Should a court kill Obama's health care plan?

judges legislating from the bench LOL.

Yes, it's anti-American to force someone to buy a junk insurance policy that they cannot afford. It is also un-Constitutional to force someone to buy a service or product from a corporation, or anyone for that matter.

Activist wrote:

judges legislating from the bench LOL.

Well they legislated abortion for all those liberals killing babies in the womb. Turnabout is fair play.

And I guess you want the government to be able to FORCE you to buy whatever they tell you to, whether you want to or not?

Maybe your motto should be, "Down With Freedom, Down With The Constitution."

Seen Is Awesome wrote:

Yes, it's anti-American to force someone to buy a junk insurance policy that they cannot afford. It is also un-Constitutional to force someone to buy a service or product from a corporation, or anyone for that matter.

Agreed.

Yes. A court SHOULD kill Obamacare.

{Interesting language used. Most of the people supporting Obamacare are those that support abortion as well but they won't admit that abortion is killing a pre-born, but they get all hypersensitive and try to personalize Obamacare using the hyperbole language of "kill", as if Obamacare is alive - If Obamacare DOES continue I propose every liberal that support it MUST be admitted into an asylum permanently. That is the ONLY way I see myself paying for THEIR healthcare.}

Kill it - a bad piece of legislation, forced down the throats of those that ultimately have to pay more, for the benefit of the few. The few who just happen to support those that passed the stupid piece of crap.
The back room deals.
The last minute changes.
As transparent as Molasses!

Damn, I wanted to say that.

Activist wrote:

judges legislating from the bench LOL.

JosephOne wrote:

<quoted text>
Well they legislated abortion for all those liberals killing babies in the womb. Turnabout is fair play.
And I guess you want the government to be able to FORCE you to buy whatever they tell you to, whether you want to or not?
Maybe your motto should be, "Down With Freedom, Down With The Constitution."

the motto is up with freedom, up with the constitution, up with the common good, down with religious nuts restricting freedom.

Seen Is Awesome wrote:

Yes, it's anti-American to force someone to buy a junk insurance policy that they cannot afford. It is also un-Constitutional to force someone to buy a service or product from a corporation, or anyone for that matter.

constitutional scholar. LOL

Nope wrote:

<quoted text>
the motto is up with freedom, up with the constitution, up with the common good, down with religious nuts restricting freedom.

Restricting freedom how?

By being FORCED to buy healthcare. Are you nuts?

This means IF they wanted to they could FORCE you to buy a car. Force you to buy a motorcyle.

FORCE you to participate in prostitution.

The moralless gimme gimmes love this kind of government. Getting their freebees off the backs of the past and putting it on the backs of the future. Problem being they are raising a bunch sissies who won't and better yet can't. Libbies love a gumment free bee.

Yes they should. Will they???

The selection of words, and their order in the title for this story, are sure to bring in the CIA and the NAACP for sure :>)

JosephOne wrote:

Yes. A court SHOULD kill Obamacare.
{Interesting language used. Most of the people supporting Obamacare are those that support abortion as well but they won't admit that abortion is killing a pre-born, but they get all hypersensitive and try to personalize Obamacare using the hyperbole language of "kill", as if Obamacare is alive - If Obamacare DOES continue I propose every liberal that support it MUST be admitted into an asylum permanently. That is the ONLY way I see myself paying for THEIR healthcare.}

i see no need to cater to people who were irresponsible on the "baby" making bed. their male partner should be required to pay for the procedure.
by the way, it should not be called ObamaCare, but CongressCARE; for they were the ones that produced the legislation.

hammer time wrote:

<quoted text>
i see no need to cater to people who were irresponsible on the "baby" making bed. their male partner should be required to pay for the procedure..

Too bad your mom didn't feel that way.

Lucky Ned Pepper wrote:

<quoted text>
Too bad your mom didn't feel that way.

it would've been ok........did your mom finally sign the adoption documents for you in 2011? sorry to break the news to you sonny, it had to be told.

Lucky Ned Pepper wrote:

<quoted text>
Too bad your mom didn't feel that way.

LOL She didn't know which "john" did it to her.

Seen Is Awesome wrote:

Yes, it's anti-American to force someone to buy a junk insurance policy that they cannot afford. It is also un-Constitutional to force someone to buy a service or product from a corporation, or anyone for that matter.

What are you 12 years old?

Do you understand how the real world works? Of course you do not you simpleton. Why do we have to put up with the trashy likes of you.

va_tazdad wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL She didn't know which "john" did it to her.

LOL, Yep, Father's Day is always confusing for Knothead.

We have three branches of government for a reason. So if bad law is passed, the it can be overturned by the judicial branch.
Why do you think prohibition was overturned? And it was a Constitutional Amendment too boot. You libs need to understand civics a little better rather than try to control free citizens.