Scott Walker wins Wisconsin recall election

Ken wrote:

<quoted text>
Told you, not interested in you, troll..

I am sure you keep your schedule full, troll, no doubt part of your multiple partner California metrosexual lifestyle.

Happy to cram it up your azz from here, though, Sweetgums.

Ken wrote:

<
Now off with you. yr mom needs a coffee...she's been in the alley overnight doing buck hand-jobs....

Not nearly as tired as yours, riding bull walt.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I am sure you keep your schedule full, troll, no doubt part of your multiple partner California metrosexual lifestyle.
Happy to cram it up your azz from here, though, Sweetgums.

You're a disgusting pos. Why don't you venture over to alternative lifestyle sites and act out your twisted desires over there?

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text> You're a disgusting pos. Why don't you venture over to alternative lifestyle sites and act out your twisted desires over there?

Orca is so fat, even her fingers waddle.

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text> You're a disgusting pos.

Why don't you swallow more often or at least change your shirt before the lunch crowd?

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>Orca is so fat, even her fingers waddle.

Barefoot is really a very creepy excuse of whatever it is. I usually try to ignore the dirty scab. I'm sure if everyone did ignore it, it would get bored and go away.

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text>Barefoot is really a very creepy excuse of whatever it is.

realitycheck is really a very creepy bigoted excuse of whatever it is.

Notice how many posts realitycheck makes when "ignoring" me.

RT Pipe wrote:

Remember to Vote for Mitt if you want a REAL American with a REAL business background.

I agree.

I'm glad that Mitt is a success. I'm encouraged that he knows how to run a business and he is not ashamed for earning his way.

Why do these Liberal want to always attack anyone that reaps a reward for working hard. Maybe it is because they don't know what it is like to receive money that you work for or that is not from some entitlement?

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree.
I'm glad that Mitt is a success. I'm encouraged that he knows how to run a business and he is not ashamed for earning his way.
... EDITED ...

I wouldn't call Romney the best possible choice for a Presidential nominee, but I too am encouraged by his former position with Bain Capital.

He and Bain has taken over various businesses and companies, their restructuring has lead to the unemployment of hundreds of workers and the closing of various plants and industries all over the United States and resulted in huge profits and savings for Bain, it’s employees and investors…

Now, that being said: if nothing else, Romney has shown he knows exactly what to do with duplicative, redundant, over staffed, under producing and wasteful corporations in the private sector.

If he could apply just a little of that reasoning to employees, agencies, commissions, and bureaucracies of the federal government as well as making or saving his new employer (the United States and all the people in the country) a butt-load of money with the same tactics he used in the private sector, Wouldn’t That Be A Good Thing… A VERY GOOD THING?

We have one Presidential candidate that has already proved he wants to expand government, install new previously non existent agencies and bureaucracies and hire more employees for those various agencies and bureaucracies, thus increasing government spending…

We have another Presidential candidate what has shown, in the private sector at least, he can effectively cut spending, get rid of redundant and under producing businesses, cull unnecessary employees and by doing so make and save a lot of money.

Without naming any names or assigning any political affiliation – which do you figure the American people would choose as the best candidate?

Now when we insert Obama -vs- Romney, or Democrat -vs- Republican, for some reason all such previous considerations become irrelevant…

How does that even make sense to anyone with more than one brain cell working?

grinder wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree.
I'm glad that Mitt is a success. I'm encouraged that he knows how to run a business and he is not ashamed for earning his way.
Why do these Liberal want to always attack anyone that reaps a reward for working hard. Maybe it is because they don't know what it is like to receive money that you work for or that is not from some entitlement?

Liberals do not want voters to think for themselves. They need everyone to follow so big govt. can grow and control.

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text>Barefoot is really a very creepy excuse of whatever it is. I usually try to ignore the dirty scab. I'm sure if everyone did ignore it, it would get bored and go away.

Amazing the vermin we have crawling around this great land....High 'ick' quotient. Typical lib.

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text>Liberals do not want voters to think for themselves. They need everyone to follow so big govt. can grow and control.

Liberals are self-haters, with an angst against their own country. Malcontents and miscreants.

realitycheck wrote:

<quoted text>Liberals do not want voters to think for themselves. They need everyone to follow so big govt. can grow and control.

This explains their destruction of our family and education systems with generational welfare and open borders.

It maintains their steady supply of stupid voters.

mjjcpa wrote:

<quoted text>
This explains their destruction of our family and education systems with generational welfare and open borders.
It maintains their steady supply of stupid voters.

Yep, most of it started with Wilson, continued with FDR and then the LBJ years of spreading the nanny state message.

Don-N-Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>
I wouldn't call Romney the best possible choice for a Presidential nominee,

Obviously the best the GOP has.

I enjoy he and his campaign flip flopping on the "it's a tax, no, it's a penalty... no it's a tax" issue this week, how 'bout you?

Don-N-Kansas wrote:

We have another Presidential candidate what has shown, in the private sector at least, he can effectively cut spending, get rid of redundant and under producing businesses, cull unnecessary employees and by doing so make and save a lot of money.

And he used his business skills to destroy businesses in the US, cut the jobs of thousands, and make a huge profit- and at the same time, to pay a tax rate half of those who lost their jobs.

Thing is: in the US, most think that we have to create jobs, not send them overseas. Most also think that the very rich should start paying their fair share instead of getting tax breaks working people don't have.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously the best the GOP has.
I enjoy he and his campaign flip flopping on the "it's a tax, no, it's a penalty... no it's a tax" issue this week, how 'bout you?

Not to put to fine a point on it but the: "It's a penalty", came from one of Romney's campaign aids... when Romney made a comment on the mandate he clearly said: "The Supreme Court said it's a tax - so it's a tax", something our current President and ‘Congressional Scholar’ continues to deny.

Romney didn’t even have to “evolve” his opinion, all anyone had to do is wait for him to actually make a statement instead of taking the statement from someone else and claiming “Romney said…”

But I guess little things like actual facts don’t matter if they don’t appear to support a personal bias huh?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
And he used his business skills to destroy businesses in the US, cut the jobs of thousands, and make a huge profit- and at the same time, to pay a tax rate half of those who lost their jobs.
Thing is: in the US, most think that we have to create jobs, not send them overseas. Most also think that the very rich should start paying their fair share instead of getting tax breaks working people don't have.

Yep, he used his business skills to destroy businesses in the US that gave Romney and Bain an overall 80% success rate for those companies that fell under the management of Romney and Bail Capital... Why do you suppose the Obama campaign machine no longer attacks Romney on his time at Bain Capital?

Because when Romney was at Bain they had a 80% success rate 'saving" companies and businesses... as well as making money while doing so, and isn't that what a business is supposed to do... make money?

Even if that meant having to close under producing and redundant plants and laying off the employees associated with those failing or redundant companies.

“The private equity firm, co-founded and run by Mitt Romney, held a majority stake in more than 40 United States-based companies from its inception in 1984 to early 1999, when Mr. Romney left Bain to lead the Salt Lake City Olympics. Of those companies, at least seven eventually filed for bankruptcy while Bain remained involved, or shortly afterward.”

In other words, 32 or even 33 firms (at least 80%) survived a Bain takeover.

big-bain-backfire/video: http://www.youtube.com/watch...

As for the accusation of outsourcing, companies have been doing that for decades; I believe one of the first to do so was General Electric, the same company from which President Obama tapped the CEO to become the “Jobs Czar” for his administration and the same company that wound up paying no federal taxes in 2010… as a matter of fact in 2010 GE got a $3.2 million “tax benefit”.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/general-electr...

You did know about those things didn’t you?

But then perhaps we should be asking WHY do American businesses think they have to outsource jobs to remain competitive in today’s market?

Is it because of the wages corporations have to pay their employees because of unions and government regulations – could it be because of the high taxes of doing business domestically -vs- doing that same business overseas?
Or do such concerns not matter to those opposing Romney and advocating for President Obama?

Oh yeah, and just in case anyone might be interested in some factual current information:

CNN wrote:

(July 7th, 2012)
"A television advertisement released Saturday points to a newspaper report that Mitt Romney's former financial firm helped companies outsource, and questions whether the presumptive Republican presidential nominee would be as tough on China as he has pledged.

"Mitt Romney's not the solution," the narrator says in the 30-second spot. "He's the problem."

The ad quotes from a late-June Washington Post report which said financial documents show Bain Capital, Romney's private equity firm, "owned companies that were pioneers in the practice of shipping work from the United States to overseas call centers and factories making computer components."

Since it was published, Obama's campaign has referenced the article in a series of ads.

But the website FactCheck.org said that "some of the claims in the ads are untrue, and others are thinly supported." The latest ad, titled "The Problem," is not included in the FactCheck.org analysis, but includes some similar claims.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/...

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously the best the GOP has.
I enjoy he and his campaign flip flopping on the "it's a tax, no, it's a penalty... no it's a tax" issue this week, how 'bout you?

REPORT: IRS to hire thousands more agents to collect new health care taxes... well I guess this settles whether it is a tax or not. Hello middle class..........are you getting all this.

Entire industry put out of business by stroke of Obama's pen... oh I'm going to pivot to jobs just any month now.........after I've destroyed more jobs.

Campaign Sends New 'Urgent' Request for Cash... help help help, we've run out of lobster.

NADER:'Cowering' Democrats Face Defeat...