Barack Obama, our next President

meaningless fred wrote:

<quoted text>
Secret liberal decoder ring translation:
when Bush was pushing this country into war = when W was defending America by preventing a second 9/11

Retard Fred has a point Nia.

If you want to get something across to the idiot right wing you must put it in simple, pseudo-patriotic, propagandistic terms or they just won't get it and will spend hours trying to twist it into something they can accept.

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Conservative Daniel Larison has been documenting Willard Romney’s neo-con/Bush foreign policy better than anyone. I gave an example in a post the other day, Romney’s Scary Foreign Policy. Well today Larison brought us an example of just how scary that foreign policy might be.
Report: Bolton Is a “Leading Candidate” for Secretary of State
That’s a terrifying prospect, but it’s also not very surprising. Many of Romney’s foreign policy views sound very much like Bolton’s. Bolton is a prominent supporter of Romney. There is every reason to assume that Romney will govern in a fashion that would generally satisfy Bolton. The hope that Romney’s foreign policy statements are all campaign posturing and don’t mean anything has always been just that–a hope. The fact that Bolton is even being considered for this position ought to provide all the confirmation anyone needs that Romney’s positions on Iran and Russia in particular are more than just election-year demagoguery.
Even when the Republicans controlled the Senate Bolton could not get 50 votes for approval to be UN ambassador. But that was yesterday’s Republican party – if the Republicans take the senate I have no doubt he would be approved. Yes, they will use the nuclear option.
If Romney wins the US will be at war with the world and the wars won’t be paid for. Don’t forget that when the Republicans are in charge deficits don’t matter.
I guess it could be worse, I haven’t heard Frank Gaffney mentioned for a position in Romney’s administration yet. He is perhaps the only one who is crazier than Bolton.
http://themoderatevoice.com/150556/romneys-sc...
Throw Mitt a hint eh?

sonicmoron reply: Sorry!.. I am a "Recovery Summer" lifeguard.. I don't save anyone..
-
I just blame the last lifeguard...
-
It's the culture...

A neoconservative (also spelled "neo-conservative"; colloquially, neocon) in American politics is someone presented as a conservative but who is a liberal...
-
It's the culture

And so it goes wrote:

<quoted text>
Who was in control of Afghanistan? Really, this is not a trick question.

The Taliban.

And???

Did Afghanistan attack the US?

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
I would think a true libertarian would be more concerned about lily using her socio-economic standing as an insult. Oh, well, keep talking about movies with your libturd friends.

Why would that concern a libertarian?

You have no clue what libertarianism is.

More pathetic desperation. Aren't I paying enough attention to you?

Mitt Romney Visits Subsidized Farms, Knocks Big Government Spending

In front of federally subsidized cows, Romney reiterated his opposition to big-government spending. Wayne Barrett speaks to the cows’ owners, who say they dislike Obama even while they take government money.

The black-and-white cows lumbering behind Mitt Romney during his sit-down with Bob Schieffer last Sunday on Face the Nation actually feed off the same big government the presidential candidate spent much of the interview deriding. When Romney told Schieffer that “the only solution to taming an out-of-control spending government is to cut spending,” the bovines in the background could be forgiven for worrying.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06...

Maybe he should stick to foreign policy?

Syl wrote:

<quoted text>
So China gets more America jobs will build our cars and sell them back to us. Thank you Obama for the kick in the rear end . Maybe we can all get on welfare now. Wait.... somebody has to work to pay taxes so lazy people won't have to.

Wrong imbecile! The cars being built by GM in China are for the Chinese market.
You’re an idiot!

Florida wrote:

A neoconservative (also spelled "neo-conservative"; colloquially, neocon) in American politics is someone presented as a conservative but who is a liberal...
-
It's the culture

http://www.weeklystandard.com/

Try harder.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Ever notice how libertarian candidates either are or were Republicans? Never mind, a libturd like probably hasn't.

Yes they do, but there's a small libertarian faction in the GOP that opposes the larger Christ-fascist faction. That faction is the one I have a problem with too and I believe it ruins the party. I wish you idiots would calve off and form your own party.

My question is how far back Congress and the republican bobos should investigate the federal government supplying guns used to kill Americans. Should we start with Iraq and Afghanistan and go backwards?
It's really in domestic gun crime gun tracking that's gonna take alot of time and mon ey. But money is never an object for republicans as long as the rich and corporate aren't providing it.

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't I just say it, folks?
Speak of the Devil.....another Bush-Bashing fool shows up...

Certainly not bashing Bush. I would bash Bush and Obama if this weren't such a minor blip on the radar to which the real solution is so simple.

Certainly bashing the goofball faction of your party's insane tendency to attack the Democrats for the things they themselves do and the fact that you idiots are so stupid you don't recognize it.

Yep, its what I do.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
The sad thing is he's not joking.
TurdSlinger truly believes all a gynecologist does is stare and poke between the legs of hot women all day.
One look at Lily or Jean's tarantula, he'd be out the door running like his hair was on fire.

LOL ... tarantula ... LOL

<cough, wheeze>

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
Haven't you started back breathing yet? It shows in your postings, Dood.
What in-the-hell does an economic event back in 1921 have to do with Mitt Romney today? You failed to make any connection between the two and if you assume that readers will do it for you, try again.
You are clueless and wandering in the desert of stupidity.

Of course I don't expect an idiot like you to get it, you don't know anything.

There's a clear reason for talking about the 1920-21 depression with respect to what has happened since. I made that clear and anybody who knows history and understands the interplay between the economy and the government will understand it.

You certainly weren't my target audience, you'd have been better off just scrolling past it to the next shiny chunk of red meat.

Jean wrote:

One of the major issues of 2008 was Heath Care reform .This is a life and death issue.Democrats won in a landslide on it. It is also major economic issue for business and our country.
If HCR gets overturned it will be clearly because republicans overturned it. in the past they could lie and say Hillary and Bill failed and stupid morons would believe it.
they can't say Obama and the dems failed anymore. They succeeded and the republicans detroyed it. Republicans will own the issue now.
It's their baby and they will be blamed for the chaos and misery that will ensue.
People will suffer and die. Republicans will be to blame.

Tarantula! LOL

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you not see the MSNBC article I just posted above?
A Romney spokesman said it best. "It's ironic that President Obama, who has grown government beyond belief for the past three years, is calling for consolidation of government. It is unfortunate that he is only doing so now to curry political favor in an election year."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/13/us-...
Any clear-thinking person can see this political ploy for what it is.

Of course you’d think that Carol but the Romney spokesman like his boss is a bald faced liar. Government has not grown under Obama it has in fact shrunk. After an initial spike in spending to kick start the economy spending has been flat and even declining.
articles.businessinsider.com/.../30673024_1_g... ...
articles.businessinsider.com/.../29984054_1_f... ...

Jean wrote:

One of the major issues of 2008 was Heath Care reform .This is a life and death issue.Democrats won in a landslide on it. It is also major economic issue for business and our country.
If HCR gets overturned it will be clearly because republicans overturned it. in the past they could lie and say Hillary and Bill failed and stupid morons would believe it.
they can't say Obama and the dems failed anymore. They succeeded and the republicans detroyed it. Republicans will own the issue now.
It's their baby and they will be blamed for the chaos and misery that will ensue.
People will suffer and die. Republicans will be to blame.

Ah, I see you are gearing up for an announcement from the Supreme Court, tomorrow, the "pre-emptive blame-game".

"It's their baby" ... Yep, Obama and the Dems. They rammed Obamacare through Congress even though members of their own party complained they didn't have time to read the bill much less understand it and its ramifications.

If Congress rules that Obamacare is unconstitutional, Democrats
will be to blame and you know it.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
The American Conservative (TAC) is an anti-war and Old Right voice against the dominance of what it sees as a neoconservative media establishment.
It also has ties with anti-war libertarians, although individual TAC columnists such as Stuart Reid and Robert Locke have been sharply critical of libertarianism.
In 2009 Reihan Salam wrote that the publication had "gained a devoted following as a sharp critic of the conservative mainstream."
+++
So no, TAC is not a traditional "conservative" website like Redstate, Gateway Pundit, or Hot Air.

Wow, cut 'n paste straight from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as original material.

"Old Right voice" is not a "traditional 'conservative' website".

The only original material in the post is completely self-contradictory and nonsensical.

What an idiot, you should just stick with plagiarism.

And so it goes wrote:

<quoted text>
I find them a very confused website because as I stated before their stated philosophy and articles do not reflect each other.

Ha!

When the stupid are confused it must be the fault of whatever confused them.

Y'all are so precious.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave...

OBAMA AD: Job creation in Massachusetts “fell” to 47th under Romney.
FACT: Massachusetts’ state ranking for job growth went from 50th the year before he took office, to 28th in his final year.

OBAMA AD: Romney “cut taxes for millionaires”.
FACT: Romney opposed a plan to impose a capital gains tax retroactively insisting on delaying the hike eight months. That’s different than pushing for a tax cut.

OBAMA AD: Romney raised taxes on the middle class.
FACT: Romney imposed a number of fees but none of them targeted middle-income persons. Also, Romney proposed cutting the state income tax three times — a measure that would have resulted in tax cuts for all taxpayers — but he was rebuffed every time by the state’s Democratic Legislature.

OBAMA AD: Romney “left the state $2.6 billion deeper in debt.”
FACT: Long-term bond debt used for capital improvements rose under Romney as it had in the years before he took office. But Romney wasn’t piling up yearly deficits to support operating expenses the way the federal government is because Massachusetts requires balanced budgets.

OBAMA AD: When Romney was governor,“Massachusetts lost 40,000 manufacturing jobs.
FACT: The state lost a greater number of manufacturing jobs in the four years before Romney took office, and more in the four years after he left. In fact, the rate of job loss in manufacturing slowed during Romney’s time as governor.

OBAMA AD: Romney “outsourced call center jobs to India.”
FACT: He vetoed a measure that would have prevented the state from doing business with a state contractor that was locating state customer-service calls in India. Democrats who controlled the Legislature could have overridden the veto but didn’t. The veto was supported by leading newspapers as a savings to taxpayers.

http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obama-twists-rom...

...when first we practice to deceive...

Good morning.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
The sad thing is he's not joking.
TurdSlinger truly believes all a gynecologist does is stare and poke between the legs of hot women all day.
One look at Lily or Jean's tarantula, he'd be out the door running like his hair was on fire.

Ummm, no.

That was the point.

You don't have to keep proving how stupid you are, I get it.