Obama Takes on Dobbs, Limbaugh

Anonymous wrote:

So why won't Barry just fess up (he was known as Barry Soetoro in Indonesia) and admit he was a Muslim and let the truth wash away his veneer of lies? No one will hate him for it. No one really cares except his campaign operation. And him.
<quoted text>

Barry f-ing who? Can I get a translater here?

If you are talking about Barack Obama, US Senator, Married in a church, kids baptised in a church, wife does not wear head scarf, kids do not wear head scarves or attend madrases, they eat ham, pork and ribs on a regular basis, and yet you are dumb enough to continue with your Jr. High gossip?
The GOP is so pathetic these days.

Americans were dumb enough to fall for Bush and all the lies he used to destroy Gore and Kerry and McCain. It won't work with Obama.

That's why he's up 12 points in the polls.

McLame is going down!!!!!
Now wipe your tears off on your skirt and grow a brain cell.

Anonymous wrote:

So why won't Barry just fess up (he was known as Barry Soetoro in Indonesia) and admit he was a Muslim and let the truth wash away his veneer of lies? No one will hate him for it. No one really cares except his campaign operation. And him.
<quoted text>

At least this poster is embarrassed enough to hide his name when posting rumors and lies.

Clyde Nocar wrote:

<quoted text>Never trust ANY LIBERAL/DEMOCRAT/GLIBERAL. EVER!

I see 8 years under George "I'm a uniter, not a divider" Bush has done wonders for you.

Clyde Nocar wrote:

<quoted text>If, GOD FORBID, he is elected, he will bring the troups home, snatching DEFEAT from the hands of VICTORY!

I'm just curious, how do you personally define "victory" and "defeat"? What specifically do each of your possible outcomes entail?

I'm trying to understand this vacuous talking point from the perspective of someone who truly believes it. Please, help me understand.

Barry Soetoro
Barack Hussein Obama
Same person - Different lies

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>Barry f-ing who? Can I get a translater here?
If you are talking about Barack Obama...

Your moniker stamp says it all.

Ridge wrote:

<quoted text>
At least this poster is embarrassed enough to hide his name when posting rumors and lies.

Preston2 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm just curious, how do you personally define "victory" and "defeat"? What specifically do each of your possible outcomes entail?
I'm trying to understand this vacuous talking point from the perspective of someone who truly believes it. Please, help me understand.

No, you're not just curious. You're a pathetic moron who wants to destroy the country I served & love.

Have you seen this video about Barack Obama?
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx...
(Shameless self promotion – it’s from the organization I work for). But, it’s a great video and you should check it out anyway.

Anonymous wrote:

Barry Soetoro
Barack Hussein Obama
Same person - Different lies
<quoted text>

Weak, weak, weak.

Just like McLame. Weak.

Honest question: isn't Lou Dobb's wife Mexican-American?

hey,anyone on?

Thanks, Senator Obama, for confiming that you are not going to do nothing to solve Illegal Immigration aka Modern Day Slavery. You and your cohort Senator McCain are partners in crime.

Excuse me, I meant "you are not going to do anything".

Clyde Nocar wrote:

<quoted text>No, you're not just curious. You're a pathetic moron who wants to destroy the country I served & love.

Enough childish nonsense, just answer the question.

How do you define "victory" and "defeat"?

Preston2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Enough childish nonsense, just answer the question.
How do you define "victory" and "defeat"?

All for a dumbass like you would I even try:

Victory: A stable government in Iraq that will be self serving for the Iraqi people. Without interference from any other country, including the United States. When this is accomplished then that will be victory.

Defeat: When the above is not accomplished and Iran is the main influence in the middle east. That is the hope of one Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

To whom it may concern: I truly applogize to the camel dung for the insult comparing you to Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Sorry camel dung.

Praise be Allah wrote:

<quoted text>
All for a dumbass like you would I even try:
Victory: A stable government in Iraq that will be self serving for the Iraqi people. Without interference from any other country, including the United States. When this is accomplished then that will be victory.
Defeat: When the above is not accomplished and Iran is the main influence in the middle east. That is the hope of one Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
To whom it may concern: I truly applogize to the camel dung for the insult comparing you to Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Sorry camel dung.

Last things first: On behalf of Camel dung worldwide, your appology is accepted! Thank you for the desriptive definitions. I get so sick of these LWLWs who love to question our beliefs and then tear down the answers. Its such an excercise in futility when we all know they are too dumb to recognize how dumb they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Your moniker stamp says it all.
<quoted text>

What gave it away? The ears?

Ridge wrote:

<quoted text>
What gave it away? The ears?

Didn't curious George have big ears?

x0x0x wrote:

<quoted text>OK, you made some good points.
AS for my last zinger, sure, it was unnecessary, but you haven't exactly been Mother Teresa, so stop with the 'poor me' routine. After all, you said I was jealous of the Jews after I simply stated facts about foreign aid to Israel. That's not exactly mature behavior either.
You seem to have come around anyway. We need to talk to our enemies no matter how repulsive they are. That was my original point. I guess we basically agree. Scary.

I did misunderstand you about the foreign aid. I thought you were implying that we give Jews money because of any one of the "jewish conspiracy" theories (Jews control the media, Jews control world's money supply) instead of foreign aid. Sorry about the mistake.
I'm not exactly crying 'poor me'- I merely pointed out some minor hypocrisy. And while I despise name-calling, I get aggressive with people in a different fashion. I put down their actions instead - I try to leave the person themself alone. Maybe not mature, but it's what I do.
We don't completely agree. I don't think we should be talking to stateless people who call for genocide, and I don't think a guy without a diplomatic post should be engaging in diplomacy. Check back in the posts. My problem was with jimmy Carter talking to Hamas and Hezbollah representatives. Jimmy Carter is engaging in diplomacy, but for who? He is not a current representative of the US. It would be like George Clooney signing an agreement with Sudan to stop the genocide in Darfur - good work, but why should the US do what Clooney promised? He does not represent the US. Make Carter a Special Envoy or something and tell him not to give the entire store away. Then he would have some legitimacy.
People will agree on some things and disagree on others. If we could do it in a constructive fashion and have some compromises without lingering rancor, then we'd all be better off.

Praise be Allah wrote:

<quoted text>
Victory: A stable government in Iraq that will be self serving for the Iraqi people. Without interference from any other country, including the United States. When this is accomplished then that will be victory.

In other words, you're in the "100 years" camp with McCain.