BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 4,351)

Showing posts 87,001 - 87,020 of167,696
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“The Usurper FAILED”

Since: Apr 11

Americans

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97723
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

The Sinking of the USS Liberty

http://video.google.com/videoplay...

“The Usurper FAILED”

Since: Apr 11

Americans

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97724
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
It is okay Poppo, you have to understand the conditioning they go through.
I expect people who are indoctrinated that there is one God would react this way. There are billions who don't share their beliefs.
Even if billions of people told you that you could bite yourself on the forehead, their numbers still wouldn't make it a true statement.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97725
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LurkerLooky wrote:
The Sinking of the USS Liberty
http://video.google.com/videoplay...
Thank you.
you will be doomed to repeat it...

you will be doomed to repeat it...

you will be doomed to repeat it...
Tim Wong

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97726
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It is time to move on and drop that birther nonsense. Let us stay in the real world and continue reading the news about Romney and Obama. http://bit.ly/H0jj0u

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97727
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LurkerLooky wrote:
The Sinking of the USS Liberty
http://video.google.com/videoplay...
“I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom!”
—President Lyndon Johnson recalling support for the U.S.S. Liberty from the sixth fleet.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97728
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
With a man like Ron Paul around, it is very hard to imagine why anyone would vote for Romney or Obama.
Well, I define myself as a Conservatarian which is a Conservative with strong Libertarian leanings. Which also means I am a Fiscal Conservative but a Moderate on social issues.
Sorry, Ron Paul is just to far out on to many issues for me. Would I vote for him rather than Obama. Yes I would! I am not entirely happy with Mitt but he is still ABO (Anyone But Obama) so I will vote for him.
Oh, did you know Roseanne Barr is a Libertarian? That is what one of the Libtards said a few days ago on this forum but I was able to straighten them up. Roseanne is running for president under the Peace and Freedom Party and her VeeP candidate is ...... Cindy Sheehan!!!
http://www.roseanneforpresident2012.org/
Oh, just Google the Peace and Freedom Party and you will see that it is not part of the Libertarian movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_Freedo...
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97729
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Subject: Catholics
Whether you are Catholic or not this is good advice.
Catholics are members of the oldest Christian religion in the world…The Catholic Church was founded in the year 33.
The next oldest Christian Church is the Lutherans and they have only been around for about 500 years. The Mormons have only been here since 1829.
In the year 33 there were no hospitals. Today, one out of five people in this country receive their medical care at a Catholic hospital.
In the year 33 there were no schools. Today, the Catholic Church teaches 3 million students a day, in its more than 250 Catholic Colleges and Universities, in its more than 1200 Catholic High Schools and its more than 5000 Catholic grade schools.
Every day, the Catholic Church feeds, clothes, shelters and educates more people than any other organization in the world.
There are more than 77 million Catholics in this country. It takes an estimated 50 million votes to be elected president. I am asking all of you to go to the polls and be united in replacing our present president with a president that will respect the Catholic Church in this country.
I urge you to pass this on to all of your friends.
__________
So, in effect,you want American Catholics to vote for...a Mormon, a religion that is not even considered by many to be christian. As usual, your logic and sense of relevance are askew, like your politics. Is Obama not more of a christian as he belongs to a real christian church, the united church of Christ? It is therefore logical, if you are catholic and neither candidate is catholic, to vote for the closest thing, a United church of Christ candidate, not a so-so Christian mormon. Vote OBAMA.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97730
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
The media is trying to create a sense of momentum and of inevitability about the Obama candidacy. One benighted Newsweek reporter even speculated about a possible Democratic landslide.
On Friday, I saw the real numbers. These state-by-state polls, taken by an organization I trust (after forty years of polling) show the real story. The tally is based on more than 600 likely voter interviews in each swing state within the past eight days.
The trend line is distinctly pro-Romney. Of the thirteen states studied, he improved or Obama slipped in nine states while the reverse happened in only four. To read the media, one would think that Romney had a terrible month. In fact, the exact reverse is true.
Romney is currently leading in every state McCain carried plus: Indiana, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, and Colorado. If he carries these states, he’ll have 228 electoral votes of the 270 he needs to win.
To win the election, Romney would then have to carry Florida where he trails by two points, and either Virginia (behind by two) or Ohio where he’s down by only one.
If he carries all three of these states and also wins all the others where Obama is now at 50% or less – Iowa, New Mexico, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey — he will get 351 electoral votes, a landslide about equal to Obama’s 363 vote tally in 2008.
The strong probability is that Romney does, in fact, carry Florida, Ohio, and Virginia and a share of the other states where Obama is below 50% of the vote.
So don’t believe the garbage being put out by the media. The attempt to portray Romney as not catching on and as dropping in the polls is ludicrous. It is, at best, the product of incompetent polling and, at worst, the result of deliberate media bias. But Romney is winning and expanding his lead each week. That’s the real story.
You have written : "These state-by-state polls, taken by an organization I trust (after forty years of polling". Er, an that organisation you trust is...?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97731
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
There are two ways to rate how a candidate is doing when it comes to contribution$. One is the total amount in dollar$ and the other is in the number of small donor$ and Romney is leading in both.
Of the two, the number of small donors is probably more important as it shows voter support. People who donate are more likely to vote and the Dems just don't have their base motivated. Not to donate but also to not vote come November.
Yep, voter apathy will probably do Obama in!!! Just wait until the Democrat convention and see how many seats that will be empty. That is, if the Alphabet networks show them on TV!
If I were Obama, I'd throw in the towel right now. Why bother campaigning, Romney's a shoo-in, just like the birther Jacksonville mayoral candidate (it's the papers that fooled Rogue - not his fault - like maybe the papers again this time). Who will forget your list of sure-fire GOP presidential candidates, Rogue, to name a few, as they were all at one-time on your sure-thing list to be the next GOP candidate and future president :

Sarah Palin
Ron Paul
Donald Trump
Rick Santorum
Michele Bachmann
Newt Gingrich
Rick Perry
Herman Cain

Any otners?

Ha ha. Hey, Rogue, so much for your predictions. If Romney has seen them, how relieved he must be, ha ha. Are you sure you're not a frustrated wannabe weatherman, Rogue?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97732
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I got a threatening note from the moderators. To me that just means I've scored some points and I am upsetting people.
Yuk yuk yuk!
You mean by lying, fabricating and acting like a boorish aggressor, using the word "tard" consistently, you sincerely believe you scored points? Bravo. Please tell us (50th request) how the Dems cheat more than Repubs (you wrote it) come election time and why you mentioned the GE jet engine transfer to the Czech rep. And all the other lies and fabrications which you never proved. So, that is how you score points? Goebbels would be proud of you. There is difference between you two, though, because as rotten as he was, Goebbels was intelligent.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97733
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LurkerLooky wrote:
The Sinking of the USS Liberty
http://video.google.com/videoplay ...
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
“I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom!”
—President Lyndon Johnson recalling support for the U.S.S. Liberty from the sixth fleet.
Sorry, I am not a conspiracy nut-job. You have no hard core evidence that LBJ said those words or had anything to do with it.
Now I am no fan of LBJ as I believe he is the one who lost the Vietnam War by failing to wage-war in North Vietnam where they were being supplied from. But I do not think LBJ had anything to do with the attack on the USS Liberty.
If the Israelis wanted to sink the USS Liberty, they would have. But just like in the USS Pueblo Incident, LBJ did not have a combat escort for these ships, and that I do hold him responsible for.
Oh, neither the USS Liberty nor the USS Pueblo were "spy" ships as is the U-2 and SR-71s "spy" planes because they are marked as U.S. ships and aircraft.
The Pan Am Boeing 747s that first flew into Moscow were "spy aircraft" as they intelligence gathering equipment on board and it was marked as a "civil aircraft"
Tell me, do human spies dress up in black suits and wear black fedoras? No, the look like ordinary people. Do you know why? I won't try an explain that to you if you don't!
Oh, and Bush or anyone at the White House had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks just as FDR had no prior knowledge to the attack on Pearl Harbor!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97734
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

'Debbie Gone Wild' Website
Debbiegonewild.com
This is worse than Debbie does Dallas.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97735
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean by lying, fabricating and acting like a boorish aggressor, using the word "tard" consistently, you sincerely believe you scored points? Bravo. Please tell us (50th request) how the Dems cheat more than Repubs (you wrote it) come election time and why you mentioned the GE jet engine transfer to the Czech rep. And all the other lies and fabrications which you never proved. So, that is how you score points? Goebbels would be proud of you. There is difference between you two, though, because as rotten as he was, Goebbels was intelligent.
Again, you show me a Republican involved in voter fraud and I will show you even more Democrats involved in voter fraud!!! But since most District Attorneys are Democrats, they are reluctant to prosecute these crimes ..... unless a Republican is involved. But still with this factor, more Dems are still prosecuted!!!
Goebbels was intelligent? He killed his whole family and then himself!!!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97736
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I may not be a Catholic in Good Standing but I do not perceive myself to be a hypocrite. My dad used to say, you can tell who the real Catholics are in the parking lot!
I will not donate one dollar if I think it will end up in Rome. I do give to Catholic Charities though. I also believe in personal action. I have stopped to help people on the side of the road or someone in distress.
In 1976 I was walking to the PX at Schofield Barracks on a Saturday afternoon and as I was walking past a chapel a young lady came out and seemed to be in big distress so I stopped to help her. She told me she had been molested by the chaplain and I ended up calling the MPs. I then ended up testifying at Chaplain Hay's court martial and it seems she was not the only one he had molested.
Yep, a LTC Chaplain got five years at Fort Leavenworth and left as a private and with a bad conduct discharge. Oh, the chaplain was not Catholic but that in itself is meaningless. You have have heard about the ongoing sexual harassment problems in the USAF but training NCOs.
Ahh, good ole charitable do-gooder Rogue. He has, like The Lone Raanger, helped waitresses, truck drivers, bums, NCO's, bag ladies, has given hell to high-ranking militry officers, policemen and judges. Where is he now? No fear, he is riding off in the sunset to help people in distress in the next town.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97737
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all of that is true. But I do believe there are nude photos of her.
Taken by his real daddy.
So?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97738
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LurkerLooky wrote:
The Sinking of the USS Liberty
http://video.google.com/videoplay...
It must've sunk at night, all I get is a black screen.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97739
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you.
you will be doomed to repeat it...
you will be doomed to repeat it...
you will be doomed to repeat it...
Got it. TY
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97740
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I define myself as a Conservatarian which is a Conservative with strong Libertarian leanings. Which also means I am a Fiscal Conservative but a Moderate on social issues.
Sorry, Ron Paul is just to far out on to many issues for me. Would I vote for him rather than Obama. Yes I would! I am not entirely happy with Mitt but he is still ABO (Anyone But Obama) so I will vote for him.
Oh, did you know Roseanne Barr is a Libertarian? That is what one of the Libtards said a few days ago on this forum but I was able to straighten them up. Roseanne is running for president under the Peace and Freedom Party and her VeeP candidate is ...... Cindy Sheehan!!!
http://www.roseanneforpresident2012.org/
Oh, just Google the Peace and Freedom Party and you will see that it is not part of the Libertarian movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_and_Freedo...
You wrote : "but I was able to straighten them up". The biggest farce here is that you REALLY think you straightened ANYone out.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97741
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you show me a Republican involved in voter fraud and I will show you even more Democrats involved in voter fraud!!! But since most District Attorneys are Democrats, they are reluctant to prosecute these crimes ..... unless a Republican is involved. But still with this factor, more Dems are still prosecuted!!!
Goebbels was intelligent? He killed his whole family and then himself!!!
Again, no proof. Just say you lied or made it up, so much more honest and manly. You see, Rogue, I never wrote that Repubs committed voter fraud. So I don't have to prove anything. The onus to prove that Dems cheated more than Repubs is on YOU. Don't pretend you don't know the difference, it does you no credit. As to Goebbels, he was crazy. Crazy does not mean he is not intelligent, you know that as well as I do.

What about those jet engines? YOU brought it up. Why?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97743
Aug 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Article 1 section 8 of our Constitution staes only congress has the power to declare war. This has not occured since Dec. 8th 1942.
The war powers act only covers LEGAL wars. Not invasions. Unless it is self defense. Which clearly...Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan do not fall under.
Congressional approval for strikes within the time frame allowed by the commander in cheif go out the window after 60 days I believe. 90 total if you count time to extract our forces. We are still there.
ALL wars since WWII have been illegal as far as our constitution is concerned. As Americans we may not let the UN override our beloved constitution. Otherwise...well we all know give an inch take a mile. That is exactly what we have become, the fist of the UN. THEIR priorities come before ours.
We as a united people must put a stop to this.
Think terrorist group. We are at war with the terrorists, not a country.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 87,001 - 87,020 of167,696
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••