Obama Announces Support For Eliminating BSA Ban On LGBT Participation

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought it was a nice variation on that exact quote...glad you caught it...
you cheer lead, I get immature...
opposing gay marriage is not AUTOMATICALLY bigotry against gays...GROW UP.

And supporting segregation is not automatically bigotry against blacks either......

Opposing marriage for same-sex couples IS bigotry against gays.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
So don't join, start your own club.

We're probably going to have to start our own club, because the the pending lawsuits from the victims of your pedophile leaders will likely bankrupt the organization. The BSA doesn't have the same deep pockets of the Catholic church.

Hey, by any chance were any of those pedophiles you all hid all these years catholics with a history of wearing black dresses.....?

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
ever notice they insist on joining and then trash the club they want to join...BSA and MARRIAGE...

Wrong again.

It was the BSA who trashed their own organization by hiding & protecting known pedophiles from prosecution.

It's heteros and their serial marriage-divorce-marriage-divo rce, etc who have trashed "traditional marriage".

Same-sex couples want to bring a little honor back to both the BSA and marriage.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
If you call one side anti-gay, you need to call the other side pro-gay, not pro-equality. Start with that question, do you think m/m sex is normal?

No, I need to call them anti-gay and pro-equality.

Just because you support treating everyone equally under the constitution, doesn't mean you are necessarily "pro-gay". I know a few people who quite anti-gay but support treating us equally anyways.

I've already said I male/male sex is completely normal for homosexuals. It's definitely NOT normal for heterosexuals to engage in male/male sex.

Just as writing with your left hand is completely normal for left-handed people, but not normal for right-handed people.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I need to call them anti-gay and pro-equality.

Sorry, it's pro or anti-gay according to all of your posts.
You already have the identical rights that everyone else has.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
We're probably going to have to start our own club,

Good, maybe then you'll stop whining.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, it's pro or anti-gay according to all of your posts.
You already have the identical rights that everyone else has.

Well according to THIS post, it's pro-equality or anti-gay.

If I had identical rights then my marriage would be recognized by the federal govt and all 50 states like all other marriages.

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
explain.

Look up "Set Theory".

Here's a beginning:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_Theory

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
yah, I already said i didn't say that...so you just invented it and then argued against it...so go ahead and just leave me out of it!

Ahh, infinitely avoiding my questions. I asked you quite clearly which side, the anti-equality or the pro-equality side, do you think started shoving their views down the others' throats first?

Avoiding the question only shows you think the pro-equality side did it first.

Avoiding questions is the only thing you hateful people are good at. You never answer any direct questions.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
Well according to THIS post, it's pro-equality or anti-gay.
If I had identical rights then my marriage would be recognized by the federal govt and all 50 states like all other marriages.

That's not identical. Anyone is free to enter into a marriage with a qualifying person, as defined by the state you wish to marry in, or remain single, that includes you.

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Look up "Set Theory".
Here's a beginning:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_Theory

Jane Dough's points were easy to understand and relevant, for most people. Your BS is nonsense and irrelevant.

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
Well according to THIS post, it's pro-equality or anti-gay.

Still false. You said that anyone opposing gay marrage is anti-gay.
It's common sense then to say supporting gay marriage is pro-gay.
You have no common sense.

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
Ahh, infinitely avoiding my questions. I asked you quite clearly which side, the anti-equality or the pro-equality side, do you think started shoving their views down the others' throats first?
.

no. I only said you guys are shoving you views down other people's throats NOW...
the "who did it first" is for kids, so you figure it out...
and leave me out of your arguments with yourself...

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Look up "Set Theory".
Here's a beginning:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_Theory

yah, thanks, but why don't you go ahead and explain how it applies to what i said...

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>

Opposing marriage for same-sex couples IS bigotry against gays.

nope, its not. and you are being silly for thinking so...
So Obama was a bigot up to the minute he shifted?
of course not. he was just "informed".

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
yah, thanks, but why don't you go ahead and explain how it applies to what i said...

You are confusing your set parameters.

GIGO

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
You are confusing your set parameters.
GIGO

I was using your logic, so yes, GIGO....
it was a proof of the hilarity of the logic...
turns out, being LGBT is not related to being gay...

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not identical. Anyone is free to enter into a marriage with a qualifying person, as defined by the state you wish to marry in, or remain single, that includes you.

Yeah, and blacks were free to enter into a marriage with a qualifying person as defefined by the state they wished to marry in or remain single..........

Oh wait, that's right, the SCOTUS ruled that eqaully discriminating against people ISN'T equal.

Just as they are about to rule that the federal government can't discriminate against a married couple just because because they are the same sex.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Still false. You said that anyone opposing gay marrage is anti-gay.
It's common sense then to say supporting gay marriage is pro-gay.
You have no common sense.

You can say whatever you want.

I say you're either pro-equality or anti-gay.

See, that's called freedom of speech.