Local News: Los Angeles, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Who still takes global warming seriously?

Posted in the US News Forum

Read

27,168 Comments

More US News Discussions »

Comments (Page 1,306)

Showing posts 26,101 - 26,120 of27,168
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27144
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Judge wrote:
I like Global Warming. I see no problem with it. Hate cold weather.
Only one problem, Glowbull warming appears to be causing freezing weather right now.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27145
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Everything causes man made global warming according to alarmist.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27146
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
Everything causes man made global warming according to alarmist.
Robust Science! More Than 30 Contradictory Pairs Of Peer-Reviewed Papers

...No matter if it’s hot-cold, wet-dry, green-brown, windy-calm, bad-nice – its all due to manmade climate change.

Amazon dry season greener
Amazon dry season browner

Avalanches may increase
Avalanches may decrease – wet snow more though [?]

Bird migrations longer
Bird migrations shorter
Bird migrations out of fashion

Boreal forest fires may increase
Boreal forest fires may continue decreasing

Chinese locusts swarm when warmer
Chinese locusts swarm when cooler

Columbia spotted frogs decline
Columbia spotted frogs thrive in warming world

Coral island atolls to sink [?]
Coral island atolls to rise [?-?]

Earth’s rotation to slow down
Earth’s rotation to speed up

East Africa to get less rain
East Africa to get more rain – pdf

Great Lakes less snow
Great Lakes more snow

Gulf stream slows down
Gulf stream speeds up a little

Indian monsoons to be drier
Indian monsoons to be wetter

Indian rice yields to decrease – full paper
Indian rice yields to increase

Latin American forests may decline
Latin American forests have thrived in warmer world with more co2!

Leaf area index reduced [1990s]
Leaf area index increased [1981-2006]

Malaria may increase
Malaria may continue decreasing

Malaria in Burundi to increase
Malaria in Burundi to decrease [?]

North Atlantic cod to decline
North Atlantic cod to thrive

North Atlantic cyclone frequency to increase
North Atlantic cyclone frequency to decrease – full pdf

North Atlantic Ocean less salty
North Atlantic Ocean more salty

Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to decline [?-?-?]
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to grow [?]

Plant methane emissions significant
Plant methane emissions insignificant

Plants move uphill
Plants move downhill [?]

Sahel to get less rain
Sahel to get more rain
Sahel may get more or less rain

San Francisco less foggy
San Francisco more foggy

Sea level rise accelerated
Sea level rise decelerated – full pdf

Soil moisture less
Soil moisture more

Squids get smaller
Squids get larger

Stone age hunters may have triggered past warming [?]
Stone age hunters may have triggered past cooling

Swiss mountain debris flow may increase
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease then increase in volume

UK may get more droughts
UK may get more rain

Wind speed to go up [?]
Wind speed slows down [?]
Wind speed to speed up then slow down

Winters maybe warmer [?-?]
Winters maybe colder ;O)

http://notrickszone.com/2011/03/30/robust-sci...

gcaveman1

Erin, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27148
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gord wrote:
Continuation...
<quoted text>
In addition to the FRAUDULENT AGW "science" and the FACT that the AGW QUACKS have LOWERED THE SUN TEMPERATURE we have the IPCC's ACTUAL PUBLIC STATEMENT that PROVES the IPCC is just a Marxist Organization that only wants to "redistribute de facto the world’s wealth"!!
The German IPCC Official confirms the Marxist plot of the IPCC in a PUBLIC STATEMENT.
FP’s Peter Foster: Canada dodges carbon suicide
"Before he was forced to talk the minority talk, Mr. Harper described climate change as a “socialist plot.” Intriguingly, this fact is now
openly acknowledged.
This week, German IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer said in an interview:“[O]ne must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth
by climate policy.…One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing
to do with environmental policy any more.”
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/11/1...
I have posted the above link about a hundred times with ZERO comments from AGW CULT.
Hey Gcaveman1, is the German IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer a Nut?
STOP RUNNING FOR THE HILLS AND ANSWER THE QUESTION!
---------
What a bunch of AGW CULT "sheeple" you AGW'ers must be.
Gord, the Monckton Monk.
NO AGW

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27149
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

AGW, the myth perpetrated by Marxist, continues to get busted.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/13/do-late...
Gord

Calgary, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27150
Feb 13, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gord, the Monckton Monk.
These posts to YOU answered all your questions AGAIN and exposes you as a babbling and lying AGW CULTIST....AGAIN.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

Rather than discuss Science, measurements, the AGW proven FRAUD and actual PUBLIC QUOTES by the IPCC Marxists, you prefer to RUN FOR THE HILLS like the Cult-Speak LIAR you are.

This is nothing new for YOU or your CULT and is simply standard "sheeple" behaviour when confronted with the TRUTH.

Do you really think that nobody notices that you and your Cult follow exactly the same procedure each and every time?

You will deficate the same tired lies again and again and run for the hills each time I expose you as the Human Garbage that you have become.

Fortunately, the Public has become increasingly aware of the AGW Fraud and the real agenda behind the AGW Criminals.
--------
The alarmist propaganda spewed by your Cult has worn so thin that it is now viewed as "news comedy".

Die hard Cult Nuts like you will still stand around on street corners in your Polar Bear costumes with your little "The Earth Has A Fever" cardboard signs flapping in the cold Winter wind.

Nobody will notice except for the odd person that will be amused and point at you so their children can have a good laugh.

You are just another invisible nut.

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27152
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Mothra wrote:
Robust Science! More Than 30 Contradictory Pairs Of Peer-Reviewed Papers
...No matter if it’s hot-cold, wet-dry, green-brown, windy-calm, bad-nice – its all due to manmade climate change.
Amazon dry season greener
Amazon dry season browner
Avalanches may increase
Avalanches may decrease – wet snow more though [?]
Bird migrations longer
Bird migrations shorter
Bird migrations out of fashion
Boreal forest fires may increase
Boreal forest fires may continue decreasing
Chinese locusts swarm when warmer
Chinese locusts swarm when cooler
Columbia spotted frogs decline
Columbia spotted frogs thrive in warming world
Coral island atolls to sink [?]
Coral island atolls to rise [?-?]
Earth’s rotation to slow down
Earth’s rotation to speed up
East Africa to get less rain
East Africa to get more rain – pdf
Great Lakes less snow
Great Lakes more snow
Gulf stream slows down
Gulf stream speeds up a little
Indian monsoons to be drier
Indian monsoons to be wetter
Indian rice yields to decrease – full paper
Indian rice yields to increase
Latin American forests may decline
Latin American forests have thrived in warmer world with more co2!
Leaf area index reduced [1990s]
Leaf area index increased [1981-2006]
Malaria may increase
Malaria may continue decreasing
Malaria in Burundi to increase
Malaria in Burundi to decrease [?]
North Atlantic cod to decline
North Atlantic cod to thrive
North Atlantic cyclone frequency to increase
North Atlantic cyclone frequency to decrease – full pdf
North Atlantic Ocean less salty
North Atlantic Ocean more salty
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to decline [?-?-?]
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to grow [?]
Plant methane emissions significant
Plant methane emissions insignificant
Plants move uphill
Plants move downhill [?]
Sahel to get less rain
Sahel to get more rain
Sahel may get more or less rain
San Francisco less foggy
San Francisco more foggy
Sea level rise accelerated
Sea level rise decelerated – full pdf
Soil moisture less
Soil moisture more
Squids get smaller
Squids get larger
Stone age hunters may have triggered past warming [?]
Stone age hunters may have triggered past cooling
Swiss mountain debris flow may increase
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease then increase in volume
UK may get more droughts
UK may get more rain
Wind speed to go up [?]
Wind speed slows down [?]
Wind speed to speed up then slow down
Winters maybe warmer [?-?]
Winters maybe colder ;O)
http://notrickszone.com/2011/03/30/robust-sci...
Great list, good find.
Patriot AKA Bozo

San Marcos, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27153
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Robust Science! More Than 30 Contradictory Pairs Of Peer-Reviewed Papers
...No matter if it’s hot-cold, wet-dry, green-brown, windy-calm, bad-nice – its all due to manmade climate change.
Amazon dry season greener
Amazon dry season browner
Avalanches may increase
Avalanches may decrease – wet snow more though [?]
Bird migrations longer
Bird migrations shorter
Bird migrations out of fashion
Boreal forest fires may increase
Boreal forest fires may continue decreasing
Chinese locusts swarm when warmer
Chinese locusts swarm when cooler
Columbia spotted frogs decline
Columbia spotted frogs thrive in warming world
Coral island atolls to sink [?]
Coral island atolls to rise [?-?]
Earth’s rotation to slow down
Earth’s rotation to speed up
East Africa to get less rain
East Africa to get more rain – pdf
Great Lakes less snow
Great Lakes more snow
Gulf stream slows down
Gulf stream speeds up a little
Indian monsoons to be drier
Indian monsoons to be wetter
Indian rice yields to decrease – full paper
Indian rice yields to increase
Latin American forests may decline
Latin American forests have thrived in warmer world with more co2!
Leaf area index reduced [1990s]
Leaf area index increased [1981-2006]
Malaria may increase
Malaria may continue decreasing
Malaria in Burundi to increase
Malaria in Burundi to decrease [?]
North Atlantic cod to decline
North Atlantic cod to thrive
North Atlantic cyclone frequency to increase
North Atlantic cyclone frequency to decrease – full pdf
North Atlantic Ocean less salty
North Atlantic Ocean more salty
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to decline [?-?-?]
Northern Hemisphere ice sheets to grow [?]
Plant methane emissions significant
Plant methane emissions insignificant
Plants move uphill
Plants move downhill [?]
Sahel to get less rain
Sahel to get more rain
Sahel may get more or less rain
San Francisco less foggy
San Francisco more foggy
Sea level rise accelerated
Sea level rise decelerated – full pdf
Soil moisture less
Soil moisture more
Squids get smaller
Squids get larger
Stone age hunters may have triggered past warming [?]
Stone age hunters may have triggered past cooling
Swiss mountain debris flow may increase
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease
Swiss mountain debris flow may decrease then increase in volume
UK may get more droughts
UK may get more rain
Wind speed to go up [?]
Wind speed slows down [?]
Wind speed to speed up then slow down
Winters maybe warmer [?-?]
Winters maybe colder ;O)
http://notrickszone.com/2011/03/30/robust-sci...
So, what's your point. That is how science works! Are you trying to say that science is worthless? No one has shown that CO2 is not one of the major causes of global warming as theorized by the scientists. It seems that you are anti-science unless it promotes your bias.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27154
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what's your point. That is how science works! Are you trying to say that science is worthless? No one has shown that CO2 is not one of the major causes of global warming as theorized by the scientists. It seems that you are anti-science unless it promotes your bias.
<sigh>

These are all 'peer reviewed' studies that give contradictory results.

So regardless of the outcome, it's covered under the global warming meme.... and some yay-hoo like you will then trot it out to say, "See... that's what we've been saying all along."

But what a curious argument you've presented. It's now incumbent on skeptics to prove a 'negative'-- that CO2 is NOT a major cause of global warming.

Anti-science?

Like I said before, grow up.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27155
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

4

These are the fundamental conclusions
about climate change:

(i) The planet is warming due to increased
concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our
atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington
does not alter this fact.

(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration
of these gases over the last century is due
to human activities, especially the burning of
fossil fuels and deforestation.

(iii) Natural causes always play a role in
changing Earth’s climate, but are now being
overwhelmed by human-induced changes.

(iv) Warming the planet will cause many
other climatic patterns to change at speeds
unprecedented in modern times, including
increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations
in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations
of carbon dioxide are making the
oceans more acidic.

(v) The combination of these complex
climate changes threatens coastal communities
and cities, our food and water supplies,
marine and freshwater ecosystems, forests,
high mountain environments, and far more.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27156
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

3

SpaceBlues wrote:
These are the fundamental conclusions
about climate change:
(i) The planet is warming due to increased
concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our
atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington
does not alter this fact.
(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration
of these gases over the last century is due
to human activities, especially the burning of
fossil fuels and deforestation.
(iii) Natural causes always play a role in
changing Earth’s climate, but are now being
overwhelmed by human-induced changes.
(iv) Warming the planet will cause many
other climatic patterns to change at speeds
unprecedented in modern times, including
increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations
in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations
of carbon dioxide are making the
oceans more acidic.
(v) The combination of these complex
climate changes threatens coastal communities
and cities, our food and water supplies,
marine and freshwater ecosystems, forests,
high mountain environments, and far more.
YOU are an end of the world freak no different from the ones that stand by the side of the road with their "THE END IS NEAR" signs. Except at least those freaks have the courage to ACT like they mean what they say and if there were real consequences for you condemning our children to a CO2 death you wouldn't be shooting your mouth off like this. If you really mean what you say, I'll respect your heartless, neocon-like fear mongering if you started ACTING like a catastrophic climate crisis was real because NOTHING besides a comet hit is worse than a climate crisis. Now get your sign and start marching or just shut up.
YouHelpFixIt

Nottingham, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27158
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

SpaceBlues wrote:
These are the fundamental conclusions
about climate change:
(i) The planet is warming due to increased
concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our
atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington
does not alter this fact.
(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration
of these gases over the last century is due
to human activities, especially the burning of
fossil fuels and deforestation.
(iii) Natural causes always play a role in
changing Earth’s climate, but are now being
overwhelmed by human-induced changes.
(iv) Warming the planet will cause many
other climatic patterns to change at speeds
unprecedented in modern times, including
increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations
in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations
of carbon dioxide are making the
oceans more acidic.
(v) The combination of these complex
climate changes threatens coastal communities
and cities, our food and water supplies,
marine and freshwater ecosystems, forests,
high mountain environments, and far more.
You cut and pasted this exact text already in post #27027, but you failed to defend it against even the most basic criticism. Please try go back and try to come up with some answers, instead of just being a mind numbed propagadist for he alarmists.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27159
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

5

4

4

According to a new Texas A&M study, the most severely affected areas of rising ocean temperatures are off the coast of Australia, near the Philippines, the Gulf Stream from Florida to New England, the Brazil current and the Kuroshio current, which is similar to the Gulf Stream but located in the Pacific Ocean near Japan.

Results of the team’s study have been published in the journal Nature Climate Science
Fun Facts

Las Cruces, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27160
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
According to a new Texas A&M study, the most severely affected areas of rising ocean temperatures are off the coast of Australia, near the Philippines, the Gulf Stream from Florida to New England, the Brazil current and the Kuroshio current, which is similar to the Gulf Stream but located in the Pacific Ocean near Japan.
Results of the team’s study have been published in the journal Nature Climate Science
Graphic of various ocean temps.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_...
YouHelpFixIt

Nottingham, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27161
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
According to a new Texas A&M study, the most severely affected areas of rising ocean temperatures are off the coast of Australia, near the Philippines, the Gulf Stream from Florida to New England, the Brazil current and the Kuroshio current, which is similar to the Gulf Stream but located in the Pacific Ocean near Japan.
Results of the team’s study have been published in the journal Nature Climate Science
More Spaceblue's spam
Patriot AKA Bozo

San Marcos, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27162
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
<sigh>
These are all 'peer reviewed' studies that give contradictory results.
So regardless of the outcome, it's covered under the global warming meme.... and some yay-hoo like you will then trot it out to say, "See... that's what we've been saying all along."
But what a curious argument you've presented. It's now incumbent on skeptics to prove a 'negative'-- that CO2 is NOT a major cause of global warming.
Anti-science?
Like I said before, grow up.
I see that you do not understand how the scientific method works. The standing theory is that CO2 is causing the Earth to warm. The theory will stand until some skeptic proves it wrong. That is all it takes, someone to prove it wrong. No one has done that yet! A few peer reviewed papers will not do that unless they present verifiable and repeatable studies that do show that CO2 does not cause warming.

“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27165
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
I see that you do not understand how the scientific method works. The standing theory is that CO2 is causing the Earth to warm. The theory will stand until some skeptic proves it wrong. That is all it takes, someone to prove it wrong. No one has done that yet! A few peer reviewed papers will not do that unless they present verifiable and repeatable studies that do show that CO2 does not cause warming.
The next step is to test the theory; are we there yet? It's not up to skeptics to create compelling experimental tests, trials and demonstrations; scientists do that to learn and teach.

Don't blame the skeptics for the holes in your theory, blame the science. If there is no compelling test then climate change mitigation is putting the horse before the carriage.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27168
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
According to a new Texas A&M study, the most severely affected areas of rising ocean temperatures are off the coast of Australia, near the Philippines, the Gulf Stream from Florida to New England, the Brazil current and the Kuroshio current, which is similar to the Gulf Stream but located in the Pacific Ocean near Japan.
Results of the team’s study have been published in the journal Nature Climate Science
YOU are an end of the world freak no different from the ones that stand by the side of the road with their "THE END IS NEAR" signs. Except at least those freaks have the courage to ACT like they mean what they say and if there were real consequences for you condemning our children to a CO2 death you wouldn't be shooting your mouth off like this. If you really mean what you say, I'll respect your heartless, neocon-like fear mongering if you started ACTING like a catastrophic climate crisis was real because NOTHING besides a comet hit is worse than a climate crisis. Now get your sign and start marching or just shut up.

“Be true to yourself.”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27169
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Unscientific Bozo wrote:
The theory will stand until some skeptic proves it wrong.
All 'good' scientists are sceptics.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27170
Feb 14, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

mememine69 wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU are an end of the world freak no different from the ones that stand by the side of the road with their "THE END IS NEAR" signs. Except at least those freaks have the courage to ACT like they mean what they say and if there were real consequences for you condemning our children to a CO2 death you wouldn't be shooting your mouth off like this. If you really mean what you say, I'll respect your heartless, neocon-like fear mongering if you started ACTING like a catastrophic climate crisis was real because NOTHING besides a comet hit is worse than a climate crisis. Now get your sign and start marching or just shut up.
Without consensus there isn't a crisis.
The global scientific community on the worldwide scale amounts to there being literally millions of people who are warning us of catastrophic climate crisis. These millions of people in the science world have families and kids too who will suffer in a climate crisis yet these millions of people in the world of science refuse to join the dozens of climate change protesters in the streets.
So the millions of people in the world of science who say a catastrophic climate crisis is upon us, refuse to ACT like it’s a real crisis. The tragic exaggeration is obvious and this planet lover is happy a crisis was avoided for whatever reason.
These monsters of science in the sick world of climate blame gorged themselves in the climate blame feeding frenzy and exploited 26 years of this consultant’s wet dream and it was science that polluted the planet originally with their pesticides and deadly chemicals that they denied for decades as being toxic to the planet. Science and scientists made environmentalism necessary in the first place. As Rachel Carson said, science is the enemy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker

Send me an email

Showing posts 26,101 - 26,120 of27,168
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Daily Horoscope for June 4

Sagittarius

Relationships have been going through through testing times since the Solar Eclipse at last month's New Moon in Gemini on May 20. Events may force you to reevaluate the state of a partnership. You may even decide that you need to make some major adjustments if things are to carry on as you would like. During the coming fortnight leading up to the rare second New Moon in Gemini, this may feel like a crisis, but that doesn't mean you should abandon all hope or throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Get your Horoscope »