John McCain Commercial Angers Hollywood

Jason wrote:

<quoted text>
S. O. B.

I believe McCain said he later gave up some information under torture. The longer you are held the less you know of any operational nature. Anyone will say anything under torture. They just told us to try to hold out and try to resist.

The Mendicant wrote:

DOES OBAMA EVER TELL THE TRUTH?
Report: Exxon Execs Gave More to Obama
By Matthew Mosk
The Democratic National Committee may be trying to get some mileage out of recent news about oil industry contributions to Republican Sen. John McCain, launching a web site spoofing the idea of McCain sharing his presidential ticket with Exxon. But they may have found an unwelcome surprise in a just-released analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Turns out, the biggest recipient of contributions from Exxon executives and employees during this campaign is not McCain. It's Obama.
The non-partisan center writes: "Through June, Exxon employees have given Obama $42,100 to McCain's $35,166. Chevron favors Obama $35,157 to $28,500, and Obama edges out McCain with BP $16,046 vs.$11,500."

what you seem to fail to realize... those are individual supporters, not a corporation. so your just making the point for the liberals. more individual supporters support obama then mccain. by far.

The Mendicant wrote:

DOES OBAMA EVER TELL THE TRUTH?
Report: Exxon Execs Gave More to Obama
By Matthew Mosk
The Democratic National Committee may be trying to get some mileage out of recent news about oil industry contributions to Republican Sen. John McCain, launching a web site spoofing the idea of McCain sharing his presidential ticket with Exxon. But they may have found an unwelcome surprise in a just-released analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Turns out, the biggest recipient of contributions from Exxon executives and employees during this campaign is not McCain. It's Obama.
The non-partisan center writes: "Through June, Exxon employees have given Obama $42,100 to McCain's $35,166. Chevron favors Obama $35,157 to $28,500, and Obama edges out McCain with BP $16,046 vs.$11,500."

These are not the donors he though he knew

^thought^

Daniel wrote:

<quoted text>
what you seem to fail to realize... those are individual supporters, not a corporation. so your just making the point for the liberals. more individual supporters support obama then mccain. by far.

What you fail to realize is the numbers Obama used were from the same sources ... and INCORRECT.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/...

BANNED FROM MARS wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama is not even american.
More a filipino and kenyan citizen than an american.

I take offense in you stating Obama is filipino. My wife is Filipino and doesn't look or act like this man.

Bush and McCain are liars wrote:

<quoted text> My whole point was that the McCain camp is saying that he never gave up any information when the facts clearly prove otherwise. Sit down before you hurt your brain. His whole version of events doesn't hold water if you do some fact checking.

Seems to us that you may need to sit the fukdown.....facts clearly prove....bwaaaaa ha ha ha ha if they had been proven...McAmnesty wouldn't be able to even run for pres.....you idiot!

There are NO FACTS nor has it been proven that he gave intel to the VC....you're just Blatting like a sheep, with your second-hand, spoon-fed, predigested "opinions", lacking any quality of critical analysis nor backed up with facts.

Here is a statement from someone that was at the Hanoi Hilton when McAmnesty was there. You might find it interesting...

http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/pos...

Seems to me that you're the one with the "hurt brain".....

Daniel wrote:

<quoted text>
what you seem to fail to realize... those are individual supporters, not a corporation. so your just making the point for the liberals. more individual supporters support obama then mccain. by far.

Please direct your arguments to the author of the article. Thank you for your cooperation.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has seen his lead in Massachusetts and across the nation slip precipitously over the past few months, especially with older, more experienced, voters.

In June, Obama was ahead of Republican candidate John McCain by 23 percentage points, but this summer, Obama has been virtually bleeding support in the Bay State. He now leads McCain by only 9 percentage points here.

Nationally, Obama's lead varies on an almost daily basis. In recent days, he has been tied with McCain, ahead by 3 points and ahead by 1 point.

The fluctuating numbers come on the heels of Obama's much-publicized Middle Eastern and European tour, during which he was treated as visiting royalty by most officials while he made the mistake of portraying a potential president as a monarchist. The trip did help Obama's lead, but it didn't last long, particularly once McCain began a weeklong attack on the Democrat's so-called celebrity status. The McCain campaign ran an advertisement comparing Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. It appears to have hit home with some voters.

But the roller-coaster numbers aren't due only to McCain's ads.

They are also directly related to Obama's roller-coaster positions on issues.

In recent weeks, Obama has changed his positions almost as often as he changes his designer suits.

He has switched his stance on oil drilling, suddenly deciding he would be open to limited proposals for offshore drilling. He recently declared he would be willing, after all, to tap the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserves to lower the price of gasoline. And he has altered his position on withdrawing from Iraq, saying he will listen to advice from ground commanders.

Frankly, the Democratic candidate's flip-flops are starting to give voters whiplash. They can't snap their heads back and forth as quickly as Obama can change his stances on crucial issues. But voters' pain may prove to be Obama's loss, if recent polls are any gauge of public opinion.

It takes a lot more than a good campaign slogan and a smooth speaking style to win the presidency. Obama may well learn that lesson the hard way.

Freedom Now wrote:

<quoted text>I take offense in you stating Obama is filipino. My wife is Filipino and doesn't look or act like this man.

As long as your wife don't (flip) on the issues an have ears big enough to double as a 747's wings.Then no she looks nothing like Obama.

sam wrote:

vote all the old goats out of gov cain is to old

So it Teddy Kennedy.

The numbers Obama used were incorrect according to the CRP. They were in part from the same sources, but the CRP themselves explained the campaign got it wrong.

The CRP (opensecrets) has an article explaining how Obama's campaign got it wrong.

The contributions to McCain were also employees, family members, etc.

Both campaigns get oil money, and although McCain has gotten more oil, Obama has gotten more from some other very big businesses.

Esq from Indy wrote:

<quoted text>
What you fail to realize is the numbers Obama used were from the same sources ... and INCORRECT.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/...

The wrinkled old dude has been flip-flopping for years. Although there have been a few upswings, the stock market has been in the sh!!tter since Bush to office and i know 911 wasn't his fault. The polls are going McCains way now, but we are a long way from nov. Obama just might learn his lesson very quickly.

Senator McCain should be watching his campaign spending on wasteful commercials, he doesn't have that much spare change.

The Mendicant wrote:

DOES OBAMA EVER TELL THE TRUTH?
Report: Exxon Execs Gave More to Obama
By Matthew Mosk
The Democratic National Committee may be trying to get some mileage out of recent news about oil industry contributions to Republican Sen. John McCain, launching a web site spoofing the idea of McCain sharing his presidential ticket with Exxon. But they may have found an unwelcome surprise in a just-released analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Turns out, the biggest recipient of contributions from Exxon executives and employees during this campaign is not McCain. It's Obama.
The non-partisan center writes: "Through June, Exxon employees have given Obama $42,100 to McCain's $35,166. Chevron favors Obama $35,157 to $28,500, and Obama edges out McCain with BP $16,046 vs.$11,500."

The left wing demoncrates will not believe that.it did not come from the huffington post or move on.org if it's not from hate bush orginization it's a lie!

HEY NoBama!!!!!IF YOUR READING THIS..........YOU ARE A JOKE!!!!! YOU ARE A FOOL!!!! YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT!!! AND YOUR WIFE IS TOO!!!!!!HOW DOES FEEL TO HAVE MORE THAN HALF OF YOUR COUNTRY HATE YOU????????? GO AWAY!!! WERE SICK OF LOOKING AT YOUR CHIMPANZEE FACE!!!!!

The Ice Man wrote:

<quoted text>200 years? Still puffin on that pipe i see

maybe your puffin ...i'm just telling the truth about the oil problem in the world !

Angus Young wrote:

The wrinkled old dude has been flip-flopping for years. Although there have been a few upswings, the stock market has been in the sh!!tter since Bush to office and i know 911 wasn't his fault. The polls are going McCains way now, but we are a long way from nov. Obama just might learn his lesson very quickly.

THE CHIMPBOY DOSENT HAVE A CHANCE NOW!!!!!! STICK A FORK IN HIM!!!.....HE,s DONE!!!!

The only thing I hate more than politicians (in either party) are the wackos in Hollywood. Nuff said.

Looter Shooter wrote:

HEY NoBama!!!!!IF YOUR READING THIS..........YOU ARE A JOKE!!!!! YOU ARE A FOOL!!!! YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT!!! AND YOUR WIFE IS TOO!!!!!!HOW DOES FEEL TO HAVE MORE THAN HALF OF YOUR COUNTRY HATE YOU????????? GO AWAY!!! WERE SICK OF LOOKING AT YOUR CHIMPANZEE FACE!!!!!

Check it out mrsockmonkey.com/topics/pictures-where-george...