Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

3

3

2

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
And just why would I need to prove anything about Lynne, to you, Lynne?
That's like you saying I have to believe, or for that matter, prove, the earth is round. That too has been proven by the "clear and convincing" standard.

Judged:

3

3

2

-Michelle- wrote:

<quoted text>
So let me get this straight. A woman is on a medication that is known to cause horrific birth defects. In order to be on such a medication, they *have* to be on 2 forms of effective birth control and must take a pregnancy test to confirm they are not pregnant. The prescription is valid for 7 days and is only dispensed 1 month at a time. If the woman is to be on this medication for more than 1 month, she must still be on 2 forms of effective birth control and has to take a pregnancy test that confirms she is not pregnant each time she gets a prescription for the medication.
Some women are on such medications for months(especially to achieve true efficacy). If she is taking all of the precautions listed above, which means the risk of pregnancy is very slight, and she chooses to have sex with her husband, that's considered "selfish" in your world? Okey dokey.

Judged:

2

2

2

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
FACT: You claimed I said you lived in Bangor.
FACT: YOU offered proof that I DID NOT SAY THAT.
FACT: YOU claimed you've NEVER posted from another state. "ever".
Fact: You lied, and I proved that as well.
Fact: You ARE the poster who previously posted as Lynne D, so claims regarding Lynne D are regarding YOU.
FACT: You are lying by acting like you're NOT the OP that used to post as Lynne D, and talking about yourself in the third person, like someone believes you.
Fact: NOBODY does.

Judged:

2

2

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Technically, that's not the lawyers fault, its the fault of those doing the investigation and prosecution. But straight up sue, I dont disagree with you at all. I DO understand it and I DO believe in our system of justice passionately.

Judged:

1

1

1

pupsee wrote:

<quoted text>
Let me guess .. you thought Lalu made that post, out of thin air ??
Just thought she would post that for the h e double hockey sticks of it huh ?!
LALU -- will you STOP posting about NOTHING, out of thin air !! TIA !!
;)
DUH, sASSy !!@@

Judged:

2

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
A lawyer DOES have to disclose ACTIVE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that he is aware of as an officer of the court. That will often get him thrown off a case.
A priest hearing a confessional of another priest was historically ordered to actively lie to conceal it, and was complacent in the moving of the peophile priests in question to other NEW areas where new victims awated.
Long day. Hope to pick this up in the AM! Nite all!

Judged:

3

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text> Really? Never heard of Pro Bono? Public defenders?
<quoted text>
I'm not ignoring a thing. Yes, the defense counsel's job is to if not get his client off, to mitigate the damage. That's what they DO you stupoid Skank. Its a REQUIREMENT OF OUR LAWS that EVERY MAN be given the best defense that's possible.
Sorry you dont like that. Guess you'll be moving to Iran soon. Let me know, and I'll pitch in for the rocks that will be your legal demise.

Judged:

1

1

Ink wrote:

<quoted text>
Excellent example of liberal tolerance for another's point of view.

Judged:

1

BROvahqueen wrote:

How did this end up in the Entertainment section? I'm glad they're remembering a successful court date for its time.

Judged:

1

1

1

SassyJM wrote:

retty funny how most proaborts have run from Sue's post.
LOL gee I wonder why.
They're true colors will be shown and they won't be able to hide their bigotry.
Unreal. Such cowards. I LOVE every minute of it.
Foo(l) is the only one trying to be a people pleaser but is clearer double talking while burying herself.
Poor thing.

Judged:

1

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text>When your childs well being is at stake, then yes, it is selfish. Come ON now we're talking about Accutane here....not some life.saving drug.
I've had scheduled surgery where I had to abstain. You act like you have sex None stop 24/7 and are unable to abstain.
Give me a break. We talking about practicing self control vs killing your child @@

Judged:

1

1

1

Kenose wrote:

<quoted text>
This coming from someone who pokes fun at bi-racial children.

Judged:

1

1

1

-Michelle- wrote:

<quoted text>
Give *me* a break with the melodrama. Who's talking about having 24/7 sex? No one but you. However, in the real world, women do have sex especially if they are married and in committed relationships.
As I said before, in order to be prescribed Accutane, a woman must be on 2 forms of effective methods of birth control and she must take a pregnancy test that shows she is not pregnant. If she is on 2 forms of effective methods of birth control, the chances of pregnancy are virtually nil. Some women are on Accutane for months. Expecting a woman to NOT have sex at all, especially if she's married on or in a committed relationship, because of a very slight risk of pregnancy is NOT realistic at all. To claim that a woman who does so is "selfish" is ridiculous to say the very least. Sweet Jesus Almighty.

Judged:

1

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean the liberal way you tolerate my views on abortion or the fact there is no god?
So, I assume you understood my point, then?

Judged:

1

1

1

-Michelle- wrote:

<quoted text>
Give *me* a break with the melodrama. Who's talking about having 24/7 sex? No one but you. However, in the real world, women do have sex especially if they are married and in committed relationships.
As I said before, in order to be prescribed Accutane, a woman must be on 2 forms of effective methods of birth control and she must take a pregnancy test that shows she is not pregnant. If she is on 2 forms of effective methods of birth control, the chances of pregnancy are virtually nil. Some women are on Accutane for months. Expecting a woman to NOT have sex at all, especially if she's married on or in a committed relationship, because of a very slight risk of pregnancy is NOT realistic at all. To claim that a woman who does so is "selfish" is ridiculous to say the very least. Sweet Jesus Almighty.

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text> Darling? Lily proved you to be a fibber.She showed the post
Get over it. OWN what you said. Don't you have any class to admit that you lied?

Judged:

1

1

1

SassyJM wrote:

<quoted text>When your childs well being is at stake, then yes, it is selfish. Come ON now we're talking about Accutane here....not some life.saving drug.
I've had scheduled surgery where I had to abstain. You act like you have sex None stop 24/7 and are unable to abstain.
Give me a break. We talking about practicing self control vs killing your child @@

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you effing insane? It was SUE that ran from MY FACTUAL POSTS on the matter. I presented all the FACTS and the LINKS and the TRUTH of the idiocy of her claims. Why would any other PC have to post just to repeat what I already said? Grow up, dingleberry.
SUE is the ridiculous coward and totally ignorant, as are you, to even try to compare a CHILD raping priest, and those that protected them, to a lawyer. She could not even answer my posts and dodged them all, you moron!!!
AND you are both trying to justify your priests raping KIDS and covering the rape of innocent children by making yet ANOTHER idiotic analogy started by a couple of dummies sitting around trying to work out a justification for why they keep supporting and worshiping an institution that promotes and protects perverts that RAPE CHILDREN. Stupid, pathetic, asses.
You really are deranged and delusional.