'The War Is Not Over'

The good news is Obama will pull out of Iraq slowly and will return the troops only if Iran gets control. We all know the love that Iran has for Israel. Bush tells us this war is not about protecting Israel. Believe whatever you want but Palestine will be free. We can all cheer when that happens.

I can just see the Backfire's right now, about 1600 nautical miles from the USA aircraft carrier Nimitz.

About 600 miles out, they launch their 24 cruise missiles.

Now, of course, if only one of those Russian nuclear cruise missiles breaks cover and detonates near the carrier, it is all over.

Backfire jets. For real, Barksdale.

We got some folks afraid of the Admiral Kusnetsov here. Those Su-35s fly nicely off that ski-jump on the front of the Admiral Kusnetsov.

Trigonis wrote:

Gonna run on over to talk to the crazies with the intercontinental ideas. Don't matter if CIA or bin Laden did the towers. We got the future ahead of us.
None of us are getting out alive, and don't you forget it. You are all terminal, we are all terminal.
Terminal.
Have a good next 24 hours.

Morrison said that. I saw him in concert maybe 15 years before you were born. He's dead, and I'm still here. Top of the evening to ya.

Barkie, wanna put your B-1B "Lancer" jets against my namesake Tu-160 Blackjacks? C'mon, give it a shot.

My Blackjacks "White Swans" are much better jet bomber aircraft. I have heard that you love your B-52s, what do you think of my Tu-160s and my classic Tu-95 Bears, with the counterrotating propellers?

Trigonis wrote:

Jet aircraft, well, the Me-262 is all it took to make me love spinning jet turbines. Yes, made of titanium.

Beautiful plane, but the P-51 could catch it in a dive. In fact, one did, and shot it down. American ingenuity.

Too little, too late, though. By 42 the Brits had one in the air, but not in production.

We got some Nazis here. Not hard to believe, we are talking at a table in the States. No one here can talk strategically, most of them don't read much, and the rest of them are like castrated roosters, DO THEY REALLY WANT TO DISCUSS THE INTRICACIES OF NUCLEAR COMBAT?

Surfr22 wrote:

We got some folks afraid of the Admiral Kusnetsov here. Those Su-35s fly nicely off that ski-jump on the front of the Admiral Kusnetsov.

Ever seen a jet fly backwards, in person?

Barksdale has his work cut out for him. Blackjack will run him through his paces. Let us see where he has prepositioned his arsenal.

GJ Brain Damaged at Birth wrote:

<quoted text>
I have my path as you have your. Your path is holding back progress. Never works for long. Palestine will be free.

Palestine will be free when they declare independence. We already went over that.

You're standing in the way, not me. I'm free.

Don't anticipate my move. I have eight boats in each ocean, eight Ohio-class "boomers." I choose to use four in each ocean to conduct a nuclear raid on Russia.
Each boat has 24 tubes. Each tube or missile, ten warheads. So I use four in each ocean, that is eight, and twenty-four times ten is 240 times eight is 1920 warheads, twenty-minutes flight time.
Surfr, Blackjack, got anything better?

With the release of your ICMBs, we fail in this attempt. Our subs just weren't up to the task. Barksdale, you B-52 loving jerk, you won this one.

If we could ever get the '22s and the '95s in the game earlier, we could pull the wool over your eyes and ice you.

We're only playing this game with you, Barksdale, because you need to understand that even if you control all of the fused hydrogen in the entire world, sometimes winning isn't everything.
IT IS, OF COURSE, EVERYTHING! Barksdale, you just won't quit with that high-tech airborne stuff.

I get to play Russia, and my move is to launch sixty SLBMs, each MIRVed with six, for 360 inbounds. The flight time, mean average, is six minutes. Range: three to twelve minutes. That is wave 1.
Your call. I call wave 2 next.

blacker, we already got over 1100 detonated inbounds, the war is over.

But everyone wants another simulation. Get ready.

arbitrageur wrote:

<quoted text>
Beautiful plane, but the P-51 could catch it in a dive. In fact, one did, and shot it down. American ingenuity.
Too little, too late, though. By 42 the Brits had one in the air, but not in production.

USer's ingenuity...have other Countries Educated population build it for you.
Then you claim it as your own.

OK, we got control, through espionage, of two Ohio-class boomers, the USS Alabama and the USS Virginia. In cooridnation, I have released all Typhoon-class boombers.

In all, about 1200 inbounds, thirty minutes mean flight time, 1 megaton mean yield.

Blackjacker wrote:

Barkie, wanna put your B-1B "Lancer" jets against my namesake Tu-160 Blackjacks? C'mon, give it a shot.
My Blackjacks "White Swans" are much better jet bomber aircraft. I have heard that you love your B-52s, what do you think of my Tu-160s and my classic Tu-95 Bears, with the counterrotating propellers?

Initially, it would be 65 operational B1-Bs to 16 operational Tu-160s, if all of them were to be brought out, at one time, unlikely. You can bring the 4 out that are still in test, to help your numbers, if you want.

Might also help somewhat to have some actual combat experience, 3 ops to zero.

I do like the fact that one dropped a FOAB, and they are pretty sleek, you must admit. Russian design? Bigger..........

Love the Bears with the counter-rotating props.

Get em up in the air more, show them off, will ya ?

I had an entire wing of '52s flying right outside Russian radar cover. Sure, you destroy my country, but using my fail-safe ruleset, my '52s enter Russia and destroy all major cities.
You win the battle, we win the war.

We're not here to play tiddlywinks. We are here to learn about nuclear combat, the ins and outs of it.
Sure, it is not a nice thing, detonating a hydrogen fusion weapon over the heads of the women and children of our enemies.
The Americans don't seem to feel too bad about vaporizing women and children in cities beginning with N or H in Japan in 1945.