Turtle bay thug club

And it looks like Obama is playing along with their plan too. More and bigger government and less and less freedom. How long will it be before we are fighting each other in the streets because of this Constitution hating subversive wannabe dictator?

sailorman2 wrote:

And it looks like Obama is playing along with their plan too. More and bigger government and less and less freedom. How long will it be before we are fighting each other in the streets because of this Constitution hating subversive wannabe dictator?

F.U.A.H. How many amendments do the Republicans want to change or erase? Lets count them.
1st amendment
4th amendment
5th amendment
6th amendment
7th amendment
8th amendment
9th amendment
14th amendment
15th amendment
17th amendment
19th amendment
20th amendment
21st amendment
24th amendment
9th commandment

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>F.U.A.H. How many amendments do the Republicans want to change or erase? Lets count them.
1st amendment
4th amendment
5th amendment
6th amendment
7th amendment
8th amendment
9th amendment
14th amendment
15th amendment
17th amendment
19th amendment
20th amendment
21st amendment
24th amendment
9th commandment

I haven't a clue as to where you come up with this total BS but just for the sake of argument let's say it is true. Republicans will change the constitution by amendment not like the democrats do with their activists judges and Obama appointed Czars.

Imagine that. Republicans are complaining because Russia and China are abusing their veto power the way Republicans abuse the filibuster.

sailorman2 wrote:

<quoted text>I haven't a clue as to where you come up with this total BS but just for the sake of argument let's say it is true. Republicans will change the constitution by amendment not like the democrats do with their activists judges and Obama appointed Czars.

Czars? There are no czar position in Government. The only ones who have ever called a position "czar" are Republicans starting with Reagan’s appointment of what he called his drug czar. The tradition was continued by both Bush's. Now the Republicans are trying to call every appointed position a “czar” because they think it sounds communistic and they use the term perpetually in they ridiculous attempt to paint the President as a communist. The most ridiculous part of all is the fact that the Czar was overthrown by the communists who murdered him and his entire family. But why would perpetual liars care about facts of history.

sailorman2 wrote:

<quoted text>I haven't a clue as to where you come up with this total BS but just for the sake of argument let's say it is true. Republicans will change the constitution by amendment not like the democrats do with their activists judges and Obama appointed Czars.

Activist judges? You mean like Scalia who actively campaigns and supports Right Wing causes that he then rules on? Scalia who attends Republican Congressional Caucuses? Corporations are people? You must think today is opposite day.

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>Activist judges? You mean like Scalia who actively campaigns and supports Right Wing causes that he then rules on? Scalia who attends Republican Congressional Caucuses? Corporations are people? You must think today is opposite day.

Justice Breyer Finally Concedes Judicial Activism

It turns out that your worst suspicions regarding activist judges are true.

In a remarkably revealing interview on "Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace," Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer finally conceded what liberal judges have attempted so relentlessly to deny: that policy objectives guide his rulings.

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>Czars? There are no czar position in Government. The only ones who have ever called a position "czar" are Republicans starting with Reagan’s appointment of what he called his drug czar. The tradition was continued by both Bush's. Now the Republicans are trying to call every appointed position a “czar” because they think it sounds communistic and they use the term perpetually in they ridiculous attempt to paint the President as a communist. The most ridiculous part of all is the fact that the Czar was overthrown by the communists who murdered him and his entire family. But why would perpetual liars care about facts of history.

In the United States, the informal political term "czar" or "tsar" is employed in media and popular usage to refer to high-level officials who oversee a particular policy. There have never been any U.S. government offices with the title "czar", but various governmental officials have sometimes been referred to by the nickname "czar" rather than their actual title.

The earliest known use of the term for a U.S. government official was in the administration of Franklin Roosevelt (1933–1945), during which eleven unique positions (or twelve if one were to count "Economic Czar" and "Economic Czar of World War II" as separate) were so described. The term was revived, mostly by the press, to describe officials in the Nixon and Ford administrations and continues today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._exe...

Baba Yaga wrote:

<quoted text>Justice Breyer Finally Concedes Judicial Activism
It turns out that your worst suspicions regarding activist judges are true.
In a remarkably revealing interview on "Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace," Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer finally conceded what liberal judges have attempted so relentlessly to deny: that policy objectives guide his rulings.

Great spin but that is not what he said.(a·bridge&#8194; &#8194;/&#601;&#71 2;br&#618;d&#658;/ Show Spelled[uh-brij] Show IPA
verb (used with object), a·bridged, a·bridg·ing.
1. to shorten by omissions while retaining the basic contents: to abridge a reference book.
2. to reduce or lessen in duration, scope, authority, etc.; diminish; curtail: to abridge a visit; to abridge one's freedom.
3. to deprive; cut off.) Congress may not pass laws that reduce freedom of speech, however congress can pass laws that protect freedom of speech, such as the fairness doctrine. Having freedom of speech is irrelevant if you are not allowed to be heard.

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>F.U.A.H. How many amendments do the Republicans want to change or erase? Lets count them.
1st amendment
4th amendment
5th amendment
6th amendment
7th amendment
8th amendment
9th amendment
14th amendment
15th amendment
17th amendment
19th amendment
20th amendment
21st amendment
24th amendment
9th commandment

That's a funny as a fart in an elevator!

Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a funny as a fart in an elevator!

Most men find farts to be humorous. It is one of the male attributes that drive women crazy. How for you feel about farts, do you find them humorous or disgusting? If you find them humorous lift your leg and let one rip. Otherwise join the ladies auxiliary and cry about how disgusting men are.

sailorman2 wrote:

<quoted text>I haven't a clue as to where you come up with this total BS but just for the sake of argument let's say it is true. Republicans will change the constitution by amendment not like the democrats do with their activists judges and Obama appointed Czars.

You do realize your 4th, 5th, and 6th ammendment rights were in fact crushed by the republicans in 2002, with the Patriot Act, right?

TonyT1961 wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize your 4th, 5th, and 6th ammendment rights were in fact crushed by the republicans in 2002, with the Patriot Act, right?

And lets not even get into what they have done to the ninth commandment.

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>And lets not even get into what they have done to the ninth commandment.

I was purposely avoiding injecting religious aspets into the debate. But your point is well noted.

TonyT1961 wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize your 4th, 5th, and 6th ammendment rights were in fact crushed by the republicans in 2002, with the Patriot Act, right?

You do know that nobammy and the dem full congress extended it, Right??

swampmudd wrote:

<quoted text>Most men find farts to be humorous. It is one of the male attributes that drive women crazy. How for you feel about farts, do you find them humorous or disgusting? If you find them humorous lift your leg and let one rip. Otherwise join the ladies auxiliary and cry about how disgusting men are.

Can't join the laides auxiliary, bozo. It's biologically impossible.

sailorman2 wrote:

And it looks like Obama is playing along with their plan too. More and bigger government and less and less freedom. How long will it be before we are fighting each other in the streets because of this Constitution hating subversive wannabe dictator?

ISN'T THAT THE REASON THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT ROLLED THE OLD RED CARPET OUT FOR "OCCUPIERS"?TO GET IT STARTED,AS THE MONTHS ROLL ON THEY HAVE FREE EVERYTHING<FROM TENTS TO OFFICE SPACES<AND DON'T EVEN HAVE A PERMIT TO BE FREELOADERS IN A TOWN NEAR YOU!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY PElOSI IS SO READY TOO GIVE THEM SUPPORT AND PRAISE THEIR THUGGERY BEHAVIOR!AFTER ALL "HIGH CLASS THUGGERING IS THE CHICAGO WAY<ALL THE WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE!

Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:

<quoted text>
You do know that nobammy and the dem full congress extended it, Right??

Yes I do - and I'm not saying I agree with this either. One can have ideological affiliations without agreeing with every aspect of what that party does. I was against the Patriot Act from it's inception - once anyone allows their rights to be sacrificed, even under the guise of fear, which is what the Bush/Cheney regime pushed, it is almost impossible to regain those rights again.

Decisions made under the guise of fear have underlying implications those pushing for drastic changes such as these put forth. But no one in the company had worked in believed this.

Every one of them feel like a bunch of schmucks now.

Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't join the laides auxiliary, bozo. It's biologically impossible.

Work hard, save your money and you can get the operation. I am sure you will be much happier.

mobob wrote:

<quoted text> ISN'T THAT THE REASON THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT ROLLED THE OLD RED CARPET OUT FOR "OCCUPIERS"?TO GET IT STARTED,AS THE MONTHS ROLL ON THEY HAVE FREE EVERYTHING<FROM TENTS TO OFFICE SPACES<AND DON'T EVEN HAVE A PERMIT TO BE FREELOADERS IN A TOWN NEAR YOU!! MAYBE THAT'S WHY PElOSI IS SO READY TOO GIVE THEM SUPPORT AND PRAISE THEIR THUGGERY BEHAVIOR!AFTER ALL "HIGH CLASS THUGGERING IS THE CHICAGO WAY<ALL THE WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE!

It is a real protest moron. Not a Fox produced staged event that you take your lawn chairs to and watch the show.