The President has failed us

Judged:

5

5

3

boot BO wrote:

<quoted text>
BO "I guess there really weren't any shovel ready jobs, haw haw haw"
Hilarious, wouldn't you agree?
BO's jobs' czar, Jeff Immelt of GE, with 167,000 overseas employees, more hilarity, right?

Judged:

6

6

4

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe it's just me, because I'm really weary and heading out, but have you been drinking? Read your post again.
U do U best to decipher it. Thanks. Goodnight.

Judged:

4

4

3

boot BO wrote:

<quoted text>
Low wage earners pay no federal taxes and in fact receive money from the feds, how do you propose to leave more money in their hands? Give them more free money?

Judged:

4

4

4

RayOne wrote:

Please return to the Oval Office and stay there until you have an approved budget.
Save the DEEMING for Chicago or Hawaii, that will be your choice.

Judged:

6

5

5

Don Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
budgets come from the house of Reps, controlled by the GOP. They might think that anything they pass with numbers in it is a budget. Perhaps you think that as well, but it isn't true. The president can suggest a budget, but it doesn't matter when the GOP controlled house has no interest, or knowledge of a budget.

Judged:

5

5

5

fishaholic wrote:

True to form, obama causes business to lose money. Just a microcosm of a national reality.
Owner complains Obama’s beer tent stop cost him $25,000
"The Bud Tent owner added that he hasn’t yet replied to a phone message from Obama’s staff asking him to respond publicly to Grassley’s tweet.
“I wouldn’t have voted for (Obama) before,” Cunningham said.“I won’t again.”
http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index....

Judged:

8

7

7

X -Man- wrote:

<quoted text>
What does this have to do with my comment?

Judged:

7

6

6

Terry Buckeye wrote:

paradim=paradigm

Judged:

4

4

3

Adventure Time wrote:

<quoted text>
ANyone can make stupid allegations.

Judged:

8

7

6

boot BO wrote:

<quoted text>
Seems like only yesterday:
The 2008 Obama campaign was all about hope and change. Obama's nomination was to mark the end of rising sea levels, his presidency was going to mark the end of racial strife, and he was going to deliver "net spending cuts" and reduce the budget deficit "by half" before the end of his first term.
Que paso ?

Judged:

4

4

4

Terry Buckeye wrote:

<quoted text>
No combat troops in Iraq. Osama bin Laden dead. Depression averted. Auto industry continues to grow. Things are better. I don't say that they are perfect, just better than four years ago.

Judged:

2

2

2

Jeff T in MPLS wrote:

<quoted text>
When was the last time you changed your name and posted, pretending there are more liberals than there really are?
3 minutes?
1 minute?
Pathetic, lying liberal losers are SO obvious!
Quick!
Change your name again and give yourself "brilliant, agree and interesting" icons!

Judged:

5

5

5

positronium wrote:

<quoted text>
He will..

Judged:

8

7

7

higgans wrote:

<quoted text>
we've already agreed u and I speak two different languages. I speak American English and u speak European (or Progressive) English.
that's why u don't understand so many posts here.
try this: Obama NO win.
Come On Nov.

Judged:

6

5

5

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/106157/romney-c...
How Reporters Are Letting Romney Get Away With His Plan to Massively Cut Medicare
Jonathan Cohn
August 14, 2012
Mitt Romney may be losing the fight to win the hearts and minds of voters, at least if the polls are accurate. But he may be winning the battle to obscure his real agenda for Medicare. The proposals Romney has made so far would, with virtual certainty, require cuts to Medicare. These cuts would likely be larger, and possibly much larger, than the cuts in the Affordable Care Act—yes, the very same cuts that Romney keeps attacking Obama for enacting......Here’s how the authors of the Center on Budget Paper, Richard Kogan and Paul van de Water, explained it:
Medicare would be cut by $185 billion in 2016 and $2.0 trillion from 2014 through 2022. Achieving cuts of this size solely by reducing payments to hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers would threaten beneficiaries’ access to care. Thus, beneficiaries would almost certainly face large increases in premiums and cost-sharing charges.(Continued:)
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/106157/romney-c...
..........
The cuts Obamacare proposes are in provider compensation and are used to plug the doughnut-hole in prescription drug coverage, a portion will be used to cover children and non-elderly Medicaid users and to refund low income Americans for healthcare coverage.
Romney would take away the doughnut hold coverage, would end free preventive care visits for seniors,
How would Romney use this money? Would it actually be for deficit reduction, or would it be to pay for the tax cuts the wealthiest apparently "need". Hummm? I suspect the latter. I just hope we don't have to find out first hand what he has in mind.
Let's shut Mitt Romney up come November.