Local News: Los Angeles, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Feb 5, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger

NASA: Human Activity, Not Solar Activity, Drives Global Warming and...

Full story: ThinkProgress

Adam Voiland, NASA's Earth Science News Team, in a repost .A The research brief by Hansen et al is here .

Read

70 Comments

More US News Discussions »

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of70
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 5, 2012
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Duh.. of course.

See if you understand this composite summary graph:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/image/s/a/D...

Topic piece:

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/05/4190...

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 5, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

and Returning to 350 ppm Is Needed to Stop It

ROFLMAO at Joe Romm
Northie

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Duh, redux.

"The 0.58 Watts per square meter imbalance implies that carbon dioxide levels need to be reduced to about 350 parts per million to restore the energy budget to equilibrium."

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

I'm still ROFLMAO at Joe Romm, he's a screaming lunatic.
Northie

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

That wasn't Romm's opinion, idiot. It was Hansen's team reporting in "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics".

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Hmmm, I've been laughing at the Hansen gang for a long time, Joe Romm is funnier.

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

A lot funnier.

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Too funny for words.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Northie wrote:
That wasn't Romm's opinion, idiot. It was Hansen's team reporting in "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics".
After looking at the site I would have to say it both of thier opinions and yours as well. The site showed plain bias about everything and was leaning hard to the left on everything.

Either way I found it to be heavy on unfounded opinon and light on fact. A perfect thing for you.
Northie

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Feb 6, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics" is a leftist political site? Really?

Only to someone who thinks evolution is a plot by biologists to ban church.
Ajax

Corydon, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

5

2

2

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
After looking at the site I would have to say it both of thier opinions and yours as well. The site showed plain bias about everything and was leaning hard to the left on everything.
Either way I found it to be heavy on unfounded opinon and light on fact. A perfect thing for you.
You would because your a fool.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Ajax wrote:
<quoted text>You would because your a fool.
Am I? Or am I intelligent enough to do more than just look at the link. To look at what is behind it all.

What I think is that you are upset is because I have pointed out that the site has clear leaning to the left.
Northie

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics is an international scientific journal, and as dryly scientific as they come. As far as I can see, there isn't a politically slanted sentence in it...

http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics....
NobodyYouKnow

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Earthling-1 wrote:
and Returning to 350 ppm Is Needed to Stop It
ROFLMAO at Joe Romm
It will stop some time AFTER you hit the brakes. We can hardly hit the brakes at 350 ppm.. dddoohhhh
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

ddddooohhh

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

really

Since: Aug 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Feb 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

tina anne wrote:
Am I? Or am I intelligent......
Are... are you saying,'I Am Who I Am'

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Feb 8, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

LessFactMoreHype, alias:
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow wrote:
It will stop some time AFTER you hit the brakes.
I didn't hit the gas pedal, so me hitting the brakes won't help.
NoFactAllHype wrote:
We can hardly hit the brakes at 350 ppm.. dddoohhhh
Read the headline of Romm's article:
NASA: Human Activity, Not Solar Activity, Drives Global Warming and Returning to 350 ppm Is Needed to Stop It
SoE

Blackfoot, ID

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Am I? Or am I intelligent enough to do more than just look at the link. To look at what is behind it all.
What I think is that you are upset is because I have pointed out that the site has clear leaning to the left.
..........
You do seem to be behind in it all...
Leaning to the left ?
Straighten up your monitor...
SoE

Blackfoot, ID

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Feb 13, 2012
 
Earthling-1 wrote:
I'm still ROFLMAO
Good heavens...we certainly wouldn't want that !

Since: Aug 11

Woodridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

I think there was a massive boom in population during the ice age. The smoke from their campfires caused the environment to change and melted the ice. I think that's how the ice age ended. Perhaps there were gas powered vehicles at the time.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 20 of70
< prev page
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for June 4

Sagittarius

Relationships have been going through through testing times since the Solar Eclipse at last month's New Moon in Gemini on May 20. Events may force you to reevaluate the state of a partnership. You may even decide that you need to make some major adjustments if things are to carry on as you would like. During the coming fortnight leading up to the rare second New Moon in Gemini, this may feel like a crisis, but that doesn't mean you should abandon all hope or throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Get your Horoscope »