'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

Judged:

1

PhreakkyPhroggy wrote:

<quoted text>
Older and wiser now...I once helped Bill Clinton get elected; by voting for H.Ross Perot!
If you divert your vote away from the alternative to Obama...Obama will finish "FINISHING" this country!
I am also a Ron Paul Libertarian...that fight is over.

Judged:

1

1

1

john wrote:

<quoted text>...no you loose!! an all americans loose!! freedom to choose, higher taxes, unstopable taxiaton, nanny gov. socialism etc, etc. so how do you win?

frank wrote:

Apparently ‘The Fat Man’ received tenths of thousands of emails telling him to keep his promise and move his fat ass to Costa Rica! Because he promised, if Obamacare were to be passed and implemented – I’m out of here!
"Obamacare Won. Move your motor-mouth to Costa Rica already!"
And again, to the people of Costa Rica ... um ... sorry!

Darryl Washington wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you have any idea why Costa Rica in particular? Offshore bank accounts? Some good drug connections? Costa Rican cuisine? All played out here, but has a job offer in Costa Rica?
Anyone?

Judged:

1

1

Mike wrote:

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.
It will be a short-lived celebration.
Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.
Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.
Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical. Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So, Roberts gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.
Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states —‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.’ Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?
Ultimately, Roberts supported states rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is funded by tax increases.
Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.
And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown threw his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.
Brilliant.
Source; http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9398-why-chie...

Judged:

1

WakeUp wrote:

Were your youtube videos supposed to have anything to explain or refute that Obamacare isn't going to apply to the politicans and their families, as well as the special interest groups, like unions and businesses that have made the proper campaign contributions...?
Like I've said before, Congratulations! We will all have health insurance! Now, are we going to get around to actually solving the rising health care costs, access to actual health care and the like?

Hello wrote:

Question....
If you don't pay the tax do you get free medical coverage????

Judged:

1

Hello wrote:

Question....
If you don't pay the tax do you get free medical coverage????

Judged:

1

1

Hello wrote:

Where I was headed with that was if you are covered either way why pay the tax??
Also if it's collected by the IRS then why can't they just get it when you file your income taxes.
But either way the working class dogs end up footing the bill...
Or is this basically putting everyone on welfare..

Judged:

1

1

1

whitehair wrote:

My suggestion to all is to vote for Romney,get this Bill removed,and then get a real bill covering the listed good parts,and deleting all the rest.Like,a 5 page bill to do what is in this 3000 page bill turning this Country into another failing socialist country.

whitehair wrote:

My suggestion to all is to vote for Romney,get this Bill removed,and then get a real bill covering the listed good parts,and deleting all the rest.Like,a 5 page bill to do what is in this 3000 page bill turning this Country into another failing socialist country.