Right-wing Christians beginning to lean left

"and the twelve took all thier coin and placed it in one purse and gave to each as needed" <== You allz GOP rednecks know what book that there quote is from? huh, Billybob? Well, ok, does that sound like socialism or GOP greed? yeah, it's almost exactly left wing economic policy isn;t it?!?!?! Straight from the bible too!!! right wing conservative christian is the biggest oxymoron anywhere!!! the right's favorite saying = "no free rides" Christ was all about charity! good luck reconcilling the two... then again, solid reasoning means nothing to the stupid or brainwashed

Gail wrote:

<quoted text>
True, but this time period was an exception due to the hot issue of slavery. Whigs went away an were replaced by the Republicans. The reason I think we will only have two parties (by any name) is because governing comes down to one philosphy that is what is the role of the federal government. One party will always claim the federal gov't should be more involved in peoples' lives while the other party says the feds should stay out. We will always agrue over this very question in this country. Independents won't work because, well, they are too independent. They are both on the left and the right and do not have a unitifying philosphy to keep them a viable party.

Seems to me we didn't used to be so concerned with unification or trying to please everyone at every level. we were more concerned with upholding the spirit and intent of our Constitution, according the our forefathers---the people who WROTE it.

youreallybelievethat wrote:

This FORMER LEFT-WING CHRISTIAN "TYPICAL WHITE PERSON" is now LEANING TO THE R-I-G-H-T..........and so are my friends.
Obama is a COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST.

Glad you were able to SEE that before it was too late.

Kitcat wrote:

<quoted text>
It would be wonderful to think it COULD happen in this election but I'm scared to think my vote for a 3rd party will come up empty and make it easier to Obmam to "take the cake". The thought of that happening makes me ill. I'm so torn about what to do .....

We'll soon be in another World War, or a Revolution. It will then become crystal clear "what to do"....

Alan Cozzi wrote:

"and the twelve took all thier coin and placed it in one purse and gave to each as needed" <== You allz GOP rednecks know what book that there quote is from? huh, Billybob? Well, ok, does that sound like socialism or GOP greed? yeah, it's almost exactly left wing economic policy isn;t it?!?!?! Straight from the bible too!!! right wing conservative christian is the biggest oxymoron anywhere!!! the right's favorite saying = "no free rides" Christ was all about charity! good luck reconcilling the two... then again, solid reasoning means nothing to the stupid or brainwashed

And how does one get that which they are to use to give, chump? THAT'S RIGHT! THEY >WORK< FOR IT. Besides which, you DUNCE, it is a FACT that conservatives give FAR MORE than LIE-berals do. So then, what does that make >you< - "stupid or brainwashed" [or BOTH]?

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
And how does one get that which they are to use to give, chump? THAT'S RIGHT! THEY >WORK< FOR IT. Besides which, you DUNCE, it is a FACT that conservatives give FAR MORE than LIE-berals do. So then, what does that make >you< - "stupid or brainwashed" [or BOTH]?

AH, THE VERBALLY VIOLENT POS GSOTN ARRIVES TO DRAG DOWN THE COLLECTIVE IQ OF ANOTHER THREAD....as usual not addressing the topics your opponants post, just slinging venom without even debating. Kill your self you waste of everyone's time and oxygen.

Alan Cozzi wrote:

<quoted text> AH, THE VERBALLY VIOLENT POS GSOTN ARRIVES TO DRAG DOWN THE COLLECTIVE IQ OF ANOTHER THREAD....as usual not addressing the topics your opponants post, just slinging venom without even debating. Kill your self you waste of everyone's time and oxygen.

And your posts just seem so ... warm and fuzzy? intelligent? open to discussion? uh huh----and Obama is a saint just waiting to be discovered---in the same category as buying oceanfront property in Albuquerque, NM.

Alan Cozzi wrote:

<quoted text> AH, THE VERBALLY VIOLENT POS GSOTN ARRIVES TO DRAG DOWN THE COLLECTIVE IQ OF ANOTHER THREAD....as usual not addressing the topics your opponants post, just slinging venom without even debating. Kill your self you waste of everyone's time and oxygen.

Ah, the ignorant communist-socialist LIAR tries to save what little is left of their moronic argument. An argumnt BTW, which has been thoroughly REFUTED by the FACTS previously on this thread:

"Mar 27, 2008 ... The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives.... Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood...."

- Conservatives Really Are More Compassionate
by George Wil
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GeorgeWill...

Take a hike you ignoramus, before I BURY you with the FACTS.

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah, the ignorant communist-socialist LIAR tries to save what little is left of their moronic argument. An argumnt BTW, which has been thoroughly REFUTED by the FACTS previously on this thread:
"Mar 27, 2008 ... The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives.... Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood...."
- Conservatives Really Are More Compassionate
by George Wil
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GeorgeWill...
Take a hike you ignoramus, before I BURY you with the FACTS.

Up to your usual inability to read what your percieved enemy was posting about I see... There is no point in debating you - I think you're probably drunk? maybe... At any rate inbred one, I was not talking about/debating who donates more at any point in my posts. Way to go! You failed to percieve what was really going on again, as usual.

Alan Cozzi wrote:

<quoted text> Up to your usual inability to read what your percieved enemy was posting about I see... There is no point in debating you - I think you're probably drunk? maybe... At any rate inbred one, I was not talking about/debating who donates more at any point in my posts. Way to go! You failed to percieve what was really going on again, as usual.

It certainly does appear that you smacked your empty little head on EVERY SINGLE LAST BRANCH on your fall from the tree....

Alan Cozzi wrote:

<quoted text> Up to your usual inability to read what your percieved enemy was posting about I see... There is no point in debating you - I think you're probably drunk? maybe... At any rate inbred one, I was not talking about/debating who donates more at any point in my posts. Way to go! You failed to percieve what was really going on again, as usual.

"....You allz GOP rednecks know what book that there quote is from? huh, Billybob? Well, ok, does that sound like socialism or GOP greed? yeah, it's almost exactly left wing economic policy isn;t it?!?!?! Straight from the bible too!!! right wing conservative christian is the biggest oxymoron anywhere!!!"

What a MORON.....

Alan Cozzi wrote:

"and the twelve took all thier coin and placed it in one purse and gave to each as needed" <== You allz GOP rednecks know what book that there quote is from? huh, Billybob? Well, ok, does that sound like socialism or GOP greed? yeah, it's almost exactly left wing economic policy isn;t it?!?!?! Straight from the bible too!!! right wing conservative christian is the biggest oxymoron anywhere!!! the right's favorite saying = "no free rides" Christ was all about charity! good luck reconcilling the two... then again, solid reasoning means nothing to the stupid or brainwashed

"For some [of them] thought, because Judas had the bag, that Jesus had said unto him, Buy [those things] that we have need of against the feast; or, that he should give something to the poor..."

"...and Judas Iscariot, which also was the traitor."

"...the devil having now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's [son], to betray...."

Sounds quite a bit like the DemonRats, now DOESN'T IT?

Gail wrote:

<quoted text>
Kit, a third party vote is always a throw-away vote, even when done for honorable reasons. It will always be a throw away vote in my opinion because we will never see a viable third party, left or right.

You are the reason nothing changes.

That kind of defeatist attitude is why we always have to choose the lesser of two evils.

The Libertarian Party is most definitely a viable Third party and has been growing in numbers every year. Once people realize that what we believe is almost always CLOSE to what they believe they stop believing the 1980's propaganda that LIbertarians are the Party of Potheads. Go look at www.lp.org and tell me you believe there is anything but the Best for America that we represent.....

The Libertarian Party is a United States political party founded on December 11, 1971. It is currently the largest third party in the United States, claiming more than 200,000 registered voters and more than 600 people in public office, including mayors, county executives, county-council members, school-board members and other local officials. It has more people in office than all other third parties combined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Part... (United_States)

lily of the Valley wrote:

<quoted text>
Hypocrite? Well, as the saying goes "it takes one to know one"
Have a good life, bye.

Prove it young lady.

Find a single post of mine that has shown me to be a hypocrite.

You can't and you won't but you'll still judge me, knowing NOTHING about me....

Yes, my dear you are MOST CERTAINLY a hypocrite.....

Gail wrote:

<quoted text>
True, but this time period was an exception due to the hot issue of slavery. Whigs went away an were replaced by the Republicans. The reason I think we will only have two parties (by any name) is because governing comes down to one philosphy that is what is the role of the federal government. One party will always claim the federal gov't should be more involved in peoples' lives while the other party says the feds should stay out. We will always agrue over this very question in this country. Independents won't work because, well, they are too independent. They are both on the left and the right and do not have a unitifying philosphy to keep them a viable party.

But this is EXACTLY why a party like the Libertarians does so well because it combines the very BEST of the Left and Right in a way that is best for the Individuals who live in the US and the US as a whole.

lily of the Valley wrote:

Same old, same old, there is nothing new under the sun. ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Reading your own posts again Lilly?

Lost Rights James Bovard wrote:

<quoted text>But this is EXACTLY why a party like the Libertarians does so well because it combines the very BEST of the Left and Right in a way that is best for the Individuals who live in the US and the US as a whole.

Good point, James. I also like the point of the party being CLOSE to what people believe. I don't think it's realistic to think any of us will find a party that is 100% exactly the way we would like to see things done. But these 3rd options seem to be so much more "in tune" with the will of the people than the major 2 do!

Lost Rights James Bovard wrote:

<quoted text>But this is EXACTLY why a party like the Libertarians does so well because it combines the very BEST of the Left and Right in a way that is best for the Individuals who live in the US and the US as a whole.

I'm not being a defeatist, just a realist. Because their views are so diverse they will never team up. One's view of freedom (let business florish without controls) is contra to the other's view (no regulation of personal behavior).

And let me add most of these people are "one issue" voters.

Gail wrote:

And let me add most of these people are "one issue" voters.

I totally disagree with this. What is the basis for your statement? I mean, how is this any more true for the 3nd party voters than it might be for the major 2, for example? It's sad that anyone would choose candidate with such tunnel vision but I'm sure it DOES happen. Some people feel so passionately about one particular issue that it's all they see or focus on.

I'm very passionate about the murder of babies, for example, and that issue IS very important to me. I cannot vote for anyone who supports it; however, I also look at where a person stands on the other major issues, as well---things like foreign policy, enforcement of our immgration laws, limiting federal involvement in state and personal affairs, etc. I try to base my decision and my vote on the candidate who most CLOSELY represents my beliefs and thoughts about these things. And I don't see it in either Obama or McCain.