North Carolina voters approve gay marriage ban

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:

There's a health risk centered around you having a boyfriend, like there is about me (not even eating a burger) have for being in England at the wrong time....

Get That Fool wrote:

"Openly", does not mean they couldn't serve at all....

Get That Fool wrote:

Nope, never said gay people become straight, but marriage is not about gay/straight...it's about man/woman....

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny the only court that matters hasn't said anything...no harm in wishing though....

Judged:

2

2

2

Get That Fool wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you kidding me??? I was in England during the mad cow thing decades ago

Judged:

1

1

1

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? You haven't been paying attention, have you? The Courts are on OUR side, sugar.

Judged:

2

1

1

Wat the Tyler wrote:

<quoted text>
How is being in a homosexual relationship a health risk?
<quoted text>
Everyone is the US military was officially recognized as gay. There was technically no officially gay military men and women till 2011. Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone. Deal with it you homophobic bigot.
<quoted text>
Gay marriage is about EQUAL RIGHTS for gay couples under the law that is being denied to them because of bigotry. What gives you the right to tell who can and can not have equal rights?

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>You're saying marriage is a federal issue only? several state supreme courts have wighed on on this issue.

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:

<quoted text>
For the purposes of federal $$...yes it is....

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Good to know for future discussions about whether it is a states' right or a federal issue.

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sure you won't understand the content...either way...

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Yet I consistently post reasoned, logical comments and all you can do it personal insults like you just did.
and you think i won't understand something....

Judged:

2

2

2

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
No all, nor the most important one, SCOTUS, as of yet. Plus the voters are opposing SSM at the polls, contrary to those who support it in the polls.

Judged:

2

2

1

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
What the voters support at the polls is irrelevant when it comes to civil rights. All your silly anti-gay State Amendments will become moot next year when DOMA goes down. Enjoy your last year of arrogance.

Judged:

2

2

2

Get That Fool wrote:

<quoted text>
You post kool-aid soaked bs that only makes sense to you and simple-minded like you...that is 'not' fact....

Judged:

2

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>thank you for proving my point about you...

Judged:

2

2

2

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
What the voters support at the polls is irrelevant when it comes to civil rights. All your silly anti-gay State Amendments will become moot next year when DOMA goes down. Enjoy your last year of arrogance.

Judged:

2

2

2

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
How will you feel if more states vote in bans on ssm, AND DOMA remains? It is a possibility.

Judged:

3

3

2

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>The trends show it won't remain for long if that possibility happens. many homophopes ARE seeing the inevitable trend coming which is why they are racing to implement as many ways to bar SSM as they can.(amendments to state constitutions, etc.)
If the trend does continue this way briefly, it will change as the inevitable trend of public sntiment towards acceptance of homosexuality and SSM takes over. then those laws and amendments and silly federal rules will be overturned.

Judged:

1

1

1

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
How will you feel if more states vote in bans on ssm, AND DOMA remains? It is a possibility.

Judged:

2

2

2

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>The trends show it won't remain for long if that possibility happens. many homophopes ARE seeing the inevitable trend coming which is why they are racing to implement as many ways to bar SSM as they can.(amendments to state constitutions, etc.)
If the trend does continue this way briefly, it will change as the inevitable trend of public sntiment towards acceptance of homosexuality and SSM takes over. then those laws and amendments and silly federal rules will be overturned.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
It's possible that you could shit $100 bills, but highly unlikely.
DOMA is going down. It's already been ruled unconstitutional five times. They knew it when they voted it in and Clinton signed it. It's merely a delaying tactic. SCOTUS will invalidate it.