After health ruling, will US be ready for the law?

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>they thought the same thing in 1935 with the Social Security Act.

That's true but it was a whole diffrent program and it is a tax based program while one works..but with obama care now Americans 35 million of them will get an I.R.S. bill of roughly $800 to $1100 written in the Bill!
So how is social Security the same thing...yes all Americans pay into the program...An individual should not be taxed because he/she can't afford to buy it...worse thing is penalties and even federal prison are now realities for 35 million people who can't afford to pay the tax and there are many I know who can barley make it week to week...So you can stick your Obama care up your Ass and piss off OK Sunshine!

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
Keep tuning into the fux liars club and rush dickless. Your repetitive talking points are boring like their's. It's best you leave the U.S. after his re-election. If you think you've been made a jackass out of so far....
Bwahahahahahahaha

Could you call your Mommy over to the computer so she can help make sense of your postings? Please. All I got out of your post was that You were looking forward to the election so Obama could really make jackasses out of the American people????

That sort of makes you a Party of one.

Roger Edgar wrote:

<quoted text>
Could you call your Mommy over to the computer so she can help make sense of your postings? Please. All I got out of your post was that You were looking forward to the election so Obama could really make jackasses out of the American people????
That sort of makes you a Party of one.

Do you use a pink parasol when dancing?

HeyPal wrote:

<quoted text>Yeah your probable right...they will stick it to Americans no matter what the people vote or dissent on anymore...they just tell us all to sit down take our meds and watch more dumb sports to numb our fluoride minds...they can all burn in hell in D.C. and the U.K. ain't much better with the whole Euro event about to crash over there...A big deck of cards just waiting to fall down!

What I find funny is that even AFTER the big O's attorney argued it was a tax not fee, even AFTER SCOTUS agreed it was a tax not fee, the big O is STILL saying oh its not a tax at all......... how stupid does he think we are

no big O wrote:

<quoted text>
What I find funny is that even AFTER the big O's attorney argued it was a tax not fee, even AFTER SCOTUS agreed it was a tax not fee, the big O is STILL saying oh its not a tax at all......... how stupid does he think we are

very

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

In less than 24 hours after the Supreme Court ruled that Obamacare was Constitutional a few new polls have come out that show the law has gained popularity even to the point of being seen as more positive than negative (a first for this law). It was priceless to see the unpatriotic right-wing tea-baggers lose it completely yesterday as all their hopes came crashing down to reality, LOL.
President Obama is too brilliant for these ignorant tea-bagging idiots, LOL.

You should be ashamed to show you are a Marine!!!!!
What's wrong with you? Countless people are laughing at your meth hazed thoughts.

The laughing liberal wrote:

The Real "War On Women": No more annual Pap smear: New cervical cancer screening guidelines
By Otis Brawley,
Special to CNN
Thu March 15, 2012
CNN)-- Q: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is releasing new guidelines on cervical cancer screenings. What's changed?
A: In the 1930s, cervical cancer was the deadliest women's cancer in America. At that time, it killed more women each year than breast or lung cancer.
But over the past 80 years, there has been a tremendous decline in the death rate from cervical cancer because of improvements in treatment and screening. Today, death from cervical cancer is relatively rare in the U.S.
In 2009, about 4,000 American women died of cancer of the cervix. A review of the medical history of these women showed that the overwhelming majority had never had cervical cancer screening, and most who did were screened more than 10 years before diagnosis.
This week, the Obama Preventive Services Task Force is announcing new recommendations for Pap tests to screen women for cervical cancer.
OBAMACARE CUTS (Rationing)
1. The new guidelines advise women to reduce the number of tests they receive over their lifetime.
2. Most surprising of these recommendations is that women under age 21 should not be tested.
3. The task force has also recommended that women over 21 undergo a Pap test screening every three years, instead of annually.
Let the RATIONING Begin!
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/14/health/brawley-...

Republiscums, like Bishop Smut Romney, pornographer and socipath, are pathological liars. You even lie about easily disproved things. Now you are claiming to be a pap smear expert?

You are a sick ****.

"Most surprising of these recommendations is that women under age 21 should not be tested. But it makes sense -- many sexually active women under 21 will develop a human papillomavirus infection, or HPV, which can lead to pre-cancerous lesions. And when doctors see those lesions on a Pap test, they want to treat them. Yet nearly all of those lesions will disappear on their own without residual effects. And those that do not are easily treated years later. Treating them as soon as they're spotted can lead to cervical incompetence and miscarriage down the road.

The task force has also recommended that women over 21 undergo a Pap test screening every three years, instead of annually. This, too, fits with what we know about this disease: HPV can take more than a decade to progress to cervical dysplasia or cancer."

HeyPal wrote:

<quoted text>hey bird brain..before you label me as a tee bager which I'm not you should know neither party will do jack crap with obama care except to maybe take the tax law out if Mitt gets in..but mitt will expand on it and it may even get worse before you and many others realize the reality of this gang of thugs in D.C. want no one to have real freedom anymore...they are all trader's bought out by the greed of Bankers!

Why don't you:

1. run for office.

2. leave.

HeyPal wrote:

<quoted text>how can they tax Americans without representation as the Constitution says...just asking you?
Read: Obamacare: Taxing The American People Into Oblivion
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamacare-taxing-...

here How the Republicans felt about Social Security in 1935.

Alf Landon Opposes Social Security as a "Fraud"

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Alf Landon was the Republican Nominee for the election in 1936

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you use a pink parasol when dancing?

OH No. I'm a Man not a panty waisted "progressive'. You have me confused with one of Pelosi's neutered lackeys.

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
They'll be represented when the House votes to repeal it and the Senate says,'not so fast, party of no.'
Sux to be an ineffective teabooger.

What is really going to sux is when middle class parents have to stand in line to get an operation for their kids and then BEG one of Pelosi's new bloated overpaid self important Bureaurcats to approve the Operation. Out side of the Blue States, most Americans aren't good at paying more to settle for less... and having to BEG to get it.

Begging for a child's Operation will really be hard on any Parent who actually VOTES to re-elect Obama. Ouch!

The Libtards are toast in November...

Florida wrote:

The Libtards are toast in November...

No-vem-ber....(more)...?....!; -000

Florida wrote:

The Libtards are toast in November...

there is two Libtards running if you didnt know, one is Democrat and the other says he is a Republican, either way the Libtards win in November.

Republiscum vowing to rip away health care from your child.

Republiscum vowing to eliminate Medicare and Medicaid.

Republiscum say that it is your right to die in the streets because you cannot pay $100K out of pocket for an operation.

Obamney Care:

"Children’s Pre-Existing Conditions

Insurance companies can no longer limit or deny benefits to children under age 19 due to a pre-existing health condition."

This will apply to adults as well in 2014.

Bishop Smut Romney vows to let insurance companies deny you care and leave you holding the bill when you get sick.

Obamney Care:

"
Curbing Insurance Cancellations

The Affordable Care Act stops health plans from retroactively canceling your insurance coverage solely because you or your employer made an honest mistake on your insurance application.
What This Means for You

Before the health care law, if your insurance company found that you’d made a mistake on your insurance application, the insurance company might “rescind” your benefits — that is, declare your policy invalid from the day it began. Your insurance company might also ask you to pay back any money already spent for your medical care.

Now, an insurer cannot rescind your coverage simply because you made an honest mistake or left out information that has little bearing on your health."

Yes, insurance corporation death panels do this kind of thing all the time:

"Example:

When her insurance application asked for “anything else relevant to your health that we should know about,” Katy forgot to mention two visits to a psychologist she had 6 years earlier. Katy was later diagnosed with breast cancer, and submitted claims to her insurance company for breast cancer treatment.

After receiving Katy’s claim, her plan discovered the two psychologist visits. Before the new law, Katy’s mistake might have prompted her health insurer to rescind, or retroactively cancel, her coverage. But under the health care law, Katy’s insurance plan cannot rescind her coverage, because Katy did not intentionally misrepresent significant information."

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
Republiscums, like Bishop Smut Romney, pornographer and socipath, are pathological liars. You even lie about easily disproved things. Now you are claiming to be a pap smear expert?
You are a sick ****.
"Most surprising of these recommendations is that women under age 21 should not be tested. But it makes sense -- many sexually active women under 21 will develop a human papillomavirus infection, or HPV, which can lead to pre-cancerous lesions. And when doctors see those lesions on a Pap test, they want to treat them. Yet nearly all of those lesions will disappear on their own without residual effects. And those that do not are easily treated years later. Treating them as soon as they're spotted can lead to cervical incompetence and miscarriage down the road.
The task force has also recommended that women over 21 undergo a Pap test screening every three years, instead of annually. This, too, fits with what we know about this disease: HPV can take more than a decade to progress to cervical dysplasia or cancer."

We should publish your postings. Your posts would drive any decent, principled American to get off their butts and Vote Romney just to prove that America is WAY BETTER than uncivilized, unparented creatures like you.

"If You Oppose Single Payer Insurance, Take Your Parents Off Medicare and Pay for Their Medical Bills Yourself

I'm so sick of freeloaders on my tax dollars, aren't you?

So, I want to get a message across to those who are on Medicare, and to the children of those who are on Medicare, who oppose health care reform and Medicare for all: remove yourself from Medicare, or remove your parents from it and just pay for your/their medical services without me paying for them, all right?

Before, BuzzFlash at Truthout has made this request of Tea Party promoters of the oxymoron: "Down with socialized medicine and the government better not touch my Medicare." We've asked that those who have such outlooks to remove themselves from Medicare because we don't want them to be such hypocrites and make us pay for a healthcare program that they oppose for other Americans under 65, but support for themselves.

Now we are extending that challenge to Tea Party advocates and other Americans who have parents on Medicare, but who in their middle age oppose improving healthcare insurance - for even themselves (out of ignorance, it appears). To those middle age Americans with such an outlook, we ask that you remove your parents from Medicare and pay for their healthcare yourselves. Because we don't want to make a hypocrite out of you on our tax dollars by providing socialized medicine to your parents while you denounce it in principle.

And while you are at it, if you oppose medical care for all Americans, please sign a legally binding pledge - and this applies to all of you under 65 who oppose a single payer system - that you will not apply for Medicare when you turn 65 - and that you will not ask the US government to pay for your healthcare in your senior years."

BF

no big O wrote:

<quoted text>
What I find funny is that even AFTER the big O's attorney argued it was a tax not fee, even AFTER SCOTUS agreed it was a tax not fee, the big O is STILL saying oh its not a tax at all......... how stupid does he think we are

You're talking about teaboogers.....i.e. stupid.