|
“At my signal unleash hell”
Since: Sep 09
Sunbury, OH
|
Please wait...
Marauder wrote: <quoted text>
Oh bunny...thank you so much for putting on your "typo police" hat. My brain just goes so fast when I'm responding to your ignorance, my fingers just can't keep up. I'll try and type S L O W E R for you.
"Back to reality, and away from fantasy land!"
It was your fantasy that you started, I was just playing along. Then you come out with more fantasy. Not only is your belly button lint clouding your view, the fumes are clouding your mind...what little you have. LOL...this post is code for: I "Maurader" am dodging the post from Bunny! I am gonna go ahead and dodge the "Guerrilla warfar" and "building my own bombs" bull shizz I spewed. I'll change the subject from Government attack and citizens losing....to belly buttons, lint, clouds, fumes, etc...lol, without ever having addressed the actual point! Sincerely, Maurader
|
|
Louiston
Des Moines, IA
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>Baby doll...that has gotta be the most ignorant quote posted to date!
Heck, I don't trust Americans...nor do I trust politicians!
Neither do you...that's why you have guns! For lack of trust and knowing who will harm you, and who won't...right?
It's not as they view you as an "individual"...lol, that's impossible. They don't know most of us as "individulas"...now do they?
They don't know you or I any more than they would a rapist or criminal...right?
We are not trustworthy citizens...we have the most astounding crime rate of all developed countries! Why would ANYONE trust us? Heck, most other countries dont trust us! Even or allies...they fear us and comply to keep peace due to how unstable our US actions are!
Yes, we do need REGULATED (supervised)...I myself DO NOT need regulated or supervised! BUT...BUT, I am willing to be supervised...I am law abiding, I have nothig to hide....all to ensure a criminal doesn't have easy access to weapons.
I have a quote for you:
"How a citizen stands on guns tells you how he views his fellow citizens as individuals. If he feels he needs to be armed in his own home, or in PUBLIC tells you that he believes you are NOT trustworthy or productive citizens! He views you as part of an unruley crowd that need to be shot at his discretion"
Bunny 2012 It's spelled unruly. Yikes.
|
|
“SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM”
Since: Dec 07
Suffolk, VA
|
Please wait...
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>Exactly "no immediate census"...so you can't factually claim a correlation between the tow. Especially when crime is UP in high gun ares (regions). So, I wouldn't call that ZERO affect on crime...gun + guns = violence. That's why the rates are UP in those areas. LMAO! And you want to berate someone for spelling errors.
|
|
“At my signal unleash hell”
Since: Sep 09
Sunbury, OH
|
Please wait...
Louiston wrote: <quoted text>It's spelled "two". And it's zero "effect". Wow...looks like i hit a nerve with "Louistin"...lol Yep...I make typos...make'm all the time...BUT, the reason I pointed out Mauraders "misspelling" is because he had the nerve to say "Learn about Guerrilla Warfare"...calling me out as "not knowing"...when all the while he can't even spell it? see irony? See the difference? I mean, if I said "learn how to spell the number tow dummies"...you would call me out on not spelling it right...no? YIKES!
|
|
“At my signal unleash hell”
Since: Sep 09
Sunbury, OH
|
Please wait...
Armed Veteran wrote: <quoted text>
LMAO! And you want to berate someone for spelling errors. Funny...all the gun nuts suddenly wanna dodge all my valid points made in all my previous posts, and now wanna talk about spelling:) Of everything I wrote, that's all you can refute? Yep...I make typos...make'm all the time...BUT, the reason I pointed out Mauraders "misspelling" is because he had the nerve to say "Learn about Guerrilla Warfare"...calling me out as "not knowing"...when all the while he can't even spell it? see irony? See the difference? I mean, if I said "learn how to spell the number tow dummies"...you would call me out on not spelling it right...no? YIKES!
|
|
Jon24
Manassas, VA
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>WOW...is that so? 1 in a million? Got proof of that?
From the CDC:
Guns cause the death of 20 children and young adults (19 years of age and under) each day in the U.S.
Children and young adults (19 years of age and under) constitute over 41% of all firearm deaths and non-fatal injuries.
More than 75% of guns used in suicide attempts and unintentional injuries of 0-19 year-olds were stored in the residence of the victim, a relative, or a friend.
The practices of keeping firearms locked, unloaded, and storing ammunition in a locked location separate from firearms has assisted in reducing youth suicide and unintentional injury in homes with children and teenagers where guns are stored. During 2001, the CDC reported a total of 157,078 injury-deaths. On their interactive Web site, if you click "Firearm" under "Cause of Injury," the figure becomes 29,573. For deaths in children, click on <1 as the lowest in the age range and 17 as the highest. Also select the "No Age-Adjusting Requested" option. The figure becomes 1,433. Multiplied by four, this is 5,732, or roughly 40 percent of what MMM asserts. The 5,732 includes at least two categories of death that do not clearly belong because they do not clearly support MMM’s anti-gun arguments. That is to say, MMM’s use of death statistics coupled with calls for legislative control as a "solution" unmistakably implies that the cited deaths could have been prevented by gun control. It is misleading, therefore, to include deaths that would probably have occurred whether gun laws and, in some cases, whether guns themselves — were present Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,113094,00...
|
|
Patriot
Denver, CO
|
Establishment Media Ignores Massive Ron Paul Veterans March http://www.infowars.com/establishment-media-i...
|
|
Since: Jan 11
Columbus, NJ
|
Please wait...
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>Actually, it's spelled guerrilla warfare. Yikes.
Also, WAKE UP! Back to reality, and away from fantasy land! FYI...if the government wanted to attack you, I assure you they would not warn you. They'd simply killl you. You would not have time to "aquire" anything:) You'd be dead before you could even get your gun, let alone build or "aquire" bombs....LOL! Not to mention AIRCRAFT, and mmortars! HA! You really make me laugh sometimes!
Vietnam? How did Guerrilla tactics help Vietnam, other than our troops withdrew from the area? Vietnam was an unprecedented military victory for the U.S. We didn't lose any battles and tactics in Vietnam set our military doctrine for years to come. We didn't militarily lose Vietnam, it was a political defeat that influenced military actions and therefore led to a withdrawal.
So tell me...what is your point regarding Vietnam and Guerrilla warfare? lol "How did Guerrilla tactics help Vietnam, other than our troops withdrew from the area?" That's a blond joke, right?
|
|
|
Jon24
Manassas, VA
|
Teaman wrote: <quoted text>
"How did Guerrilla tactics help Vietnam, other than our troops withdrew from the area?"
That's a blond joke, right? Is she calling John Kerry a gorilla?
|
|
Since: Jan 11
Columbus, NJ
|
Please wait...
Jon24 wrote: <quoted text>
Is she calling John Kerry a gorilla? Kerry was a legend in his own mind. LOL
|
|
“At my signal unleash hell”
Since: Sep 09
Sunbury, OH
|
Please wait...
Teaman wrote: <quoted text>
"How did Guerrilla tactics help Vietnam, other than our troops withdrew from the area?"
That's a blond joke, right? No, I assure you, it's a serious question:) So why not answer? Vietnam was an unprecedented military victory for the U.S. We didn't lose any battles and tactics in Vietnam set our military doctrine for years to come. We didn't militarily lose Vietnam, it was a political defeat that influenced military actions and therefore led to a withdrawal. So tell me...what is your point regarding Vietnam and Guerrilla warfare?
|
|
Louiston
Ankeny, IA
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>Wow...looks like i hit a nerve with "Louistin"...lol Yep...I make typos...make'm all the time...BUT, the reason I pointed out Mauraders "misspelling" is because he had the nerve to say "Learn about Guerrilla Warfare"...calling me out as "not knowing"...when all the while he can't even spell it? see irony? See the difference? I mean, if I said "learn how to spell the number tow dummies"...you would call me out on not spelling it right...no? YIKES! No, you didn't hit a nerve at all, bunny. You can spin it any way you want to but you simply got nailed for the same thing you were pointing out as an error to someone else. And yet here you are trying to gloss over your hypocrisy. Looks like you're the one with the sensitive nerves. LOL!
|
|
Since: Jan 11
Columbus, NJ
|
Please wait...
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>No, I assure you, it's a serious question:) So why not answer?
Vietnam was an unprecedented military victory for the U.S. We didn't lose any battles and tactics in Vietnam set our military doctrine for years to come. We didn't militarily lose Vietnam, it was a political defeat that influenced military actions and therefore led to a withdrawal.
So tell me...what is your point regarding Vietnam and Guerrilla warfare? Vietnam is now a communist country. They won, we lost. Very simple. Guerrilla tactics worked. It wore down our public will power. Because we left, other countries now adopt that strategy with the use of IED's. But, I agree naive political influence and the left wing media had a lot to do with it. In the end, it was the guerrilla tactics that kept it going for so long. "unprecedented" ?? I would say just the Normandy invasion in WWII alone would be a precedence.
|
|
Louiston
Ankeny, IA
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>
Funny...all the gun nuts suddenly wanna dodge all my valid points made in all my previous posts, and now wanna talk about spelling:)
Of everything I wrote, that's all you can refute?
Yep...I make typos...make'm all the time...BUT, the reason I pointed out Mauraders "misspelling" is because he had the nerve to say "Learn about Guerrilla Warfare"...calling me out as "not knowing"...when all the while he can't even spell it? see irony? See the difference? I mean, if I said "learn how to spell the number tow dummies"...you would call me out on not spelling it right...no? YIKES! Funny that Bunny expects a dialog but has to call others "gun nuts".
|
|
Marauder
Anchorage, AK
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>LOL...this post is code for:
I "Maurader" am dodging the post from Bunny! I am gonna go ahead and dodge the "Guerrilla warfar" and "building my own bombs" bull shizz I spewed. I'll change the subject from Government attack and citizens losing....to belly buttons, lint, clouds, fumes, etc...lol, without ever having addressed the actual point!
Sincerely,
Maurader oh poor bunny...doesn't have a response and can't answer my question so you again...LIE...and attempt to speak for someone else. Tell me why I should address your fantasies...? You’re the one that said “Back to reality, and away from fantasy land!”. So you still can’t make up your mind…?...such a terrible thing to waste. What is “warfar”...? Is that like “bunny talk” for a war fought far away...? I know you claim to be an “English Major”(cough, cough) so I’m pretty sure YOU couldn’t make any “typos”…especially when you have your “typo police badge and hat” on. What is that now..?..3 posts in a row...you're on a roll.
|
|
Marauder
Anchorage, AK
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>
Funny...all the gun nuts suddenly wanna dodge all my valid points made in all my previous posts, and now wanna talk about spelling:)
Of everything I wrote, that's all you can refute?
Yep...I make typos...make'm all the time...BUT, the reason I pointed out Mauraders "misspelling" is because he had the nerve to say "Learn about Guerrilla Warfare"...calling me out as "not knowing"...when all the while he can't even spell it? see irony? See the difference? I mean, if I said "learn how to spell the number tow dummies"...you would call me out on not spelling it right...no? YIKES! "...dodge all my valid points made in all my previous posts." "Dodge"..?...hardly. ..here's YOUR "valid points" that prove what a "frustrated control freak" you really are; "Yes, we do need REGULATED (supervised)...I myself DO NOT need regulated or supervised! BUT...BUT, I am willing to be supervised...I am law abiding, I have nothig to hide....all to ensure a criminal doesn't have easy access to weapons." "I myself DO NOT need regulated or supervised!"...what holier than thou BS!! Oh, and you don't want to "ban guns"...."I have never said I want to ban guns". No, YOU just want to violate the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Individual right to keep and bear arms...BECAUSE..."I myself DO NOT need regulated or supervised!" Those are the ONLY valid points you have made and proved.
|
|
Marauder
Anchorage, AK
|
Teaman wrote: <quoted text>
"How did Guerrilla tactics help Vietnam, other than our troops withdrew from the area?"
That's a blond joke, right? Well yeah, considering the source.
|
|
Arctic Guard
Anchorage, AK
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>No, I assure you, it's a serious question:) So why not answer?
Vietnam was an unprecedented military victory for the U.S. We didn't lose any battles and tactics in Vietnam set our military doctrine for years to come. We didn't militarily lose Vietnam, it was a political defeat that influenced military actions and therefore led to a withdrawal.
So tell me...what is your point regarding Vietnam and Guerrilla warfare? So how did Vietnam set our "Military Doctrine for years to come"? I do not think you truly understand Military Doctrine if that is what you think. Did Vietnam have an effect on Military Strategy? Yes it did, but that is not what sets Military Doctrine. Vietnam WAS instrumental in the forming of the US Army's TRADOC(Training and Doctrine Command)BUT it did not set the US Military Doctrine.
|
|
Marauder
Anchorage, AK
|
Snow Bunny_ wrote: <quoted text>No, I assure you, it's a serious question:) So why not answer?
Vietnam was an unprecedented military victory for the U.S. We didn't lose any battles and tactics in Vietnam set our military doctrine for years to come. We didn't militarily lose Vietnam, it was a political defeat that influenced military actions and therefore led to a withdrawal.
So tell me...what is your point regarding Vietnam and Guerrilla warfare? "One theme presented by supporters of the American empire is the U.S. military is invincible and can never lose unless stabbed in the back by impatient politicians. They claim the U.S. military never lost a battle during the entire Vietnam war. This was disputed by America's most decorated officer of that war, Col. David Hackworth, in his book "About Face." The U.S. military had every advantage, yet mistakes were made and battles lost. Internet research turns up these 50 lost battles of the Vietnam war:" Read about them here: http://www.g2mil.com/lost_vietnam.htm Now granted...there were no real head to head combat battles...that is the nature of "guerilla" (plz note spelling)warfare, they are called "hit and run tactics". But as you can see, some of the effects were devastating. "You, our Vietnam veterans, did not always receive the respect that you deserved — which was a national shame," Obama said. "But let it be remembered that you won every major battle of that war. Every single one." We found the statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details. Although the U.S. may have won most of the major battles, it's important to note that there is wide agreement that the U.S. lost the war. We ruled it was Half True. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/artic... Ignorance must really be bliss.
|
|
Louiston
Ankeny, IA
|
Marauder wrote: <quoted text>
......Ignorance must really be bliss. She wears it like a badge of honor.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Pisces
