Romney Signs on to Anti-Gay Group's Campaign Pledge

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear dumb fundie sow,
Most people with AIDS are straight. And you don't have any evidence that hell even exists.

You are purely rediculous because HIV/AIDS started in homosexual communities in the US.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>All we have is your pompous claim and no proof. Not supporting the radical gay agenda does not prove he is untit as a parent.

His posts prove he is irrational and homophobic. What is one of his kids turns out to be gay?

Brandi8 wrote:

<quoted text>You are purely rediculous because HIV/AIDS started in homosexual communities in the US.

You do realize there are people outside of the US...don't you?

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Why don't you just answer the questions. I understand that your answers will be your opinions.
1. If a man thinks he's a woman and is attracted to men is he gay?
2. If a woman that thinks she's a man is attracted to women is she gay?
3. If this same woman has a girlfriend who claims not to be gay but wants the woman who thinks she's a man to keep her female genitalia is she gay or lying?

Oh. I was trying to give you the tools to answer those on your own.

The questions are oxymoronic, and stack the deck by their very construction.

The real question is "Where does 'self' reside?"

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
They lost work because of the simpleton who decided to go with another temp service because of something so trivial.

I guess the women didn't think it was trivial when they met this guy in the ladies room. Silly women, huh?

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh. I was trying to give you the tools to answer those on your own.
The questions are oxymoronic, and stack the deck by their very construction.
The real question is "Where does 'self' reside?"

The real answer is it doesn't matter, a man in a dress isn't normal. If they could, some LGBT group would try to stop doctors from calling out the sex of a newborn at delivery. They would be ordered by law to say something like, Mrs. Jones, you have a healthy to be determined later.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
The real answer is it doesn't matter, a man in a dress isn't normal. If they could, some LGBT group would try to stop doctors from calling out the sex of a newborn at delivery. They would be ordered by law to say something like, Mrs. Jones, you have a healthy to be determined later.

Which humours were in the ascendency?

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Which humours were in the ascendency?

1. If a man thinks he's a woman and is attracted to men is he gay?
2. If a woman that thinks she's a man is attracted to women is she gay?
3. If this same woman has a girlfriend who claims not to be gay but wants the woman who thinks she's a man to keep her female genitalia is she gay or lying?

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
They just changed to a new temp service. That one confused person messed it up for a lot of other people.

Whine, whine, whine.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess the women didn't think it was trivial when they met this guy in the ladies room. Silly women, huh?

No. Silly you for making up a lie. I'm not buying your story.

Brandi8 wrote:

<quoted text>You are purely rediculous because HIV/AIDS started in homosexual communities in the US.

No it didn't.

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
No. Silly you for making up a lie. I'm not buying your story.

I'm crushed.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Consider ignoring the fool. Lides is wrong on so many levels. He has resorted to personal attacks which, as we all know, means he knows he's a loser. He pretends that you didn't say things that prove him wrong, he won't answer questions that force him to say he's wrong. His only 'credible' sources are those pro-gay websites that support his confusion. He's just an idiot and no longer deserves your time or response.

When is the last time I cited a website, dumba$$?

For that matter when is the last time you have cited anything?

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize there are people outside of the US...don't you?

You are very silly and we are talking about the US & the origination of HIV/AIDS in the gay communities. 65% of HIV/AIDS today are within the homo lifestyle #truestory.

Brandi8 wrote:

You are very silly and we are talking about the US & the origination of HIV/AIDS in the gay communities. 65% of HIV/AIDS today are within the homo lifestyle #truestory.

None of which has any bearing upon the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the law for all persons within a state's jurisdiction.#truestory moron.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
His posts prove he is irrational and homophobic. What is one of his kids turns out to be gay?

From what I have seen of you on Topix, I would consider the Three Stooges to be more fit parents than you. And if one does not agree with the radical homosexual agenda, it hardly proves whether or not he is a loving and nurturing type of parent and supporting the gay agenda does not automatically qualify one as a competent parent.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear dumb fundie sow,
Most people with AIDS are straight. And you don't have any evidence that hell even exists.

That is only a partial truth. In raw totals, yes, but when one considers the percentage of gays relative to the population, their infection rate is totally out of proportion to their percentage of the population.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
1. If a man thinks he's a woman and is attracted to men is he gay?
2. If a woman that thinks she's a man is attracted to women is she gay?
3. If this same woman has a girlfriend who claims not to be gay but wants the woman who thinks she's a man to keep her female genitalia is she gay or lying?

You presuppose "man" to begin with. That's called "stacking the deck".

Are you aware that scans of transgendered people show patterns that match their imago?

Constitution-lover wrote:

Anti-gay means good common decent ideals. Being pro-gay means being evil demonic and nasty vile liberal commie.

Communists and liberals don't mix.

Liberals don't like authoritarian totalitarians of any stripe.

Constitution-lover wrote:

Yea every gay man has same equal rights as me. A gay man can marry any women he wants just like I can.

Do you have the competence to indicate even so little as a rational interest served by such a restriction that would render the restriction constitutional, and prove that you are not a moron?

Constitution-lover wrote:

SAME AND EQUAL....

It is equal, but it is not same, and the restriction serves no legitimate state interest, a fact that is illustrated by your inability to indicate any such interest.

Constitution-lover wrote:

Now if we give SSM then gays would have special rights and that is what is unconstitutional. SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE AND PROVE YOU WRONG COMMIE LIBERAL GAY SCUM..........

Actually it would be giving them equal protection of the law to marry the adult consenting partner of their choosing, which thus far you have lacked the competence to show there is a legitimate state interest to deny.

Feel free to grow a brain and a rational argument.

Constitution-lover wrote:

Anti-gay means good common decent ideals. Being pro-gay means being evil demonic and nasty vile liberal commie.

Actually, it seems the founders were profoundly concerned about the human tendency to dominate others and to force them to abide by the wishes of a domineering class. They felt so strongly on this issue that they ensured that people in this country were free to worship the faith of their choosing. However, BEFORE they did that, they ensured that congress could make no law respecting an establishment of religion, having realize that to do so inherently violates the aforementioned religious freedom.

If you weren’t an idiot, you would understand this.