Local News: Seattle, WA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

'Joe the Plumber' links deaths of Jews in Nazi Germany, gun control, in Ohio campaign video

Posted in the US Politics Forum

Read

471 Comments

More US Politics Discussions »

Comments (Page 11)

Showing posts 201 - 220 of471
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
liza

Bridgeport, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#221
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

If you were born stupid, the chances are: you will
remain that way for life.
Never have I seen more Americans as dumb as they
are now. Read and learn, what a laugh you are,
except when you speak
South beach

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#222
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Makes sense wrote:
Oh dear, he's dimmer than Palin. We're cooked.
Palin is brilliant as far as conning the easily conned , not only does she do it well but has been doing it for years.

Not a single idea or solution .Only empty after the fact comments and silly talking points but it works for her and hypocrite Bristol.

Sarah "PAC" makes my point and lets add those who still pay to hear her empty jibberish.
rider

Marquette, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#223
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

JohnInLa wrote:
Yepper the forum's usual suspects are at it again, posting one sentence garbage because that's the full extent of their knowledge. To assume those morons comprehend anything about WWII and the Holocaust is indeed a bad assumption. The fools are so politically inept they do not realize their votes for obama amounts to trading a grandfather's priceless Stradivarius for a shiny new whistle and some chump change. A pluckhead who does that needs a boot up their behind. So to each of the usual suspects...GFY.
edarem - Cry - YouTube
Apr 17, 2009 ... Johnny Ray's #1 hit in the 50"s ---------- If your sweetheart sends a letter of
goodbye It's no ... So let your hair down and go right on and cry ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch... - 152k -
1 post removed
CC Ryder

West Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#225
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

realitycheck wrote:
<quoted text> Well thank you for expressing a big reason to reduce this centralized power. It's time to reduce govt. to only the bare essentials. A smaller govt. would be easier for the people to manage. I'd like to see annual audits from a neutral citizen action group. Restore the middle class and let small and medium businesses grow and return to the marketplace. Let the people keep more of their money and let the poor learn how to earn. Rather than throwing money at a problem, let's throw our humanity at it. Let people help people without the govt. or some money grubbing attorney getting in the way. The libs have proven their way is a disaster. We've seen it in Europe and now the United States. We need to swing to the other extreme but it may take a couple administrations to wean the people from the teat. I'd rather do it ourselves than have it done by economic collapse and ruin.
exactly
1 post removed
rider

Marquette, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#227
Jun 23, 2012
 
The Washington Times, June 29, 1989 (Front page story ...
Jun 29, 1989 ... The June 29, 1989 issue of The Washington Times newspaper seen below was
gathered up and collected from news stands and newspaper ...

http://educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoveru... - 44k -
CC Ryder

West Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#228
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? What about the legislation that banned assault weapons? Oh and by the way, "assault weapons" sounds soooo sinister. It is simply defined as a semi-automatic( fires once each time you pull the trigger) rifle that holds more than 10 rounds.
What about limiting handgun magazines to 10 rounds or less? If you run I to a gang that has a dozen members, I guess you can feel good about taking out ten of them before being killed by the last two.
What I find strange is that most of the people here that think Obama doesn't want to take our guns haven't read the anti-gun bills he put his name to while he was in the senate.
Do they really believe that he has changed his mind about what he signed back then?
realitycheck

Carmel, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#229
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

StarsplashTaiwan wrote:
<quoted text>
A president is basically a tyrannical leader anyways. Everything goes through him and he decides what is to be done.
Clearly, ur patriotism and ur hatred for Obama is just turning you stupid.
We have never had a president sht on our constitution in the way obama has. We have never had a racist president in a post racial society. We have never had a president who has lied and deceived since Nixon although that pales to what obama and his administration have done. I'm afraid the mindless carper that you are does not allow you to realize that you've swallowed the stupid pill hook, line and sinker.
realitycheck

Carmel, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#230
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

CC Ryder wrote:
<quoted text>
What I find strange is that most of the people here that think Obama doesn't want to take our guns haven't read the anti-gun bills he put his name to while he was in the senate.
Do they really believe that he has changed his mind about what he signed back then?
obama is a power monger liberal elite hell bent on destroying the US Constitution. He is only interested in incorporating his socialist policies on the backs of middle and upper middle class Americans. He wants to centralize more power and create a govt. that will have more control over what were once a free people. It's really sad to see so many Americans fall into his clutches like flies in a spider's web. Let's hope more will wake up before it's too late.
realitycheck

Carmel, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#231
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

South beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Palin is brilliant as far as conning the easily conned , not only does she do it well but has been doing it for years.
Not a single idea or solution .Only empty after the fact comments and silly talking points but it works for her and hypocrite Bristol.
Sarah "PAC" makes my point and lets add those who still pay to hear her empty jibberish.
No doubt you're looking for someone who is 'full' of empty promises and lies. No wonder you're a supporter of obama. You have fallen prey to the liberal elite media and representatives who have peddled their sack of lies to you. The feed bag is in place.....you are content and oblivious to the food processing plant.
realitycheck

Carmel, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#232
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Tea Party nothing, Walker was a Republican and Republicans came out in droves to re-elect what was elected legally in the first place. This was a bad strategy by Democrats, now the next election ain't gonna go so well for them now that their cards have been played.
Not true at all. Dems are very skilled at 'acquiring' votes. Not only that, obama may be able to ship in enough Mexicans to get the job done. The media will influence enough gullible, dependent and stupid people to vote for obama. They outnumber the sensible. This election is not going to be an easy victory for either party although obama has an advantage.

Since: Sep 08

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#233
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

5

4

3

Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
How did we get on Armenians? I didn't see that anywhere in this conversation until now.
Yes, Hitler gave the "For the first time in history" speech about having complete gun control. Guess what happened next?
And you should worry about your second amendment rights being challenged. The UN wants world wide gun control. Some politicians in America agree with them. Now that the government "ratifies" without We The People, you should be very concerned.
More paranoid nonsense. There hasn't been a gun control ruling come out of the Supreme Court that allows for confiscation or preventing lawful citizens from purchasing the vast majority of guns. Hell the John Birchers and all their bastard off-spring been spewing that BULLSH!T about the UN for 60+ years. "some politicians." Just for the hell of it, can you name (and cite a quote and source) of ANY state or federal politician who in the last 50 years has advocated gun confiscation?

You really are ignorant! Joe-not- Plumber referenced the Armenians in his BULLSH!T ad aimed at the paranoid dumbasses.

Only are real ignoramus would still being repeating that debuunke BULLSH!T about Hitler's - see below.

"...PERHAPS THE MOST INFAMOUS BOGUS QUOTE IS ATTRIBUTED TO ADOLF HITLER. Usually, the questionable passage reads as follows:
1935 will go down in History! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead to the future!
"Note: This passage sometimes features different punctuation and slight wording changes...While the above 'quote' makes a nice T-shirt, there are numerous problems with this alleged statement.(1) It violates the rule of not beginning a sentence with a number.(2) It isn’t phrased in Hitler’s style.(3) Major changes to the German gun laws occurred in 1928 and 1931 (under the Weimar Republic) and in 1938 (under the Nazi’s). No significant changes happened in the gun registration laws in 1935. Furthermore, the changes in 1928 and 1931 were designed to disarm the Nazis and Communists and therefore it is doubtful that Hitler would trumpet the success of any law aimed at his goon squads...." http://saf.org/pub/rkba/general/BogusAntiGunQ...

Since: Sep 08

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#234
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

5

downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
The 1938 Weapons Act stated Jews were forbidden from manufacturing or owning firearms and ammunition. The Night of the Broken Glass was implemented after the Jews were forbidden to own firearms and the death camps also came after Jewwish gun control.
The changes in 1928 and 1931 Nazi gun laws were designed to disarm the Nazis and Communists - not Jews. Hell German citizens, including Jews didn't have weapons to any significant degree.

BTW: You need to understand the 'Post-hoc ergo propter hoc' logical fallacy.

Yeah - and the death camps came after the Hindenburg disaster.

And after And the death camps came after Morgan, Rockefeller, GE,DuPont, Dubya's Grandpapy, Standard Oil, Henry Ford a and other Reich-wing & anti-Semitic industrialists aided Hitler's rise to power.

And the death camps came after the Spanish Civil War had ended.

The Firearms Policy Journal (January 1997): " "The Nazi Party did not ride to power confiscating guns. They rode to power on the inability of the Weimar Republic to confiscate their guns. They did not consolidate their power confiscating guns either. There is no historical evidence that Nazis ever went door to door in Germany confiscating guns. The Germans had a fetish about paperwork and documented everything. These searches and confiscations would have been carefully recorded. If the documents are there, let them be presented as evidence."
Cat74

Elmhurst, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#235
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

This Administration cares less about Supreme Court rulings on gun control. They want your guns. It is the same thing eerytime we elect a Democrat President.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#236
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

CC Ryder wrote:
<quoted text>What I find strange is that most of the people here that think Obama doesn't want to take our guns haven't read the anti-gun bills he put his name to while he was in the senate.
Do they really believe that he has changed his mind about what he signed back then?
I doubt he planned to vote "present" on that one.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#237
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

PlacitasRoy wrote:
<quoted text>
The changes in 1928 and 1931 Nazi gun laws were designed to disarm the Nazis and Communists - not Jews. Hell German citizens, including Jews didn't have weapons to any significant degree.
BTW: You need to understand the 'Post-hoc ergo propter hoc' logical fallacy.
Yeah - and the death camps came after the Hindenburg disaster.
And after And the death camps came after Morgan, Rockefeller, GE,DuPont, Dubya's Grandpapy, Standard Oil, Henry Ford a and other Reich-wing & anti-Semitic industrialists aided Hitler's rise to power.
And the death camps came after the Spanish Civil War had ended.
The Firearms Policy Journal (January 1997): " "The Nazi Party did not ride to power confiscating guns. They rode to power on the inability of the Weimar Republic to confiscate their guns. They did not consolidate their power confiscating guns either. There is no historical evidence that Nazis ever went door to door in Germany confiscating guns. The Germans had a fetish about paperwork and documented everything. These searches and confiscations would have been carefully recorded. If the documents are there, let them be presented as evidence."
Don't leave J. Stalin out, there is company on the despot list.
realitycheck

Carmel, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#238
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

PlacitasRoy wrote:
<quoted text>
The changes in 1928 and 1931 Nazi gun laws were designed to disarm the Nazis and Communists - not Jews. Hell German citizens, including Jews didn't have weapons to any significant degree.
BTW: You need to understand the 'Post-hoc ergo propter hoc' logical fallacy.
Yeah - and the death camps came after the Hindenburg disaster.
And after And the death camps came after Morgan, Rockefeller, GE,DuPont, Dubya's Grandpapy, Standard Oil, Henry Ford a and other Reich-wing & anti-Semitic industrialists aided Hitler's rise to power.
And the death camps came after the Spanish Civil War had ended.
The Firearms Policy Journal (January 1997): " "The Nazi Party did not ride to power confiscating guns. They rode to power on the inability of the Weimar Republic to confiscate their guns. They did not consolidate their power confiscating guns either. There is no historical evidence that Nazis ever went door to door in Germany confiscating guns. The Germans had a fetish about paperwork and documented everything. These searches and confiscations would have been carefully recorded. If the documents are there, let them be presented as evidence."
You can attempt to down play the effects of disarming a free people but history will prove you wrong every time. One of the tactics of a takeover is to gather up or take away arms. The more you attempt to cover this fact up, the more transparent you become. When the French gave guns to the Native Americans, they had a fighting chance for a while. As their numbers fell due to the imbalance of weaponry, their society fell. They became slaves and eventually alcoholics. Caging a free people like animals squeezed the spirit out of many. The media has been slowly squeezing the life out of the people of today. People are becoming dead inside because of the way they are being socialized by the media.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#239
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

realitycheck wrote:
<quoted text>We have never had a president sht on our constitution in the way obama has. We have never had a racist president in a post racial society. We have never had a president who has lied and deceived since Nixon although that pales to what obama and his administration have done. I'm afraid the mindless carper that you are does not allow you to realize that you've swallowed the stupid pill hook, line and sinker.
Don't blame him he was made that way.
Blame Nancy&Reid.

“Antisocialistic”

Since: May 12

Lake Charles, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#240
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

PlacitasRoy wrote:
<quoted text>More paranoid nonsense. There hasn't been a gun control ruling come out of the Supreme Court that allows for confiscation or preventing lawful citizens from purchasing the vast majority of guns. Hell the John Birchers and all their bastard off-spring been spewing that BULLSH!T about the UN for 60+ years. "some politicians." Just for the hell of it, can you name (and cite a quote and source) of ANY state or federal politician who in the last 50 years has advocated gun confiscation?

You really are ignorant! Joe-not- Plumber referenced the Armenians in his BULLSH!T ad aimed at the paranoid dumbasses.

Only are real ignoramus would still being repeating that debuunke BULLSH!T about Hitler's - see below.

"...PERHAPS THE MOST INFAMOUS BOGUS QUOTE IS ATTRIBUTED TO ADOLF HITLER. Usually, the questionable passage reads as follows:
1935 will go down in History! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead to the future!
"Note: This passage sometimes features different punctuation and slight wording changes...While the above 'quote' makes a nice T-shirt, there are numerous problems with this alleged statement.(1) It violates the rule of not beginning a sentence with a number.(2) It isnÂ’t phrased in HitlerÂ’s style.(3) Major changes to the German gun laws occurred in 1928 and 1931 (under the Weimar Republic) and in 1938 (under the NaziÂ’s). No significant changes happened in the gun registration laws in 1935. Furthermore, the changes in 1928 and 1931 were designed to disarm the Nazis and Communists and therefore it is doubtful that Hitler would trumpet the success of any law aimed at his goon squads...." http://saf.org/pub/rkba/general/BogusAntiGunQ...
Oh, NOW it's "the vast majority of guns" that we are not prevented from purchasing or having confiscated.

There are plenty of anti gun politicians out there. Have they been flagrant enough to push for full gun confiscation? Not yet. That's how politicians work. They chisel away a little at a time ,so that people like you think the worst cant happen, until they get what they really want. In this case, our guns.
Do you even wonder why this treaty with the UN is being kept quiet in America? Wake up before its too late.

Since: Sep 08

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#241
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

realitycheck wrote:
<quoted text> You can attempt to down play the effects of disarming a free people but history will prove you wrong every time. One of the tactics of a takeover is to gather up or take away arms. The more you attempt to cover this fact up, the more transparent you become. When the French gave guns to the Native Americans, they had a fighting chance for a while. As their numbers fell due to the imbalance of weaponry, their society fell. They became slaves and eventually alcoholics. Caging a free people like animals squeezed the spirit out of many. The media has been slowly squeezing the life out of the people of today. People are becoming dead inside because of the way they are being socialized by the media.
You can deny history all you want to and expose your ignorance all you want to, but the fact remains: No dictator has ever risen (rose?) to power because the populous didn't have guns. Lenin/Stalin rose to power because their side won the civil war, as did Franco and damn near all those 3rd world African countries.(Some countries fell to dictators because of the actions of the CIA) Hitler rose to power by appealing to hate and his thugs were tougher than the commie thugs.

I don't know of any country populated by 'free people' have been taken over because they didn't have guns. The only confiscation efforts have occurred AFTER they have been conquered because their armies were out-gunned, out maneuvered, or out manned.

And your delusional whining is just that; delusional whining

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#242
Jun 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Holder doesn't want us to have guns, but he gives them to the Mexican drug cartel so they can kill us with them. Ain't that something?
Holder is going to drag Obama down with him. It's already happening.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 201 - 220 of471
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for May 20

Aries

As the Sun cruises into chatty Gemini, you are likely to get involved in a spirited discussion in which you can explain your beliefs and values to other people. Not only will this help you to clarify what you think, it will also give others a useful insight into what really matters to you. On a more mundane note, this is a good day to return something faulty to a shop because you'll be able to put your case well.

Get your Horoscope »