The President has failed us

JackMcIntosh wrote:

<quoted text>
You sure we're watching the same convention?

I see a lot of whining and the garnering of sympathy by everyone who has spoken so far......With no solutions being stated......Just a bunch of blaming

JackMcIntosh wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not a democrat and I am aware of what some conservatives called "empty chair day".
I didn't mention it because I thought the far right had probably suffered enough humiliation as of late.
That doesn't change the fact that when the Romney campaign released the official highlight video of the convention, they decided not to inlcude any footage of the whole Eastwood mess.

Ooooh. Sorry about that Jack. I mistook you for a Democrat when you are just an avid Clint Eastwood admirer.

Well here's one you shouldn't forget.

Words Matter

watch

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/words-matter-...

fishaholic wrote:

<quoted text>
OH, the horrors! It's about a freaking marathon. You want lies that are relevant? Try this one:
"Once again the Chair of the Democratic Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz proves you just can't fix stupid. Earlier today she was caught in a lie claiming that Israel's Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren said the Republican policies were dangerous to Israel. An obvious lie because a diplomat, especially an Israeli one would never choose one side over the other in an American Political race."
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/09/debbie...

"OH, the horrors! It's about a freaking marathon. You want lies that are relevant? Try this one:"

So, you do admit that Paul Ryan DID lie to the American people?

I guess that's progress.

positronium wrote:

<quoted text>I see a lot of whining and the garnering of sympathy by everyone who has spoken so far......With no solutions being stated......Just a bunch of blaming

Isn't it funny how two people can view the same event and walk away with completlely different perceptions?

Of course, I'm trying to base mine on what I actually see and hear.

Not sure what standard you're using.

completlely?

Oh well, you'll figure it out.

;)

EAGLE EYE1 wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not so much anti obama.. I think those tax cuts should have ended for everyone and not just the rich.. I never supported any bailout either.. I sure don't support the spending going on nowadays.. I just don't see the economy turning around under another 4 years of obama..
Eagle

The next 4 years no matter who is president will see the economy improve even if the continued congressional fighting continues. I already know that companies are not in the business to sit on money, they'll start investing again.

The Notorious Rico wrote:

<quoted text>
The next 4 years no matter who is president will see the economy improve even if the continued congressional fighting continues. I already know that companies are not in the business to sit on money, they'll start investing again.

There will be no hoarding.

Obama Pushes False GM Success Story

As it turns out, GM got Treasury's OK to "repay" more than $6.7 billion "using a portion of the escrow account that had been funded with TARP funds." So GM is merely paying the government back with government money, not money GM is earning selling cars, as the administration has claimed.

Worse, GM in effect is still borrowing money. Consider this item from the report: "What remained in escrow was released to GM." Bottom line: Taxpayers have not been paid back and are still on the hook as GM continues to require government help. Yet Obama has hailed the GM bailout as the signature achievement of his big government programs.

"On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen," the president said. "Today, General Motors is back on top as the world's No. 1 automaker."

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/0430...

JackMcIntosh wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it funny how two people can view the same event and walk away with completlely different perceptions?
Of course, I'm trying to base mine on what I actually see and hear.
Not sure what standard you're using.

My eyes, ears and my well developed sense of perception......and the whining and cussing I see here.... by those who favor obama and his agenda....

Mirror Mirror wrote:

Obama Pushes False GM Success Story
As it turns out, GM got Treasury's OK to "repay" more than $6.7 billion "using a portion of the escrow account that had been funded with TARP funds." So GM is merely paying the government back with government money, not money GM is earning selling cars, as the administration has claimed.
Worse, GM in effect is still borrowing money. Consider this item from the report: "What remained in escrow was released to GM." Bottom line: Taxpayers have not been paid back and are still on the hook as GM continues to require government help. Yet Obama has hailed the GM bailout as the signature achievement of his big government programs.
"On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen," the president said. "Today, General Motors is back on top as the world's No. 1 automaker."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/0430...

Romney would have gutted GM and sold the bolts and tools to turn a profit.

It looks like Obama's getting ready for his Waterloo.

The Obamas Already Preparing for Move to Hawaii in January 2013: Hyde Park neighbors talking about Chicago house being sold soon.

Obamas are using Chicago proxy-buyers to purchase a $35 million oceanfront estate for them in the most posh area of Oahu, where they coincidentally vacation frequently already. Move-in date is scheduled for January 2013.

Read more http://hillbuzz.org/the-obamas-already-prepar...

For 613 new federal regulations in the first 33 months of his presidency.

33. And because 129 of those regulations will each cost the economy more than $100 million a year.

34. Because the Small Business Administration estimates the price of current regulations at $1.75 trillion annually — a bigger burden than the corporate income tax.

35. Because his neck must be hurting from keeping his chin up in the air for nearly four years.

36. Because Cass Sunstein boasted about an “unprecedentedly ambitious government-wide review” of regulation that saved only $2 billion per year, or 0.1 percent of the cost of regulatory compliance.

37.“The private sector is doing fine.”

38. Because the private sector isn’t doing fine.

39. Because his administration predicted the stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent.

40. February 9, 2009:“If we get things right, then starting next year, we can start seeing some significant improvement” on the employment front.

41. Because now we have a 24 percent unemployment rate for people 16 to 19 years old.

42. Because the lowest the unemployment rate was during the Obama administration was 8.1 percent.

43. Because the current unemployment rate is 8.3 percent.

44. Because 4 million Americans have been out of work for more than a year.

45. Because the black unemployment rate is 14.4 percent.

46. And the Hispanic unemployment rate is 10.3 percent.

47. And because the real unemployment rate — including those who have abandoned the job hunt — is even higher.

48. Because the percentage of working-age Americans who are employed has dropped from 61 percent to 58 percent — and stayed there.

49. Because, in his own words, his “first job is to make sure the economy is growing, that we’re creating jobs out there.” You said it, not us.

50. Because he spent all of 2007 and 2008 imploring us to send him to Washington and, now that he has the job, he can’t stop whining about how much he hates it there.

51. Because Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm The Tarrance Group, while discussing public views of Obama, said that “there’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.” We should help them out.

52. Because when unemployment hit 10.2 percent, he extolled the economy’s “core strengths.”

53. Because in a fundraising e-mail of September 1, 2011, he demanded that Republicans “take action on” a jobs plan that he had not yet released.

54. Revising his tune on the recovery in December 2011, he said:“It’s going to take more than two years. It’s going to take more than one term. It probably takes more than one president.” We agree with that last part.

55. Because he promised to “ban all earmarks.”

56. But he didn’t ban earmarks.

57. And he promised to go “line by line” through legislation.

Mirror Mirror wrote:

Obama Pushes False GM Success Story
As it turns out, GM got Treasury's OK to "repay" more than $6.7 billion "using a portion of the escrow account that had been funded with TARP funds." So GM is merely paying the government back with government money, not money GM is earning selling cars, as the administration has claimed.
Worse, GM in effect is still borrowing money. Consider this item from the report: "What remained in escrow was released to GM." Bottom line: Taxpayers have not been paid back and are still on the hook as GM continues to require government help. Yet Obama has hailed the GM bailout as the signature achievement of his big government programs.
"On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen," the president said. "Today, General Motors is back on top as the world's No. 1 automaker."
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/0430...

In due time, GM will make a full return. The stock has nowhere to go but up. I have to wonder why you turds think that GM is supposed to pay back it's loan over night.

Get fking real. Come back to a place called REALITY.

The Notorious Rico wrote:

<quoted text>
The only way to change the mind of a real right wing radical is with a shotgun blast to their head.

In your case, it wouldn't hit anything vital.

The Notorious Rico wrote:

<quoted text>
The only way to change the mind of a real right wing radical is with a shotgun blast to their head.

Terrorist threatening!!

Republicans have worked harder at taking away the job of President Obama than they have worked at trying to give you more jobs.

positronium wrote:

<quoted text>My eyes, ears and my well developed sense of perception......and the whining and cussing I see here.... by those who favor obama and his agenda....

I favor the truth and I'm not getting much of it from you these days.

Maybe after the election is over?

EAGLE EYE1 wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO.. I hear ya man..:-)
Eagle

I actually felt sorry for LA's Mayor.
He really did look embarrassed by all the confusion.
"Stuff's gettin better"
2012

Mirror Mirror wrote:

It looks like Obama's getting ready for his Waterloo.
The Obamas Already Preparing for Move to Hawaii in January 2013: Hyde Park neighbors talking about Chicago house being sold soon.
Obamas are using Chicago proxy-buyers to purchase a $35 million oceanfront estate for them in the most posh area of Oahu, where they coincidentally vacation frequently already. Move-in date is scheduled for January 2013.
Read more http://hillbuzz.org/the-obamas-already-prepar...

Waterloo... in your wet dreams.

Mirror Mirror wrote:

It looks like Obama's getting ready for his Waterloo.
The Obamas Already Preparing for Move to Hawaii in January 2013: Hyde Park neighbors talking about Chicago house being sold soon.
Obamas are using Chicago proxy-buyers to purchase a $35 million oceanfront estate for them in the most posh area of Oahu, where they coincidentally vacation frequently already. Move-in date is scheduled for January 2013.
Read more http://hillbuzz.org/the-obamas-already-prepar...

And , Predator ROMEney Romney RowMONEY offshore and buyout US SME and year or less closed it down and give American a big Superfund BIll and sent our US operations and jobs overseas .