Who says Mormons aren't Christians?

Dana Robertson wrote:

<quoted text>
Do they even still make Postum? It tasted like crap. Made about as much sense as Near Beer.

Nope, they discontinued it.

I like how the psycho from Novato told me to read Nibley. She doesn't know that I already know about those nutty mo-pologists. She can have me read Daniel C. Peterson as well...

I agree, she seems to be around age 12-16. Very stupid.

Joe started it all; Noobley, McDonkey, and Peter-sin simply embellished Joseph's Myth.

And yes, Denial C. Peter-Sin got his ass fired from the Funny FARMS. Read all about it on exmormon.org . His vindictive email was so hilarious I nearly pissed myself.

piratefighting wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyone can put anything on the Internet. It's not magic... you put your non-sense here.
Look at the history of it... look at the geograghical evidence.... READ SOME NIBLEY.... learn your history... and pray and ask Heavenly Father for guidance.
That's where you will find your answers.

Sorry, you have the wrong guy. I don't suspend the rules of evidence and listen to a horny child molester huckster who gets his info from rocks in hats. Nor will I read his modern-day spinners and believe their tripe just because they say so. I know the history of your cult. Quite well. As far as praying to your sex-charged Elohim-on-Planet-Near-Star-Kol ob.... Nope. The Utah version of Amway of the hereafter, that great Multi-Level-Marketing hierarchy of the gods, has no appeal whatsoever to me.

Try again.

LoL wrote:

<quoted text>
As does using the wrong article of grammar
whin you'z uh.. GRAMMER KnotSeeYiN!
You're a hick.
You're not what's needed to represent Evangelbillyism.
Hook us up with some pictures of you handling snakes at cherch with Al Gore piped in telling you about the magical treemomiturs sayin
we all gotta sind Al some Money
fer CARBUN SINN.
That's the kind of tale he figured YOU'd go for.
And, your kind pretty much bit hook,
line,
& sinker.
A few of you too drunk to read are still waving Armalites around, cutting donuts in your pickups, but by and large if one of you cud look in thim squigglie thangs
& tawk edJyEEKaYeTid,
you went around looking nervous like "Awl thuh WetheR dun WiNT KraZee!"
No?
Global Warmin's real,
Al Gore's one of your preachers,
And you're so simple minded you lunge and use FAWTEE GRAMMER
while you're trying to Grammar
Nazi.
Hick.

And this is your brain on Mormonism. Any questions?

Haw Haw wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, they discontinued it.
I like how the psycho from Novato told me to read Nibley. She doesn't know that I already know about those nutty mo-pologists. She can have me read Daniel C. Peterson as well...
I agree, she seems to be around age 12-16. Very stupid.
Joe started it all; Noobley, McDonkey, and Peter-sin simply embellished Joseph's Myth.

Several members have come and reported great deception by Nibley recently. It has been discovered that his foot notes were often faked. Some even taught the opposite of what he claim hey said.

"In her book Leaving the Saints: How I Lost the Mormons and Found My Faith (2005), Martha Beck describes an encounter she had with a scholarly looking person in a supermarket who accuses her famous father, the quintessential LDS apologist Hugh Winder Nibley, of being a liar. When Martha asks the man (she calls him Tweedy) for an explanation, he says he used to work as "one of the flunkies who checked his footnotes," and that in the process had discovered that most of them ("conservatively, 90% of them")were bogus"

She also talks about her father's abuse: "This accusation pales in comparison with Beck's much more devastating claim, namely that her father subjected her to ritual sexual abuse when she was a child."

http://www.utlm.org/newsletters/no110.htm#p9

Joseph Smith would be proud.

piratefighting wrote:

<quoted text>
Oregon Sucks...
Are you a hair dresser for a living?
Because I probably have more intelligence and education then you are worthy of knowing about... because in my book you are not worthy of knowing anything about me.
But, thanks for your inquire.

BTW PirateFighting -

Here's a hint. Before you registered, you posted here anonymously as "piratefighting" from Novato, same place as your "LOL" alter ego. Don't believe me? Look just a few pages back to where you first came upon the scene in this thread responding to long stale messages from last year.

Your stupid little game of good cop/bad cop with yourself isn't fooling anybody but yourself.

Defending a proven fraud by both being nice and being mean doesn't make you credible. It just makes you look schizophrenic.

And stupid.

Have a nice day.

Haw Haw wrote:

<quoted text>
And this is your brain on Mormonism. Any questions?

The idiot writes in "reformed Egyptian". Had to put a stone in my hat to see what they were saying.

Dana Robertson wrote:

<quoted text>
By the way, the word of wisdom bans hot drinks, not coffee. So according to the exact wording, Postum and hot chocolate are violations.
"9 And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.

If you were a member of the Church for 30 years, you would know what the WoW means.

Didn't like Postum? Oh well. It wasn't for everybody. Nope, Postum isn't made anymore, but there's Pero, Dandy-Blend, and a few others.

Haw Haw wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, you have the wrong guy. I don't suspend the rules of evidence and listen to a horny child molester huckster who gets his info from rocks in hats. Nor will I read his modern-day spinners and believe their tripe just because they say so. I know the history of your cult. Quite well. As far as praying to your sex-charged Elohim-on-Planet-Near-Star-Kol ob.... Nope. The Utah version of Amway of the hereafter, that great Multi-Level-Marketing hierarchy of the gods, has no appeal whatsoever to me.
Try again.

You and Dana are starting to sound awfully alike.

Dana Robertson wrote:

<quoted text>
Several members have come and reported great deception by Nibley recently. It has been discovered that his foot notes were often faked. Some even taught the opposite of what he claim hey said.
"In her book Leaving the Saints: How I Lost the Mormons and Found My Faith (2005), Martha Beck describes an encounter she had with a scholarly looking person in a supermarket who accuses her famous father, the quintessential LDS apologist Hugh Winder Nibley, of being a liar. When Martha asks the man (she calls him Tweedy) for an explanation, he says he used to work as "one of the flunkies who checked his footnotes," and that in the process had discovered that most of them ("conservatively, 90% of them")were bogus"
She also talks about her father's abuse: "This accusation pales in comparison with Beck's much more devastating claim, namely that her father subjected her to ritual sexual abuse when she was a child."
http://www.utlm.org/newsletters/no110.htm#p9
Joseph Smith would be proud.

When it comes to Mormonism, only an idiot would believe rabidly anti-Mormons.

Find the truth here:

www.mormon.org

Haw Haw wrote:

<quoted text>
And this is your brain on Mormonism. Any questions?

There you go again!

I'm beginning to suspect that perhaps you and Dana are a bit "too close for comfort"...if ya know what I mean!

Does Dana's wife know?

piratefighting wrote:

<quoted text>
so sorry ... i admit im knew and not ashamed as ur name i did misunderstand

Ms LOL/Uhm/Piratefighting/Piratef ighter:

Or should I just call you the Psycho from Novato...

For the record, this is the post where you admitted to being "knew"

Not only are you "new," with your multiple postings under multiple names you've presented yourself here as, not only a rabid cultist, but quite an idiot. And I say that with all sincerity. And correct spelling. Because I can do that, most of the time. Except when making fun of true hicks like you.

So telling me to read Hugh Nibley is like me telling you to read or even watch Richard Dawkins, or Christopher Hitchens, or Charles Darwin, or Albert Einstein, or Isaac Newton, or Nicolaus Copernicus, or Alexander Fleming, or Louis Pasteur, or Stephen Hawking, or Bertrand Russell, or Robert Goddard, or Edward Jenner, or Nels Bohr, or James Watson and Francis Crick, or Marie Curie, or Jane Goodall, or Edwin Hubble, or Johnas Salk, or B.F. Skinner, or Nikola Tesla, or Jean Piaget, or Thomas Edison, or John Atanasoff, or Margaret Mead.

Ain't gonna happen.

Cary L Nickel wrote:

<quoted text>
You and Dana are starting to sound awfully alike.

Isn't that funny... How I an atheist, sound just like Dana, a Christian, to you. Well, when you're enveloped in the clutches of a cult, when you have been programmed to have a black and white outlook on life, when you see everything as my way or the highway, you would probably have that type of observation.

It only confirms what we've already known about you since you started posting here.

Cary L Nickel wrote:

<quoted text>
You and Dana are starting to sound awfully alike.

Thank you, Haw Haw is very intelligent. I could do worst then sounding like him. I certainly wouldn't ever claim you were that smart. Thanks!

Haw Haw wrote:

And yes, Denial C. Peter-Sin got his ass fired from the Funny FARMS. Read all about it on exmormon.org . His vindictive email was so hilarious I nearly pissed myself.

Would you post it?

Cary L Nickel wrote:

<quoted text>
There you go again!
I'm beginning to suspect that perhaps you and Dana are a bit "too close for comfort"...if ya know what I mean!
Does Dana's wife know?

Yeah, right. With myself in Chicago, and Dana 3000+ miles away in Merced, we're certain to be fully engaged in all of the worst, most despicable debauchery that your goody-goody black and white mor(m)on cult brain can imagine.

Grow up.

Cary L Nickel wrote:

<quoted text>
There you go again!
I'm beginning to suspect that perhaps you and Dana are a bit "too close for comfort"...if ya know what I mean!
Does Dana's wife know?

Oh my! He is insinuating I'm gay for you Haw Haw! Whatever I'm I going to do!!! Next thing you know, he'll accuse me of being black! LOL!!!

Livinginthelandofcrazy wrote:

<quoted text>
Would you post it?

I went there and couldn't find the e-mail either. Could you post it for me also, Haw Haw?

piratefighting wrote:

I'm disappointed in the lackadaisical response from anti-saint crowd.... maybe we get more of a response on the 4th of July....
I'm waiting for the fireworx!

You're cheap and pathetic trolling for responses to your baiting isn't worth any more than the exposure for the rotten predictable cliche it is.

I was happy to deliver.

Now go on back to Daddy and confess that you were on the computer talking to non-cultists when you shouldn't have been. And confess all to your bishop.

Dana Robertson wrote:

<quoted text>
I went there and couldn't find the e-mail either. Could you post it for me also, Haw Haw?

Here's the post where I read it, from last week:

http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php...