A look at what Ohio voters are saying about Obama

Judged:

3

3

2

Duke for Mayor wrote:

Every time Romney speaks on camera, his numbers slide.
Maybe its the result of something else.
Yeah.
woof

Judged:

1

1

1

liza wrote:

DID any o you listen to what Obama said in N.H.
today? If you get the chance, I can't promise
you that you will not vomit..
He told you what his 4 yrs., has been all about.
That should hold you until you get to the bathroom.
And he did give Romeny the real dirt, you know
the way he can ruin people. Those N.H. people
were shouting "4 more Years" Looks like "we
the people" are in for some really bad times
for awhile.....LIES is our slogan for a ONCE
great place to live.....HES for solveing all
our programs.....and he will be saving YOU money..
WHAT MONEY?

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
The original Constitution left the right of votes (and laws on who votes) to the states.

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan Salazar wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry. Loving Parents and Grand Parents will swarm to the polling places to replace Obama with Romney/Ryan. America is about to rise above Obama's Orwellian Nightmare.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a possibility.
Can you back that up?

Judged:

1

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
So? The original constitution didn't allow for voting for non-whites, women, or men under 21 either. What's your point?
(The phrase "original constitution" is a bit of a trap as well. There is only one constitution.)

Judged:

1

1

1

liza wrote:

DID any o you listen to what Obama said in N.H.
today? If you get the chance, I can't promise
you that you will not vomit..
He told you what his 4 yrs., has been all about.
That should hold you until you get to the bathroom.
And he did give Romeny the real dirt, you know
the way he can ruin people. Those N.H. people
were shouting "4 more Years" Looks like "we
the people" are in for some really bad times
for awhile.....LIES is our slogan for a ONCE
great place to live.....HES for solveing all
our programs.....and he will be saving YOU money..
WHAT MONEY?

Judged:

1

1

1

UdintBuildThat wrote:

<quoted text>
.
The only people that should vote are those that have paid revenue. Great incentive for one to get some skin in the game. A form 1040 should be ones voter ID. Instantly verified at the polling place.

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
The original Constitution left the right of votes (and laws on who votes) to the states.

Judged:

1

1

1

UdintBuildThat wrote:

PIGH as long as you want to talk about the military, talk about the seals who told Obama, "YOU DIDN'T KILL BIN LADIN!"
.
ROFLMAO

Judged:

1

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
So? The original constitution didn't allow for voting for non-whites, women, or men under 21 either. What's your point?
(The phrase "original constitution" is a bit of a trap as well. There is only one constitution.)

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots
August 6, 2012 | 8:00 pm
In the eyes of the Obama administration, most Democratic lawmakers, and left-leaning editorial pages across the country, voter fraud is a problem that doesn't exist. Allegations of fraud, they say, are little more than pretexts conjured up by Republicans to justify voter ID laws designed to suppress Democratic turnout.
That argument becomes much harder to make after reading a discussion of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race in "Who's Counting?", a new book by conservative journalist John Fund and former Bush Justice Department official Hans von Spakovsky. Although the authors cover the whole range of voter fraud issues, their chapter on Minnesota is enough to convince any skeptic that there are times when voter fraud not only exists but can be critical to the outcome of a critical race.
In the '08 campaign, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman was running for re-election against Democrat Al Franken. It was impossibly close; on the morning after the election, after 2.9 million people had voted, Coleman led Franken by 725 votes.
Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman's lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.
During the controversy a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons -- all ineligible to vote -- who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race.
Minnesota Majority took the information to prosecutors across the state, many of whom showed no interest in pursuing it. But Minnesota law requires authorities to investigate such leads. And so far, Fund and von Spakovsky report, 177 people have been convicted -- not just accused, but convicted -- of voting fraudulently in the Senate race. Another 66 are awaiting trial. "The numbers aren't greater," the authors say, "because the standard for convicting someone of voter fraud in Minnesota is that they must have been both ineligible, and 'knowingly' voted unlawfully." The accused can get off by claiming not to have known they did anything wrong.
Still, that's a total of 243 people either convicted of voter fraud or awaiting trial in an election that was decided by 312 votes. With 1,099 examples identified by Minnesota Majority, and with evidence suggesting that felons, when they do vote, strongly favor Democrats, it doesn't require a leap to suggest there might one day be proof that Al Franken was elected on the strength of voter fraud.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/york-when-1099-...

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
No, there are several Constitutions as it has been amended over the years. Every amendment and idiotic ruling by some activists judges makes major change. Usually it's the direct opposite of what our founders intended.

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
No, there are several Constitutions as it has been amended over the years. Every amendment and idiotic ruling by some activists judges makes major change. Usually it's the direct opposite of what our founders intended.

Judged:

1

1

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
The founders intended that women not be allowed to vote and that black people should be enslaved.
You for that?