Ron Paul on the Verge of Going Third Party?

Constitution Party wrote:

<quoted text>
Generally Oligarchies enslave their people and tend to be a military threat to their neighbors.

Constitution Party wrote:

How about Vote, any and all leaders along with president follows a probationary period of 1 year, if not met performance guidelines goodbye.
<quoted text>
Radical Constitutional structure change.
See how Libertarians believe in RADICAL extra-Constitutional doctrine.

Bill R wrote:

<quoted text>
Ron Pauler - I've tried to persuade Murray to
join us on Topix ... truly have ... but he is
one of those guys who doesn't believe in 'puters'
and blames them for much of what is wrong in
the world.
Truth is, I've known Murray for about 13 years
now and he is still pretty incomprehensible to
me. He's not a Democrat, but he is a kind of
Republican anarchist .... if there can be such a
thing. I guess I'd call him an Independent
because he won't even join AARP or Costco.
Then, just as I conclude he's an anarchist he
spews a "law and order" mantra and muses about
the 2nd Amendment being the 11th Commandment.
Go figure.
My read on Murray is that he will vote for McCain
if only because McCain has disclosed his lack of
facility with computers, as he's suspicious of
those who are. I think its like how some people
who are in a store and a couple of people are
speaking Spanish ... and think they must be
talking about them. A bit paranoid, but in
Murray's case, wearing a green felt hat and
flip flops to a pot luck supper at the church,
it just might be true.
I'm disclosing my age a bit, but my wife thinks
of him as George, the caretaker at the inn in
that Bob Newhart series. I think of him more as
the neighbor in "Home Improvement" who dresses
like George and sounds like Yoda.

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
How long to plug a hole? The Real estate developers are faster in acquistion liek squirel to a nut ... must lot of loop holes and big holes in the State and local code?

Thoreauing wrote:

<quoted text>
Chiming in on your response to BillR, what approach are you talking about? Are you siding with the developer to build or the single owner to live outside of urbanization? If you are siding for the individual owner the strategy is either reapportionment or incorporation. In either example you get home rule. Sounds like your both on an interesting thread here.

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
How about Vote, any and all leaders along with president follows a probationary period of 1 year, if not met performance guidelines goodbye.

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
Stay safe and watch out for loose objects.
Insurance premium for Florida must be way very expensive and they called it a retirement state?

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
Sound like asking for to form a "Workers Party?" You think Americans will implement and wake up to reality that capitalists are raping the serfs/slaves livihoods?

Constitution Party wrote:

<quoted text>
Generally Oligarchies enslave their people and tend to be a military threat to their neighbors.

RonPauler wrote:

<quoted text>
They are Communist with certain Chinese characteristics. That's the official name, I think.

Bill R wrote:

<quoted text>
So the "development" in other countries is a
"potential threat" to the United States? When
did we come to the conclusion that America's
prosperity was contingent on a lesser quality
of life for other nations? How does this match
up with Paul's purported noninterventionist
approach?

Judged:

1

1

1

Bill R wrote:

<quoted text>
In this case the "hole" was plugged two years
later. However, once it was clear that the first initiative was being used in a manner not intended
by the citizens ... demonstrated at public meet-
ings ... the counties put requests on hold until
we had a chance to vote on revisions. All things
considered very little damage was done.
The big loophole still existing rests with those
who buy large tracts of land previously farms or
ranches, then submit requests to build resorts.
The resorts, of course, are touted to be a source
of economic growth in what are usually rural areas
that are hard pressed for new sources of income
(taxes), so they often passed.
Resorts include golf courses, of course, which
means country clubs and upscale homes along the
fairways. These, in turn, place pressure on the
school systems, county infrastructure, and more.
The upshot is that this loophole is also being
considered for closure.

Judged:

1

1

1

LORAX wrote:

<quoted text>
Watch out GIR they will start calling you a Marxist. But even he knew it was just a dream.

RonPauler wrote:

<quoted text>
It's hard to communicate with someone who constantly tries to distance himself from me. So while you are you and I am I there is also we. And we are not free traders in this thread and neither are we protectionists. We are the people. Therefore we have a common interest, we are both looking out for each other. It's no good to deny this and alienate yourself from everyone else just to show us that we're wrong. Change happens when the people get together and demand it.

LocalBoy wrote:

<quoted text>Soon CP will get his wish. The central planners will create a new managed trade agreement and call it something like "America first" and ole CP will be happy.
The outcome will be the same only now CP will have a new evil monster to blame.
What will CP's next monster be called, RP ?

Judged:

1

1

1

LORAX wrote:

<quoted text>
HA HAH HAHH AHHHA HHHAAA
Cant get insurance on the coasts any more and rates of doubled every year since the trifecta in 2004.

Judged:

1

1

1

LORAX wrote:

<quoted text>
Not a bad idea. Lets hear more about your transparency ideas.

LORAX wrote:

<quoted text>
Japan?

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
By time the loophole closure, i had read cases, that some are are left homeless.
How about loophole in enroachment of Govt, the Eminent domain issue? What about protection against intervionist Fed govt unlawful asset acquistion notice , the Govt clause called "Best Use..." as they have right to acquire the land anytime?

GLOBAL IDIOTS RACE wrote:

<quoted text>
CPs nationalistic fervor and overly jingositic pride will be US downfall. He needs to wake up to reality and instead should support "We, the people (world)" rights to free from corrupted (world) govts evil agendas for the world . His patriotism is for the govt rule, not represent the (world) populace human and civil rights and other rights.