High court hears Arizona immigration dispute

Judged:

1

1

1

McBeekini wrote:

<quoted text>
U still didn't get Pentagon had the policies ( don't ask-don't tell)...and you think about relegious;-0000000

Judged:

1

1

1

Vance1 wrote:

High court hears Arizona immigration dispute
AZ Sb 1070 will stand in tact, Then in 2013 other states will follow, driving these illegals to only liberal backrupted sanctuary cities.

Judged:

1

1

1

Le trou de balle wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical as8hole that repeats talking points from stupid haters.
.
How look at the training manual for the AZ police on enforcing this ethnic profiling law? I BET NO!!! Since you have not read the police training slides, you can not opiniate on something that comes down to "how it is implemented."
The police will stop you even for having one broken light in your vehicle or for J-crossing or whatever. And most probably they will not stop you if you have green eyes, blonde hair and six feet tall! But if you look brown or native central american, must probably they'll stop you and ask for proof of legality.
.

Judged:

1

1

1

Le trou de balle wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry btch! Either everyone carries proof of legality or we chop down one anglo for every abuse of this law! Period!!! I don't need you to be scare, just run away from me.
<quoted text>
Proceed with your stupid attitude and your kind will receive in turn. Period! We'll find out when violations occur and the favor will be returned.

Judged:

1

1

1

pancho wrote:

No dispute here, deport every illegal and there ancors babys!!!!
and while there at it deport the illegal kenyan muslim

Judged:

4

3

1

Le trou de balle wrote:

<quoted text>
Butthole, how do the police know (if you deputize them) who is a US national and who is an immigrant without asking for papers in the first place?
.
Do you based that decision on optical appearance or are you assuming that only immigrants behave suspiciously? Suspiciously is too fuzzy to be left to some fking policeman who is biased and tired of policing communities!
You are not a policeman for you to make statements on "suspicious" or "behavio" STUPID WHORE!!!!

Judged:

2

2

2

Memo From Turner wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently Rebel is unaware that Arizona police have a really bad track record when it comes to identifying suspicious characters.
Remember last year when they stopped Jared Loughner hours before he shot twenty people and killed eight. Apparently they found nothing suspicious after they stopped him for running a red light. You would think the look in his eyes would have been a give away.
http://www.examiner.com/article/loughner-stop...

Judged:

2

2

1

Rebel wrote:

<quoted text>
The "look in someone's eye" is not a legal reason to detain someone -- nor is running a red light. The look in someone's eye is nothing illegal, and running a red light gets a ticket.

Le trou de balle wrote:

<quoted text>
You are about to get one. Call it a free Anglo gift!

Hit Back to England wrote:

<quoted text>
Much ado about nothing me thinks anyway. Maybe you will agree with Clarissa Martinez. She seems very bright.
Clarissa Martinez of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil-rights and advocacy organization, predicted that most states -- regardless of the Supreme Court's decision -- would stay away from Arizona-type laws out of self-interest.
"For most of them, the balance sheets do not add up," she said, referring to the Alabama law that has created burdens for some business and caused farmers to complain about lack of workers to pick their crops."

Judged:

1

1

1

Frito Bandito wrote:

<quoted text>
"Your ignorance is abysmal; don't advertise it."
When are you gonna use some other BS cliche. You just tried using this on me on another thread, you nimrod!

Judged:

1

1

1

Hit Back to England wrote:

<quoted text>
Much ado about nothing me thinks anyway. Maybe you will agree with Clarissa Martinez. She seems very bright.
Clarissa Martinez of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil-rights and advocacy organization, predicted that most states -- regardless of the Supreme Court's decision -- would stay away from Arizona-type laws out of self-interest.
"For most of them, the balance sheets do not add up," she said, referring to the Alabama law that has created burdens for some business and caused farmers to complain about lack of workers to pick their crops."

Judged:

3

3

1

Rebel wrote:

<quoted text>
When the shoe fits... I can and will use it as often as I want, no matter what you want!

Judged:

1

1

1

Rebel wrote:

<quoted text>
A member of the racist organization, La Raza, is hardly someone to listen to.
Colossal fail!

Judged:

2

2

2

Vance1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Amen, La Raza is a terrorist operation

Judged:

3

2

1

Rebel wrote:

<quoted text>
When the shoe fits... I can and will use it as often as I want, no matter what you want!

Judged:

1

1

1

Hit Back to England wrote:

<quoted text>
Congratulation Rebel on being the first one in your family to wear shoes. Now use them to hit back to England!!!!!!!!!!

Judged:

2

2

1

racer42 wrote:

<quoted text>
He will, right after you sag azz back to Asia.

Hit Back to England wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear Vance, don't attack the messenger just for telling the truth even if that truth is hard for you to accept. Even Arizona is not happy with senate bill 1070, they kicked out the author from office and he was some sort of wounded political soldier or something, but then killed his own career with this bad law that even the Feds have been refusing to enforce because it's bad and hurts this great Country by the bunch.