Obama Announces Support For Eliminating BSA Ban On LGBT Participation

Judged:

2

2

2

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
What?!?!
We've already covered that.
You are a bigot against anyone who views homosexuality as immoral.
You are a bigot against pedophiles.
And you put out there that someone can call being black an immoral condition.
So all you can argue now is to "name call"? Please...

Judged:

2

2

2

Think wrote:

<quoted text>
How about a person who simply states that he believes that marriage is between a man and a woman? Is that person bad?

Judged:

2

2

1

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
"Bad" is very subjective, but they definitely support discrimination, which doesn't exactly make them good.

Judged:

1

1

1

Think wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you define discrimination as someone who holds to their beliefs but does nothing to stop people from living their lives. The chik fila CEO hires gays doesn't persecute them or discriminate against them. Marriage has always been defined as between a man and a woman. Nothing discriminating about that. Civil unions take care of all the issues for gay people who want to make a committment to each other. That's what I believe and I'm not ashamed of it.

Judged:

1

1

1

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
That doesn't resolve the issue b/c the age of who and who is not an adult is also assigned by society.
Are you age-phobic?
If a person concludes they are an adult 2 years, a month or even a day or two prior to the law identifying them as one, then who are you to say they cannot consent to sex with someone else.
What this proves out is that society does set boundaries on behaviors, especially those related to sex. And people hold various opinions.
Again, good people do not become bad people for not agreeing with gays on the moral concerns of homosexuality.
You don't see the homosexual lifestyle as immoral, however there are many people who do and their opinions are valid whether it agrees with your views or not.

Judged:

1

1

Think wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you define discrimination as someone who holds to their beliefs but does nothing to stop people from living their lives. The chik fila CEO hires gays doesn't persecute them or discriminate against them. Marriage has always been defined as between a man and a woman. Nothing discriminating about that. Civil unions take care of all the issues for gay people who want to make a committment to each other. That's what I believe and I'm not ashamed of it.

Judged:

1

1

1

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, go ahead with that one...
If your morals tell you that being black is wrong that's your decision. You'll get no support from me on that.
What is clear is that you believe in different morals and you cannot make other people accept your beliefs.

Judged:

1

1

WeTheSheeple wrote:

Allowing everyone to live their own life would be you being able to marry the person of your choice, and me being able to marry the person of my choice.

Judged:

1

1

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
grinder,'morals' are not a universal characteristic as no two people hold even similar 'moral values'. each person has their very own 'moral compass' and they are as individual as are finger prints. they cannot be taught by anybody, and can only be learned by living one's own life.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
You are free to believe whatever you want, and I'm free to call you a bigot if you support discrimination against anyone, whether gay or straight or black or white or christian or jew or muslim etc, etc, etc.
If you don't want to be called a bigot, then stop being one.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
If you view homosexuality as immoral, then that makes you a bigot.
I didn't make the rules, that's just the way it is.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

If being gay can be immoral, then so can being black.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>Actually is just proved the bigots will come out to support their fellow bigots at ChikFilA.

As for the Bigot Scouts of AmeriKKKa, they'll continue to lose members over the next decade, just like they did over the previous decade; especially when they bring back racially segregated troops again.

Ahhh, the good old days......

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>Why should I tolerate those who want to discriminate against me?

Now that they can ban gays, the Bigot Scouts of AmeriKKKa will return to segregated troops too.

It's only a matter of time.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>When the Bigot Scouts of AmeriKKKa stop getting tax breaks and preferential treatment at taxpayer expense, THEN they can set their own rules.

Until then we'll keep harassing them and pressuring them to drop their discriminatory policies.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>Who are you to say being black isn't immoral?

Didn't you just say people get to decide for themselves what is or isn't immoral??

If being gay can be immoral, then so can being black.

It's all a matter of opinion.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>The Bigot Scouts of AmeriKKKa should take a clue from the the Girl Scouts and stop promoting discrimination.

As I said, I couldn't care less what they do, as long as they give up their special tax breaks and preferential treatment all at taxpayer expense.

They can merge with the KKK for all I care.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>You're too stupid to understand I was saying those who think being gay is immoral are as idiotic as those who think being black is immoral.

Being who you are can't be immoral. Being gay isn't immoral, being straight isn't immoral, being black isn't immoral, being white isn't immoral, being jewish isn't immoral, etc.

Only a bigot would make just a sweeping judgment of others.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>The only hatred & bullying is coming from the anti-gays.