U.S. officials receive 5 fingers from Baghdad hostages

peteoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Its okay to be completely non-responsive to my challenges to the things you've said. It strongly suggests that you've promoted some indefensible positions.
Good luck in your endeavors.

I have answered your questions and you fail to create a dialog. Because you don't agree with my answers its easy for you to say my positions are indefensible. Its not my job to convince you my answers are right. I have responded and added much more to it and you fail to comment. Its not my fault your not really saying anything but that your right and somehow your expecting me to prove you wrong.
This has been a waste of time.

shakin stevens wrote:

are you sure they were his fingers and not fingers he might hav kept as sick trophies from all the women an kids he been shootin
every one forget about the americunts in vietnam?

F-You you good for nothing piece of shit!!!!!!!!!!

antonyto wrote:

<quoted text>You only seem to show the amount of Americans who have died before 9/11 by Muslims and fail to show the amount of Muslims killed by Americans. Those numbers are surely harder to find because the US army would never divulge such statistics.

Apparently the number was not high enough (short by 19?) since 9/11 still happened.

By the way, I am concerned for your health. I have heard of your condition and am fighting to help rid the planet of this horrible affliction. It's called Cranial/Rectal Insertion Disorder (CRIDs) and millions of people suffer from it daily. It is especially prevalent in American Liberals and the French, but can affect select people anywhere on the planet. Please, if you think you may have it immediately turn off CNN/MSNBC, put down the NY Times and RUN to the nearest military recruiting station. They have ways of curing CRIDs that you cannot imagine unless you have been through basic training.
If you do not understand what CRIDs is then you probably have it.

The Word is Life wrote:

<quoted text>
First off, your comments prove that you're a fool and an idiot. "I PAY"!!!!!!!! Is the key words to why I have every right to be here after my ancestors were shipped across the atlantic. They didn't ask to come here you devil. You try to put logic into paying for water, which is a natural resource you moron! Since I can tell that you're a devil, I have nothing else to say to you. You and I are on opposing sides. We have NOTHING to discuss. Just live it up and enjoy the short time you have left in this evil nation.
PRAISE YHWH!!!

Sir your nothing more then the typcial bitter fanatic blaming the past for the dismal present you put yourself in. Keep blaming everyone for your short comings and the only thing that will happen is life will continue to pass your by.

lazy housesdad wrote:

<quoted text>
you have friends who are mercs?
Then you know the risks they assume for the massive amounts of money they are given for their service.

I do, but the money is no longer as massive as it was. The really experienced (recently retired Special Forces and the like with 20+ years) are no longer as abundant as they were. Now it's kids with only three years of experience in the army or Marines and no real experience to speak of. They are paid much less and prone to more mistakes.

Early on, the "mercs" were guys who were much more dedicated to the US and its mission...now it is including more and younger hot heads looking to make a buck.

shakin stevens wrote:

r u sure they are his fingers?
are u sure they are no sick trophies hes been collecting from all the kids he been killin?
has everyone forgotten when america went to save the pplz of vietnam?

Well! Look everybody, at the islamo-fascist chiming in from the UK. It was such a nice country now, it's getting all crappy because, of all the invading muslims, trying to turn it into Sudan...

This is what we have to prevent from happening in the US...

antonyto wrote:

<quoted text>You only seem to show the amount of Americans who have died before 9/11 by Muslims and fail to show the amount of Muslims killed by Americans. Those numbers are surely harder to find because the US army would never divulge such statistics.

red cross/red crescent collects stats, digging aound the internet will pull up some estimates based on the best of their ability. army doesn't know how many they've killed. stats aren't their job and who says its the army? we have other agencies that carry out covert operations. and who says its the US? where were we? what were we doing? what was our motive? gulf war / desert storm was in response to the request by kuwait after saddam invaded that country. the un approved of our action there

peteoo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think they (the 'muslims' flying the planes) cared either. If a few other muslims have to die so they can get their ticket to heaven, then that's okay.
Now, if they KNEW they were going to go to hell for blowing other people up, but the innocent muslims that died were going to get to heaven, would they still do what they did?
I'm looking for an education as well.
When you say things like, they aren't blowing up their own people, and then when I call you on it, that you don't care...well...that tells me a lot.
See I'm every bit as careful of the words you're saying that I'm not swallowing as the words from the US administration.
Now on the other hand, if I accepted what you are saying blindly/faithfully, without challenging the hypocrises, you'd be in a great position to suggest that I'm swalling verbiage from US leadership hook, line, and sinker.
I had another post to you in case you missed it.
http://www.topix.net/forum/us/fbi/TESFIMKL07J...

It comes down to this your government is responsible for 9/11 and not muslims. Aluminum planes sliced throught steel and concrete, and with the addition of jet fuel made them fall perfectly in on themselves? Eyewitnesses and professionals alike said they herd bombs going off and that the only way for them to fall the way they did is if that were the case. Its funny how nobody ever talks about the 2 bombs that didn't detonate during the Oklahoma city bombing that they found IN the building. All people remember is Timothy McVeigh was found guilty of the rider. You people don't really care about finding the truth to anything. It's just not convenient enough .

well give the man a hand!

change agent wrote:

<quoted text>
red cross/red crescent collects stats, digging aound the internet will pull up some estimates based on the best of their ability. army doesn't know how many they've killed. stats aren't their job and who says its the army? we have other agencies that carry out covert operations. and who says its the US? where were we? what were we doing? what was our motive? gulf war / desert storm was in response to the request by kuwait after saddam invaded that country. the un approved of our action there

I just don't like how people try to prove their argument by stating one side of the facts.

change agent wrote:

<quoted text>
red cross/red crescent collects stats, digging aound the internet will pull up some estimates based on the best of their ability. army doesn't know how many they've killed. stats aren't their job and who says its the army? we have other agencies that carry out covert operations. and who says its the US? where were we? what were we doing? what was our motive? gulf war / desert storm was in response to the request by kuwait after saddam invaded that country. the un approved of our action there

Its like saying were completely innocent because they started it/

lazy housesdad wrote:

<quoted text>
WOW

That's great. I've pointed out your posts and your points as the idiotic bulls**t they are. What is your response? Post under my name with a fourth grade response. I think Lazy Troll would be a more appropriate handle here for you.

wherebugsgo wrote:

<quoted text>
Your [lack of] logic amuses me.
First of all, Clinton was not responsible for the deaths in Rwanda, because he did not declare war on any faction within the country. He had no power to step in and stop the bloodshed, although it would have probably been helpful for the civilians if he had.

9/11, 19 terrorists hijacked American planes and killed approximately 3000 people by flying those planes into the WTC, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. How many of those terrorists were Iraqi? Absolutely none. How many were Afghani? Again, absolutely none. A great majority of them were Saudi, while a few were from the UAE and Lebanon.

Bush later invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, citing 9/11,

And yet, you're trying to say that Clinton, who balanced the budget, oversaw the greatest period of economic growth in this country in the past half century,
I laugh at you.

You must be LAUGHING while looking in the mirror.

First of all: Clinton personally acknowledged that he could have stopped what happened in Rwanda
Clinton acknowledges he failed to stop Rwandan massacre

Last Updated: Saturday, July 23, 2005 | 11:46 PM ET
CBC News

Former U.S. president Bill Clinton says he's sorry for his "personal failure" to stop the 1994 slaughter of 800,000 people in Rwanda.
He made the comment as he visited a Rwandan genocide memorial on Saturday, where he laid a wreath. Clinton is in the country as part of an African tour to fight AIDS.

He was president while 800,000 minority Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus were systematically slaughtered by Hutu militants between April and June 1994.

Clinton explained his lack of action to stop the massacre by saying the U.S. didn't know what was going on, BUT REPORTS LAST YEAR BASED ON DECLASSIFIED U.S. DOCUMENTS SAID THE CABINET HAD ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SITUATION.

The final report of the 9/11 Commission…“details a much more extensive set of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda than the earlier staff statement. It also modifies the original "no collaborative relationship" description, now saying there was "no collaborative operational relationship" (emphasis added) between Iraq and Al Qaeda. And it suggests a significant amount of contact and communication between the regime of Saddam Hussein and the terrorist organization headed by Osama bin Laden.”

CLINTON BALANCED THE BUDGET……Bwahhhhh hahaha……

You’re kidding right.

There are three fundamental ways to eliminate a budget deficit:
1) Increase tax revenues.
2) Decrease spending.
3) Do a combination of 1 and 2.

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, from 1992 to 2000:
- Spending increased by 29.49%.
- Tax revenues increased by 85.58%.

Obviously, Bill Clinton did not control federal spending (like bush jr.) since it increased by almost 30% during his tenure.

What saved his goat was the dramatic 85.58% increase in tax revenues.

So the raw data show that although federal spending increased dramatically during Clinton’s term, tax revenues increased even faster!

That’s why there was a budget surplus - tax revenue increased at a faster pace than Bill Clinton could spend it. The surplus had nothing to do with his ability to intentionally balance the budget.

Economic growth were due to Reagan / Bush…… you are forgetting the technology boom that occurred during the Clinton Administration. This event had very little to do with the Clinton Administration but completely changed the economy.

Bwaaaaah haha.....

NoMuslimsNoTerror wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell you what buddy - let the Muslims put on a military uniform and go toe to toe with our military in a conventional war. Then I will respect them. Until then, they are sneaky, barbaric pieces of excrement.

Your fogetting we are the ones who taught them how to fight in the first place. There were plenty of people during the Vietnam War who said the same thing and they kicked our butts.
Please America leads the world in clandestine operations they are simply using our own tactics against us.

antonyto wrote:

<quoted text>
It comes down to this your government is responsible for 9/11 and not muslims. Aluminum planes sliced throught steel and concrete, and with the addition of jet fuel made them fall perfectly in on themselves? Eyewitnesses and professionals alike said they herd bombs going off and that the only way for them to fall the way they did is if that were the case. Its funny how nobody ever talks about the 2 bombs that didn't detonate during the Oklahoma city bombing that they found IN the building. All people remember is Timothy McVeigh was found guilty of the rider. You people don't really care about finding the truth to anything. It's just not convenient enough .

No...It comes down to you being a Kool-Aid drining moron. Keep your Canadan BS theory and pay attention to your country....it's obvious you know nothing of ours.

There is no "W" in Hebrew.

There wouldn't be any free black people in the world if your ancestores hadn't come here and your grandparents would have paved entry ways with their own skulls. Blacks and Muslims introduced slavery to the West and for the most part, Whites gave them their lives, food, shelter, clothing, education and opportunity. You'd be cutting yourself, or slaughtering your own if it weren't for whites. That's why the stagnant, lazy and self-infatuated American Black has generally abandoned the African people today.

-

The Word is Life wrote:

<quoted text>
First off, your comments prove that you're a fool and an idiot. "I PAY"!!!!!!!! Is the key words to why I have every right to be here after my ancestors were shipped across the atlantic. They didn't ask to come here you devil. You try to put logic into paying for water, which is a natural resource you moron! Since I can tell that you're a devil, I have nothing else to say to you. You and I are on opposing sides. We have NOTHING to discuss. Just live it up and enjoy the short time you have left in this evil nation.
PRAISE YHWH!!!

antonyto wrote:

<quoted text>Its like saying were completely innocent because they started it/

When was the last time anything relevant on the international geopolitical stage started, determined, or solved by anything having to do with Canada? Canada is like your attic. You forget it's up there because nothing ever really goes on, you check it occasionally but nothing ever happens, then you go about your way. It's just sort of there with little purpose or meaning. That makes it very easy for it's citizenry who add no value, produce nothing, and don't participate, to have a lot of free time to pontificate about how other nations and it's citizens (who EVERYONE in the world looks too when they need help) should behave, and defend itself.

By the way, if the US and it's citizens are such awful, mis-guided people, then why with the land mass the size that Canada has, does 97% of it's population live within 100 miles of the US border?

"Kicked our butts..." Let's see... 58,000 American dead soldiers and 4,000,000 dead terrorist communist horror mongers. Yeah, they put up a good fight.

-

NYRESQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Your fogetting we are the ones who taught them how to fight in the first place. There were plenty of people during the Vietnam War who said the same thing and they kicked our butts.
Please America leads the world in clandestine operations they are simply using our own tactics against us.

antonyto wrote:

<quoted text>Its like saying were completely innocent because they started it/

how do you get that i was saying we're completely innocent? i didn't suggest that, say that or imply that. you aren't able to respond to my questions. i asked some very specific questions to clarify and qualify your very generalized statments - thats all.

i challenge anyone to support their claims - regardless of their point of view. i am tired of seeing people regurgitate information pulled from biased incomplete or outright false sources without making the effort to verify the claims. i've been seeing posts on here of "proof" from the likes of the daily kos (from the left) and world net daily (from the right)without citing verifiable data.

NYRESQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Instead of a headstone it would be more fitting to just place a urinal at the gravesite. Bush has pissed on America and everything it stands for for 8 years now.
It should be a right for Everyone to piss on him for all the time that follows.

Ok, but what if he was cremated, you would piss in the urn?