N.J. child autism count up sharply

Isn't it interesting that only 2 of the 14 states have the highest autism rates? The 2 states themselves are interesting. It points away from vaccine cause. And again, the rate is higher in boys than girls even in a state where medical diagnosing is better than other states.

friend wrote:

Isn't it interesting that only 2 of the 14 states have the highest autism rates? The 2 states themselves are interesting. It points away from vaccine cause. And again, the rate is higher in boys than girls even in a state where medical diagnosing is better than other states.

Not interesting, meaningless. Do you think numbers should be equal in all states or what? More susceptible means higher numbers of vaccine injury. It doesn't point away, it supports vaccine cause. Explain why Utah and New Jersy should have more victims or victims at all. Explain why there are victims in every city in every state and why anything points away from vaccines. Explain why autism is worldwide and rates are growing worldwide. INTERESTING how ignoring vaccines leaves us with a "no known cause" scenario, which has been the planned coverup all along.

Prevalence does not at all support vaccine cause. That's a scare tactic and wishful-thinking.

Thereis no known cause. Get used to it.

friend wrote:

Prevalence does not at all support vaccine cause. That's a scare tactic and wishful-thinking.
Thereis no known cause. Get used to it.

Get used to the truth becoming clearer. Get used to parents refusing to vaccinate. Get used to the noose tightening on the liars and criminals ar Pharma, FDA CDC etc. This won't go away. The groundswell is just beginning. Bury your head in the sand all you want, no onme gives a hoot about your duh opinion.

Stuart Chaifetz could not believe the statements from teachers at his son's school that his 10-year-old boy was acting out, hitting, and throwing around furniture. The boy, Akian, had never done this before. So he wired up his son to record audio and school one day and was shocked at what he found. Teachers were joking in front of students about getting drunk the night before, throwing up that morning, and still being drunk. They call the boy a "bastard." They bully the boy and tell him that he can't see his dad, which finally causes him to panic into a half-hour meltdown in which the boy, who is autistic, thrashes around the room.

The father, to his credit, fights back with this video. He doesn't take the problem to the principal or the superintendent to be swept under the rug. He simply goes public and exposes the teachers for what they are.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Another typical anti vaxxer attack.
Jersey ballo's comment has nothing to do with me. Only trolls take one persons comment and uses it against another, instead of just focusing on what the comment content was to begin with. I would agree to video taping for evidence, But I'm not sure who would agree with video taping and getting evidence of abuse, but doesn't take the issue to the school district or police. He puts it on youtube. Posts the link on forums and why? Obviously the dad wants to make millions off the video.

Not true I would applaud that behavior. It also has nothing to do with vaccines.

Not true that I criticize those for not vaccinating. I never have. I have been promoting vaccine choice since I've been on this forum to date. I could care less if you vaccinate or not, but the fact is if you do or don't, it's YOUR choice. You have to take some responsibility for YOUR choice, instead of blaming everyone else. That's what adults do.

I also don't "blame" genetics. I've never been suckered into that blame game as you were and still are. I simply follow the science, and science points to genetics, NOT vaccines.

Vaccines Cause Autism wrote:

<quoted text>
New Jersy has one of the highest vaccination intakes in the country..nuff said. More Vaccines, more autism.

One more element in yoru equation MORE PEOPLE = more vaccines

So maybe MAYBE it can be said MORE PEOPLE = more autisim

OR! New methods of diagnosis + MORE PEOPLE = more autism.

Funny, then New Jersey should have the highest rates of autism then.
It doesn't.
Oh, and this from 2010
NJ Immunization Rate Among Nation’s Lowest
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/08/22/nj-imm...

See how anti vaxxers twist the facts?

The highest rates in the USA is Utah and lookee here

Immunization rate drops in Utah
http://www.heraldextra.com/news/science/healt...

Nice try for misinfo.

Utah's immunization dropped prior to the new CDC autism rates study- which was data from 2008. According to your vaccine theory, Utah shouldn't have the countries highest autism rates. But it does.

Obviously it's not what's happening regardless of what you claim is as to why it's happening. You go around siting the new autism rates of the USA without even knowing of those 14 states, which had low vaccination rates.

One expects as much from an anti vaxxer who is only here to disrupt the topics.

topix net topix terms
http://www.topix.net/topix/terms
"It would be easier on all of us if you were polite."

Nice back tracking. Sorry pal, I never said parents should be responsible if vaccination goes bad. For whatever reason, you have to play the blame game. Parents don't make cars, either but they often cause accidents and death. Parents don't market them as safe when often they are not, parents don't share the profits or get bonuses for sales, and they don't licence and approve them for use. Some choose to use them, some do not. Some research prior, some do not. No one forces anyone to get a car; no one forces anyone to get vaccines.

As for autism, it's untrue it affects children indiscriminately. It affects boys far more than girls. Facts are facts, not about about being equal in every state, and since you have no clue how the rates are obtained, you'll never grasp it. The states with low vaccination rates, by YOUR own vaccine theory, should have low autism rates. That in fact is not the case, so you continue with the self appointed "I had no clue" victim.

Calixto el Diablo wrote:

<quoted text>
One more element in yoru equation MORE PEOPLE = more vaccines
So maybe MAYBE it can be said MORE PEOPLE = more autisim
OR! New methods of diagnosis + MORE PEOPLE = more autism.

Wrong senior

friend wrote:

Nice back tracking. Sorry pal, I never said parents should be responsible if vaccination goes bad. For whatever reason, you have to play the blame game. Parents don't make cars, either but they often cause accidents and death. Parents don't market them as safe when often they are not, parents don't share the profits or get bonuses for sales, and they don't licence and approve them for use. Some choose to use them, some do not. Some research prior, some do not. No one forces anyone to get a car; no one forces anyone to get vaccines.
As for autism, it's untrue it affects children indiscriminately. It affects boys far more than girls. Facts are facts, not about about being equal in every state, and since you have no clue how the rates are obtained, you'll never grasp it. The states with low vaccination rates, by YOUR own vaccine theory, should have low autism rates. That in fact is not the case, so you continue with the self appointed "I had no clue" victim.

Utah shows that even though they may have lower vaccination rates it doesn't clarify that children get NO vaccines or SOME vaccines. If they have lower rates overall but each child gets the MMR, then my theory stands. So much for your self-appointed DUHNESS.

Each child get's the MMR, who says so? You just keep assuming, that's what anti vaxxers do best. And again, you have no clue how the rates were obtained and of course it was a rate of autism, not including who had vaccines so in no way does it implecate vaccines, but more points away from it due to the low vaccination rates and blows your theory out of the water.

friend wrote:

Each child get's the MMR, who says so? You just keep assuming, that's what anti vaxxers do best. And again, you have no clue how the rates were obtained and of course it was a rate of autism, not including who had vaccines so in no way does it implecate vaccines, but more points away from it due to the low vaccination rates and blows your theory out of the water.

I said if. And its implicate. It blows nothing except your theory. We don't have the proper informantion. It doesn't say lower mmr rates it says lower rates of vaccination in general. But if the MMR causes brain swelling (autism) and MMR rates ARE high then lower general rates mean nothing. If the offending vaccines it given but overall rates are low it supports me. Can't comprehend that can you?

http://www.indiadivine.org/andarya/ayurveda-h...
www.flu-treatments.com/prevnar-vaccine.html
http://curezone.com/art/read.asp...
http://www.thenhf.com/article.php...

What a bunch of dumb links. Gotta love the first one!
And who cares about some paper conducted by a law firm? Biased big time. More so when Robert Krakow was part of it.

But thanks for posting it, so everyone can see what you rely on!

"Its so a person can't contemplate the issue"?? Talk about comprehension problems. Or did you really mean to dictateand deman people agree with you??

More like complicate the issue with biased sites. And why is it you're the only one who screws up web addresses??!! I think it's an excuse. You really were interested in Hinduism.