Who will be in Obama's cabinet?

Who will be in his cabinet? No one because the American people aren't stupid enough to vote him in. Other that Massachusetts liberals,stupid college students and the usual leftwing crackpots who would be that ignorant of the facts and so filled with hate?

Winnie The Poo will be Sec. of State and I think Tigger will be Sec. of Defense.

Really? It's funny that Obama is still leading in the polls. Tell us, Proud Republican, what you've been proud of for the last eight years. Are you proud that the best candidate that you can find to run to succeed the worst president in the nation's history finished 894th in his class of 899 at the USNA? I guess that this is better than the record of going AWOL in the Air national Guard, as the current President did.

I am not a republican. I am an American who votes for the best candidate amoung the field of candidates. McCain may not be the best our country has to offer, but no one else is up there other than Obama, a Marxist. It's like considering if I want to be slapped in the face or shot. I believe I'd rather be slapped thank you.

AdrianP wrote:

Really? It's funny that Obama is still leading in the polls. Tell us, Proud Republican, what you've been proud of for the last eight years. Are you proud that the best candidate that you can find to run to succeed the worst president in the nation's history finished 894th in his class of 899 at the USNA? I guess that this is better than the record of going AWOL in the Air national Guard, as the current President did.

The current POTUS isn't running this time so drop it.

Oh BTW what polls are you looking at?

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/i...

http://electoral-vote.com/

That person who finished 849th at the USNA still managed to qualify to fly fighter jets on and off of aircraft carriers. That argument doesn't really fly that well. I've known a couple of people that went to the Air Force and Navy Academy, they take the best and the brightest. The person who graduates last is probably ten times smarter than you or I. At least McCain can answer questions succinctly. Without some stupid 'above my pay grade' BS.

AdrianP wrote:

Really? It's funny that Obama is still leading in the polls. Tell us, Proud Republican, what you've been proud of for the last eight years. Are you proud that the best candidate that you can find to run to succeed the worst president in the nation's history finished 894th in his class of 899 at the USNA? I guess that this is better than the record of going AWOL in the Air national Guard, as the current President did.

I wouldn't worry about the cabinet till he explains the ghosts in his closet.

BTW, the Gorebot and Mz Heinz 57 had "huge" leads in the polls too, according to the MSM.

So again we have a weak candidate they have pushed on the public whose only claim to fame is being a corrupt politician from the most corrupt political machine in the nation. Is that the best they could come up with???

Why would anyone even consider the notion of writing a letter to the editor asking this question?

In this internet age, if you can't find information about something your interested in, you're either too lazy or too stupid for it to matter anyway.

why are we still talking about Omama-- he is a nothing, has been a nothing, has done nothing, why do we continue to even think about him-- he is toast.

Maybe its time The Berkshire Eagle employed some real proof readers. The letter should have read "Legislative Branch" not "Executive Branch".

AdrianP wrote:

Really? It's funny that Obama is still leading in the polls. Tell us, Proud Republican, what you've been proud of for the last eight years. Are you proud that the best candidate that you can find to run to succeed the worst president in the nation's history finished 894th in his class of 899 at the USNA? I guess that this is better than the record of going AWOL in the Air national Guard, as the current President did.

Oh, you mean like the scholar Edward M. "Ted" Kennedy who got suspended from Harvard in a cheating scandal.("And that's just for openers!", said deceased campaign aide Mary Jo Kopechne.)
Or the war hero, John Forbes Kerry, who fought in Viet Nam, who lied about his VietNam war record.

JOY wrote:

Maybe its time The Berkshire Eagle employed some real proof readers. The letter should have read "Legislative Branch" not "Executive Branch".

Why start now after all these years?

GMHeller wrote:

<quoted text>
Why start now after all these years?

I remember when the Eagle was and an award winning paper, for JOURNALISM!!!!
We now have a BUZZARD that is below the standards of the Star and Enquierer

lost freedoms wrote:

<quoted text>
I remember when the Eagle was and an award winning paper, for JOURNALISM!!!!
We now have a BUZZARD that is below the standards of the Star and Enquierer

I think the worm has turned. The Enquirer actually prints Rielle news. The MSM just looks the other way.

AdrianP wrote:

Really? It's funny that Obama is still leading in the polls. Tell us, Proud Republican, what you've been proud of for the last eight years. Are you proud that the best candidate that you can find to run to succeed the worst president in the nation's history finished 894th in his class of 899 at the USNA? I guess that this is better than the record of going AWOL in the Air national Guard, as the current President did.

can it buddy

lost freedoms wrote:

<quoted text>
I remember when the Eagle was and an award winning paper, for JOURNALISM!!!!
We now have a BUZZARD that is below the standards of the Star and Enquierer

Don't even think of equating The National Enquirer with The Berkshire Eagle.
The Enquirer triple checks EVERY fact it publishes and has been leading the pack in accurate investigative journalism since it got nailed in a libel suit years back (filed by either Joan Rivers or Johnny Carson).
Ever since, The Enquirer has been right on the money.
For example, The Enquirer was the media outlet that first broke the John Edwards' mistress story back in October 2007 and the national media is only now catching up.