Are GOP Candidates Against Birth Control?

Feb 23, 2012 | Posted by: Politix Staff Ed

Topix Staff Story

Last night’s GOP debate saw a surprising amount of consensus on the evils of birth control.

“Which candidate believes in birth control, and if not, why?” asked host Jonathan King - a question clearly aimed at Santorum’s unfashionable approach to contraception.

The audience loudly booed, and the other candidates, who’d previously been tearing each other a new one over fiscal issues, closed ranks and defended Santorum. Gingrich explained that Obama was the dangerous radical on sexual health matters, not Santorum:

In the 2008 campaign, not once did anybody in the elite media ask why Barack Obama voted in favor of legalizing infanticide. OK? So let's be clear here. If we're going to have a debate about who the extremist is on these issues, it is President Obama.

The question referred to a moment late last year, when Santorum promised to talk about what "no president has talked about before - the dangers of contraception." Speaking at last night’s debate, Santorum elaborated on these dangers:

Children being born out of wedlock in America, teens who are sexually active…children being raised by children… The family is fracturing.

Weigh in: does Santorum have a point – has contraception contributed to the decline of two-parent families?

Comments
1 - 20 of 146 Comments Last updated Feb 27, 2012
First Prev
of 8
Next Last
Edgar

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

What a bag of rocks Gingrich is...

“Kiss Me You Fool!”

Since: Jan 08

Atlanta via Brooklyn NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Only the one's who want to pander to the very farthest rightwinger. But even repub men appreciate and take advantage of birth control.

“Kiss Me You Fool!”

Since: Jan 08

Atlanta via Brooklyn NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

The bad thing for repubs is this decision has been dealt with decades ago.

There is a whole generation of voters that see this as TAKING AWAY A RIGHT THEY'VE HAD ALL THEIR LIFE.

And no one likes having rights taken away.
1 post removed
Questioner

Rising Star, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

does Santorum have a point – has contraception contributed to the decline of two-parent families?

I offer the opponents of birth control a test for the depth of their conviction:

How many unwanted children (presumably those the mother/family is unable to financially support) is each opponent of contraception willing to adopt if a woman does not practice birth control?

correlary: how many of their children are adopted?

poorly worded, but I hope you get the idea ...

“your life is great”

Since: Aug 09

you poop in clean water

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

does Santorum have a point – has contraception contributed to the decline of two-parent families?

Ironically, if every unmarried person were on birth control, his "40%" would be a much much smaller number.
Yup

Reading, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

7

4

3

Right wing nutjobs are such m o r o n s.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

OneRyder wrote:
Only the one's who want to pander to the very farthest rightwinger. But even repub men appreciate and take advantage of birth control.
Not often enough. There's way to many ignorant teabaggers around.
political circles

Oldsmar, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Willard Romney now wants to have it out with Santorum. He feels he has an edge by putting WD-40 on the zipper of his fly.
NotaproductofTex as

Austin, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

6

5

5

anneutral wrote:
does Santorum have a point – has contraception contributed to the decline of two-parent families?
Ironically, if every unmarried person were on birth control, his "40%" would be a much much smaller number.
according to his moronic wealthy backer, a woman only has to put an aspirin between her knees....
Santorum is a product of his own inbreeding. For CENTURIES, this has been the cross of ONLY WOMEN to bear. Men can "pollenate" the whole county, and walk away...but women carry the burden and responsibility. That being said, if MEN don't want to step up and be men, ie, put their money where their penis has been, then they can just schtupp elsewhere. HOw quickly do you think this issue would fade, should women demand that for every forced ultrasound before seeking abortion, or for every denied morning after pill, a man would have to undergo a full cardiac workup, and watch a 30 minute video of the dangers of Viagra/Ciais all at their own expense, before they get the little blue pill for their erectile dysfunction problem. Fair'sfair...in love/sex/and war...
SO, if Rick, Newt, Mitt, and Ron ( sounds lik a rock group) want to dictate to me the inner workings of my uterus, my menstrual cycle, my endometrial treatment, my fibroidal tumor treatment, and yes, perhaps my unwanted pregnancies, they are only able to comment when they, themselves sign up for the first class on mandatory Erectile Dysfunction education. Until then, they can go pound sand. My ovaries, my uterus, and my menstural cycle is MINE...as is the products and outcomes thereof. If they wish to participate in the aforementioned, then they need to show up, be a PARENT, and grow a spine to go with their over inflated bloviating egos and PAY for that child throughout it's life... otherwise, they are nothing but panderers/whoring themselves out to the right wing talebangical/catholics that FOR YEARS have cloaked themselves in hypocrisy and ignorance. Remember, it was the catholic church who locked up Galileo for going against their flat lander beliefs that the Earth was the center of the universe, not the Sun....this should be your first sign that most of these dorks couldn't find their own penises without a map, a compass, and someone to point it out to them! NO THANK YOU...I won't invade your penile implant space, if you'll stay the hell out of my uterus.
SMALLER GOVERNMENT?? REALLY?? I thought my bedroom was nobody's business...but apparently, the GOP would like to fit their smaller government into my uterus for all eternity. No thanks, I like it just the way it is!
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

OneRyder wrote:
Only the one's who want to pander to the very farthest rightwinger. But even repub men appreciate and take advantage of birth control.
Pelosi and the rest of the 'progressive' whack-jobs obfuscate the issue to appeal to the lowest common denominator of intelligence on the left. Thinking people know that the right isn't trying to *ban* birth control; they don't want people who have religious objections to it to have to pay for it for those who choose to use it.

NO ONE IS TRYING TO BAN CONTRACEPTION.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Growing up in the days before the pill, sex before marriage was presented as a bad idea because you could get pregnant. And that, of course, meant the end of life. With the availability of a form of contraception that didn't inconvenience guys, and could be implemented completely separate from the actual act, that particular argument fell to shreds. What did not change was the basic inclination towards copulation.

So--did the pill change behaviors? Certainly.

But, insofar as women electing to have children without a husband, it seems far more likely that increasing access to education and employment, along with some salary improvement, is more likely to have had an impact. Only incidentally can the pill be blamed for this one. Back in the day, women had an employment disadvantage as it was assumed that they would soon become pregnant and leave--particularly if they were married.

So--a generation of women has willingly shouldered a double load (work and family) in order to earn for our daughters to be seen as workers equal in earning power to men. Some of us ain't to eager to see that fall apart. Nor, are we very willing to sign on to the notion that the best way to get a man is to withhold sex until married. If they are only signing on for the sex, well then, screw them!

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Pelosi and the rest of the 'progressive' whack-jobs obfuscate the issue to appeal to the lowest common denominator of intelligence on the left. Thinking people know that the right isn't trying to *ban* birth control; they don't want people who have religious objections to it to have to pay for it for those who choose to use it.
NO ONE IS TRYING TO BAN CONTRACEPTION.
Apparently they are counting on Rome to do it for them.

Since: Sep 08

Placitas, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

The old white male bible- thumpers and mackerel snappers hate women....They are threatened by women.
Makes sense

Dearborn Heights, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

No, that's too narrow. They are against ALL SEX, UNLESS you are MARRIED to someone of the OPPOSITE GENDER AND you are doing it to MAKE BABIES.

No sex for pleasure, just for making babies with hubby or wife.

WISE UP, the American TALIBAN is COMING (poor choice of words?) and wants to get all up into your business, probe your vagina for developing fetuses.

NO PRIVACY RIGHTS especially if a BUSINESS wants to track your every key stroke, while you stroke.

Get used to it or VOTE them OUT. Defeat the American TALIBAN!!!

We the People need to SUPPORT OUR CONSTITUTION.

“Obama tells the right to...”

Since: Jun 07

shhhh... STFU, you lost...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

These non-presidential potential republican nominees are against contraception, Blacks, Latinos, women, the middle class and the poor… I still cannot believe that they were stupid enough to take the bait and make their true feelings and desires known, LOL…
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Feb 23, 2012
 
OneRyder wrote:
The bad thing for repubs is this decision has been dealt with decades ago.
There is a whole generation of voters that see this as TAKING AWAY A RIGHT THEY'VE HAD ALL THEIR LIFE.
And no one likes having rights taken away.
very sensible comment. also, one has to face the complication that people do not like having privileges taken away that they should not have been given in the first place (like state-mandated prayer in public schools, which are unconstitutional). you are correct as a practical matter. but in each case one does have some obligation to consider whether it really is a right. in the case of contraception, it certainly should be a right of the individual. just because the Constitution did not spell out in detail every right an individual has, does not mean the individual does not have that right. in the case of abortion, the courts have been refining on what they consider to be a right for several decades. It does not involve only the right to privacy, and many people consider that there are right to life issues involved - though some may take one extreme view and others may take a flexible centrist view (which causes vagueness and controversy, but may actually be the most sensible way to approach the issue).
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Feb 23, 2012
 
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently they are counting on Rome to do it for them.
I agree, funny, star and helpful!
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Makes sense wrote:
No, that's too narrow. They are against ALL SEX, UNLESS you are MARRIED to someone of the OPPOSITE GENDER AND you are doing it to MAKE BABIES.
No sex for pleasure, just for making babies with hubby or wife.
WISE UP, the American TALIBAN is COMING (poor choice of words?) and wants to get all up into your business, probe your vagina for developing fetuses.
NO PRIVACY RIGHTS especially if a BUSINESS wants to track your every key stroke, while you stroke.
Get used to it or VOTE them OUT. Defeat the American TALIBAN!!!
We the People need to SUPPORT OUR CONSTITUTION.
OK - let's be clear what you mean. We the People is a big tea-party cry, like the folks who tried to steal the American flag and make it a GOP symbol. I assume you are not using a code word to tell us you are a tea party supporter.

Your choice of words was funny. Do you use the term talibangelical or talivangelical? or both?

I think you are a civil libertarian against big corporate intrusion into our lives, and also against the use of government to enforce some religious moralistic view, especially about sex, which seems to be a fixation of the fundies - i e religious rightwing.

Am I correct? What do you think of the sort of libertarian who only yells about abuses socalled for partisan purposes, as so many right-wing types do? Do you have any fear that progressives may be too suspicious on the one hand, or too trusting on the other hand, about the signing statement that Obama issued - Presidential right to detail suspected citizen terrorists issue? I think I will be interested in your opinions.
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marine Corp Pat wrote:
These non-presidential potential republican nominees are against contraception, Blacks, Latinos, women, the middle class and the poor… I still cannot believe that they were stupid enough to take the bait and make their true feelings and desires known, LOL…
Hi Pat. come now, of course you can believe they were stupid enough! Huntsman got very little support for being smart. why not try the other extreme and court the rightwing fundie gOP base? the economic conservatives may not like it much, but they have no place else to go, to get the taxes for the superrich cut further, except the gOP.
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Feb 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

PlacitasRoy wrote:
The old white male bible- thumpers and mackerel snappers hate women....They are threatened by women.
I suspect you are correct, and must make a slight objection to the colorful language, just to be on the side of politeness and cordiality. But the objection is not thunderous!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 8
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

41 Users are viewing the US Politics Forum right now

Search the US Politics Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min lily boca raton fl 1,082,696
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 min CDC 48,966
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 5 min Caligula 245,391
Politics is The Art of Marketing Images 6 min Culture Auditor 1
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 10 min LIbEralS 32,110
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 min LRS 175,007
Poll: Romney tops Obama but loses to Clinton 14 min scirocco 57
•••
•••