Judged:
1
1
1
Nov 8, 2009 | Posted by: defyr
Comments
|
Judged:
1
1
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
1 |
||||
|
Judged:
3
2
2 Such diabolical deception our liberal media spews when they become opportunistic pawns for this corrupt socialistic administration. Obama is too busy stimulating the stock market by sending the US tax payers dollars to artificially boost up US stocks to make it look like our economy is improving when it is not. Slowly and deliberately this liberal socialist Federal Government is seeking to be to the owner of several US companies and industries. This high-level governmental corruption and collusion allows Obama and his buddies and including the businesses that supported his campaign to rake in power and wealth for themselves. I have had it with Communist Network News (CNN) Words from our next president http://www.youtube.com/watch... FAKE UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS TO MAKE OBAMA LOOK GOOD The truth of the matter is that unemployment rate is as high as 18 percent if not higher, but this lying Obama administration has publicly declared that the number of people who are unemployed should not be counted in the national rates so that this administration can make it look like more people are working. This is shear deception. Obama has not improved this economy; he has only made it worse by his socialist policies! The federal government largely controls the media. WAKE UP AMERICA!!! WE MUST JOIN FORCES TO RID THIS DECEIVERS ART OF SCAM. THAT'S WHY THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS DON'T TRUST HIM. You have heard it before haven't you? Press Releases fabricated by this Arrogant White House say something like this: "Jobless rates fall as more workers drop out" The truth is that the unemployment rates really have not fallen. http://news.ino.com/headlines/... This is an excerpt from the article: "The job market is not recovering at all yet," said Jim Diffley, regional economist for IHS Global Insight. "We're looking at another jobless recovery." The September unemployment rate fell in 223 of 380 metro areas, or about 59 percent. The jobless rate rose in 123 metro areas, and was unchanged in 34. Thirteen metro areas reported unemployment above 15 percent, down from 16 the previous month {which were also based on other who (allegedly) dropped out of the work force. But in MANY cases the drops were resulted from discouraged workers leaving the labor force, perhaps to return to school. Once unemployed workers stop looking for jobs, they are no longer counted in the unemployment rate. Behold the deception of Obama. This Jobless Recovery is a lie. Watch This http://www.youtube.com/watch... America this is exactly why you never vote for a politician just because they look or sound good. A used car salesmen look and sound good by design in order to deceive. In a president, you look for competence, executive experience, and sound intellectual and moral judgment. At that rate, Mike Huckabee was a far more superior presidential candidate than Barack Hussian Obama. The both the republican and democrat socialist establishment used their clout over the mainstream media to stifle coverage on Mike Huckabee. The establishment cannot be trusted. Check this Video Out! http://www.youtube.com/watch... |
||||
|
“Free money is a myth” Since: Aug 08
|
Judged:
3
2
1 |
|||
|
Judged:
1 http://tycoon-cashflow.blogspot.com |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 And there are the mindless democrats focusing on something that no on in the nation cares about, HC reform. NOT A SINGLE POLL IN AMERICA SAYS THAT IS THE TOP PRIORITY. NOT A SINGLE POLL EVER HAS said that. We can break down barriers to competition. We can remove the insurance companies exemption from anti trust laws We can do tort reform INCREMENTAL changes that aren't even being given a CHANCE before the democrats are doing this wholesale take over. There is something really wrong with Obama and Pelosi that they are pushign wholesale against the people, to the exclusion of jobs. Mindlessly pushing forward, like a rabid obsessive dog who won't stop chasing his tail. As Herbert wrote "Does Obama Get It?" And Clift wrote "Dems should focus on the economy" But there goes Obama and Pelosi...mindlessly, obsessively...demanding to push into the most intimate part of your life, your doctor's office. There is something really, really wrong with these guys. And the nation is starting to realize it. While 16 million people are on the edge of destitution, Obama's response, "get used to it, we'll probaly lose more." There's something really wrong with these guys. Watch that unemployment, if it gets to a 20% figure, there will be a rise in civil unrest. You'll see people demanding the right to recall their federal officials (you don't have the right to recall your federal officials, only your state levels) There will be a rising demand for recalls, for special elections.... A man went to a check cashing place, he was going to rob it. The woman asked him to pray with her. He broke down in tears and started praying. He was desperate to get money to feed his 7 year old daughter. And there are the democrats, not caring about the real pain in the nation. Only their agenda. There's something VERY wrong with the democrats, and the nation is starting to realize it. They're deranged. But, America has an uncanny knack of getting the right leaders just when she needs them. She has a way of shaking off the parasites. 58% of the nation NOW believes the next president will be a republican. 60% of the INDEPENDENETS say that, and 52% of WOMEN also believe that. Onlyu 31% of democrats think they'll hold the WH. Obama is going the way of Carter. Ineffectual and incompetent. Incapable of leading a nation in crisis. Like Carter. "Put on a sweater and turn down your furnace." If the elction were held today? only 45% would support Obama, and 49% would OPPOSE him. Independents would oppose him by a 2 TO 1 MARGIN! And the funniest part>? Get this, the poll is against an UN NAMED CHALLENGER. That's RIGHT. Obama would lose because HE'S OBAMA, not because someone else is better, but that other person would win BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT OBAMA. What goes around comes around. If you're NOT Obama, or you're NOT a democrat, you'll most likely win the next election. Even though OBAMA isn't on the ballot in 2010, just like BUSH wasn't on the ballaot in 2008. Yep, Rasmussen. Obama would LOSE because he is OBAMA. People just aren't supporting him anymore. they may like him personally, but his policies suck. And the nation now sees him as a partisan liberal democrat. He's going down the drain. But keep ignoring the destitution democrats. That's a GREAT strategy. |
||||
|
Since: Aug 07
South Central Virginia ISP: Carson, VA |
Judged:
3
2
1 Any of you discuss the "real" unemployment rate? Gee, it has not moved much since bush was setting record low unemployment rates. What did you think about those? I'll give you one better, look at the "real" employment rate. Take the number employed and strip out part-timers. The rate went down the whole time bush was in office and now you bozo's are just catching on. Anyone want an intelligent conversation? What is the effect of deleveraging (where banks that have taken $1 and made it act like $25 - 30 reduce that to a more sensible $10 on inflation? Why is deflation such a concern instead of inflation? Why didn't Gold go up with the inflation rate? Right now Gold is half the price it used to be when inflation is factored in. And why don't the scare mongers (Republicans) tell you that? |
|||
|
“Its A Great Day To Be Alive” Since: Jan 08
Atlanta via Brooklyn NY ISP: Decatur, GA |
Judged:
4
2
2 This mess didn't just start on 1/20/08, immediately after the inauguration. |
|||
|
“Its A Great Day To Be Alive” Since: Jan 08
Atlanta via Brooklyn NY ISP: Decatur, GA |
Judged:
3
2
1 Isn't it amazing that Repubs realize we have a mess, but don't acknowledge who was in office for 8 years when this mess was created? And now you're upset because others aren't fixing the Repub mess fast enough? Where were these rants a year ago when Bush was telling you the economy was just fine....and it's "turning the corner"? If you Topix Repub posters were not such rubber stampers of the spending, nation-building, and "21st Century Job" empty speeches, this mess may have been averted...or not been so deep. But you ignored it all. You were more concerned about your gang colors, then you were the U.S.. Where is the honor anymore? For every word you spend complaining about the present, you spend 0 words admitting we ever had a problem in the past, and on who lead us into this mess. |
|||
|
“Open your eyes” Since: Sep 09
Central Florida ISP: Deltona, FL |
Judged:
3
3
2 Bush was not the biggest problem in the market decline. He had a hand in it, but, was not at the center. The crash came from the international bankers and their grab of power. Problem-Reaction-Solution. The bankers inflicted the crash in the economy and the same people who orchestrated the crash are the same people who are coming up with solutions to the crash they created. Obama can not do anything to stop the next crash from coming. You can expect it with in the next year. Just have to listen to what these bankers are saying and what they already own. These people will manufacture another crash to pave the wave for the global currency (SDR's). The decline came from the falsehood Madoff scheme of the derivitive markets where bankers were recieving 100-1 returns on their investments. The market was created on nothing and based on nothing but speculation. Now when they pass this cap and trade derivitive market with the global tax, it is the same thing as all other false credit bubbles. These bankers will use it for a short time and then crash the market to soak up the ownership of everything else. Watch Fall of the Republic, it explains everything that international bankers has done and what they will do again. And, it all revolves around Goldman Saks. |
|||
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Please be so kind to acknowledge who has been running Congress for the past 3 years.... and that Obama was in the Senate for half Bush's term. But it was all Bush, all the time? And yet Obama has the gall to blame the past 8 years selectively ignoring his own involvement (or lack thereof) for 4 of them? Puh-lease. |
||||
|
“No Swine Here” Since: May 09
Deluxe Motel Mecca ISP: Clermont, FL |
Judged:
1
1
1 time to send the muslim race pimp back to his homeland maybe reverend wright can opens up a few more churches over there. hahaha...just kidding, old jerry won't be able to git no loot off of them savages over ther. |
|||
|
Judged:
1 You do not understand as most people do not. The financial system has collapsed. No amount of bull is going to change that. What we have is, who is going to pay for the the now dwindling amount of people to still live well. Obama is backing the "poor" and the unions first. Or should I say second because he paid off the rich in the bailouts first. America has much potential, but the men and women who are truly negative have hijacked it and turned us into a nation of woe. But they are happy. For they are of power. President Bush to me will always be a traitor. No one signs legislation to lose rights and still gets away with it from those who can still think. Yet he has. President Obama has done nothing to eliminate that legislation. A dozen men or so on 9/11 used weapons that we call box cutters and has cost Americans many rights and indignities. On top of that, we have spent trillions of dollars on useless wars. Woe to this nation. But it is here now. And you see it everyday and laugh at the antics of the growing tyranny. That tyranny will hit home at some point and the laughter will stop for those affected as it increases. If it is Bush's fault, why is obama not reversing things? |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 Those that want to strip OUT the part time are trying to cook the numbers. Look, on Tuesday nite, Democrats lost 6 virginia house seats. A DECADE worth of seat gains were wiped out in ONE SINGLE NITE. This nation isn't going to tolerate Obama's "get used to it" message while they focus on stupid liberal items. More and MORE ARTICLES talking about how Obama and Pelsoi are tone deaf to what the nation said tuesday. That's why Pelosi HAD to shove her HC through, because it was going to get worse and worse for the democrats. Rasmussen: If Obama were up for election today, only 45% would support him, 49% would OPPOSE him. And the poll doesn't even NAME a challenger! Obama would lose because he is OBAMA! Yep... 58% of the nation NOW believes the next president will be a republican. 60% of the INDEPENDENTS say that, 51% of WOMEN say that.... And only 31% of democrats believe the democrats will hold the WH. Yep, you guys don't even hold your own party. Obama is going the way of Carter. Ineffectual and incompetent. Incapable of leading a nation in a crisis. Clift even wrote an artyicle that essentially says WTF? about the democrats ignoring the economy. Over 16 million people on the edge of destitution, and the dmeocrats keep screwing around with stupid things rather than focus on JOBS. Herbert, a liberal, wrote a piece called "Does Obama Get It?" where he said, in other words, HC reform isn't the crisis Obama, it's unemployment. He also laments that Obama seems clueless to it, and doesn't have any indication that he even has a plan. Look, when the MEDIA starts to focus on the idiocy of Obama dnd the denmocrats, you can be assured, its the end of the show for Obama. Fox will be the least of his worries. Even the MEDIA heard the message from Tuesday, "its the ECONOMY, stupid." But the democrats seem to be mindlessly and obsessively ignoring the people, like they think they're royalty. Sayyyyyyyyyyyy bye bye to your majorities. Only take 41 to take over the congress. Took 54 seats in 1994 and the nation jwas no where NEAR as angry as it is now. 60 seats in red states....37 governors... Democrats are going to be slaughtered in 2010. All the same warning signs, Xs 2. And the liberals are ignoring them. Will it take them longer than a decade like it did after 1994? Will the democrats look back and say "yep, that's when we lost it." Will they look back and say "never again" will we allow our party to be pulled to the radical left? Because right now, the nation is looking at the democrats and saying "no more." Sayyyy bye bye democrats.....you've totally blown it. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 And liberal knuckleheads like you still trying to rewrite history. Unemployment was 5.1% in April of 2008. Funny how things just happened to go south after democrats take control of congress. Last Updated: April 4, 2008: 12:37 PM EDT Employers slash jobs for third straight month while unemployment jumps to 5.1%, a nearly three-year high. NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com )-- U.S. employers slashed jobs for the third straight month in March and unemployment rose to a nearly three-year high, offering the latest signs that the economy has fallen into a recession. http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/04/news/economy/... In the meantime unemployment has gone from 7.6% in Jan 2009 when Obama took office, to 10.2%... and what do we hear from the dumb dem media? We are coming out of a recession!!!! It is like Pravda is running our media ... pure lies and propoganda. It is going to get worse ... much worse. Obama, Pelosi and Reid keep looking to spend and print more money ... a certain recipe for disaster. The only "jobs" they create are government jobs. That is a like a family drowning in debt, hiring it's children ... and telling it's creditors ... "look, our children now have jobs ... and they will contribute to the family income." |
||||
|
Since: Aug 07
South Central Virginia ISP: Carson, VA |
Judged:
1 Yeah your are right. And the reason it is not being fixed is all because of Boehmer, right? I mean if Obama had so much power as a junior Senator, certainly the Minority leader with all of his seniority and experience has total control. |
|||
|
“None is as blind as he that ” Since: Feb 06
not see ISP: San Antonio, TX |
Judged:
3
2
1 There was no inauguration on 1/20/08. The mess startes Jan 2007, when Nancy Pelotes became Speaker. |
|||
So you're comparing the influence of the minority leader to a member of the majority party? Yeah... that's some serious logic there. You do understand that the minority party leader does not set the agenda, don't you? And that as a member of the majority party, pre-presidential Obama would have significant influence... if he chose to? Wow. |
||||
|
Judged:
2
2
1 So what you are writing is that Obama is over his head. That he is a pig shit non knowing ignorant bumpkin who deserves to be skewered every day. What does he know? He is not experienced! He could barely see the dividing line between his neighborhood commie position and the other one across the line where the people work like jack asses and help each other without government help for a better quality of life. Sarah never had the chance Obama had. And even if she never becomes President, like many Americans she will be heard....oh yeah...she will be heard! |
||||
|
every thing has to come into the one world order,even if it takes the economy down, to were they want it,666, go figure
|
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigerian charged in jetliner attack | 3 min | Billie | 6 |
| Sound Off! (Dec. 26) | 3 min | WTF | 58 |
| Hate crimes against gays rose 11% | 3 min | Rose | 392 |
| Failed plane attack reportedly linked to al-Qaida | 3 min | Pdamerica | 115 |
| U.S. Democrats secure 60th vote on health bill | 4 min | mikelle | 831 |
| Advocates criticize Schwarzenegger's efforts to... | 4 min | Domino 21 | 10 |
| Oprah to tackle Sarah Palin | 4 min | Liberals Doo... | 1307 |