|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
Double Fine wrote: Yo Buck. Long time no see. Hope you have been well. Let's discuss the seperation of state and church in America, if you don't mind. Thanks [In background] Sound of round entering chamber of spinny thing on some pistols with holes for bullets, spinny thing being turned several times, hammer cocks and clicks, cocks and clicks, cocks and fires, brains splatter on wall just before swallowed poison kicks.
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
nanoanomaly wrote: When you lay down with swine you get up soaked in crap. Are you coming on to me? An authority on pig shit is in the house now, but it's not me.
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
nanoanomaly wrote: My own tom doesn't bother her but he tries to molest me when he thinks I'm asleep, the turd. He's not confusing you with a female. He's confusing you with his cat box.
|
|
havent forgotten
Lamoni, IA
|
Buck Crick wrote: <quoted text> Have you seen what they do to the definition of "atheism"? ...adopted the definition of agnosticism in order to seem objective. I covered it in excruciating detail. ...good times. what they, and please hit the reply button to put up a quote from someone who does it. I define agnosticism by its root words, from the greek, and atheism by its root words, from the greek. Then there are modern variants - some of which warp the definition, and some of which clarify two different varieties of atheism - one of which makes a knowledge claim, and one doesn't. one assumes you always make knowledge claims, since you are so excruciating.
|
|
havent forgotten
Lamoni, IA
|
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> You mean that they don't like the ten definitions that I posted in a row as I saw them? and they supplied their own without sources, or skipped over definitions to get to the one they liked? and that KrustyOdor asserted that agnostics were "technically" the same as atheists? and that surveys counted agnostics as Christians? Funny... if I said the exact same thing (that they were the same)- I'd never hear the end of it. I never heard of a commenter using the name KrustyOdor - wounds like a rightwing nut trying to pretend to be on the other side, to me. it isn't a matter of what definition one likes. it is a matter of the origins of words, and parts of words, and the simplest possible meaning when the parts are combined. lots of folks like to misdefine the view they disagree with. and some egomaniac types think they can phrase things better than by using the simple root words. occam's razor is not just the name of a commenter on topix, it is the name of a principle of clear and concise explanation.
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Ah, as 'he' gets in the USA, a secular country, where not only is religious instruction not available, it is banned... as opposed to countries like the UK where collective worship is required by law. I wouldn't know. I am out of the loop, and not too involved in earthly matters anyway at the moment. Right now, I'm waiting for a cloud to roll away from the sun to look at Venus transiting it. I've got my old timey photo negatives four layers thick ready for viewing. Mexico, where I live, has a relatively religious population, but an EXTREMELY anti-clerical constitution, with articles aimed specifically at the church. The chrch had been allied with a harsh dictator, Diaz, at the time of the Mexican revolution, and the Mexican people were pretty pissed. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholicis... : "lvaro Obregn and the Constitutionalists eventually took active measures to reduce the profound influence of the Catholic Church. On May 19, 1914, Obregn's forces sentenced Bishop Andres Segura and other clerical officials to jail for eight years because of their participation in a revolt. While Obregn was in control of Mexico City during February 1915, he ordered the Church to pay 500,000 pesos to alleviate the suffering of poor Mexicans. "Venustiano Carranza assumed the presidency on May 1, 1915. Carranza and his followers felt that the clergy was turning people against him by spreading propaganda. Soon after Carranaza took total control of Mexico and developed a new Constitution with the intention of diminishing the Churchs political sway and power within Mexico. "Anti-clerical elements were included in 1917 Mexican Constitution. Five elements in the Constitution were aimed at reducing the Catholic Churchs influence in Mexican domestic affairs. Article 3 enforced secular education in Mexican schools. Monastic vows and orders were outlawed in Article 5. Article 24 prevented public worship outside the confines of the Church buildings. According to article 27, religious institutions were denied the right to acquire, hold, or administer real property. Furthermore, all real estate held by religious institutions through third parties like hospitals, schools, was declared national property. Finally in article 130, it declared all basic civil responsibilities like voting or commenting on public affairs was taken away from Church officials. The Mexican government was extremely harsh in their attempt to eliminate the Catholic Churchs legal existence in Mexico. The stern premises of the 1917 Constitution contributed to the rise of resentment between the church and state." That's what I'm talking about! The priests and nuns aren't even allowed on the streets in penguin gear. BTW, the streets of most Mexican pueblos are named after these heroes. I live on Venustiano Carranza, a few blocks from lvaro Obregn. And such streets are in just about every town.
|
|
“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”
Since: Sep 08
The Borderland of Sol
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Public schools, honey. Do pay attention. In American, you can get as much religious instruction as you want to swallow and as we know: swallowing is what you do best. You neglected to say anything about "public schools". In other words, you're wrong. You pay attention.
|
|
“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”
Since: Sep 08
The Borderland of Sol
|
Please wait...
It aint necessarily so wrote: <quoted text> I wouldn't know. I am out of the loop, and not too involved in earthly matters anyway at the moment. Right now, I'm waiting for a cloud to roll away from the sun to look at Venus transiting it. I've got my old timey photo negatives four layers thick ready for viewing. Mexico, where I live, has a relatively religious population, but an EXTREMELY anti-clerical constitution, with articles aimed specifically at the church. The chrch had been allied with a harsh dictator, Diaz, at the time of the Mexican revolution, and the Mexican people were pretty pissed. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholicis... : "lvaro Obregn and the Constitutionalists eventually took active measures to reduce the profound influence of the Catholic Church. On May 19, 1914, Obregn's forces sentenced Bishop Andres Segura and other clerical officials to jail for eight years because of their participation in a revolt. While Obregn was in control of Mexico City during February 1915, he ordered the Church to pay 500,000 pesos to alleviate the suffering of poor Mexicans. "Venustiano Carranza assumed the presidency on May 1, 1915. Carranza and his followers felt that the clergy was turning people against him by spreading propaganda. Soon after Carranaza took total control of Mexico and developed a new Constitution with the intention of diminishing the Churchs political sway and power within Mexico. "Anti-clerical elements were included in 1917 Mexican Constitution. Five elements in the Constitution were aimed at reducing the Catholic Churchs influence in Mexican domestic affairs. Article 3 enforced secular education in Mexican schools. Monastic vows and orders were outlawed in Article 5. Article 24 prevented public worship outside the confines of the Church buildings. According to article 27, religious institutions were denied the right to acquire, hold, or administer real property. Furthermore, all real estate held by religious institutions through third parties like hospitals, schools, was declared national property. Finally in article 130, it declared all basic civil responsibilities like voting or commenting on public affairs was taken away from Church officials. The Mexican government was extremely harsh in their attempt to eliminate the Catholic Churchs legal existence in Mexico. The stern premises of the 1917 Constitution contributed to the rise of resentment between the church and state." That's what I'm talking about! The priests and nuns aren't even allowed on the streets in penguin gear. BTW, the streets of most Mexican pueblos are named after these heroes. I live on Venustiano Carranza, a few blocks from lvaro Obregn. And such streets are in just about every town. Amusingly, Obregon was of Irish extraction. The original name was "O'Brien".
|
|
|
|
“I see quantum effects”
Since: Jan 11
In the macro world.
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text>You mean that they don't like the ten definitions that I posted in a row as I saw them? and they supplied their own without sources, or skipped over definitions to get to the one they liked? and that KrustyOdor asserted that agnostics were "technically" the same as atheists? and that surveys counted agnostics as Christians?
Funny... if I said the exact same thing (that they were the same)- I'd never hear the end of it. Are you talking to yourself?
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
JEB wrote: You enjoy the word "I" You enjoy shaping your post into the letter "I". So, are we now reduced to hurling insults? OK. I've got a few words longer than "I" that you might like. These have all appeared in Topix posts within the past week. I'm glad Buck is here, as he fancies himself among the literati : Merry andrew - clown: a person who amuses others by ridiculous behavior Imbulbitate - to defecate in ones pants Odorivector the source of a stench Mattoid someone who is semi-insane Naffin one who is almost an idiot Cacozealot - a zealot devoted to evil Eproctolagniac someone who is sexually stimulated by flatulence, be it there own or someone else's. Smellfungus - a perpetual pessimist Gobemouche - a highly gullible person Scapegrace - a habitually unscrupulous person; scamp Pecksniffian - hypocritically affecting high moral principles Ninnyhammer - a fool or simpleton Here are several earmarked for Buck, for his autobiography: Pettifogger - A person who tries to befuddle others with his speech. Quibberdick a nasty quibbler Popinjay - person given to vain, pretentious displays and empty chatter Tergiversater one who is ambiguous or unclear in order to mislead or withhold information Snoutband one who constantly interrupts to contradict Casuistry - specious or excessively subtle reasoning intended to rationalize or mislead Spuddle attend to trifling matters as if they were important Entheomaniac one who is literally insane about religion Sophomaniac one under the delusion that he is wise
|
|
“I Am No One Else”
Since: Apr 12
Seattle
|
Please wait...
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Public schools, honey. Do pay attention. In American, you can get as much religious instruction as you want to swallow Not until after 18, before that it's as much as the parents will cram down your throat. We know how use to having your parents cram stuff down your throat you are.
|
|
Since: Feb 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
macumazahn wrote: <quoted text>You neglected to say anything about "public schools". I've "mentioned" public schools several dozen times, donguelicker. I can't help your AADD.
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
nanoanomaly wrote: <quoted text>Funny, that's how I typed it originally and then went back and changed it to lay. I kinda have "laid" on the brain today. XD You've been drinking, haven't you? Pretty soon, you'll be telling us about petting your kitteh again. Don't bother. I read the book, "How Grey Was My Valley" I'll bet that pubic tattoo that says, "No free parking" was all the rage before electricity. Not so much today.
|
|
“Life may be sweeter for this”
Since: Nov 08
Fennario
|
Please wait...
macumazahn wrote: <quoted text>Amusingly, Obregon was of Irish extraction. The original name was "O'Brien". Good piece of trivia. Thanks!
|
|
“I see quantum effects”
Since: Jan 11
In the macro world.
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text>Public schools, honey.
Do pay attention.
In American, you can get as much religious instruction as you want to swallow and as we know: swallowing is what you do best. Did you say "public schools" 'honey'? No. I didn't think so.
|
|
“I see quantum effects”
Since: Jan 11
In the macro world.
|
Please wait...
It aint necessarily so wrote: <quoted text>I wouldn't know. I am out of the loop, and not too involved in earthly matters anyway at the moment. Right now, I'm waiting for a cloud to roll away from the sun to look at Venus transiting it. I've got my old timey photo negatives four layers thick ready for viewing. Mexico, where I live, has a relatively religious population, but an EXTREMELY anti-clerical constitution, with articles aimed specifically at the church. The chrch had been allied with a harsh dictator, Diaz, at the time of the Mexican revolution, and the Mexican people were pretty pissed. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholicis... : "Álvaro Obregón and the Constitutionalists eventually took active measures to reduce the profound influence of the Catholic Church. On May 19, 1914, Obregón's forces sentenced Bishop Andres Segura and other clerical officials to jail for eight years because of their participation in a revolt. While Obregón was in control of Mexico City during February 1915, he ordered the Church to pay 500,000 pesos to alleviate the suffering of poor Mexicans. "Venustiano Carranza assumed the presidency on May 1, 1915. Carranza and his followers felt that the clergy was turning people against him by spreading propaganda. Soon after Carranaza took total control of Mexico and developed a new Constitution with the intention of diminishing the Churchs political sway and power within Mexico. "Anti-clerical elements were included in 1917 Mexican Constitution. Five elements in the Constitution were aimed at reducing the Catholic Churchs influence in Mexican domestic affairs. Article 3 enforced secular education in Mexican schools. Monastic vows and orders were outlawed in Article 5. Article 24 prevented public worship outside the confines of the Church buildings. According to article 27, religious institutions were denied the right to acquire, hold, or administer real property. Furthermore, all real estate held by religious institutions through third parties like hospitals, schools, was declared national property. Finally in article 130, it declared all basic civil responsibilities like voting or commenting on public affairs was taken away from Church officials. The Mexican government was extremely harsh in their attempt to eliminate the Catholic Churchs legal existence in Mexico. The stern premises of the 1917 Constitution contributed to the rise of resentment between the church and state." That's what I'm talking about! The priests and nuns aren't even allowed on the streets in penguin gear. BTW, the streets of most Mexican pueblos are named after these heroes. I live on Venustiano Carranza, a few blocks from Álvaro Obregón. And such streets are in just about every town. I missed the transit. Clouded out.
|
|
“I see quantum effects”
Since: Jan 11
In the macro world.
|
Please wait...
It aint necessarily so wrote: <quoted text>I wouldn't know. I am out of the loop, and not too involved in earthly matters anyway at the moment. Right now, I'm waiting for a cloud to roll away from the sun to look at Venus transiting it. I've got my old timey photo negatives four layers thick ready for viewing. Mexico, where I live, has a relatively religious population, but an EXTREMELY anti-clerical constitution, with articles aimed specifically at the church. The chrch had been allied with a harsh dictator, Diaz, at the time of the Mexican revolution, and the Mexican people were pretty pissed. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholicis... : "Álvaro Obregón and the Constitutionalists eventually took active measures to reduce the profound influence of the Catholic Church. On May 19, 1914, Obregón's forces sentenced Bishop Andres Segura and other clerical officials to jail for eight years because of their participation in a revolt. While Obregón was in control of Mexico City during February 1915, he ordered the Church to pay 500,000 pesos to alleviate the suffering of poor Mexicans. "Venustiano Carranza assumed the presidency on May 1, 1915. Carranza and his followers felt that the clergy was turning people against him by spreading propaganda. Soon after Carranaza took total control of Mexico and developed a new Constitution with the intention of diminishing the Churchs political sway and power within Mexico. "Anti-clerical elements were included in 1917 Mexican Constitution. Five elements in the Constitution were aimed at reducing the Catholic Churchs influence in Mexican domestic affairs. Article 3 enforced secular education in Mexican schools. Monastic vows and orders were outlawed in Article 5. Article 24 prevented public worship outside the confines of the Church buildings. According to article 27, religious institutions were denied the right to acquire, hold, or administer real property. Furthermore, all real estate held by religious institutions through third parties like hospitals, schools, was declared national property. Finally in article 130, it declared all basic civil responsibilities like voting or commenting on public affairs was taken away from Church officials. The Mexican government was extremely harsh in their attempt to eliminate the Catholic Churchs legal existence in Mexico. The stern premises of the 1917 Constitution contributed to the rise of resentment between the church and state." That's what I'm talking about! The priests and nuns aren't even allowed on the streets in penguin gear. BTW, the streets of most Mexican pueblos are named after these heroes. I live on Venustiano Carranza, a few blocks from Álvaro Obregón. And such streets are in just about every town. P.s. You'd probably need a scope to see it. I checked a brief appearance of the sun with my solar filter, and I seriously doubt you'd be able to see it naked eye. Filtered binoculars should work, but you have to have a filter over both objectives.
|
|
“I see quantum effects”
Since: Jan 11
In the macro world.
|
Please wait...
macumazahn wrote: <quoted text>You neglected to say anything about "public schools".
In other words, you're wrong.
You pay attention. I guess we were supposed to know that.
|
|
“I'm only happy when I'm hungov”
Since: Mar 11
Please use this phrase as a we
|
Please wait...
True Truth wrote: <quoted text> Haha! Well you may be highly experienced with martian language, but not I. Chaucer is beautiful! And I'm the pagan?!? And yeah, well tell the older generations to "google" something, and either they'll be confused, or look at you as if you're stupid. Yeah. See! There is a saying that the only thing natural, is change. While I quite like change, I am somewhat concerned at our pace. We are changing faster than ever because technology is progressing faster than ever. I watch a lot of documentaries, and the technology they show today can have really massive society-changing consequences if rolled out commercially. But whether we worry about it, or want it to happen, it's coming whether we are prepared or not for it. So what is your worry? What happens if we change too quickly?
|
|
“....hoist the Jolly Roger ”
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Say What, Revrend Coon is that one of your Aliases ? barefoot2626 wrote: <quoted text> Talk To The Hand Phaggit.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|