sent troops into Little Rock and our schools would not today be integrated. Had we had a small government when JFK was pres he could not have sent help to black students in Birmingham and those water hoses and dogs would have wiped out the civil rights movement. I could go on but I'll stop at those two examples. But it's not just anti-racists. Had we had a small government we would not have built the Hoover Damn, the Interstate Hiway system, our nations air traffic control system, OR SENT AMERICANS TO THE MOON AND BACK! Sometimes you just gotta pay your taxes and sit back and marvel at how wonderful America really is! Hogwash, you're examples are bunk. Define "small"
|
|
Frank Rizzo
Santa Rosa, CA
|
obumbalamumbala wrote: <quoted text> and a community organizer with a nefarious past did? LOL. What about a Hollywood actor who once made a film called, "Bedtime for Bonzo?" Bonzo was a chimpanzee. LOL What's wrong with a business man for President. If Obozo had had any real business experience, he probably would have done a better job as President....The business of America IS BUSINESS...it's not the crap Obozo has been pushing, that's for certain.
|
|
“gay is OK”
Since: Dec 07
Denver
|
Please wait...
Frank Rizzo wrote: <quoted text> LOL. What about a Hollywood actor who once made a film called, "Bedtime for Bonzo?" Bonzo was a chimpanzee. LOL What's wrong with a business man for President. If Obozo had had any real business experience, he probably would have done a better job as President....The business of America IS BUSINESS...it's not the crap Obozo has been pushing, that's for certain. Nothings wrong to have a businessman being pres. I said 4 years ago it should have been Romney. I like Cain, but Obaumbles has made me a little suspicious of blacks.
|
|
|
|
“Hang 'em High”
Since: Sep 11
Commie Fake, Phony, & Fraud
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Frank Rizzo wrote: <quoted text> LOL. What about a Hollywood actor who once made a film called, "Bedtime for Bonzo?" Bonzo was a chimpanzee. LOL What's wrong with a business man for President. If Obozo had had any real business experience, he probably would have done a better job as President....The business of America IS BUSINESS...it's not the crap Obozo has been pushing, that's for certain. It'll be Bedtime for Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Onyango in 2012.
|
|
Since: Sep 07
Los Angeles, CA
|
Please wait...
x-nutmegger wrote: <quoted text> Bullshit. I've seen it first hand in the forest on the Mongollon Rim in Az. Previously a forest service type would paint mark trees to be thinned out plus deadwood could be harvested. Since the LOONIES stopped it from happening many jobs were lost and the built up brush and crowded trees cause major foreet fires. Not only that but the fires consume many wild life species plus raise havoc on private property nearby. As to controlled forest fires ...yes ... but not the uncontrolled havoc the Tree Huggers have created. The Native American tribes were using a system of clearing brush , tree harvesting and controlled burnouts long before the Euros came here. Well, I guess your partial first hand experience of one specific situation clearly outweighs everything everyone else has seen or done. What specifically is "bullshit"? The fact that we had a fire near me? The fact that some of the tries died and some of the trees lives? The fact that there are species of tree which require fire to reproduce? Or maybe it's your claim that wildfires couldn't happen if it weren't for people trying to prevent clear cutting of forests. Yeah, that's a convincing point. Only through clear cutting are we able to "protect" the forest. LOL. Seriously, do you even listen to yourself?
|
|
Since: Sep 07
Los Angeles, CA
|
Please wait...
Frank Rizzo wrote: <quoted text> Just as I thought. You don't have any supporting evidence to support anything you say. You're just talking out of your big, liberal ass. Not only that, you try to change the subject because it's become even more evident that you don't know what you're talking about. A.L. made the point. Liberals create decieving names for every policy and law they propose, and even the groups they put together. I asked you to behave like an adult and you continue to spout filth. You can make whatever claim you like, the fact of hte matter is, you are acting like children. And, like children, the adults just shake their heads and say "Well, one day they will grow up". So, keep making your childish remarks all you want. Eventually you'll mature out of this faze, then we can have a real conversation addressing real issues. Until then "poopy doo doo" back to you.
|
|
Since: Sep 07
Los Angeles, CA
|
Please wait...
obumbalamumbala wrote: <quoted text> and a community organizer with a nefarious past did? What is your specific objection to "community organizer"? That was the big thing at the RNC a few years back. "Community Organizer" as if that were a bad thing. So, the tea party is against grass roots? Is that what you want us to believe? Seriously, do you even KNOW why you guys think what you think? Here's some examples: 1) Why do you have grass roots community organization? 2) Why are you afraid of 'death panels' and cheering for the death of the uninsured? 3) Why do your candidates want to re-instate "don't ask/don't tell" in order to keep sexual orientation out of the army's consideration. That action is the opposite of the goal states? 4) Why are you guys "pro-life" but cheer for the execution of the mentally retarded? 5) Why are you against gay marriage and for smaller government? What is more big government than a government that tells you who you can or can not marry?
|
|
Since: Sep 07
Los Angeles, CA
|
Please wait...
dont snow me wrote: <quoted text> Nothings wrong to have a businessman being pres. I said 4 years ago it should have been Romney. I like Cain, but Obaumbles has made me a little suspicious of blacks. And explain to me again how you aren't racist?
|
|
“Obama's YouTubeGate”
Since: Mar 09
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
|
Please wait...
Let Nuggin talk to himself, that's basically what he's been doing all along. No one takes him seriously ...except maybe himself.
Buhbye, Nuggin have fun playing with yourself...
|
|
Frank Rizzo
Santa Rosa, CA
|
American_Infidel wrote: Let Nuggin talk to himself, that's basically what he's been doing all along. No one takes him seriously ...except maybe himself. Buhbye, Nuggin have fun playing with yourself... When he loses the debate, he cries like a baby and complains about children or something. He's a child himself - a juvenile who runs away whenever he can't prove his point or refute someone else's point. Sort of like Obama really - A man-child.
|
|
“Obama's YouTubeGate”
Since: Mar 09
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
|
Please wait...
Frank Rizzo wrote: <quoted text> When he loses the debate, he cries like a baby and complains about children or something. He's a child himself - a juvenile who runs away whenever he can't prove his point or refute someone else's point. Sort of like Obama really - A man-child. Exactly!
|
|
Since: Jan 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
It was a white guy that really put the dolphin's tail back on. You better ask somebody. Ask Morgan if he really like's pushing black propaganda.
|
|
Since: Jan 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
|
|
GBA
Madison Heights, MI
|
Half-Black Hitler wrote: <quoted text> Only real RACIST in America are WHITE lib Progressive Subversives that HATE their OWN skin, race, country and culture. Dead bang on.
|
|
GBA
Madison Heights, MI
|
kalon wrote: <quoted text> Cain's mother cleaned houses,Cain's father was a Chauffer. Facts (okay, like most people I read what others write. I didn't persoanlly check to see if that is true. But don't you and the rest of here also do this?) Fact, most black children of maids of chauffers don't finish high school, much less go to college. thus it is reasonable to assume that someone helped Mr. Cain get into Morehouse. You are completely wrong is thinking liberals had very litte or nothing to do with today's civil rights movement. Liberals -black and white- had EVERYTHING to do with today's civil rights gains. Like you, I don't know since most of us on this blog don't know that much about Mr. Cain. In fact, I'm learning way too much about him. I'm not a conservative thus I'll probably never vote for him. The only reason I'm commenting at all is because you Tea Party people have used this black man to try to "prove" you are not a bunch of racists. Good try by you all, but no cigars. Blah blah blah. The most racist statement ever made "a black man or woman isn't smart enough or hard working enough to make it on their own without a white liberal handout".
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|