Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Comments
225,841 - 225,860 of 305,446 Comments Last updated 12 hrs ago

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239973 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah
ga
ga
ga
All together now....ah ga ga ga ga ga
@@
Gross. Seriously bitch, SPIT. STop trying to swallow.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239974 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> yep, I know.
They post porn..
And you choking on the Popeye's chicken ISNT?@@ Knutbar's wishing Chicky's grandkids would be raped ISNT? You and Knut are a match made in hell, so its appropriate that you're sucking up to each other again. Perhaps THAT'S what you're choking on actually, the two of you are so foul, it would make sense.
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239975 May 22, 2012
sassy does knit wrote:
strap-on action
"gagagagagagagagaga!! ahhhhh! gagagagagagagagaga!! ah!!! GAGAGAGAGAGAAGAGAGAG!!
GAG!!!
sassy and knit old ladies in lez love!
ah gagagagagagagaga!!!
Oh no no no. Lesbians (according to foo and cpeter) Don't use strap ons.

LOL

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239976 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> WTH is this? As if some nobody has anything meaningful to say?
Thanks for the laugh!
"Some nobody"?? You moron. Its the offical statement of the American Jewish Congress to the American people and to legislators.

Its amusing to watch you try, and FAIL miserably, to demean and invalidate other faith's views.

But then, its not like anyone takes you seriously anyway. As the Skanky joke you are here, you're not even good for much of a laugh anymore as all you seem to know how to do is regurgitate the same shit over and over.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239977 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> Amelia WAS viable. THAT'S the point.
Name ONe Viable preemie that didn't need life support to survive?
You're a moron Skank. If they were viable, they wouldn't NEED support. Pay attention to # 2B you dolt. "UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS".

vi·a·ble&#8194; &#8194;/&#712;va&# 618;&#601;b&#601;l/ Show Spelled[vahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
1. capable of living.
2. Physiology .
a. physically fitted to live.
b.(of a fetus) having reached such a stage of development as to be capable of living, under normal conditions, outside the uterus.
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239978 May 22, 2012
realkatie wrote:
Now JM, when are you gonna ride K&P's ass for writing such an ugly fantasy of Chicky's lovely grandkids?
And when are you going to point out to her how wrong it was for her to sit there and claim such foulness against preschoolers and a newborn?
Some of you expect all of us to babysit each other. Well why aren't you out there babysitting your fellow PLer? Nothing like leading by example.
Chicky's grandkids? These are the products of conception, y'know? Live births, somebody's offspring... that offspring you're so concerned about when a stranger decides not to follow through with a pregnancy. Look at how you let that offspring be treated once out of the womb.
This just proves you don't care for women or children. You only care about pregnancies and fetuses. And then, only those you think will be legally aborted.
Sshhh. Can you hear that? It's Cyndi Lauper singing about True Colors.
When am I going to? When you start telling the truth about abortion. You're a Mother who carried her developing child and delivered them. YOU know the truth. Abortion kills your developing child /offspring.

Hypocrite.

You people abort and /or support this evil act ....a crime against himaniy...ones own..and YOU have the audacity to point out what someone else said?

Don't make me laugh.

Dispicable!
1 post removed

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239980 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> ....a crime against himaniy...
"himanily" huh?@@

Skanky, clearly, choking on that boner has affected the blood supply to your one functioning brain cell. Or maybe that sepsis did that first huh? ROFLMAO!

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#239981 May 22, 2012
realkatie wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not Chicky refusing to back her claim.
You and your buddies are refusing to look at this with the same perspective medical personnel do.
Really ? We are ? Fascinating.
Here's a REAL medical dictionary's take...with "medical personnel perspective".....

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...

"viable infant
Neonatology An infant who is likely to survive to the point of sustaining life independently, given the benefit of available medical therapy."

As an added bonus for you dunderheads, here's the definition of "non viable"....also from a REAL medical dictionary....

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...

nonviable fetus
Obstetrics An expelled or delivered fetus which, although living, cannot possibly survive to the point of sustaining life independently, even with support of the best available medical therapy.

According to stupid chicky....and you....an otherwise healthy infant born at 8 months that might need some temporary artificial assistance to breathe......is non viable.
I'd say medical personnel would disagree.
The 22wk preemie would be determined likely able to reach viability with life support. This does not mean the newborn is already viable -- which is what you and your buddies continually claim.
Yes it does. You are simply.....W-R-O-N-G.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#239982 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text> When am I going to? When you start telling the truth about abortion. You're a Mother who carried her developing child and delivered them. YOU know the truth. Abortion kills your developing child /offspring.
Hypocrite.
You people abort and /or support this evil act ....a crime against himaniy...ones own..and YOU have the audacity to point out what someone else said?
Don't make me laugh.
Dispicable!
So you do support what knutter wrote.. Your hypocrisy has just hit a new low, skanky..

And you justify this by your own warped desire to control other women Choice concerning their pregnancy..

Despicable? That is all you and your fellow antichoice freaks.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#239983 May 22, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a moron Skank. If they were viable, they wouldn't NEED support. Pay attention to # 2B you dolt. "UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS".
vi·a·ble&#8194; &#8194;/&#712;va&# 618;&#601;b&#601;l/ Show Spelled[vahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
1. capable of living.
2. Physiology .
a. physically fitted to live.
b.(of a fetus) having reached such a stage of development as to be capable of living, under normal conditions, outside the uterus.
Remember that often silly discussion that took place on here regarding what is considered normal/natural ?
Would not available neonatal ICU medical methods and support be considered normal ?

They are absolutely and positively wrong on this. I'm surprised you saw fit to hitch your wagon to such an absurdity.
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239984 May 22, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
"Some nobody"?? You moron. Its the offical statement of the American Jewish Congress to the American people and to legislators.
Its amusing to watch you try, and FAIL miserably, to demean and invalidate other faith's views.
But then, its not like anyone takes you seriously anyway. As the Skanky joke you are here, you're not even good for much of a laugh anymore as all you seem to know how to do is regurgitate the same shit over and over.
Go to Torah.org and any other REAL,AUTHENTIC Jewish site and they ALL prohibit abortion even its earliest stages.

Yout "feel" good breakaway group is fake. REAL religious value ALL human life and prohibit abortion/killing of humans.
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239985 May 22, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a moron Skank. If they were viable, they wouldn't NEED support. Pay attention to # 2B you dolt. "UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS".
vi·a·ble&#8194; &#8194;/&#712;va&# 618;&#601;b&#601;l/ Show Spelled[vahy-uh-buhl] Show IPA
adjective
1. capable of living.
2. Physiology .
a. physically fitted to live.
b.(of a fetus) having reached such a stage of development as to be capable of living, under normal conditions, outside the uterus.
"if they were viable, they wouldn't NEED support"

Name ONE young preemie that didnt NEED support.

Kthanks.

“YEAH, read it and weep Knit”

Since: Apr 12

Love animals more

#239986 May 22, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi pups. She lies. Sad.
Hiya Chicky ..
Yeah, she really is a piece of work ..

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#239987 May 22, 2012
sassychic wrote:
<quoted text>Go to Torah.org and any other REAL,AUTHENTIC Jewish site and they ALL prohibit abortion even its earliest stages.
Bullshit. They do NOT prohibit it at even its earliest stages.

From your favorite site and the link you gave above:

What is the Torah view on abortion?

The Torah holds human life to be of the utmost value; this applies also to fetal life. Hence abortion is basically forbidden.****However*****, the Torah differentiates between born and unborn life, and when only one of them can be preserved, the former is preserved. Thus there are situations in which abortion is permitted, for example to save the mother's life. But since preservation of life is of the utmost importance, in any such situation a qualified Rabbi must be consulted.

What are the Biblical, Talmudic, and halachic sources about abortion?

The Torah speaks in one place (Ex. 21:22-23) about accidental abortion. The Talmud discusses abortion in a few places: Mishnah Arachin 7:1 and Ohalos 7:6; Tosefta Gitin 3:13 and Bava Kama 6:6; Gemara Sanhedrin 72b. The material on the subject in the halachic literature (including the Shulchan Aruch) is widely scattered; extensive references can be found in vol. 2 of the Encyclopedia Hilchasis-Refuis, article on Hapalah, and in the collection Nishmas Avraham (medical halacha, arranged according to the Shulchan Aruch; see the index volume, under "Hapalah".)

**********

AGAIN Skanky, stick to bastardizing your own faith, because you're NOT doing it to mine unchallanged.
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239988 May 22, 2012
Anybody see STO around? He's MIA at question time /confrontation time.

AGAIN.

A few weeks from now he'll come back on CONVENIENTLY forgstting questions asked of him and RE-ASKING the same answered questions

LMAO!

“YEAH, read it and weep Knit”

Since: Apr 12

Love animals more

#239989 May 22, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text>It was what was going to happen if they turned out like her, never wished. Dream on, pro abort.
What the hell is this supposed to mean ??
If those children turn out like her then we know they WON'T wish rape on anyone's children !! That is YOURS, YOU own that filth !!

I cannot believe that you call yourself .. even a shred of Christian when you post this vile filth !! Shame on you !!

What is really pathetic is that you would try and compare abortion to anything .. let alone downplay something as evil as rape ..

Do you think that the abortion debate for pl is so weak that you have to bring in another atrosity to deflect from the topic at hand ?? How utterly pathetic is that ?! If you believe your claim that abortion is murdering innocent babies .. then you should be able to stand on that alone .. not bring up and be little rape victims, LET ALONE wish rape on innocent children !! AGAIN, shame on YOU !!
sassychic

Jackson, NJ

#239990 May 22, 2012
What about you Sunshine? Got any links of young preemies who didnt NEED life support?

How'bout you Karie or Foo(l)??

LMAO

Didn't think so.
1 post removed

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#239992 May 22, 2012
realkatie wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you have written out the truth that Chicky presents and still don't understand the meaning behind it.
Take a moment or two to consider she was considered nonviable because she hadn't reached the stage of viability yet. Once viable, life support is unnecessary.
Unmitigated bullshit.If she was non viable then no amount of medical assistance or artificial support could have saved her.
THAT is what non viable means. Look it up.....legally or medically.
You are pathetically simple. It's tragic.
You guys have used the words VIABLE and VIABILITY in error. Every attempt at correcting you (for your benefit) has been met with one stubborn brick wall after another.
For good reason.

“YEAH, read it and weep Knit”

Since: Apr 12

Love animals more

#239993 May 22, 2012
lost-cause wrote:
<quoted text>
Your one sick b*tch!
You got that right LC !! My land, she is like a human cesspool ..

“YEAH, read it and weep Knit”

Since: Apr 12

Love animals more

#239994 May 22, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are a sick piece of feces. No wonder your priest hates you.
Isn't that gross ??

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Politics Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Summer 2014 Was the Worst Ever 5 min smarty pants 9
Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... 6 min Cat74 1,847
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 7 min positronium 256,173
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min USAsince1680 1,100,198
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 11 min Nutz 151,253
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 14 min wojar 177,380
Eric H. Holder Jr., in Ferguson, shares pain ov... 19 min Cat74 221
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

US Politics People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••