Yes, America, We Have Executed an Innocent Man

Bill----- wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I really believe that you are one of the sickest people on the entire forum. You have no idea what the truth is and have demonstrated most of the characteristics of a sociopath or a true compulsive liar. A true sicko either way.

Looks like what you are saying applies to yourself instead of me. You were the one saying that it was only 1/2 true and the rest lies, distortions, and garbage.

Strange how you want to misdirect and attack the other person when it is brought to light that you are the one that does not tell the truth.

These are People wrote:

<quoted text>
Looks like what you are saying applies to yourself instead of me. You were the one saying that it was only 1/2 true and the rest lies, distortions, and garbage.
Strange how you want to misdirect and attack the other person when it is brought to light that you are the one that does not tell the truth.

Everyone needs to go back and read my post #20. Sleeze cannot even get ONE SINGLE comment on the forum without a lie or distortion. Nowhere did I say 1/2 true --- she is a complete and total liar.. totally sick!

Bill----- wrote:

<quoted text>
I never said what you are saying that I believe. No denial at all. I was talking about what she does and says. Go back and reread bit what she said and my reply.

Well, I do see, Bill did say 1/2 of the continent and not 1/2 of the content as I originally thought.

However, how does he justify, the rest of the post is lies, distortions, and garbage? Oh, I see he says he wasn't talking about this post when he says the rest of the post. Huh, oh, of course, it makes perfect sense. LOL LOL

Now, he wants to say after all of this twisting of words that someone is a liar or has other mental problems (don't remember exactly what he called it--and am not going to go back and look for it).

If he agreed with part of it, why not just say so at the time as most normal people would have done?

He claims he is someone who goes to court and whose testimony probably effects the life of some people--if he is telling the truth on that. This is a person who wants to find a way to lock someone up who has not broken any law except to disagree with him. Did he do that when he carried a gun? If he can twist the truth as he does on this site, has he also made a practice of doing that with his previous job??

One thing is for sure, this guy is getting just plain scary.

Once again all she does is lie and distort. When she is caught in a lie or distortion all she ever does is change and distort even more.

IT IS NICE TO SEE THAT SHE ADMITTED TO AT LEAST ONE OF HER LIES THIS TIME.

The only person that I want to lock up right now is "The Sleeze" who is in need of SERIOUS mental health treatment based on her constant delusions about the real world and even what she says.

Of course if I was anything like she says I am I would start misquoting her, telling lies about her, and creating delusional characteristics about her.

All she has to do to get me off her case is to tell the truth, even once in a while would start the process.

Bill----- wrote:

Once again all she does is lie and distort. When she is caught in a lie or distortion all she ever does is change and distort even more.
IT IS NICE TO SEE THAT SHE ADMITTED TO AT LEAST ONE OF HER LIES THIS TIME.
The only person that I want to lock up right now is "The Sleeze" who is in need of SERIOUS mental health treatment based on her constant delusions about the real world and even what she says.
Of course if I was anything like she says I am I would start misquoting her, telling lies about her, and creating delusional characteristics about her.
All she has to do to get me off her case is to tell the truth, even once in a while would start the process.

I see what you mean about her.

These are People wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, I do see, Bill did say 1/2 of the continent and not 1/2 of the content as I originally thought.
However, how does he justify, the rest of the post is lies, distortions, and garbage? Oh, I see he says he wasn't talking about this post when he says the rest of the post. Huh, oh, of course, it makes perfect sense. LOL LOL
Now, he wants to say after all of this twisting of words that someone is a liar or has other mental problems (don't remember exactly what he called it--and am not going to go back and look for it).
If he agreed with part of it, why not just say so at the time as most normal people would have done?
He claims he is someone who goes to court and whose testimony probably effects the life of some people--if he is telling the truth on that. This is a person who wants to find a way to lock someone up who has not broken any law except to disagree with him. Did he do that when he carried a gun? If he can twist the truth as he does on this site, has he also made a practice of doing that with his previous job??
One thing is for sure, this guy is getting just plain scary.

These!!
Hey, if you can tear yourself away from feeding the zoo animals for a couple of minutes, I'd be interested in your opinion of the recent d.p. repeal by Connecticut...

BILL: Do thse two go through and mark those funny icons a bunch of times for people they do not like? It would not do it for me. Do they sign up in different ways or as different people?

Hi Don't: Well this is my second attempt on this. I don't know what happened to the first, but if 2 show up, that is the reason why.

Yes, feeding the animals, on that I do agree. I see a new one joined the ranks. I didn't catch this at first, but now in seeing the location and the remarks that seem written by someone else, I am beginning to wonder if it is the latest invention or a hero worshipper. You remember "Mark of the Villages" who one denied was him, but then one was answering for the other. Oh well, time will tell. The hero worshippers usually wake up and move on, so time will tell.

Now, back to the question of the d.p. in Conn., as you know I came on this board for the death penalty, but only if the person were truly guilty. Now, after seeing all the hatred on this board from that side and seeing the number of people that have been found guilty of crimes, locked up, and then found not guilty of the charges, I am now leaning the other direction. Also, after seeing that we are often taking no action against prosecutors who withhold evidence that could set a person free. After seeing the feelings of a certain person on this board who is so for this, but makes you wonder how a person so out of control of their emotions was given a gun and knowing this person does or claims to have been a witness for prosecutors, yes this has helped change my opinion. So, to answer your question, I am now happy to know that another state moved this direction.

You know NM is another state that abolished the death penalty sometime back. There is or was a movement to reinstate it. I have been following the politics of this state now after someone on this board pointed it out to me. Now that one of the key players in wanting this reinstated is now facing heat himself and has fallen down the ladder of success, I am curious if this will still go forward.

Back to fabricating of evidence, can you imagine the uproar there might have been with a very thorough investigation of this lab? How many cases might have needed to be reviewed?

Well, I guess I will just wait to see the footprints in the sand. They just make my day when I think of a bull up on his toes trying not to leave any evidence behind.

I wonder how long Sleeze would last based on her history of fabricating evidence? LOL

Bill----- wrote:

I wonder how long Sleeze would last based on her history of fabricating evidence? LOL

I don't know; why don't you ask Mary. LOL LOL

These are People wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know; why don't you ask Mary. LOL LOL

I don't know; why don't you ask Dolt. You two seem to be more and more alike. Looks like you are now talking to yourself. LOL LOL

These are People wrote:

Hi Don't: Well this is my second attempt on this. I don't know what happened to the first, but if 2 show up, that is the reason why.
Yes, feeding the animals, on that I do agree. I see a new one joined the ranks. I didn't catch this at first, but now in seeing the location and the remarks that seem written by someone else, I am beginning to wonder if it is the latest invention or a hero worshipper. You remember "Mark of the Villages" who one denied was him, but then one was answering for the other. Oh well, time will tell. The hero worshippers usually wake up and move on, so time will tell.
Now, back to the question of the d.p. in Conn., as you know I came on this board for the death penalty, but only if the person were truly guilty. Now, after seeing all the hatred on this board from that side and seeing the number of people that have been found guilty of crimes, locked up, and then found not guilty of the charges, I am now leaning the other direction. Also, after seeing that we are often taking no action against prosecutors who withhold evidence that could set a person free. After seeing the feelings of a certain person on this board who is so for this, but makes you wonder how a person so out of control of their emotions was given a gun and knowing this person does or claims to have been a witness for prosecutors, yes this has helped change my opinion. So, to answer your question, I am now happy to know that another state moved this direction.
You know NM is another state that abolished the death penalty sometime back. There is or was a movement to reinstate it. I have been following the politics of this state now after someone on this board pointed it out to me. Now that one of the key players in wanting this reinstated is now facing heat himself and has fallen down the ladder of success, I am curious if this will still go forward.
Back to fabricating of evidence, can you imagine the uproar there might have been with a very thorough investigation of this lab? How many cases might have needed to be reviewed?
Well, I guess I will just wait to see the footprints in the sand. They just make my day when I think of a bull up on his toes trying not to leave any evidence behind.

Your first attempt probably got lost if it took too long for you to type out.

I didn't pick-up on the 'new one' right away either, but "Leesburg" is the betrayal, and HE can't do a think about changing that!
It's good to see that what you point out has converted you, and that you are in favor with Ct on the repeal.

On the lab...unless I read it incorrectly they are going to be investigating.

On the footprints...watch out for those predator prints! By the way, I still can't figure out why you debate with an idiot. NO ONE that use to discuss with him still does. Not Tove, not Chicago Guy, not even his slimy little buddy Nautilus1 a.k.a. Digger4. In fact other than you, only unsuspecting commenters will associate with him. I wonder if he's taken any time to visit his daughters grave lately. I still wonder what he did to screw up so badly so as to get her killed. We'll probably never know. But really,,when you embrace death for others as much as he does what else can be expected.

Mary and others, you can now see what a F****** B**** this one is, if there is another one. They or she is very sick, all I can hope for is that their final resting place is exactly where they (she) deserves.

I apologize for the hinted to the profanity to all but the appropriate two or one. Accusing me of having something to do with my daughter's death has hit a new all time sick, degenerated, slimy low; even for these "two".

Don't try to change the meaning, Bill, to get sympathy for yourself. I believe her reference was to why would someone have it in for you so much. I have often thought the same thing myself. With all the hate you have for others and no forgiveness over many years, it does tend to make one believe it could have been over someone having a gruge against you. For someone to hate so much, it appears that you do hold a guilt, but cannot accept it and therefore lash out at others because of it. It seems that for everyone that dies you feel a sense of justice, but yet through it all and so many deaths, you cannot feel a pease which is because pease comes from within.

I once asked you to imagine the person begin put to death as being your own child (as many parents have had to endure). This was something you could not even imagine--but it doesn't seem to bother you a bit, even if the person is not guilty of the crime.

You sit here and call people all kinds of names, but cannot accept it when it comes back at you. You have accused me of having a boyfriend or husband in prison which is not true at all. You have said my husband who is a 100 percent disabled veteran was never in the service because I said he joined instead of enlising. You sat here on my statement on this board and say the post is a lie, twisting of fact, or garbage (before you call this a lie, yes, I have not gone back and checked the very words, but just something to this effect) and then try to say you were not talking about that post. Wow, Bill, you sure can toss it out, but you cannot take it yourself.

As far as wanting to someone get what they deserve when they die, everyone on earth would all get Hell if we got what we deserve. Heaven is a gift and it is not because of what we have done.

So, grow up and be a man. If you can't take it--don't toss it.

Well, Don't I can see, how it is when his dirt is thrown back in his face.

By the way, I am not the one giving you the good ikons--I am not quick enough.

It wasn't just the location that was a hint to me with Mary, but the comments that seemed to be coming from him. We both know what a rage it causes him when he gets bad ikons. It does make me wonder why someone who professes to be so great has so little self-esteme as to be bothered by ikons. To me, they give me a big laugh as I imagine the bull sneaking around.

I see how he is hollering for Mary, so his split personality will probably be after you soon.

Wow, in comment no. 75: Peace--not pease. Might have made other mistakes in my wording also so please forgive me as I am not perfect and have never claimed to be.

These are People wrote:

Don't try to change the meaning, Bill, to get sympathy for yourself. I believe her reference was to why would someone have it in for you so much. I have often thought the same thing myself. With all the hate you have for others and no forgiveness over many years, it does tend to make one believe it could have been over someone having a gruge against you. For someone to hate so much, it appears that you do hold a guilt, but cannot accept it and therefore lash out at others because of it. It seems that for everyone that dies you feel a sense of justice, but yet through it all and so many deaths, you cannot feel a pease which is because pease comes from within.
I once asked you to imagine the person begin put to death as being your own child (as many parents have had to endure). This was something you could not even imagine--but it doesn't seem to bother you a bit, even if the person is not guilty of the crime.
You sit here and call people all kinds of names, but cannot accept it when it comes back at you. You have accused me of having a boyfriend or husband in prison which is not true at all. You have said my husband who is a 100 percent disabled veteran was never in the service because I said he joined instead of enlising. You sat here on my statement on this board and say the post is a lie, twisting of fact, or garbage (before you call this a lie, yes, I have not gone back and checked the very words, but just something to this effect) and then try to say you were not talking about that post. Wow, Bill, you sure can toss it out, but you cannot take it yourself.
As far as wanting to someone get what they deserve when they die, everyone on earth would all get Hell if we got what we deserve. Heaven is a gift and it is not because of what we have done.
So, grow up and be a man. If you can't take it--don't toss it.

That is of course NOT what you/she said. "I wonder if he's taken any time to visit his daughters grave lately. I still wonder what he did to screw up so badly so as to get her killed. We'll probably never know. But really,,when you embrace death for others as much as he does what else can be expected." But that again is typical Sleeze!

BTW what did you do to your so-called husband to cause him to be 100 disabled?? Now we are starting to see the reason for your "projection" -- were you involved in a long history of harming him with spouse abuse, maybe pushing him down the stairs, maybe drugging him, or what else did you and your alter ego "Dolt" do to him?

Also you have a VERY VERY strange perspective on religion, is it your own? That last paragraph of yours deserves a lot of study and it may totally explain the semi-schizophrenic postings of you and your alter-ego.

Thank you for helping provide the more than likely the explanation for the unnatural connection between Sleeze and Dolt that has been demonstrated here. Where there is one, there is the other, always together.

Whatever, Bill, you will always try to make the meaning of it the way that you want.

Now, you are saying I have abused my husband. This kind of talk is ok as long as you are the one doing it--but don't let it be turned around any on you as you will be crying like a baby for someone to come to your aid. As I said before, just be a man.

If you are so concerned about abuse it does make me wonder is this the kind of person that you were to your family? If you are so quick to come to that conclusion then I must wonder where you come up with those kind of ideas. I don't think you can point to anything in my writing that suggest an abusive nature as I am not that kind of a person, but your anger issues have always made me wonder about you.

Where there is one there is always the other as it used to be with you until one apparently saw through you for what you really are.

Now, for my viewpoints on religion. No these are not my viewpoints they come right from the Bible. You might try a little religion yourself. Maybe then you would not feel so much hatred for others.

Let me make one change to my original statement--oh, I know this will make me a liar--but that is OK, I can take it.

When I say Heaven is a gift and it is not because of anything we have done. Actually, it is because we have accepted Christ. However, as the Bible says it is not by our works (which is what I actually meant when I said not because of what we have done). If believing in the Bible makes me semi-schizophrenic in Bill's eyes, well who cares what he thinks as I do not.