BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought Police wrote:

Another sign Obama is in trouble. It is not so much that Romney is taking in more money than Obama, it is that Romney has many more "small donors". You see, small donors VOTE!
Think about that for a few seconds, why would someone donate to someone they are not going to vote for? Well, Romney has twice as many small donors than Obama has!
Romney battles Obama for cash advantage in election
By Alina Selyukh and Alexander Cohen | Reuters –
WASHINGTON (Reuters)- The Republican Party and presidential candidate Mitt Romney have almost $60 million more in the bank than President Barack Obama and his Democratic Party but campaign finance experts say it is too soon to assume that means a political advantage in November.
The Obama and Romney campaigns are vying to become the most successful fundraising operations in U.S. history, with help from their national parties. In July, Romney raised $101 million for his campaign and the party, outpacing Obama for the third month in a row. Obama and the Democrats hauled in $75 million.
More
http://news.yahoo.com/romney-battles-obama-ca...

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmmm. Birfoons would like to believe that Barack Obama graduated from Punahou High School, and allegedly registered at Occidental under the name of Soetoro as a foreign student (somehow faking that he was not from Hawaii despite the fact that he had to provide high school transcripts to Occidental), and then transferred to Columbia under the name of Barack Obama.
Meanwhile, they apparently believe people such as McCain, Romney, and other well heeled Republicans could not find a student directory from Occidental, which would have listed him under the name of Soetoro if he had registered under that name. Yet the birfoons persist, "I think it is more likely that he registered under the name Barry Soetoro and that he registered as a foreign student." This of course, with nothing but a wish and prayer. And then they wonder why they are called birfoons.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Appears made-up. If it is, how cruel can one get? And the good Judge, also, may not have written it. That the govt is allowed to go into bank accounts? That cannot be true. The private hospitals can and do, but the govt? I don't think so.

Judged:

2

1

1

Sloop21 wrote:

<quoted text>
Only "white" men?

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>No one that was interviewed ever remembered meeting a student named Barack at Occidental. For decades Occidental has had an agreement with Columbia to allow foreign students to take credit courses outside of class. This may be how Obama was able to transfer to Columbia with out the credentials that other students were required to have.

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:

"Romney has generated less enthusiasm from small donors ...."
http://tinyurl.com/9kdsccb

Judged:

1

1

1

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
It defies the imagination. Says right here on the official site the picture was attached to his application.
http://web.archive.org/web/20081015192526/htt...

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical Rougie post. He makes a claim and cites an article that mentions not a word to back it up.

Judged:

1

1

1

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
Every bit of it a lie. Had the sender of that erroneous email actually checked with snopes, he/she would have deleted it instead of passing it on. Then again maybe not.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-l...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/kithil...

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Again, misquoted, and from an amateurish page that did not cite its source.
I still don't see where President Lincoln said “an illiterate lunatic fringe group attempting to rewrite history are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts.”

Judged:

1

1

1

OregonSUX wrote:

Republiscum War on Women:
"Oops, they just woke the sleeping silent majority
I wonder if they truly understand that women of a certain younger age, who have gratefully taken for granted the freedoms so hard won by our foremothers, have just now awakened to the true nature of the war against women.
I've always called myself socially liberal and fiscally conservative.(Secret: I'm a registered Republican, but voted for Obama.) I will no longer vote for any Republican for any position at any time. I've become a straight ticket Democrat. Republicans have gone 20 steps too far toward crazy. And my husband is in the same position. A position we just call...sanity.
We are what most would consider financially comfortable. Some might consider rich. We don't feel rich. We live within (below) our means. We pay A LOT more than 13.9% in taxes. And we're generally okay with that because we don't build roads or bridges on our own. We think the government should do that. And we expect to pay for it. Honestly, we feel a little like we pay more than our fair share ... But, we still get to live okay, so, rules are rules.
We generally in principle supported Occupy but didn't speak up.
We generally in principle support "Obamacare" but didn't speak up.
We generally in principle are concerned about eroding free speech and an increasing police state but didn't speak up.
But now, we think we have to start speaking up for women. Is it too late?" LL

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought Police wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Idiotard, did you notice that everyone of those articles were written in 2008? So the picture came from .... where? Why don't the print the whole page it came from?

Judged:

1

1

1

dem wrote:

dump the terd.

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought Police wrote:

American Lady wrote:
Words Of Wisdom .....
"We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts
--not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
~ Abraham Lincoln
<quoted text>
Well, i found multiple souses for that quote. If it is a misquote, please show us the CORRECT quote!!!

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Again, misquoted, and from an amateurish page that did not cite its source.
I still don't see where President Lincoln said “an illiterate lunatic fringe group attempting to rewrite history are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts.”

Judged:

2

1

1

Obama Fake and Fraudulent wrote:

<quoted text>
No, we are saying that you are a FAKE birther!
Signed, the ORIGINAL Kentucky Loser.

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought Police wrote:

Thought Police wrote:
Another sign Obama is in trouble. It is not so much that Romney is taking in more money than Obama, it is that Romney has many more "small donors". You see, small donors VOTE!
Think about that for a few seconds, why would someone donate to someone they are not going to vote for? Well, Romney has twice as many small donors than Obama has!
Romney battles Obama for cash advantage in election
By Alina Selyukh and Alexander Cohen | Reuters –
WASHINGTON (Reuters)- The Republican Party and presidential candidate Mitt Romney have almost $60 million more in the bank than President Barack Obama and his Democratic Party but campaign finance experts say it is too soon to assume that means a political advantage in November.
The Obama and Romney campaigns are vying to become the most successful fundraising operations in U.S. history, with help from their national parties. In July, Romney raised $101 million for his campaign and the party, outpacing Obama for the third month in a row. Obama and the Democrats hauled in $75 million.
More
http://news.yahoo.com/romney-battles-obama-ca ...
<quoted text>
You attack my post without citing what figures are wrong. Tell us, if you where a real professor, how would you grade your response?

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical Rougie post. He makes a claim and cites an article that mentions not a word to back it up.

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought Police wrote:

<quoted text>
I knew you would fall for it, "those under the $5,000 limit ". You see after Gallup said that more "small donors" where donating to Romney they were talking about UNDER $100 not $5,000.
Only a Libtard would think that donating $5,000 comes from the "average" voter?
Tell me, if you have an income of, let's say,$40,000 per year and you donate $5,000, that is $12.8% of there income. Now, how many people can afford that?!?
Everyone knows that the Washington Post leans left and when someone comes out with an article to promotes any Republican, they must come out with their own spin. Only a Idiotard would think that "small donors" could afford a $5,000 donation to anyone!!!!
Oh, and let's say that Obama got one million dollars in donations from donations that averaged $5,000, that would be just 200 voters. But if Romney got one million dollars in donations from people who averaged $100, that would mean that ......10,000 voters donated.
You must have failed fourth grade math!

wojar wrote:

"Romney has generated less enthusiasm from small donors ...."
http://tinyurl.com/9kdsccb