Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Judged:

2

2

1

IAmDigitap wrote:

<quoted text>
She knows a tree's not a T.R.E.E.M.O.M.I.T.U.R. you
*STUPID*
internet church tramp.

Judged:

2

2

1

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes I did. But the bad luck is I also know how to think for myself. Did you notice what those links left out. Somehow I doubt you did.

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthling-1 wrote:

<quoted text>FYI, this is a global forum.<quoted text>Are you sure?
Not everyone agrees with NOAA:
Life, Death, and Climate
By Thomas Gale Moore, Ph.D.
Stanford University
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/archive/pre...
The Killer Season
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politi...

Judged:

1

1

1

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
Agreed & thank you.
The passage I cited was from a larger article, which in it's second paragraph said,
"And central to the newest story is one of the Climategate scientists: Keith Briffa, an expert in reconstructing historical temperature records from tree rings. More particularly, the recent scandal involves a tree-ring record Briffa prepared for a remote area of northern Russia called Yamal."
You would think that at least Briffa's name would be familiar to a 'warmists' wouldn't you? Or that a simple Google, of "Briffa, Yamal" would have answered that question.
At least, one could have scrolled back a page to see if those names were explained.
They were.

Judged:

3

2

2

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
You would think that at least Briffa's name would be familiar to a 'warmists' wouldn't you?

Judged:

1

1

1

DumBozo wrote:

But I agree that the United States is not the whole world. Just the most important part of it.

Judged:

2

2

2

LessFactMoreHype wrote:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives...

Judged:

2

2

2

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
Who can keep up with all the 'scandals' you and your cohorts 'create' out of nothing?
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives...
"So along comes Steve McIntyre, self-styled slayer of hockey sticks, who declares without any evidence whatsoever that Briffa didn’t just reprocess the data from the Russians, but instead supposedly picked through it to give him the signal he wanted. These allegations have been made without any evidence whatsoever. "
The *scientists* don't agree that there is anything 'scandalous' about the methodology. But don't let facts stand in the way...

Judged:

2

2

2

Mothra wrote:

Seriously? A 2009 RC rant?
Try this instead...
"A week ago, the Information Commissioner notified the University of East Anglia that he would be ruling against them on my longstanding FOI request for the list of sites used in the Yamal-Urals regional chronology referred to in a 2006 Climategate email. East Anglia accordingly sent me a list of the 17 sites used in the Yamal-Urals regional chronology (see here). A decision on the chronology itself is pending. In the absence of the chronology itself, I’ve done an RCS calculation, the results of which do not yield a Hockey Stick."
http://climateaudit.org/2012/05/06/yamal-foi-...
There's a link in there to the actual letter from UK ICO.

Judged:

1

RU Kidding wrote:

<quoted text>
Either u stop all subsidies or subsidies all. All subsidies should be stopped. We should do like China and add a new coal plant every ten days and then we can afford with 9% economic growth a solar run building here and There.
This makes more sense than to restrict our abundant coal and oil , drivin up deficits and poverty and then we can't afford to have a solar building without huge deficits and loans.

Judged:

2

2

2

UdiotRacesMAkeWorldPeace wrote:

why not Clean coal Tech , as clean as NG plant!

Earthling-1 wrote:

<quoted text>Cost.

Judged:

2

1

1

Earthling-1 wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sure the average patriotic inhabitant of Delhi feels the same about India.
I feel lucky not to have been cursed with patriotism.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
Seriously? A 2009 RC rant?
Try this instead...
"A week ago, the Information Commissioner notified the University of East Anglia that he would be ruling against them on my longstanding FOI request for the list of sites used in the Yamal-Urals regional chronology referred to in a 2006 Climategate email. East Anglia accordingly sent me a list of the 17 sites used in the Yamal-Urals regional chronology (see here). A decision on the chronology itself is pending. In the absence of the chronology itself, I’ve done an RCS calculation, the results of which do not yield a Hockey Stick."
http://climateaudit.org/2012/05/06/yamal-foi-...
There's a link in there to the actual letter from UK ICO.

Judged:

2

2

2

Mothra wrote:

<quoted text>
In the absence of the chronology itself, I’ve done an RCS calculation, the results of which do not yield a Hockey Stick."
http://climateaudit.org/2012/05/06/yamal-foi-...

UdiotRacesMAkeWorldPeace wrote:

<quoted text>why not Clean coal Tech , as clean as NG plant!

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthling-1 wrote:

Natural Gas Smothering 'Clean Coal' and Carbon Capture
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/20...