Local News: Ashburn, VA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Now That Mexican Border is Secure, Will Republicans Stop Blocking Immigration Reform?

Full story: Crooks and Liars

For years, the lame Republican excuse for blocking any and all comprehensive immigration reform has been a single, vapid phrase: " Secure the border first.

Read

45 Comments

More Illegal Immigration Discussions »

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of45
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

The border is not secure. We are constantly seeing articles about vans of people being shot at or having accidents while coming across the border carrying illegal aliens from Mexico. If the border was so secure, we certainly would not see such articles, as none of those things would be happening.

This is why they can (wrongly) claim that the border is more secure and less people are coming over.(Less is not NONE, which is what we need for our border to truly be secure.)

http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in...

Quote:
Border apprehensions are down for a simple reason…Obama is not allowing them

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just announced that the number of illegal aliens apprehended in fiscal year 2011 sunk to a 40-year low at 327,000.

While DHS largely attributes the decline to more stringent border security, it appears that the real reason is something much less impressive.

In May, Arizona Sheriff Larry Dever testified before Congress that Border Patrol’s new policy of giving a warning to illegal crossers rather than taking them into custody, known as “Turn Back South” was not only being practiced near the border, but far north of it as well.
End Quote

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

2

All they're doing is allowing more and more of these illegal aliens to stay here indefinitely.

http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/279/

Quote:
Historic Drop in Deportation Orders Continues
as Immigration Court Backlog Increases

During the most recent quarter (January-March 2012), Immigration Courts issued 2,429 fewer deportation orders[1] than in the previous quarter (October-December 2011). The proportion of cases resulting in an ordered deportation also fell slightly to only 64.1 percent. Thus, in over a third of all cases, the individual was allowed — as least temporarily — to remain in this country.

In most respects the latest figures mark a continuation of the historic drop in deportation orders reported by TRAC in February. This change was touched off last August when the Administration initiated a review of its nearly 300,000 court case backlog. The stated goal of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) review was to better prioritize and reduce the backup of pending matters that had led to lengthy delays in the Immigration Court proceedings of noncitizens the agency wanted to deport. To achieve this longer term objective, ICE attorneys assisted by others had been redirected in a crash effort — part of the prosecutorial discretion (PD) initiative — to review all 300,000 cases to prioritize which to focus on. A consequent drop in overall case dispositions has occurred while these reviews were being carried out.

Details on the change that has taken place nationally during the last nine months are shown in Table 1. These results are from an analysis of case-by-case Immigration Court records obtained from the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Overall court dispositions last quarter fell to 50,489 — the lowest level seen since 2002.(These are preliminary figures and are likely to rise slightly once late reports are recorded.) Regular closures numbered 48,134; the remaining cases (2,335) were closed under the PD initiative.
End Quote
Just Me

Kansas City, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Too bad the majority of citizens, don't believe most of what the Obama Admin tries to spin.
brad

Manchester, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Homeland security is too busy raiding flea markets for counterfeit pocketbooks and unsantioned sports jerseys to worry about illegals.
Whats next,a tax cheat heading up the IRS?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rebel wrote:
The border is not secure. We are constantly seeing articles about vans of people being shot at or having accidents while coming across the border carrying illegal aliens from Mexico. If the border was so secure, we certainly would not see such articles, as none of those things would be happening.
This is why they can (wrongly) claim that the border is more secure and less people are coming over.(Less is not NONE, which is what we need for our border to truly be secure.)
http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in...
Quote:
Border apprehensions are down for a simple reason…Obama is not allowing them
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just announced that the number of illegal aliens apprehended in fiscal year 2011 sunk to a 40-year low at 327,000.
While DHS largely attributes the decline to more stringent border security, it appears that the real reason is something much less impressive.
In May, Arizona Sheriff Larry Dever testified before Congress that Border Patrol’s new policy of giving a warning to illegal crossers rather than taking them into custody, known as “Turn Back South” was not only being practiced near the border, but far north of it as well.
End Quote
Actually, border apprehensions are down because border crossings are down because there are fewer jobs in the US for illegals.

this proves the fact that making it harder for illegals to get jobs is the way to stop illegal immigration.

Border patrols and the revolving door policy of deport and return has not worked and would have to continue forever for their minimal effectiveness. solving the problem, not the symptom, by cracking down on illegal hiring will solve this issue.

The facts don't lie.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

PS...Check the AP wire for the new figures on border crossings. its all over the media...
Suwannee

Port Saint Lucie, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The border is secure????? What a fk'ing laugh!
brad

Manchester, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Apr 24, 2012
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, border apprehensions are down because border crossings are down because there are fewer jobs in the US for illegals.
this proves the fact that making it harder for illegals to get jobs is the way to stop illegal immigration.
Border patrols and the revolving door policy of deport and return has not worked and would have to continue forever for their minimal effectiveness. solving the problem, not the symptom, by cracking down on illegal hiring will solve this issue.
The facts don't lie.
But the only solution I ever see is to punish employers for hiring the very people that are here because the Feds won't do their job in securing the inflow.
Why is the solution never to end federal funding to santuary cities?
Hitting politicans in the pocketbooks has always been effective.

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, border apprehensions are down because border crossings are down because there are fewer jobs in the US for illegals.
this proves the fact that making it harder for illegals to get jobs is the way to stop illegal immigration.
Border patrols and the revolving door policy of deport and return has not worked and would have to continue forever for their minimal effectiveness. solving the problem, not the symptom, by cracking down on illegal hiring will solve this issue.
The facts don't lie.
Did you bother reading the article?

http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in...

Quote:
Border apprehensions are down for a simple reason…Obama is not allowing them

In May, Arizona Sheriff Larry Dever testified before Congress that Border Patrol’s new policy of giving a warning to illegal crossers rather than taking them into custody, known as “Turn Back South” was not only being practiced near the border, but far north of it as well.
End Quote

So if all they do is give a warning, then it *appears* border crossings are down, when in reality, they are not. Or at least they are not down that much. Have you read the current news about the vans being stopped and the vans being shot at the and the accidents happening with illegal aliens being in the vans???? Apparently not.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

brad wrote:
<quoted text>
But the only solution I ever see is to punish employers for hiring the very people that are here because the Feds won't do their job in securing the inflow.
Why is the solution never to end federal funding to santuary cities?
Hitting politicans in the pocketbooks has always been effective.
As these facts clearly point out, if US citizens quit hiring illegal workers, they would stop coming here. the jobs are the reason they are coming here.

yes the Feds should step up the enforcement of this, as should the many states that have strict laws against hiring illegals, but are not enforced.

Securing the border has not worked and will not work. Taking care of the problem, the hiring of illegal workers, will solve the problem.

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>As these facts clearly point out, if US citizens quit hiring illegal workers, they would stop coming here. the jobs are the reason they are coming here.
yes the Feds should step up the enforcement of this, as should the many states that have strict laws against hiring illegals, but are not enforced.
Securing the border has not worked and will not work. Taking care of the problem, the hiring of illegal workers, will solve the problem.
"Good people" (as they purport themselves to be) would not purposely break the laws of a sovereign country (or any laws, for that matter). Supposing they made the mistake of doing so, "good people" would want to right their wrong, which, in this instance, entails going home and applying to come the right way, as well as accepting whatever decision is made on that application (good or bad).

A company cannot hire that which is not here. If the illegal aliens were not here, applying for the jobs, they couldn't hire them. If you suggest the companies recruit in Mexico, well, good people would not take a job, knowing it is against the law. These people KNOW that being here without permission is against the law. Thus, even if someone were to recruit them in their own country, they are KNOWINGLY BREAKING THE LAW.

If I am offered money to break the law, I would say NO. If I chose to do it, I would not be considered innocent, because someone else enticed me. Ignorance of the law is not a defense, anyway.

We need to punish both the employers AND the illegal aliens -- strictly. No overlooking anything because they don't have some violent criminal record. Merely working without authorization is a CRIME, as is walking over our border without the proper paperwork. Let's not even get into stealing/using a social securing number that does not belong to you, etc., etc., etc.

Not only should the employers feel the pain of hiring illegal aliens, but illegal aliens should feel the pain of being here. They should be offered NOTHING. They should not be allowed to rent, to turn on utilities, to do any business with anyone, EVER. They have no right to be here and thus should have no right to anything while here. If they are truly sick, they should have the right to be stabilized and shipped home, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO SUE ANYONE DUE TO THEIR BEING HERE ILLEGALLY AND RECEIVING WHAT THEY DETERMINE TO BE LESS THAN GOOD CARE. If they hadn't been where they didn't belong, they couldn't have gotten any "bad" care. If they hadn't been where they didn't belong, they couldn't have been the victim of a crime here, either. They make their beds. Let them lie in them...and NOT at the taxpayers' expense.

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>As these facts clearly point out, if US citizens quit hiring illegal workers, they would stop coming here. the jobs are the reason they are coming here.
yes the Feds should step up the enforcement of this, as should the many states that have strict laws against hiring illegals, but are not enforced.
Securing the border has not worked and will not work. Taking care of the problem, the hiring of illegal workers, will solve the problem.
Not all of them are working, anyway. Many, like Obozo's illegal aunt, find ways to milk the system and get on the government dole, living out of Section 8 housing, etc.(even without anchor brats).

Only 7,700,000 are found to be working.

The following stats on illegals working in the U.S. is from a study done by the Pew Hispanic Center and only published by CIS.

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/files/pdf/P...

Quote:
In addition to these new, legal foreign workers, some 7.7 million illegal aliens were employed in U.S. jobs in 2008, based on estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center.3 These are all jobs that unemployed U.S. workers—both citizens and already-resident legal immigrants—could and should have the chance to fill.
End Quote

This study was from a time when they were saying there was a minimum of 12,000,000 illegal aliens here, if not more. That leaves a lot of room for mooching.

So what are the rest doing to support themselves??

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rebel wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you bother reading the article?
http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in...
Quote:
Border apprehensions are down for a simple reason…Obama is not allowing them
In May, Arizona Sheriff Larry Dever testified before Congress that Border Patrol’s new policy of giving a warning to illegal crossers rather than taking them into custody, known as “Turn Back South” was not only being practiced near the border, but far north of it as well.
End Quote
So if all they do is give a warning, then it *appears* border crossings are down, when in reality, they are not. Or at least they are not down that much. Have you read the current news about the vans being stopped and the vans being shot at the and the accidents happening with illegal aliens being in the vans???? Apparently not.
the AP article I cited does not use border patrol records for thier source.

If you go back to when the US economy first started tanking, you can read about how the attempted border crossings dropped immediately. people in mexico know if there are jobs available for them here in the US or not, and they come here if there are and they don't of there are not.

if we actually solve the problem of illegal immigration by going at its source, the jobs, we will cut off the reason illegal immigrants come here.

Also, in the AP story, and ny other source you can look at, you will see that immigrants from mexico make up less than 2/3rds of the illegal residents in the US. almost all the rest are people that were here legally, but never left when they were supposed to. securing the border will not stop that. fully one third of the problem! taking away the ability to get a job here without proper documentation will solve the entire problem.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Apr 24, 2012
 
Rebel wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all of them are working, anyway. Many, like Obozo's illegal aunt, find ways to milk the system and get on the government dole, living out of Section 8 housing, etc.(even without anchor brats).
Only 7,700,000 are found to be working.
The following stats on illegals working in the U.S. is from a study done by the Pew Hispanic Center and only published by CIS.
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/files/pdf/P...
Quote:
In addition to these new, legal foreign workers, some 7.7 million illegal aliens were employed in U.S. jobs in 2008, based on estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center.3 These are all jobs that unemployed U.S. workers—both citizens and already-resident legal immigrants—could and should have the chance to fill.
End Quote
This study was from a time when they were saying there was a minimum of 12,000,000 illegal aliens here, if not more. That leaves a lot of room for mooching.
So what are the rest doing to support themselves??
Ummm...living with the ones that do have jobs??? Duh.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Apr 24, 2012
 
Rebel wrote:
<quoted text>
"Good people" (as they purport themselves to be) would not purposely break the laws of a sovereign country (or any laws, for that matter). Supposing they made the mistake of doing so, "good people" would want to right their wrong, which, in this instance, entails going home and applying to come the right way, as well as accepting whatever decision is made on that application (good or bad).
A company cannot hire that which is not here. If the illegal aliens were not here, applying for the jobs, they couldn't hire them. If you suggest the companies recruit in Mexico, well, good people would not take a job, knowing it is against the law. These people KNOW that being here without permission is against the law. Thus, even if someone were to recruit them in their own country, they are KNOWINGLY BREAKING THE LAW.
If I am offered money to break the law, I would say NO. If I chose to do it, I would not be considered innocent, because someone else enticed me. Ignorance of the law is not a defense, anyway.
We need to punish both the employers AND the illegal aliens -- strictly. No overlooking anything because they don't have some violent criminal record. Merely working without authorization is a CRIME, as is walking over our border without the proper paperwork. Let's not even get into stealing/using a social securing number that does not belong to you, etc., etc., etc.
Not only should the employers feel the pain of hiring illegal aliens, but illegal aliens should feel the pain of being here. They should be offered NOTHING. They should not be allowed to rent, to turn on utilities, to do any business with anyone, EVER. They have no right to be here and thus should have no right to anything while here. If they are truly sick, they should have the right to be stabilized and shipped home, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO SUE ANYONE DUE TO THEIR BEING HERE ILLEGALLY AND RECEIVING WHAT THEY DETERMINE TO BE LESS THAN GOOD CARE. If they hadn't been where they didn't belong, they couldn't have gotten any "bad" care. If they hadn't been where they didn't belong, they couldn't have been the victim of a crime here, either. They make their beds. Let them lie in them...and NOT at the taxpayers' expense.
Godd people don't speed? Please...
Suwannee

Port Saint Lucie, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm...living with the ones that do have jobs??? Duh.
Duh..........they get on welfare. I don't need any posting from the morons stating otherwise. I know for a fact they can get on welfare if they have children , anchor brats or just brats.

“United We Stand”

Since: Dec 11

Divided We Fall

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

"Now That Mexican Border is Secure"
LMAO! LOL! Ha ha ha and even ja ja ja! I one living person believes that!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Suwannee wrote:
<quoted text>
Duh..........they get on welfare. I don't need any posting from the morons stating otherwise. I know for a fact they can get on welfare if they have children , anchor brats or just brats.
We do need to re-amend the 24th amendment....

Again, the "secure border" would ony take care of 2/3rds of that problem. And we'd still have to figure how far up the coastline the raazorwire needs to go...

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>the AP article I cited does not use border patrol records for thier source.
If you go back to when the US economy first started tanking, you can read about how the attempted border crossings dropped immediately. people in mexico know if there are jobs available for them here in the US or not, and they come here if there are and they don't of there are not.
if we actually solve the problem of illegal immigration by going at its source, the jobs, we will cut off the reason illegal immigrants come here.
Also, in the AP story, and ny other source you can look at, you will see that immigrants from mexico make up less than 2/3rds of the illegal residents in the US. almost all the rest are people that were here legally, but never left when they were supposed to. securing the border will not stop that. fully one third of the problem! taking away the ability to get a job here without proper documentation will solve the entire problem.
Illegal aliens from Mexico make up the MAJORITY of illegal aliens here -- 6.6 million, or 62% of the illegal aliens are from Mexico.

Strictly enforcing our immigration laws will also stop it...strictly enforcing against both employers *and* illegal aliens. If we strictly enforced the laws, illegals would not have a chance of being here.

There are a lot of things that might entice a citizen to break the law. Do we remove all those enticements to make sure citizens don't break the law? NO! We force those citizens who break the law to suffer the consequences of their actions. Thus, we should do the same for illegal aliens. We should definitely force their employers to face the consequences of employing illegal aliens, but we should not put the whole burden on them, just like we would not put the whole burden on anyone who entices a citizen to break the law. It's *part* of the problem, but not the whole problem.

Where is personal responsibility? If illegal aliens think there is no personal responsibility, they will keep trying. They are no better than legal residents or citizens, thus they must take personal responsibility for their actions.

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics...

Illegals by Race or Country

Mexico continued to be the leading source country of unauthorized
immigration to the United States (see Table 3).

There were 6.6 million unauthorized immigrants from Mexico in 2010, representing 62 percent of the unauthorized population.

The next leading source countries for unauthorized immigrants in 2010 were El Salvador (620,000), Guatemala (520,000), Honduras (330,000), and the Philippines (280,000).

The ten leading countries of origin represented 86 percent of the unauthorized immigrant population in 2010.

The number of Mexican-born unauthorized immigrants increased by 2.3
million between 2000 and 2007 and decreased by 340,000 between 2007 and 2010.

Changes in the unauthorized population were much smaller during either period for other leading source countries.

“Assimilate & Speak English!”

Since: Jan 07

Lansing, IL - now: Pomp Bch FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Apr 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm...living with the ones that do have jobs??? Duh.
The ones that *do* have jobs are committing a crime - a federal misdemeanor -- by working without authorization. So that's something to be proud of? I think not.

And I seriously doubt that 4,000,000 people are living with the 7,700,000 that are working. Many are like Obozo's aunt, living in Section 8 housing, having back surgery on the taxpayers' dime, etc. They manage to find ways to scam the system.

If they are working for that small of a wage, then how are TWO people living on that??? Or are they breaking zoning laws, also, by living more to a house than is zoned for???

They are breaking many laws while here. Bet on it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of45
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for May 21

Sagittarius

Friends help to keep you entertained today by giving you plenty to think about and a wide-ranging discussion really tests your brain cells. Friends will also provoke deep emotions in you, so don't be surprised if you feel very powerfully about someone you spend time with now. If you make plans for something, try not to get obsessed by them.

Get your Horoscope »