It's the Guns, Stupid

Plant Lady wrote:

<quoted text>
mmm Yes that would be why the twin towers in NY are still standing today?

That was an invasion? Invasion implies occupation. All of our guns didn't exactly prevent that attack.

jmac wrote:

<quoted text>you type a long paragraph, but said nothing!! you must be going into politics!!! "those who ignore the past errors are prone to repeat them"

I will summarize: there is a reason all civilizations decline. Violence may be the reason America declines.

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
The reason we have never been invaded is because we have ocean on 2 sides, and friendly neighbors on the other 2 sides. It's not because we are locked and loaded.

The Germans had extensive plans for South and North
Americas after they were done with Europe.
Some day, perhaps you will learn to look things up before you stick your foot in your mouth.

ZigmunnDroid wrote:

<quoted text>
The Germans had extensive plans for South and North
Americas after they were done with Europe.
Some day, perhaps you will learn to look things up before you stick your foot in your mouth.

Nazis had a lot of plans. As I recall their plan was to take over the world. That did not work out for them and therefore we were never invaded.

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
That is really irrelevant to the present situation and you know it....

Wow, are you ever dense:

“The law of nature is immutable; not by the effect of an arbitrary disposition, but because it has its foundation in the nature, constitution, and mutual relations of men and things. While these continue to be the same, it must continue to be the same also. This immutability of nature's laws has nothing in it repugnant to the supreme power of an all-perfect Being. Since he himself is the author of our constitution; he cannot but command or forbid such things as are necessarily agreeable or disagreeable to this very constitution. He is under the glorious necessity of not contradicting himself. This necessity, far from limiting or diminishing his perfections, adds to their external character, and points out their excellency.

“The law of nature is universal. For it is true, not only that all men are equally subject to the command of their Maker; but it is true also, that the law of nature, having its foundation in the constitution and state of man, has an essential fitness for all mankind, and binds them without distinction.

“This law, or right reason, as Cicero calls it, is thus beautifully described by that eloquent philosopher. "It is, indeed," says he, "a true law, conformable to nature, diffused among all men, unchangeable, eternal. By its commands, it calls men to their duty: by its prohibitions, it deters them from vice. To diminish, to alter, much more to abolish this law, is a vain attempt. Neither by the senate, nor by the people, can its powerful obligation be dissolved. It requires no interpreter or commentator. It is not one law at Rome, another at Athens; one law now, another hereafter: it is the same eternal and immutable law, given at all times and to all nations: for God, who is its author and promulgator, is always the sole master and sovereign of mankind."

- James Wilson,[The Works of the Honourable James Wilson, L.L.D.; Chap. III Of the Law of Nature]. Mr. Wilson signed the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. In addition he was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention and a U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
http://gunshowonthenet.com/BOOKS/TheWorksWils...

"The First Law of Nature is that every man ought to endeavour peace, as far as he has hope of obtaining it; and when he cannot obtain it, that he may seek and use all helps and advantages of war."

- Thomas Hobbs, "Leviathan",(Outline s the Laws of Nature), 1651.
http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALEGAL/LawsofNatu...

Do you know what the word "IMMUTABLE" means, O' braindead one?

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
Nazis had a lot of plans. As I recall their plan was to take over the world. That did not work out for them and therefore we were never invaded.

Actually, you simplistic MORON, we DID have a number of attempts at being invaded. BOTH the communists and the nazis had agents here recruiting people to start rebellion/revolution. As well as training and recruiting people in Mexico and South America. The perverse powers that be didn't let We The People know about it at the time for fear it would cause a panic. Do you know ANY facts at ALL? Or, do you choose to remain in IGNORANCE?

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
I will summarize: there is a reason all civilizations decline. Violence may be the reason America declines.

Do you know one of the main reasons that the Roman empire fell, O' simplistic one? BECAUSE OF MASS AND UNCONTROLLED IMIGRATION....

Far more civilizations have declined because of tyranny, and/or the people becoming fat, lethargic, and lazy....

Dr Sybil wrote:

If you use your memory skills, I, too, am a gun owner. You kids possess no recall abilities and continually step on your lower lip. Perhaps that is caused by past or present drug use? Keep up the good work!!!

Doc, you are a bad gun owner. You think to presume how others should have access to guns.

Think to yourself for your own infringements.

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
I will summarize: there is a reason all civilizations decline. Violence may be the reason America declines.

They decline because they become complacent...and start believing everything their leaders tell them..."become sheep" "we (the goverment) will take care of you" resistance is futile.

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, you simplistic MORON, we DID have a number of attempts at being invaded. BOTH the communists and the nazis had agents here recruiting people to start rebellion/revolution. As well as training and recruiting people in Mexico and South America. The perverse powers that be didn't let We The People know about it at the time for fear it would cause a panic. Do you know ANY facts at ALL? Or, do you choose to remain in IGNORANCE?

Thanks, GS, saved me a waste of post time to a purposefully ignorant poster.

Kind of like when the Mexicans invaded Texas (not a state yet, this for the maroon)and were stopped. Guess we did not need to worry about that one either.

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
That was an invasion? Invasion implies occupation. All of our guns didn't exactly prevent that attack.

Had the passengers on board those planes been armed as is Constitutionally INTENDED, not one damn building would have been hit. JUST ASK THE ISRAELI AIRLINE COMPANIES; Arkia Israel, or EL AL, THEY'LL TELL YOU HOW IT SHOULD BE, AND IS, DONE.

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, you simplistic MORON, we DID have a number of attempts at being invaded. BOTH the communists and the nazis had agents here recruiting people to start rebellion/revolution. As well as training and recruiting people in Mexico and South America. The perverse powers that be didn't let We The People know about it at the time for fear it would cause a panic. Do you know ANY facts at ALL? Or, do you choose to remain in IGNORANCE?

I talk to people until the name calling starts, then I retreat. Buh bye.

falashio wrote:

<quoted text>
I talk to people until the name calling starts, then I retreat. Buh bye.

HYPOCRITE!!!

To wit:

"Because you religious gun fanatics have to have a phallic substitute,..."

That was YOUR post falashio!!

ZigmunnDroid wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks, GS, saved me a waste of post time to a purposefully ignorant poster.
Kind of like when the Mexicans invaded Texas (not a state yet, this for the maroon)and were stopped. Guess we did not need to worry about that one either.

No prob! More than happy to fry a LIE-beral. Yeah, Mexico just waited until we became soft and have been slowly invading us every since. Many of them publicly proclaim that they shall take 'their' land back. Guess that they forgot that 'they' took it from the NATIVE peoples FIRST.....

falasha wrote:

<quoted text>
I talk to people until the name calling starts, then I retreat. Buh bye.

You mean until that you are proven an IGNORAMUS by the FACTS, right?

Monty wrote:

<quoted text>
HYPOCRITE!!!
To wit:
"Because you religious gun fanatics have to have a phallic substitute,..."
That was YOUR post falashio!!

Good catch! Hat-tip.

Another Voice Heard From wrote:

<quoted text>
A: what thread was that on?
B: OK, the guy that replied was insulting and annoying, too bad.
C: What makes you think it was the real person using the name?
D: What makes you think all of us like the NRA?
E: Why do you feel it necessary to spam all the Guns threads with this stuff?

AVHM: That idiot is spamming that same stupid message all over other threads as well. I'd just ignore the troll and he probably won't be back.

I mean AVHF.... long day...

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, and this DESPITE the EVIDENCE to the contrary. Take a hike you ignorant and meaningless troll....

So you are saying Aussie soldiers are girlie stupid cowardards, when they have had the US backs for ever.
You really are disgusting.
The friendly fire is true, and it's still happening today, all of your allies don't want to fight around you.
Reason being is your troops overreact, and start shooting everything in sight.

Cana wrote:

<quoted text>
So you are saying Aussie soldiers are girlie stupid cowardards, when they have had the US backs for ever.
You really are disgusting.
The friendly fire is true, and it's still happening today, all of your allies don't want to fight around you.
Reason being is your troops overreact, and start shooting everything in sight.

Just your opinion. If such were really the case, you wouldn't have had a problem finding cites to back it up. Typical disgusting troll behavior.