Will racism hinder Obama's re-election?

Judged:

1

1

1

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Care to address the question I asked you? If you hate the Constitution , what should be the law of the land?

Judged:

1

1

1

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
not YET,'mudd, not yet. five years ago, I bet u would have been saying the same about 'ain't nobody forcing any body to buy HC ins, so, go piss up a rope!'; ten yrs ago it would have been smoking any where out doors; and, 20 yrs ago it would have been either seat belts or car seats!
just exactly HOW MANY examples of tyranny do u need before u see the 800 lb GREEN gorilla coming in the back door?
if u, personally, are NOT a Progressive, then u'd better educate urself quickly about their history and their ideas RE: Utopia.
remember M. Obama's words, "Barack doesn't want any body NOT working...". now, couple those with GB Shaw's dream of folks going before a 'committee' and explaining 'their worth' to society, or developing a 'humane gas'!
ideas and movements NEVER die, they just go 'underground' and re-surface as something else until the moment is 'right'. thank god, the Prog SCUM showed their hand too soon, again.
u are the only that can educate urself... if u so choose. maybe u ARE part of the problem and not the solution?
pity...
less IS better

Judged:

1

1

1

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>Please don't start telling about death panels. It is only going to prove you are either a liar or and idiot.

Judged:

1

1

1

jerthemessiah wrote:

Obama has the welfare mother vote all locked up.

higgans wrote:

should be allowed the priviledge and HONOR of voting.

Judged:

1

1

1

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
Voting is NOT a privilege, it’s a RIGHT.

Judged:

1

1

1

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
hey, my Constitutionally illiterate poser, can u just walk in any where and vote? do not felons lose their vote?
IF it were a Right, then it is a VERY conditional one, at best.
I suppose u are one of the New Democrats that believe that HC is a Right? and home ownership? and a college ed?
BTW, did u like my answers to ur budget questions?
less IS better

Judged:

1

1

1

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you should read the 15th Amendment and try this post again. It is a RIGHT.
"The right of U.S. citizens to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”
Does that sound “”very conditional” to you? Stop talking. You prove with every word just how uneducated you really are. Goodnight.

Judged:

1

1

1

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe you’ve misunderstood my post. My intent is to show that the few Black people that may have voted for Obama simply because he’s Black would have easily been outnumbered by the whites that voted for McCain because he’s NOT BLACK. Thus canceling out any real effect by those few.
I hope that makes sense.

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you should read the 15th Amendment and try this post again. It is a RIGHT.
"The right of U.S. citizens to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”
Does that sound “”very conditional” to you? Stop talking. You prove with every word just how uneducated you really are. Goodnight.

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW, you can stick that Constitution somewhere the sun doesn’t shine.

Judged:

1

1

1

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>Sounds like the kind of moronic conversation that would go on in a Teapublican house. Do you believe that anybody actually wants to live in a ghetto?

Judged:

1

1

1

TheOriginalDoby wrote:

<quoted text>
He’s right and you’re wrong. Look it up you dumbazz.

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>BARRACK OBAMA: politics meant nothing to Samuel L. Jackson because the "Pulp Fiction" star only voted for the president for one reason and one reason only ... because he's black.
In an interview with Ebony magazine, Jackson explained, "I voted for Barack because he was black.'Cuz that's why other folks vote for other people — because they look like them ... That's American politics, pure and simple.[Obama's] message didn't mean [bleep] to me."
Jackson then went on to drop the N-word several times when discussing Obama, telling the mag, "When it comes down to it, they wouldn't have elected a [bleep]. Because, what's a [bleep]? A [bleep] is scary. Obama ain't scary at all.[Bleeps] don't have beers at the White House.[Bleeps] don't let some white dude, while you in the middle of a speech, call [him] a liar. A [bleep] would have stopped the meeting right there and said,‘Who the [bleep] said that?' I hope Obama gets scary in the next four years,'cuz he ain't gotta worry about getting re-elected."

Judged:

1

1

1

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>how's this: no one who canNOT get theirself registered, locate their polling place and get there during the appointed hours, should be allowed the priviledge and HONOR of voting. participating in the American sport of maintaing a Republican form of govt shud require that MINIMUM amount of INDIVIDUAL effort, IMO.
all this other 'assistance rendering' is simply done to influence voters and outcomes. informed and politically aware people, the type of voters a thriving Republic demands, will get themselves registered and get themselves to the polls AND make their own choices.
the people that fail to even get themselves registered also fail to get themselves politically educated and are simply the tools of the last Party or candidate that renders them assistance during the voting process. that is why pol parties and candidates offer such assistance. and that is why the pol party(s) and candidates with the least popular platforms do the MOST assisting. it is simply to bolster their vote totals using the easiest and oldest voter manipulation techniques known.
less IS better

Judged:

1

1

1

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
hey, my Constitutionally illiterate poser, can u just walk in any where and vote? do not felons lose their vote?
IF it were a Right, then it is a VERY conditional one, at best.
I suppose u are one of the New Democrats that believe that HC is a Right? and home ownership? and a college ed?
BTW, did u like my answers to ur budget questions?
less IS better

Barros Serrano wrote:

<quoted text>
I would suggest that anyone watching Faux News and unable to discern that that network is LYING most of the time should not vote.

The Commish wrote:

<quoted text>Nothing to look up dummy. It is a matter of FACT that 90% is a bogus number just like the 8% unemployment numbers are bogus. If you would learn to distinguish the truth from lies you would know that dumbazz.